Download Oscarsborg and World War 2: The sinking of Hitler`s warship

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Concept Symposium 2010
Oscarsborg, Norway
16 – 17 September 2010
Symposium web-site: http://www.conceptsymposium.no/
Concept Research Programme: http://www.concept.ntnu.no/english/
The sinking of Hitler´s warship the
Blücher.
Th G
The German
occupation
ti off Norway
N
in a broader
a b oade pe
perspective.
spect e.
Peder Berg
Peder
Berg
Deputy Director General
Norway Ministry of Finance
The war as a German
The war
as a German program
Program: The political domination of the
p
European continent
Project (one
P
j (
off many): The occupation
) Th
i off
Norway
IImplementation
l
t ti strategy: Plan A ‐
t t
Pl A Unopposed.
U
d
Plan B ‐ In case of resistance.
Tactical accomplishment (from the
German point of view)
• SSouthern Norway
th
N
occupied
i d by the
b th beginning
b i i off
May. • Northern Norway occupied by 10 June.
by 10 June
• Allied relief forces accomplished little except in Narvik.
Narvik
• Total losses tolerable (5‐6000 men, 242 warplanes).
warplanes)
• Naval losses significant (1 heavy cruiser, 2 light
cruisers 10 destroyers 6 submarines a number
cruisers, 10 destroyers, 6 submarines, a number
of smaller vessels. In addition many other ships
g
g capital
p ships). p)
were heavilyy damaged, including
Strategic accomplishment
This is a quite
Thi
i
it different
diff
t issue. The key
i
Th k question
ti is how
i h
Operation ”Weser Exercise” contributed to the total German war effort and ‐ if Germany had not lost the war ‐
to the fullfillment
f f
off the Program. Some benefits were obvious: Securing
obvious: Securing iron ore supplies
ore supplies
from Northern Sweden, and the possibility of building
submarine bases for the battle of the Atlantic. But the
i
importance
t
off these
th
f t decreased
factors
d
d with
ith the
th fall of
f ll f
France. With the attack on the Soviet Union a new and unintended strategic opportunity arose: To cut off allied
supplies to Murmansk, the only available ice‐free port of
the Soviets in Europe. But the possibility was only exploited
half‐heartedly. And there
y
were other factors…..
BIGGEST MERCHANT NAVIES AS OF 1938
Gross reg t
Gross.reg.t.
1. UK
2. US
3 Japan
3.
4. Norway
5. Germany
6 Italy
6.
World total
17.7
8.9
50
5.0
4.6
4.2
33
3.3
67
Pct < 10 years
< 10 years
33
10
35
46
28
11
A plausible conclusion
A plausible conclusion
• Although
lh
h Germany
G
h d to settle
had
l for Plan B, and f
l
d
experienced set‐backs (of which the loss of the
Blü h was the
Blücher
th single most important), the
i l
ti
t t) th
tactical execution of Operation ”Weser Exercise” must be deemed a success.
must be deemed
a success
• But it was the wrong project. The strengthening
of the Western enemies as a response to the
defeat in Norway, and the strategic overreach
outweighed the benefits in the long run.
Acknowledgements:
• All images of the Blücher, courtesy of the National Archives of Norway.
• The image of the triple gun tower, photograph by Mr. Lars Erik Brattås 2004.