* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Gas and dust evolution in distant AGN
Survey
Document related concepts
Transcript
COSMIC DOWNSIZING and AGN METALLICITY at HIGH REDSHIFT Roberto Maiolino INAF - Oss. Arcetri & Oss. Roma Tohru Nagao INAF - Oss. Arcetri & NAOJ Alessandro Marconi INAF - Oss. Arcetri Mass-Metallicity relation in galaxies at z=0 Tremonti et al. 2004 Chemical version of the cosmic downsizing (anti-hierarchical growth) Evolution of the Mass-Metallicity relation: massive galaxies chemically evolve rapidly at high-z QSOs QSOs 12 11 z=0 1 10 3 5 9 lg M* = 8 (Kobulnicky et al. 2003, Shapley et al. 2005, Savaglio et al. 2005, Maiolino et al. 2006) The metallicity of the Broad Line Region at 2<z<4.5 ~ 5000 QSO optical spectra (UV-rest) from SDSS DR2 Sample large enough to disentagle the dependence on redshift and on luminosity 22 high quality composite spectra in bins of redshift and luminosity Lya NV SiII OI+SiII CIV SiIV OIV] NIV] CII HeII OIII] AlII SiIII] AlIII CIII] “1600A bump” NIV+AlII+NIII+Fe fit residuals Nagao, Marconi & Maiolino 2006 Photoionization models: Accurate fluxes for 15 emission lines - Cloudy - Integration over different distributions (in r and n) of gas clouds - Spanning various gas metallicities (abundances prop. to solar, except for N) matching flux ratios (+ constraints from EW) “best” metallicity for each [z,L] bin Hagai (!) Nagao et al. 2006 Metallicity of the BLR at 2<z<4.5 Average trends - Significant dependence on Luminosity Consequence of the mass-metallicity relation Z M* MBH LQSO ...but also dependence on accretion rate (Shemmer et al. 2004) - No evolution with redshift No metallicity evolution even in the most distant QSOs at 4.5<z<6.4 (close to re-ionization) From near-IR spectra (=UV rest-frame) of 20 QSO J1148+52 z=6.4 QSOs probe the most extreme cases of anti-hierarchical growth: their host galaxies are fully evolved, from the chemicalpoint of view, already at very high redshift QSOs QSOs 12 11 z=0 1 10 3 5 9 lg M* = 8 Selection effects associated with QSO-galaxy coevolution Passive evolution + Unobscured QSO Star formation + Obscured AGN wind Large number of emission lines: possible to contrain abundances patterns Best matches with abundances at/after the wind Pipino & Matteucci 2004 Granato et al. 2004 QSOs best fit The Broad Lines sample only a tiny, nuclear region ... not representative of the host galaxy? Use Narrow Lines in obscured AGNs NLR evolution at 1.2<z<3.8 - 51 optical spectra (UV-rest) of high redshift narrow line radio galaxies (HzRG) - 10 optical spectra (UV-rest) of high redshfit X-ray selected QSO2 in the Chandra Deep Field South CIV/HeII vs. CIII]/CIV diagram: - sensitive to metallicity - removes degeneracy from U - possible to control effects of shocks and dust Nagao, Maiolino & Marconi 2006 NLR evolution at 1.2<z<3.8 CIV / HeII No evolution with redshift among HzRG at 1.2<z<3.8 3 1 (local) 0.5 Dependence on Luminosity CIV / HeII 3 1 (local) 0.5 0.3 CIII] / CIV 1 At z>4 little information on NLR metallicity ...but information on gas in host galaxy for some QSOs J1148+52 z=6.4 same [CII]/CO as loc. ULIRGs same [CII]/FIR as loc. ULIRGs strong enrichment of carbon in the host already at z=6.4 CONCLUSIONS Luminosity-Metallicity relation: consequence of Mass-Metallicity relation BLR in galaxies & NLR No metallicity evolution with redshift: QSO are extreme cases of the cosmic downsizing (in its chemical version) Abundance patterns matching expectations of AGN-galaxy joint evolutionary models