Download Rule-Based Classifier

Data Mining
Classification: Alternative Techniques
Lecture Notes for Chapter 5
Introduction to Data Mining
by
Tan, Steinbach, Kumar
© Tan,Steinbach, Kumar
Introduction to Data Mining
4/18/2004
1
Rule-Based Classifier

Classify records by using a collection of
“if…then…” rules

Rule:
(Condition)  y
– where

Condition is a conjunctions of attributes

y is the class label
– LHS: rule antecedent or condition
– RHS: rule consequent
– Examples of classification rules:

(Blood Type=Warm)  (Lay Eggs=Yes)  Birds

(Taxable Income < 50K)  (Refund=Yes)  Evade=No
© Tan,Steinbach, Kumar
Introduction to Data Mining
4/18/2004
‹#›
Rule-based Classifier (Example)
Name
human
python
salmon
whale
frog
komodo
bat
pigeon
cat
leopard shark
turtle
penguin
porcupine
eel
salamander
gila monster
platypus
owl
dolphin
eagle
Blood Type
warm
cold
cold
warm
cold
cold
warm
warm
warm
cold
cold
warm
warm
cold
cold
cold
warm
warm
warm
warm
Give Birth
yes
no
no
yes
no
no
yes
no
yes
yes
no
no
yes
no
no
no
no
no
yes
no
Can Fly
no
no
no
no
no
no
yes
yes
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
yes
no
yes
Live in Water
no
no
yes
yes
sometimes
no
no
no
no
yes
sometimes
sometimes
no
yes
sometimes
no
no
no
yes
no
Class
mammals
reptiles
fishes
mammals
amphibians
reptiles
mammals
birds
mammals
fishes
reptiles
birds
mammals
fishes
amphibians
reptiles
mammals
birds
mammals
birds
R1: (Give Birth = no)  (Can Fly = yes)  Birds
R2: (Give Birth = no)  (Live in Water = yes)  Fishes
R3: (Give Birth = yes)  (Blood Type = warm)  Mammals
R4: (Give Birth = no)  (Can Fly = no)  Reptiles
R5: (Live in Water = sometimes)  Amphibians
© Tan,Steinbach, Kumar
Introduction to Data Mining
4/18/2004
‹#›
Application of Rule-Based Classifier

A rule r covers an instance x if the attributes of
the instance satisfy the condition of the rule
R1: (Give Birth = no)  (Can Fly = yes)  Birds
R2: (Give Birth = no)  (Live in Water = yes)  Fishes
R3: (Give Birth = yes)  (Blood Type = warm)  Mammals
R4: (Give Birth = no)  (Can Fly = no)  Reptiles
R5: (Live in Water = sometimes)  Amphibians
Name
hawk
grizzly bear
Blood Type
warm
warm
Give Birth
Can Fly
Live in Water
Class
no
yes
yes
no
no
no
?
?
The rule R1 covers a hawk => Bird
The rule R3 covers the grizzly bear => Mammal
© Tan,Steinbach, Kumar
Introduction to Data Mining
4/18/2004
‹#›
Rule Coverage and Accuracy
Tid Refund Marital
Status
Coverage of a rule:
1
Yes
Single
– Fraction of records
2
No
Married
that satisfy the
3
No
Single
antecedent of a rule
4
Yes
Married
5
No
Divorced
 Accuracy of a rule:
6
No
Married
– Fraction of records
7
Yes
Divorced
that satisfy both the
8
No
Single
9
No
Married
antecedent and
10 No
Single
consequent of a
(Status=Single)  No
rule

Taxable
Income Class
125K
No
100K
No
70K
No
120K
No
95K
Yes
60K
No
220K
No
85K
Yes
75K
No
90K
Yes
10
Coverage = 40%, Accuracy = 50%
© Tan,Steinbach, Kumar
Introduction to Data Mining
4/18/2004
‹#›
How does Rule-based Classifier Work?
R1: (Give Birth = no)  (Can Fly = yes)  Birds
R2: (Give Birth = no)  (Live in Water = yes)  Fishes
R3: (Give Birth = yes)  (Blood Type = warm)  Mammals
R4: (Give Birth = no)  (Can Fly = no)  Reptiles
R5: (Live in Water = sometimes)  Amphibians
Name
lemur
turtle
dogfish shark
Blood Type
warm
cold
cold
Give Birth
Can Fly
Live in Water
Class
yes
no
yes
no
no
no
no
sometimes
yes
?
?
?
A lemur triggers rule R3, so it is classified as a mammal
A turtle triggers both R4 and R5
A dogfish shark triggers none of the rules
© Tan,Steinbach, Kumar
Introduction to Data Mining
4/18/2004
‹#›
Characteristics of Rule-Based Classifier

Mutually exclusive rules
– Classifier contains mutually exclusive rules if
the rules are independent of each other
– Every record is covered by at most one rule

Exhaustive rules
– Classifier has exhaustive coverage if it
accounts for every possible combination of
attribute values
– Each record is covered by at least one rule
© Tan,Steinbach, Kumar
Introduction to Data Mining
4/18/2004
‹#›
From Decision Trees To Rules
Classification Rules
(Refund=Yes) ==> No
Refund
Yes
No
NO
Marita l
Status
{Single,
Divorced}
(Refund=No, Marital Status={Single,Divorced},
Taxable Income<80K) ==> No
{Married}
(Refund=No, Marital Status={Single,Divorced},
Taxable Income>80K) ==> Yes
(Refund=No, Marital Status={Married}) ==> No
NO
Taxable
Income
< 80K
NO
> 80K
YES
Rules are mutually exclusive and exhaustive
Rule set contains as much information as the
tree
© Tan,Steinbach, Kumar
Introduction to Data Mining
4/18/2004
‹#›
Rules Can Be Simplified
Tid Refund Marital
Status
Taxable
Income Cheat
1
Yes
Single
125K
No
2
No
Married
100K
No
3
No
Single
70K
No
4
Yes
Married
120K
No
5
No
Divorced 95K
6
No
Married
7
Yes
Divorced 220K
No
8
No
Single
85K
Yes
9
No
Married
75K
No
10
No
Single
90K
Yes
Refund
Yes
No
NO
{Single,
Divorced}
Marita l
Status
{Married}
NO
Taxable
Income
< 80K
NO
> 80K
YES
60K
Yes
No
10
Initial Rule:
(Refund=No)  (Status=Married)  No
Simplified Rule: (Status=Married)  No
© Tan,Steinbach, Kumar
Introduction to Data Mining
4/18/2004
‹#›
Effect of Rule Simplification

Rules are no longer mutually exclusive
– A record may trigger more than one rule
– Solution?
Ordered rule set
 Unordered rule set – use voting schemes


Rules are no longer exhaustive
– A record may not trigger any rules
– Solution?

Use a default class
© Tan,Steinbach, Kumar
Introduction to Data Mining
4/18/2004
‹#›
Ordered Rule Set

Rules are rank ordered according to their priority
– An ordered rule set is known as a decision list

When a test record is presented to the classifier
– It is assigned to the class label of the highest ranked rule it has
triggered
– If none of the rules fired, it is assigned to the default class
R1: (Give Birth = no)  (Can Fly = yes)  Birds
R2: (Give Birth = no)  (Live in Water = yes)  Fishes
R3: (Give Birth = yes)  (Blood Type = warm)  Mammals
R4: (Give Birth = no)  (Can Fly = no)  Reptiles
R5: (Live in Water = sometimes)  Amphibians
Name
turtle
© Tan,Steinbach, Kumar
Blood Type
cold
Give Birth
Can Fly
Live in Water
Class
no
no
sometimes
?
Introduction to Data Mining
4/18/2004
‹#›
Rule Ordering Schemes

Rule-based ordering
– Individual rules are ranked based on their quality

Class-based ordering
– Rules that belong to the same class appear together
Rule-based Ordering
Class-based Ordering
(Refund=Yes) ==> No
(Refund=Yes) ==> No
(Refund=No, Marital Status={Single,Divorced},
Taxable Income<80K) ==> No
(Refund=No, Marital Status={Single,Divorced},
Taxable Income<80K) ==> No
(Refund=No, Marital Status={Single,Divorced},
Taxable Income>80K) ==> Yes
(Refund=No, Marital Status={Married}) ==> No
(Refund=No, Marital Status={Married}) ==> No
© Tan,Steinbach, Kumar
(Refund=No, Marital Status={Single,Divorced},
Taxable Income>80K) ==> Yes
Introduction to Data Mining
4/18/2004
‹#›
Building Classification Rules

Direct Method:
Extract rules directly from data
 e.g.: RIPPER, CN2, Holte’s 1R


Indirect Method:
Extract rules from other classification models (e.g.
decision trees, neural networks, etc).
 e.g: C4.5rules

© Tan,Steinbach, Kumar
Introduction to Data Mining
4/18/2004
‹#›
Direct Method: Sequential Covering
1.
2.
3.
4.
Start from an empty rule
Grow a rule using the Learn-One-Rule function
Remove training records covered by the rule
Repeat Step (2) and (3) until stopping criterion
is met
© Tan,Steinbach, Kumar
Introduction to Data Mining
4/18/2004
‹#›
Example of Sequential Covering
(i) Original Data
© Tan,Steinbach, Kumar
(ii) Step 1
Introduction to Data Mining
4/18/2004
‹#›
Example of Sequential Covering…
R1
R1
R2
(iii) Step 2
© Tan,Steinbach, Kumar
(iv) Step 3
Introduction to Data Mining
4/18/2004
‹#›
Aspects of Sequential Covering

Rule Growing

Instance Elimination

Rule Evaluation

Stopping Criterion

Rule Pruning
© Tan,Steinbach, Kumar
Introduction to Data Mining
4/18/2004
‹#›
Rule Growing

Two common strategies
{}
Yes: 3
No: 4
Refund=No,
Status=Single,
Income=85K
(Class=Yes)
Refund=
No
Status =
Single
Status =
Divorced
Status =
Married
Yes: 3
No: 4
Yes: 2
No: 1
Yes: 1
No: 0
Yes: 0
No: 3
...
Income
> 80K
Yes: 3
No: 1
(a) General-to-specific
© Tan,Steinbach, Kumar
Introduction to Data Mining
Refund=No,
Status=Single,
Income=90K
(Class=Yes)
Refund=No,
Status = Single
(Class = Yes)
(b) Specific-to-general
4/18/2004
‹#›
Instance Elimination

Why do we need to
eliminate instances?
R3
– Otherwise, the next rule is
identical to previous rule

Why do we remove
positive instances?
R1
+
class = +
+
– Ensure that the next rule is
different

Why do we remove
negative instances?
-
class = -
– Prevent underestimating
accuracy of rule
– Compare rules R2 and R3
in the diagram
© Tan,Steinbach, Kumar
Introduction to Data Mining
+ +
++
+
+
+
++
+ + +
+ +
-
-
-
+
+
+
+
+ +
-
-
-
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
-
-
R2
-
-
-
-
4/18/2004
‹#›
Rule Evaluation

Metrics:
– Accuracy
–
–
nc

n
nc  1
Laplace 
nk
n

kp
c
M-estimate 
nk
© Tan,Steinbach, Kumar
Introduction to Data Mining
n : Number of instances
covered by rule
nc : Number of instances
covered by rule
k : Number of classes
p : Prior probability
4/18/2004
‹#›
Stopping Criterion and Rule Pruning

Stopping criterion
– Compute the gain
– If gain is not significant, discard the new rule

Rule Pruning
– Similar to post-pruning of decision trees
– Reduced Error Pruning:
Remove one of the conjuncts in the rule
 Compare error rate on validation set before and
after pruning
 If error improves, prune the conjunct

© Tan,Steinbach, Kumar
Introduction to Data Mining
4/18/2004
‹#›
Summary of Direct Method

Grow a single rule

Remove Instances from rule

Prune the rule (if necessary)

Add rule to Current Rule Set

Repeat
© Tan,Steinbach, Kumar
Introduction to Data Mining
4/18/2004
‹#›
Indirect Methods
P
No
Yes
Q
No
-
Rule Set
R
Yes
No
Yes
+
+
Q
No
-
© Tan,Steinbach, Kumar
Yes
r1: (P=No,Q=No) ==> r2: (P=No,Q=Yes) ==> +
r3: (P=Yes,R=No) ==> +
r4: (P=Yes,R=Yes,Q=No) ==> r5: (P=Yes,R=Yes,Q=Yes) ==> +
+
Introduction to Data Mining
4/18/2004
‹#›
Example
Name
human
python
salmon
whale
frog
komodo
bat
pigeon
cat
leopard shark
turtle
penguin
porcupine
eel
salamander
gila monster
platypus
owl
dolphin
eagle
© Tan,Steinbach, Kumar
Give Birth
yes
no
no
yes
no
no
yes
no
yes
yes
no
no
yes
no
no
no
no
no
yes
no
Lay Eggs
no
yes
yes
no
yes
yes
no
yes
no
no
yes
yes
no
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
no
yes
Can Fly
no
no
no
no
no
no
yes
yes
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
yes
no
yes
Introduction to Data Mining
Live in Water Have Legs
no
no
yes
yes
sometimes
no
no
no
no
yes
sometimes
sometimes
no
yes
sometimes
no
no
no
yes
no
yes
no
no
no
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
no
yes
yes
yes
no
yes
yes
yes
yes
no
yes
Class
mammals
reptiles
fishes
mammals
amphibians
reptiles
mammals
birds
mammals
fishes
reptiles
birds
mammals
fishes
amphibians
reptiles
mammals
birds
mammals
birds
4/18/2004
‹#›
C4.5 versus C4.5rules versus RIPPER
C4.5rules:
Give
Birth?
(Give Birth=No, Can Fly=Yes)  Birds
(Give Birth=No, Live in Water=Yes)  Fishes
No
Yes
(Give Birth=Yes)  Mammals
(Give Birth=No, Can Fly=No, Live in Water=No)  Reptiles
Live In
Water?
Mammals
Yes
( )  Amphibians
RIPPER:
No
(Live in Water=Yes)  Fishes
(Have Legs=No)  Reptiles
Sometimes
Fishes
Yes
Birds
© Tan,Steinbach, Kumar
(Give Birth=No, Can Fly=No, Live In Water=No)
 Reptiles
Can
Fly?
Amphibians
(Can Fly=Yes,Give Birth=No)  Birds
No
()  Mammals
Reptiles
Introduction to Data Mining
4/18/2004
‹#›
C4.5 versus C4.5rules versus RIPPER
C4.5 and C4.5rules:
PREDICTED CLASS
Amphibians Fishes Reptiles Birds
ACTUAL Amphibians
2
0
0
CLASS Fishes
0
2
0
Reptiles
1
0
3
Birds
1
0
0
Mammals
0
0
1
0
0
0
3
0
Mammals
0
1
0
0
6
0
0
0
2
0
Mammals
2
0
1
1
4
RIPPER:
PREDICTED CLASS
Amphibians Fishes Reptiles Birds
ACTUAL Amphibians
0
0
0
CLASS Fishes
0
3
0
Reptiles
0
0
3
Birds
0
0
1
Mammals
0
2
1
© Tan,Steinbach, Kumar
Introduction to Data Mining
4/18/2004
‹#›
Advantages of Rule-Based Classifiers
As highly expressive as decision trees
 Easy to interpret
 Easy to generate
 Can classify new instances rapidly
 Performance comparable to decision trees

© Tan,Steinbach, Kumar
Introduction to Data Mining
4/18/2004
‹#›
Instance-Based Classifiers
Set of Stored Cases
Atr1
……...
AtrN
Class
A
• Store the training records
• Use training records to
predict the class label of
unseen cases
B
B
C
A
Unseen Case
Atr1
……...
AtrN
C
B
© Tan,Steinbach, Kumar
Introduction to Data Mining
4/18/2004
‹#›
Instance Based Classifiers

Examples:
– Rote-learner
Memorizes entire training data and performs
classification only if attributes of record match one of
the training examples exactly

– Nearest neighbor
Uses k “closest” points (nearest neighbors) for
performing classification

© Tan,Steinbach, Kumar
Introduction to Data Mining
4/18/2004
‹#›
Nearest Neighbor Classifiers

Basic idea:
– If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, then
it’s probably a duck
Compute
Distance
Training
Records
© Tan,Steinbach, Kumar
Test
Record
Choose k of the
“nearest” records
Introduction to Data Mining
4/18/2004
‹#›
Nearest-Neighbor Classifiers
Unknown record

Requires three things
– The set of stored records
– Distance Metric to compute
distance between records
– The value of k, the number of
nearest neighbors to retrieve

To classify an unknown record:
– Compute distance to other
training records
– Identify k nearest neighbors
– Use class labels of nearest
neighbors to determine the
class label of unknown record
(e.g., by taking majority vote)
© Tan,Steinbach, Kumar
Introduction to Data Mining
4/18/2004
‹#›
Definition of Nearest Neighbor
X
(a) 1-nearest neighbor
X
X
(b) 2-nearest neighbor
(c) 3-nearest neighbor
K-nearest neighbors of a record x are data points
that have the k smallest distance to x
© Tan,Steinbach, Kumar
Introduction to Data Mining
4/18/2004
‹#›
1 nearest-neighbor
Voronoi Diagram
© Tan,Steinbach, Kumar
Introduction to Data Mining
4/18/2004
‹#›
Nearest Neighbor Classification

Compute distance between two points:
– Euclidean distance
d ( p, q ) 

 ( pi
i
q )
2
i
Determine the class from nearest neighbor list
– take the majority vote of class labels among
the k-nearest neighbors
– Weigh the vote according to distance

weight factor, w = 1/d2
© Tan,Steinbach, Kumar
Introduction to Data Mining
4/18/2004
‹#›
Nearest Neighbor Classification…

Choosing the value of k:
– If k is too small, sensitive to noise points
– If k is too large, neighborhood may include points from
other classes
X
© Tan,Steinbach, Kumar
Introduction to Data Mining
4/18/2004
‹#›
Nearest Neighbor Classification…

Scaling issues
– Attributes may have to be scaled to prevent
distance measures from being dominated by
one of the attributes
– Example:
height of a person may vary from 1.5m to 1.8m
 weight of a person may vary from 90lb to 300lb
 income of a person may vary from $10K to $1M

© Tan,Steinbach, Kumar
Introduction to Data Mining
4/18/2004
‹#›
Nearest Neighbor Classification…

Problem with Euclidean measure:
– High dimensional data

curse of dimensionality
– Can produce counter-intuitive results
111111111110
100000000000
vs
011111111111
000000000001
d = 1.4142
d = 1.4142

Solution: Normalize the vectors to unit length
© Tan,Steinbach, Kumar
Introduction to Data Mining
4/18/2004
‹#›
Nearest neighbor Classification…

k-NN classifiers are lazy learners
– It does not build models explicitly
– Unlike eager learners such as decision tree
induction and rule-based systems
– Classifying unknown records are relatively
expensive
© Tan,Steinbach, Kumar
Introduction to Data Mining
4/18/2004
‹#›
Example: PEBLS
Tid Refund Marital
Status
Taxable
Income Cheat
1
Yes
Single
125K
No
d(Single,Married)
2
No
Married
100K
No
= | 2/4 – 0/4 | + | 2/4 – 4/4 | = 1
3
No
Single
70K
No
d(Single,Divorced)
4
Yes
Married
120K
No
5
No
Divorced 95K
Yes
6
No
Married
No
d(Married,Divorced)
7
Yes
Divorced 220K
No
= | 0/4 – 1/2 | + | 4/4 – 1/2 | = 1
8
No
Single
85K
Yes
d(Refund=Yes,Refund=No)
9
No
Married
75K
No
= | 0/3 – 3/7 | + | 3/3 – 4/7 | = 6/7
10
No
Single
90K
Yes
60K
Distance between nominal attribute values:
= | 2/4 – 1/2 | + | 2/4 – 1/2 | = 0
10
Marital Status
Class
Refund
Single
Married
Divorced
Yes
2
0
1
No
2
4
1
© Tan,Steinbach, Kumar
Class
Yes
No
Yes
0
3
No
3
4
Introduction to Data Mining
n1i n2i
d (V1 ,V2 )  

n1 n2
i
4/18/2004
‹#›
Example: PEBLS
Tid Refund Marital
Status
Taxable
Income Cheat
X
Yes
Single
125K
No
Y
No
Married
100K
No
10
Distance between record X and record Y:
d
( X , Y )  wX wY  d ( X i , Yi )
2
i 1
where:
Number of times X is used for prediction
wX 
Number of times X predicts correctly
wX  1 if X makes accurate prediction most of the time
wX > 1 if X is not reliable for making predictions
© Tan,Steinbach, Kumar
Introduction to Data Mining
4/18/2004
‹#›
Bayes Classifier
A probabilistic framework for solving classification
problems
 Conditional Probability:
P ( A, C )
P (C | A) 
P ( A)

P ( A, C )
P( A | C ) 
P (C )

Bayes theorem:
P( A | C ) P(C )
P(C | A) 
P( A)
© Tan,Steinbach, Kumar
Introduction to Data Mining
4/18/2004
‹#›
Example of Bayes Theorem

Given:
– A doctor knows that meningitis causes stiff neck 50% of the
time
– Prior probability of any patient having meningitis is 1/50,000
– Prior probability of any patient having stiff neck is 1/20

If a patient has stiff neck, what’s the probability
he/she has meningitis?
P( S | M ) P( M ) 0.5 1 / 50000
P( M | S ) 

 0.0002
P( S )
1 / 20
© Tan,Steinbach, Kumar
Introduction to Data Mining
4/18/2004
‹#›
Bayesian Classifiers

Consider each attribute and class label as random
variables

Given a record with attributes (A1, A2,…,An)
– Goal is to predict class C
– Specifically, we want to find the value of C that
maximizes P(C| A1, A2,…,An )

Can we estimate P(C| A1, A2,…,An ) directly from
data?
© Tan,Steinbach, Kumar
Introduction to Data Mining
4/18/2004
‹#›
Bayesian Classifiers

Approach:
– compute the posterior probability P(C | A1, A2, …, An) for
all values of C using the Bayes theorem
P(C | A A  A ) 
1
2
n
P( A A  A | C ) P(C )
P( A A  A )
1
2
n
1
2
n
– Choose value of C that maximizes
P(C | A1, A2, …, An)
– Equivalent to choosing value of C that maximizes
P(A1, A2, …, An|C) P(C)

How to estimate P(A1, A2, …, An | C )?
© Tan,Steinbach, Kumar
Introduction to Data Mining
4/18/2004
‹#›
Naïve Bayes Classifier

Assume independence among attributes Ai when class is
given:
– P(A1, A2, …, An |C) = P(A1| Cj) P(A2| Cj)… P(An| Cj)
– Can estimate P(Ai| Cj) for all Ai and Cj.
– New point is classified to Cj if P(Cj)  P(Ai| Cj) is
maximal.
© Tan,Steinbach, Kumar
Introduction to Data Mining
4/18/2004
‹#›
How to Estimate
Probabilities
from
Data?
l
l
c
Tid
at
Refund
o
eg
a
c
i
r
c
at
o
eg
a
c
i
r
c
on
u
it n
s
u
o
s
s
a 
cl
Marital
Status
Taxable
Income
Evade
1
Yes
Single
125K
No
2
No
Married
100K
No
3
No
Single
70K
No
4
Yes
Married
120K
No
5
No
Divorced
95K
Yes
6
No
Married
60K
No
7
Yes
Divorced
220K
No
8
No
Single
85K
Yes
9
No
Married
75K
No
10
No
Single
90K
Yes
Class: P(C) = Nc/N
– e.g., P(No) = 7/10,
P(Yes) = 3/10

For discrete attributes:
P(Ai | Ck) = |Aik|/ Nc k
– where |Aik| is number of
instances having attribute
Ai and belongs to class Ck
– Examples:
10
© Tan,Steinbach, Kumar
Introduction to Data Mining
P(Status=Married|No) = 4/7
P(Refund=Yes|Yes)=0
4/18/2004
‹#›
How to Estimate Probabilities from Data?

For continuous attributes:
– Discretize the range into bins
one ordinal attribute per bin
 violates independence assumption

k
– Two-way split: (A < v) or (A > v)

choose only one of the two splits as new attribute
– Probability density estimation:
Assume attribute follows a normal distribution
 Use data to estimate parameters of distribution
(e.g., mean and standard deviation)
 Once probability distribution is known, can use it to
estimate the conditional probability P(Ai|c)

© Tan,Steinbach, Kumar
Introduction to Data Mining
4/18/2004
‹#›
l
s
al
uProbabilities
ca
c
How tooriEstimate
from
Data?
i
o
r
u
o
c
Tid
e
at
Refund
g
c
e
at
Marital
Status
g
c
t
n
o
Taxable
Income
in
as
l
c
Evade
1
Yes
Single
125K
No
2
No
Married
100K
No
3
No
Single
70K
No
4
Yes
Married
120K
No
5
No
Divorced
95K
Yes
6
No
Married
60K
No
7
Yes
Divorced
220K
No
8
No
Single
85K
Yes
9
No
Married
75K
No
10
No
Single
90K
Yes
s

Normal distribution:
1
P( A | c ) 
e
2
i
j

( Ai   ij ) 2
2  ij2
2
ij
– One for each (Ai,ci) pair

For (Income, Class=No):
– If Class=No

sample mean = 110

sample variance = 2975
10
1
P( Income  120 | No) 
e
2 (54.54)
© Tan,Steinbach, Kumar
Introduction to Data Mining

( 120110) 2
2 ( 2975)
 0.0072
4/18/2004
‹#›
Example of Naïve Bayes Classifier
Given a Test Record:
X  (Refund  No, Married, Income  120K)
naive Bayes Classifier:
P(Refund=Yes|No) = 3/7
P(Refund=No|No) = 4/7
P(Refund=Yes|Yes) = 0
P(Refund=No|Yes) = 1
P(Marital Status=Single|No) = 2/7
P(Marital Status=Divorced|No)=1/7
P(Marital Status=Married|No) = 4/7
P(Marital Status=Single|Yes) = 2/7
P(Marital Status=Divorced|Yes)=1/7
P(Marital Status=Married|Yes) = 0
For taxable income:
If class=No:
sample mean=110
sample variance=2975
If class=Yes: sample mean=90
sample variance=25
© Tan,Steinbach, Kumar

P(X|Class=No) = P(Refund=No|Class=No)
 P(Married| Class=No)
 P(Income=120K| Class=No)
= 4/7  4/7  0.0072 = 0.0024

P(X|Class=Yes) = P(Refund=No| Class=Yes)
 P(Married| Class=Yes)
 P(Income=120K| Class=Yes)
= 1  0  1.2  10-9 = 0
Since P(X|No)P(No) > P(X|Yes)P(Yes)
Therefore P(No|X) > P(Yes|X)
=> Class = No
Introduction to Data Mining
4/18/2004
‹#›
Naïve Bayes Classifier
If one of the conditional probability is zero, then
the entire expression becomes zero
 Probability estimation:

N ic
Original : P( Ai | C ) 
Nc
N ic  1
Laplace : P( Ai | C ) 
Nc  c
N ic  mp
m - estimate : P( Ai | C ) 
Nc  m
© Tan,Steinbach, Kumar
Introduction to Data Mining
c: number of classes
p: prior probability
m: parameter
4/18/2004
‹#›
Example of Naïve Bayes Classifier
Name
human
python
salmon
whale
frog
komodo
bat
pigeon
cat
leopard shark
turtle
penguin
porcupine
eel
salamander
gila monster
platypus
owl
dolphin
eagle
Give Birth
yes
Give Birth
yes
no
no
yes
no
no
yes
no
yes
yes
no
no
yes
no
no
no
no
no
yes
no
Can Fly
no
no
no
no
no
no
yes
yes
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
yes
no
yes
Can Fly
no
© Tan,Steinbach, Kumar
Live in Water Have Legs
no
no
yes
yes
sometimes
no
no
no
no
yes
sometimes
sometimes
no
yes
sometimes
no
no
no
yes
no
Class
yes
no
no
no
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
no
yes
yes
yes
no
yes
yes
yes
yes
no
yes
mammals
non-mammals
non-mammals
mammals
non-mammals
non-mammals
mammals
non-mammals
mammals
non-mammals
non-mammals
non-mammals
mammals
non-mammals
non-mammals
non-mammals
mammals
non-mammals
mammals
non-mammals
Live in Water Have Legs
yes
no
Class
?
Introduction to Data Mining
A: attributes
M: mammals
N: non-mammals
6 6 2 2
P ( A | M )      0.06
7 7 7 7
1 10 3 4
P ( A | N )      0.0042
13 13 13 13
7
P ( A | M ) P( M )  0.06   0.021
20
13
P ( A | N ) P ( N )  0.004   0.0027
20
P(A|M)P(M) > P(A|N)P(N)
=> Mammals
4/18/2004
‹#›
Naïve Bayes (Summary)

Robust to isolated noise points

Handle missing values by ignoring the instance
during probability estimate calculations

Robust to irrelevant attributes

Independence assumption may not hold for some
attributes
– Use other techniques such as Bayesian Belief
Networks (BBN)
© Tan,Steinbach, Kumar
Introduction to Data Mining
4/18/2004
‹#›
Artificial Neural Networks (ANN)
X1
X2
X3
Y
Input
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
1
1
0
1
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
1
0
X1
Black box
Output
X2
Y
X3
Output Y is 1 if at least two of the three inputs are equal to 1.
© Tan,Steinbach, Kumar
Introduction to Data Mining
4/18/2004
‹#›
Artificial Neural Networks (ANN)
X1
X2
X3
Y
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
1
1
0
1
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
1
0
Input
nodes
Black box
X1
Output
node
0.3
0.3
X2
X3
0.3

Y
t=0.4
Y  I (0.3 X 1  0.3 X 2  0.3 X 3  0.4  0)
1
where I ( z )  
0
© Tan,Steinbach, Kumar
if z is true
otherwise
Introduction to Data Mining
4/18/2004
‹#›
Artificial Neural Networks (ANN)

Model is an assembly of
inter-connected nodes
and weighted links
Input
nodes
Black box
X1
w1
w2
X2


Output node sums up
each of its input value
according to the weights
of its links
Output
node

Y
w3
X3
t
Perceptron Model
Compare output node
against some threshold t
Y  I (  wi X i  t )
or
i
Y  sign (  wi X i  t )
i
© Tan,Steinbach, Kumar
Introduction to Data Mining
4/18/2004
‹#›
General Structure of ANN
x1
x2
x3
Input
Layer
x4
x5
Input
I1
I2
Hidden
Layer
I3
Neuron i
Output
wi1
wi2
wi3
Si
Activation
function
g(Si )
Oi
Oi
threshold, t
Output
Layer
Training ANN means learning
the weights of the neurons
y
© Tan,Steinbach, Kumar
Introduction to Data Mining
4/18/2004
‹#›
Algorithm for learning ANN

Initialize the weights (w0, w1, …, wk)

Adjust the weights in such a way that the output
of ANN is consistent with class labels of training
examples
2
– Objective function: E  Yi  f ( wi , X i )
i
– Find the weights wi’s that minimize the above
objective function

e.g., backpropagation algorithm (see lecture notes)
© Tan,Steinbach, Kumar
Introduction to Data Mining
4/18/2004
‹#›
Support Vector Machines

Find a linear hyperplane (decision boundary) that will separate the data
© Tan,Steinbach, Kumar
Introduction to Data Mining
4/18/2004
‹#›
Support Vector Machines
B1

One Possible Solution
© Tan,Steinbach, Kumar
Introduction to Data Mining
4/18/2004
‹#›
Support Vector Machines
B2

Another possible solution
© Tan,Steinbach, Kumar
Introduction to Data Mining
4/18/2004
‹#›
Support Vector Machines
B2

Other possible solutions
© Tan,Steinbach, Kumar
Introduction to Data Mining
4/18/2004
‹#›
Support Vector Machines
B1
B2


Which one is better? B1 or B2?
How do you define better?
© Tan,Steinbach, Kumar
Introduction to Data Mining
4/18/2004
‹#›
Support Vector Machines
B1
B2
b21
b22
margin
b11
b12

Find hyperplane maximizes the margin => B1 is better than B2
© Tan,Steinbach, Kumar
Introduction to Data Mining
4/18/2004
‹#›
Support Vector Machines
B1
 
w x  b  0
 
w  x  b  1
 
w  x  b  1
b11
 
if w  x  b  1
1

f ( x)  
 
 1 if w  x  b  1
© Tan,Steinbach, Kumar
Introduction to Data Mining
b12
2
Margin   2
|| w ||
4/18/2004
‹#›
Support Vector Machines

We want to maximize:
2
Margin   2
|| w ||
 2
|| w ||
– Which is equivalent to minimizing: L( w) 
2
– But subjected to the following constraints:
 
if w  x i  b  1
1

f ( xi )  
 
 1 if w  x i  b  1

This is a constrained optimization problem
– Numerical approaches to solve it (e.g., quadratic programming)
© Tan,Steinbach, Kumar
Introduction to Data Mining
4/18/2004
‹#›
Support Vector Machines

What if the problem is not linearly separable?
© Tan,Steinbach, Kumar
Introduction to Data Mining
4/18/2004
‹#›
Support Vector Machines

What if the problem is not linearly separable?
– Introduce slack variables
 2
 Need to minimize:
|| w ||
 N k
L( w) 
 C   i 
2
 i 1 

Subject to:
 
if w  x i  b  1 - i
1

f ( xi )  
 
 1 if w  x i  b  1  i
© Tan,Steinbach, Kumar
Introduction to Data Mining
4/18/2004
‹#›
Nonlinear Support Vector Machines

What if decision boundary is not linear?
© Tan,Steinbach, Kumar
Introduction to Data Mining
4/18/2004
‹#›
Nonlinear Support Vector Machines

Transform data into higher dimensional space
© Tan,Steinbach, Kumar
Introduction to Data Mining
4/18/2004
‹#›
Ensemble Methods

Construct a set of classifiers from the training
data

Predict class label of previously unseen records
by aggregating predictions made by multiple
classifiers
© Tan,Steinbach, Kumar
Introduction to Data Mining
4/18/2004
‹#›
General Idea
D
Step 1:
Create Multiple
Data Sets
Step 2:
Build Multiple
Classifiers
D1
D2
C1
C2
Step 3:
Combine
Classifiers
© Tan,Steinbach, Kumar
....
Original
Training data
Dt-1
Dt
Ct -1
Ct
C*
Introduction to Data Mining
4/18/2004
‹#›
Why does it work?

Suppose there are 25 base classifiers
– Each classifier has error rate,  = 0.35
– Assume classifiers are independent
– Probability that the ensemble classifier makes
a wrong prediction:
 25 i
25i

(
1


)
 0.06



 i 
i 13 

25
© Tan,Steinbach, Kumar
Introduction to Data Mining
4/18/2004
‹#›
Examples of Ensemble Methods

How to generate an ensemble of classifiers?
– Bagging
– Boosting
© Tan,Steinbach, Kumar
Introduction to Data Mining
4/18/2004
‹#›
Bagging

Sampling with replacement
Original Data
Bagging (Round 1)
Bagging (Round 2)
Bagging (Round 3)
1
7
1
1
2
8
4
8
3
10
9
5
4
8
1
10
5
2
2
5
6
5
3
5
7
10
2
9
8
10
7
6
9
5
3
3
10
9
2
7

Build classifier on each bootstrap sample

Each sample has probability (1 – 1/n)n of being
selected
© Tan,Steinbach, Kumar
Introduction to Data Mining
4/18/2004
‹#›
Boosting

An iterative procedure to adaptively change
distribution of training data by focusing more on
previously misclassified records
– Initially, all N records are assigned equal
weights
– Unlike bagging, weights may change at the
end of boosting round
© Tan,Steinbach, Kumar
Introduction to Data Mining
4/18/2004
‹#›
Boosting
Records that are wrongly classified will have their
weights increased
 Records that are classified correctly will have
their weights decreased

Original Data
Boosting (Round 1)
Boosting (Round 2)
Boosting (Round 3)
1
7
5
4
2
3
4
4
3
2
9
8
4
8
4
10
5
7
2
4
6
9
5
5
7
4
1
4
8
10
7
6
9
6
4
3
10
3
2
4
• Example 4 is hard to classify
• Its weight is increased, therefore it is more
likely to be chosen again in subsequent rounds
© Tan,Steinbach, Kumar
Introduction to Data Mining
4/18/2004
‹#›