Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
2ND NEXUS ROUND TABLE ON NOVEMBER 12, 2014 Creating Impact and link to Yara Value Hosted by Permanent Delegation of the Netherlands to the OECD Proposition – in cooperation with the OECD and the IEA Climate Smart Agriculture Partnership in Practice – A Tanzania Case Study Sean de Cleene, Senior Vice President, Yara Climate Smart Agriculture According to FAO Climate Smart Agriculture (CSA) is to jointly address food security and climate challenges. It is composed of three main pillars: 1. Sustainably increasing agricultural productivity and grower incomes; 2. Adapting and building resilience to climate change; 3. Reducing and/or removing greenhouse gases emissions 2 Three levels of engagement through partnership Yara sees it is important to develop a robust approach to engagement to address climate smart agriculture at different levels simultaneously 1. Supporting transformational multistakeholder partnerships 2. Developing new and inclusive business models sustainably increasing agricultural productivity and grower incomes; 3. Robust applied R & D into sustainable intensification and climate smart agriculture Yara promotes both a partnership strategy and sustainable intensification of crop production as a response. Sustainable intensification of crop production is to help growers to produce more crop on the same land with less environmental impact. 3 Working through various collaboration models Model types Single lead player Description ▪ One organization leads on the initiative, collaborating with others on an ad hoc basis ▪ Two or three organizations partner, with similar levels of responsibility and ownership ▪ A loose network of multiple companies coordinates on an initiative ▪ Third-party organization/partnership unit pro-actively orchestrates action by multiple parties ▪ Platform approach which pro-actively facilitates transformative action by multiples of affiliated & non affiliated parties Partnership Loose network Orchestrated Partnership Transformative Partnership 4 1. Support for transformational partnership agendas – eg: SAGCOT • In support of national growth strategies • Basis for scalable inclusive agricultural business models • Increased sector competitiveness and investment • Green growth overlay 1 (cont). Support for transformational partnership agendas - SAGCOT •SAGCOT partners aim to bring 350,000 hectares into profitable production, transition 100,000 small scale farmers into emerging commercial farmers, create 420,000 new employment opportunities, and lift two million people out of poverty whilst creating $1.2 billion annual farming revenues SAGCOT – investing in Green Growth Elements of Green Growth in SAGCOT as promoted by the SAGCOT Centre • Scale up component investments in which environmental sensitivity, reduced emissions, social benefits and climate change adaptation are core to the investment model • Realize synergies and reduce trade-offs by managing interactions among investments and land uses in different parts of the landscape • Align sectoral programs and priorities to save money, reduce conflict, and establish critical masses of socially and environmentally beneficial investment • Use democratic governance processes to negotiate development priorities and parameters, recognizing legitimate local,regional, national and business interests • Design public policies and programs that shift investment incentives toward green growth 2. Supporting integrated domestic models which promote a shared value approach Integrated Domestic Model in Tanzania What needs to be in place to establish a smallholder inclusive model: Example district A A O/T D A D A Yara Distributor Local agro-dealer Village with lead farmer O/T Off-taker Achievable critical mass Dedicated investments into local capacity resourcing Committed partners with a long-term focus Smallholder farmer and value chain financing solutions Food security strategy Inclusive green growth strategy Sufficient core infrastructure Off-taker – a sustainable market for produce Impact assessment framework Positive local perception Governmental support and appropriate enabling environment Clearly defined roles and responsibilities Smallholder inclusive models are an integrated part of the Yara domestic model in Tanzania 8 3. Promoting PPPs in applied R&D and climate smart agriculture • The Environment and Climate Compatible Agriculture (ECCAg) project is a partnership between Yara and Syngenta together with Sokoine University,Tanzania and the University of Life Sciences, Norway • Initiated in Dec 2010, as a contribution towards the emerging SAGCOT Green Corridor work • Aims to develop a clear understanding of the impacts of agriculture on the environment and climate change, and to test if intensification of agriculture through the use of agricultural inputs can be compatible with environmental sustainability and climate change – while also improving the productivity and profitability at farm level. 9 3. Promoting PPPs in applied R&D (cont’) In order to meet these objectives, the project has developed and tested : • A framework to understand and measure the impact of agriculture on the environment. • Protocol for environmental measures and models. • Best practice protocols in agronomy and technology use for specific crops. • Calculators for improved productivity and profitability as well as carbon footprint reduction • First such trials in Tanzania to measure environmental impacts, alongside productivity and profitability, with smallholder farmers producing maize and rice. 10 Tanzania: The challenge for maize & rice production Present situation Population – 45 Mio Diet Future projection (2050) Population – 138 Mio Diet – Maize (25%) & rice (10%) – Assume no change – Other crops & little meat – Eliminate under nourishment – Still some under nourishment Crop Production – Maize – 4.65 mio t (3 mio. ha @ 1.55 t/ha) – Rice – 2.33 mio t. (1 mio. ha @ 2.33 t/ha) Crop Production – required – Maize ~ 18.6 mio. t – Rice ~ 9.3 mio. t 11 If average maize yields are improved to 6 t/ha, no additional land is required for maize production in TZ Required land for maize production in 2050 (in Mio ha) 14 12 10 at current yield level at 2 t/ha at 6 t/ha 8 6 Maize area in 2010 at 1.55 t/ha 4 2 0 2010 2050 Calculation based on data from FAO and UN statistics 12 Even today it is possible to produce 6 t /ha with improved crop nutrition Marketable grain yield (t/ha; 86% dm) 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 2011 2012 2013 Target yield Farmer practice Yara protocol 13 Carbon footprint guarantee for Yara N fertilizers – verified by third party audit (DNV) Yara guarantees a carbon footprint of <4 kg CO2eq/kg N produced The data and calculations are verified by an independent third party, Det Norske Veritas (DNV) 14 Carbon footprint of maize production (including potential land use change emissions) Carbon footprint (kg CO2eq / t maize grain) 6000 FP = Farmer practice Y = Yara 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 FP Y Kichewa 2011 FP Y Matiganjola 2012 FP Y Welela 2012 FP Y Sokoine Univ. 2012 CO2 emissions from potential land use change to compensate for yield difference between FP and YS (tropical scrubland into arable, acc. to IPCC, 2006) Emissions from maize cultivation including production of farming inputs, e.g. fertilizer 15