Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
La malattia oligometastastica a livello encefalico: il parere dell’oncologo Lorenza Landi Istituto Toscano Tumori Ospedale Civile Livorno-Italy Istituto Toscano Tumori –Livorno, Italy Critical issues in brain mets (BMs) • Brain is one of the preferred site of metastatic spread for breast cancer, lung cancer, melanoma and kidney cancer • Increasing incidence of BMs • Sanctuary site of metastases Blood-brain barrier Necrotic areas within the tumor mass • Lack of activity of conventional chemotherapeutics • Radiation therapy and surgery are the cornerstone of therapy in selected cases • Oligometastatic disease is a heterogeneous entity, existing mainly in “real life world” than in literature No ad hoc trials Mainly retrospective series including different types of cancer Istituto Toscano Tumori – Livorno, Italy Factors to consider when treatening BMs 1- Patient related • Age • ECOG PS • Presence of symptoms • Comorbidity/concomitant medications 2- Tumor related • Type of tumor • 3- Treatment related • End point (Histology/molecular portrait) Short- vs long-term perspectives Presence of extracranial disease • Treatment AEs • Size/location of brain lesions • Benefit achievable • Phase of disease • Risk of disability Istituto Toscano Tumori – Livorno, Italy Limited impact of chemotherapy in BMs Lombardi G, et al. Cancer Treat Rev 2014 Istituto Toscano Tumori – Livorno, Italy BMs as the only site of metastases Metastatic cancer unsuitable for target-oriented therapy • Define the aim of treatment • Consider patient for local ablative therapy • Systemic therapy according to Patient characteristics Tumor histology Previuos therapies received Previous AEs • Avoid unnecessary approaches if very-short life expectancy Istituto Toscano Tumori –Livorno, Italy The molecular revolution and the paradigm of personalized therapy A case of BRAFV660E melanoma successfully treated with BRAF inhibitor Murrell J, et al. Cancer Treat Rev 2013 Istituto Toscano Tumori – Livorno, Italy The changing face of advanced NSCLC 2000 An “easy- to -treat ” disease 2016 A “hard- to -treat ” disease • • • • Tumor biology irrelevant Tumor histology irrelevant Amount of tissue not an issue Cytology enough for any decision • • • • Tumor histology relevant Tumor biology highly relevant Tissue is one issue Cytology not enough for any decision • • • Limited role for pathologist Limited role for chest physician No role for molecular biology • • Relevant role for pathologist Relevant role for chest physician, medical/radiation oncologist, surgeon Critical role for molecular biology • Any NSCLC Platinum-based chemotherapy Each NSCLC Personalized therapy Istituto Toscano Tumori – Livorno, Italy Oncogenic drivers in NonSquamous NSCLC - Certain tumours arise as a result of aberrant activation of a single oncogene and become dependent on this activation - Identification of druggable oncogenic drivers creates the potential for highly active therapeutic interventions Sholl LM et al, JTO 2015 Barlesi F, et al, Lancet 2016 Istituto Toscano Tumori – Livorno, Italy First-line therapy for metastatic NSCLC in 2016 Stratification for EGFR, ALK and histology EGFR Mut+ EGFR TKI Erlotinib (+/Bevacizumab*) Gefitinib Afatinib ALK+ Crizotinib* EGFR WT/ALKnon-squamous EGFR WT/ALKsquamous Platinum doublet + bevacizumab OR platinum + pemetrexed Platinum-based doublet * Not in IT Istituto Toscano Tumori – Livorno, Italy The impact of targeted therapy on survival in oncogene addicted NSCLC Any druggable event Barlesi F. et al, Lancet 2016 EGFRmut+ Zhou C, et al. Ann Oncol 2015 Istituto Toscano Tumori – Livorno, Italy Epidemiology of BMs in EGFRmut+/ALK+ NSCLC • Brain is a frequent site of metastatic spread in EGFRmut+/ALK+ NSCLC • Incidence of BMs varies during the course of the disease 20-30% in patients not previously treated 30-40% in patients pretreated with two or more lines of chemotherapy 45-70% in patients treated with one of more of targeted agents ≈50% of patients will only develop intracranial progression Istituto Toscano Tumori – Livorno, Italy Expected survival in NSCLC patients with BMs Sperduto PW, et al. JCO 2012 Istituto Toscano Tumori – Livorno, Italy Prognostic impact of ALK fusions on BMs Molecularly unselected NSCLC Median OS 7.0 mos ALK+ NSCLC Median OS 49.5 mos Sperduto PW, et al. JCO 2012; Johung KL, et al. JCO 2015 Istituto Toscano Tumori – Livorno, Italy Two different clinical scenarios Brain metastases at baseline Advanced ALK+ NSCLC Brain metastases at progression after crizotinib Istituto Toscano Tumori – Livorno, Italy PROFILE 1014 Study Design Multicenter, randomized open-label phase III study Key entry criteria ● ALK-positive by central FISH testinga ● Locally advanced, recurrent, or metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC ● No prior systemic treatment for advanced disease ● ECOG PS 0−2 ● Measurable disease ● Treated brain metastases allowed 1:1 R A N D O M I Z E N=334 Crizotinib 250 mg BID PO, continuous dosing (N=167) Crizotinib continued after PD if ongoing clinical benefit Pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 + cisplatin 75 mg/m2 OR carboplatin AUC 5–6 q3w for ≤6 cycles (N=167) Crossover to crizotinib permitted after PDb Randomization stratified by: ● ECOG PS (0/1, 2), ● Race (Asian, non-Asian), ● Brain metastases (present, absent) a ALK status determined using standard ALK break-apart FISH assay independent radiologic review bAssessed by PROFILE 1014: NCT01154140 Istituto Toscano Tumori –Livorno, Italy PROFILE 1014: Intracranial DCR by IRR in Patients with Previously Treated Brain Metastases at Baseline Salomon et al, JCO 2016 Istituto Toscano Tumori – Livorno, Italy Crizotinib activity in BMs: Retrospective analysis from Profile 1005 and 1007 Costa D et al. JCO 2015 Istituto Toscano Tumori –Livorno, Italy Activity of crizotinib in untreated and treated BMs Costa D, et al. JCO 2015 Istituto Toscano Tumori – Livorno, Italy Overall and sistemic PFS in patients with or without baseline (BL) brain mets (BM) Cranial+extracranial PFS Extracranial PFS Costa D et al. JCO 2015 Istituto Toscano Tumori –Livorno, Italy Systemic and intracranial time to progression in patients with previously untreated or treated BM Previously untreated BM Previously treated BM Median 12.5 months Median 7 months Median 13.2 months Median 14 months Costa D et al. JCO 2015 Istituto Toscano Tumori –Livorno, Italy iPFS and OS according to initial type of radiotherapy Johung KL, et al. JCO 2015 Istituto Toscano Tumori – Livorno, Italy Risk of neurocognitive impairment after WBRT Weickhardt AS, JTO 2013 Cheng EL, Lancet Oncol 2009 Istituto Toscano Tumori – Livorno, Italy Prevalence of brain interventions Johung KL, et al. JCO 2015 Istituto Toscano Tumori – Livorno, Italy Continuing EGFR/ALK Inhibition beyond progression + local ablative therapy Weickhardt AS. et al , JTO 2013 Istituto Toscano Tumori – Livorno, Italy Future perspectives Could we avoid local ablative therapies ? In other words ….. Are novel drugs more effective against BMs ? Istituto Toscano Tumori –Livorno, Italy Osimertinib is effective in presence of brain mets LF, 62 y/o, female 2011 Dx of EGFRmut+ NSCLC with brain mets (single lesion, resected RT) 2011-2015 treatment with gefitinib and three lines of chemotherapy December 2015 Intracranial progression Osimertinib (3° generation EGFRTKI) 80 mg orally once daily Baseline, December 2015 + 2 cycles, February 2016 Alectinib in crizotinib resistant ALK+ NSCLCs: CNS activity and pattern of failure ORR 57% Ou SHI, JCO 2015 Istituto Toscano Tumori –Livorno, Italy Future perspectives Could we avoid local ablative therapies ? NO Reasonably, we should optimize the timing of systemic and local ablative therapies in order to maximize patient benefit Multidisciplinary approach remains the standard of care Istituto Toscano Tumori –Livorno, Italy