* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Design Considerations for Designing with Cree SiC Modules Part 1.
Immunity-aware programming wikipedia , lookup
Radio transmitter design wikipedia , lookup
Spark-gap transmitter wikipedia , lookup
Integrating ADC wikipedia , lookup
Josephson voltage standard wikipedia , lookup
Operational amplifier wikipedia , lookup
Schmitt trigger wikipedia , lookup
Two-port network wikipedia , lookup
Valve RF amplifier wikipedia , lookup
RLC circuit wikipedia , lookup
Resistive opto-isolator wikipedia , lookup
Current source wikipedia , lookup
Voltage regulator wikipedia , lookup
Power electronics wikipedia , lookup
Surge protector wikipedia , lookup
Opto-isolator wikipedia , lookup
Switched-mode power supply wikipedia , lookup
Current mirror wikipedia , lookup
Design Considerations for Designing with Cree SiC Modules Part 1. Design Considerations for Designing with Cree SiC Modules Part 1. Understanding the Effects of Parasitic Inductance Scope: The effects of power circuit parasitic inductances are an important consideration in the application and characterization of SiC MOSFET modules. Of particular importance are turn-on conditions where internal module voltage overshoots can be a concern; as well as EMI considerations. Introduction: Because silicon carbide (SiC) MOSFETs provide significant improvements in system electrical and volumetric efficiencies to minimize overall system cost, they have been implemented in modules that make SiC technology more attractive to design engineers in high power applications. The incorporation of SiC technology into power modules combines the fast switching speed of silicon (Si) MOSFETs with the low conduction loss of Si IGBTs at voltages of 1.2kV and higher. The key to successfully leveraging these improvements, especially the faster switching speed, requires paying careful attention to system parasitics; specifically stray inductances and capacitances beyond what is typically incurred for IGBT modules. This application guide provides an intuitive understanding of these enhanced parasitic effects and explains how to mitigate them in order to realize optimum performance from SiC MOSFET modules. The effects of parasitic inductance and capacitance can include voltage and current overshoots and ringing. These parasitics have always existed and are a natural consequence of the device physics involved. However, the unique combination of high voltage, high current and increased switching speed of SiC MOSFETs requires careful consideration of the circuit layout to reduce the effects of these parasitics. REV A Inductance CPWR-AN12, s of Parasitic ct fe Ef e th ng Understandi Because faster switching speeds at high voltages and currents give rise to higher dV/dt and dI/dt, voltage drops across a few nanohenries of stray inductance can be problematic. This application note addresses these concerns and illustrates how a typical SiC MOSFET module, in this case Cree’s CAS100H12AM1 1.2kV 100A half-bridge, was initially characterized. These techniques are equally applicable to other fast-switching SiC power modules as well. Subject to change without notice. www.cree.com 1 Discussion: In general, standard application guidelines developed for Si IGBT modules also apply to SiC MOSFET modules. However, the significantly faster switching speed of the SiC MOSFET module requires a more comprehensive understanding of the effects of parasitic elements to achieve a successful design of power electronic equipment. All physical circuits have stray inductance caused by bond wires, board traces, etc. The voltage drop across this inductance is expressed as the inductance times the rate of rise of current, or V=L*di/dt. A customary ‘rule of thumb’ for insertion inductance puts it at about 10nH/cm. If the di/ dt is high enough, the voltage drop across this stray inductance can become significant. Furthermore, all semiconductor switches exhibit some kind of output capacitance; typically proportional to the current rating of the switch. With its unique capability to switch large currents at high speed, the SiC MOSFET module also has a finite output capacitance. Because these parasitics form resonant circuits that need to be considered for optimum application of SiC MOSFET modules, the following discussion will address various techniques to control voltage overshoots without the use of snubbers. The following subjects will be discussed: • Application Considerations • Parasitic Assessment • Experimental Results • Switching Speed vs. Overshoot • EMI Considerations Application Considerations: The most critical parameter to control in the application of the SiC MOSFET module is to ensure that voltage overshoot does not exceed the maximum device rating. This overshoot is the result of a resonant circuit formed by the output capacitance of the module and the stray inductance present between the module and the link capacitors. The voltage overshoot manifests itself at the time when one MOSFET is turned on, while the other MOSFET is carrying freewheeling current as shown in Figure 1. Assuming the initial condition that M1 and M2 are off, and freewheeling current from the inductive load is flowing through D1 causing it to be forward biased, then net voltage across the load be small and negative, equal to the forward drop of D1. Now, however, consider the case when the M2 is turned on. The upper diode D1, being forward biased by the freewheeling current, causes an effective short circuit to be formed at the moment of turn-on. A simplified schematic of this condition is shown in Figure 2, where M2 is replaced with a switch. Current begins to flow from the link and the net forward current through D1 is Ifreewheel - Ilink. This condition holds until Ifreewheel = Ilink. At this point, D1 becomes reverse biased and presents a capacitive load to the circuit. This capacitive load consists of the total of reverse capacitance of D1 and the output capacitance (Coss) of MOSFET M1. This collective capacitance will be referred to Coss for the remainder of this discussion. CPWR-AN12, REV A 2 Understanding the Effects of Parasitic Inductance This document is provided for informational purposes only and is not a warranty or a specification. For product specifications, please see the data sheets available at www.cree.com/power. For warranty information, please contact Cree Sales at [email protected]. Stray Inductance Stray Inductance Stray Inductance Stray Inductance D1 M1 D1 M1 G1 G1 G1 RTN G1 RTN Link Link M2 M2 G2 G2 G2 RTN G2 RTN D1 D1 Freewheeling Freewheeling Current Current D1 D1 Inductive Inductive Load Load S1/D2 S1/D2 Ifreewheel Ifreewheel Inductive Inductive Load Load Ilink Ilink Link Link D2 D2 S2 S2 Figure 1: Module with inductive load Figure 1: Figure Module with inductive load 1: Module with inductive load Figure 2: Freewheeling equivalent circuit Figure 2: Freewheeling equivalent Figure 2: Freewheeling equivalentcircuit circuit As the load voltage rises, current begins to flow through the load as shown in Figure 3. The link As the theload loadvoltage voltage rises, current begins to through flow through theasload as shown in3.Figure 3. The link As rises, begins to flow theload load shown Figure The link ) andinthe remainder (Ilinkcurrent – Iload) current is now split, withcurrent a portion flowing through the (Iload ) and the remainder (I – Iload current is now split, with a portion flowing through the load (I load is now used split, with a portion flowing through the loadis(Iformed theCremainder (Ilink – Iload) beinglink used to ) load) andby . A resonant circuit being to charge Coss oss and the circuit stray inductance. A formed resonant circuit formed Cossinductance. and the circuit inductance. being used charge circuit Coss. is charge Coss. Atoresonant Coss andisthe circuitby stray In thisstray analysis, it is In this analysis, it is assumed that thebyload is inductive. Further, it is assumed that the load In this analysis, is assumed that the load inductive. Further, it is assumed that the load assumed that the it load is inductive. Further, it is is assumed that the load inductance will be significantly inductance will be significantly greater than the stray inductance shown in Figure 3. Under inductance be significantly greater the shown Figure 3. toUnder greater than will the stray inductance shown in than Figure 3. stray Underinductance these conditions, it isinreasonable assume these conditions, it is reasonable to assume that the load does not provide much clamping or that theconditions, load does not much clamping or damping to thenot resonant circuit formed by Cossorand these it isprovide reasonable to assume that the action load does provide much clamping the stray inductance. The circuit then damping action to the resonant circuit formed byshown C and the stray inductance. Theresonant circuit then reduces to that in Figure 4. inductance. The circuit then the stray damping action to the circuit formed by Coss oss and reduces to that shown in Figure 4. reduces to that shown in Figure 4. Stray Inductance Stray Inductance Stray Inductance Stray Inductance D1 D1 Link Link Iload Iload Inductive Inductive Load Load Ilink Ilink Coss Coss Link Link Figure 3: Commutation Figure 3: Commutation Figure 3: Commutation IIlink -- IIload link load Figure 4: Overshoot analysis circuit 4: Overshoot analysis circuit Figure 4:Figure Overshoot analysis circuit Although notshown, shown, the resistive (R) portion of resonant this resonant circuit is represented by the onAlthough thethe resistive (R) (R) portion of this circuit circuit is represented by the onresistance Althoughnot not shown, resistive portion of this resonant is represented by the onresistance of switch (M2 in this case) as well as any other resistive losses in the circuit. A of switch (M2 this case) any other resistive losses the circuit. A design goalcircuit. is to minimize resistance ofinswitch (M2asinwell thisas case) as well as any otherin resistive losses in the A design goal is to minimize this resistance as much as possible in order to realize the highest this resistance as much as possible in order to realize the highest efficiency. This causes the circuit to be design goal is to minimize this resistance as much as possible in order to realize the highest efficiency. This causes the circuit to be underdamped and across an overshoot of some magnitude underdamped and an overshoot of some magnitude should occur C , which is in effect across oss efficiency. This causes the circuit to be underdamped and an overshoot of some magnitude is ainclassic effect acrossorder MOSFET This RLCcharacteristics series circuit is a should across Coss, which MOSFEToccur M2. This RLC series circuit is systemM2. which general is in effectsecond across MOSFET M2. This RLC series circuitare is a should occur across Coss, which classic second order system which general characteristics are shown in Figure 5. shown in Figure 5. classic second order system which general characteristics are shown in Figure 5. CPWR-AN12, REV A 3 Understanding the Effects of Parasitic Inductance 3 3 This document is provided for informational purposes only and is not a warranty or a specification. For product specifications, please see the data sheets available at www.cree.com/power. For warranty information, please contact Cree Sales at [email protected]. 2 2 2 Normalized Capacitor Voltage (V) Normalized Normalized Normalized Capacitor Capacitor Capacitor Voltage Voltage Voltage (V) (V) (V) 1.75 2 1.75 1.75 1.5 1.75 1.5 1.5 1.25 1.5 1.25 1.25 1 1.25 1 1 0.75 1 0.75 0.75 0.5 0.75 0.5 0.5 0.25 0.5 0.25 0.25 0 0.25 00 2 0 0 0 0 Figure 5: Normalized 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.15 0.15 0.3 0.15 0.05 0.3 0.5 0.3 0.15 0.5 0.9 0.5 0.3 0.9 0.9 0.5 0.9 2 2 4 4 4 6 8 6 6 10 8 8ωn*t 10 10 ω ωn*t *t 12 12 12 14 14 14 16 2 4 voltage6vs. ω t 8for various 12 of ζ 14 n 10 values capacitor n *t Figure for values Figure 5: 5: Normalized Normalized capacitor capacitor voltage voltage vs. vs. ω ωnntt ω fornvarious various values of of ζζ 16 16 18 16 18 18 18 20 20 20 20 Figure 5: Normalized capacitor voltage vs. ωnt for various values of ζ Figure 5: Normalized capacitor voltage vs. ωnt for various values of ζ The natural frequency, ω n, in radians per second and in Hertz for this system is expressed as The natural frequency, follows: ωnn,, in in radians radians per per second second and and in in Hertz Hertz for for this this system system is is expressed expressed as as The natural frequency, ω The natural frequency, ωn, in radians per second and in Hertz for this system is expressed as follows: follows: 1 follows: The natural frequency, ωn, in radians per second and in Hertz for this system is expressed as 𝜔𝜔! = 1 1 𝜔𝜔 𝜔𝜔!! = = 𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿1 𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿 𝜔𝜔! =1 𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿 𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿 𝑓𝑓! = 1 1 𝑓𝑓 2𝜋𝜋 𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿 𝑓𝑓!! = = 2𝜋𝜋 1 𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿 𝑓𝑓! = 2𝜋𝜋 𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿 2𝜋𝜋 𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿 TheThe optimum point for minimum minimumovershoot overshoot with fastest is when the optimum pointininthis thissystem system for with thethe fastest rise rise timetime is when the damping follows: The in for overshoot with ratio,optimum ζ,ratio, is unity. this particular circuit, it iscircuit, expressed damping ζ,point isInunity. In system this particular it is as: expressed as: fastest The optimum point in this this system for minimum minimum overshoot with the the fastest rise rise time time is is when when the the damping ratio, ζ, is unity. In this particular circuit, it is expressed as: damping ratio, ζ, is unity. In this particular circuit, it is expressed as: The optimum point in this system for minimum overshoot with the fastest rise time is when the 𝑅𝑅 𝐶𝐶 2 𝑅𝑅 𝐿𝐿 𝐶𝐶 𝜁𝜁𝜁𝜁 = = 2 𝐿𝐿 𝑅𝑅 2 𝐶𝐶 𝐿𝐿 𝜁𝜁 = 2 𝐿𝐿 damping ratio, ζ, is unity. In this particular is expressed as: 𝜁𝜁 =circuit, 𝑅𝑅 it 𝐶𝐶 Thus, critical damping is achieved when: Thus, critical damping achieved when: Thus, critical is is achieved when: Thus, criticaldamping damping is achieved when: Thus, critical damping is achieved when: 1 𝐿𝐿 𝑅𝑅!"#$ = 1 1 𝐶𝐶 𝐿𝐿 𝐿𝐿 2 𝑅𝑅 = !"#$ 𝑅𝑅!"#$ = 2 1 𝐿𝐿 2 𝐶𝐶 𝐶𝐶 Where: 𝑅𝑅!"#$ = Where: 2 RDS(on) 𝐶𝐶 of the lower switch Rcrit = Total circuit resistance, typically dominated by the Where: = Total circuit resistance, typically dominated by the RDS(on) of the lower switch Rcrit Where: Total circuit typically dominated of the lower switch C == Output capacitance the upper upper switch crit C =R Output capacitance ofofthe switch circuit resistance, resistance, typically dominated by by the the R RDS(on) R crit = Total DS(on) of the lower switch Where: C = Output capacitance of the upper switch CLcrit == Output of the typically upper switch Summation of stray inductances between the module link of the lower switch = Totalcapacitance circuit resistance, dominated by and the the RDS(on) R 4 C = Output capacitance of the upper switch 4 4 CPWR-AN12, REV A 4 Understanding the Effects of Parasitic Inductance This document is provided for informational purposes only and is not a warranty or a specification. For product specifications, please see the data sheets available at www.cree.com/power. For warranty information, please contact Cree Sales at [email protected]. 4 + = Summation of stray inductances between the module and the link + = Summation of stray inductances between the module and the link Parasitic Assessment: Parasitic Assessment: Parasitic Assessment: An example of parasitics assessment has been made for the double pulse setup used to An example parasitics assessment has been made for the double setup used to characterize An exampleofof parasitics assessment has been made the pulse double setup usedoftotheCree’s characterize Cree’s CAS100H12AM1 1.2kV 100A half for bridge module.pulse A photograph CAS100H12AM1 1.2kV 100A half bridge module. A photograph of the hardware is shown in Figures 6 and 7. characterize Cree’s in CAS100H12AM1 hardware is shown Figures 6 and 7.1.2kV 100A half bridge module. A photograph of the hardware is shown in Figures 6 and 7. Gate Driver Board Gate Driver Board 50mm Module 50mm Module Gate Driver Board Gate Driver Board Figure 6: Double pulse setup top view. Figure 6: Double pulse setup topFigure view.6: Double pulse setup top view Spacer Spacer 50mm Module 50mm Module Spacer and CT Spacer and CT Figure 7: Double pulse test setup side view. Figure 7: Double pulse test setup side view. Figure 7: Double pulse test setup side view 5 5 CPWR-AN12, REV A 5 Understanding the Effects of Parasitic Inductance This document is provided for informational purposes only and is not a warranty or a specification. For product specifications, please see the data sheets available at www.cree.com/power. For warranty information, please contact Cree Sales at [email protected]. The design consists of a link capacitor printed circuit board directly connected to the module. Spacers The design consists of a link capacitor printed circuit board directly connected to the module. are used to facilitate the installation of a current transformer to monitor the module current. The current Spacers are used to thea installation of a current theTX22/14/6.4module transformer consists of facilitate two stages: first stage consisting of 10transformer turns aroundto a monitor Ferroxcube current. The current transformer consists of two stages: a first stage consisting of 10 turns 3E27 core; and the second stage is a Person Electronics current monitor model 2878. around a Ferroxcube core; circuit and the second stage is a Person Electronics The design consists ofTX22/14/6.4-3E27 a link capacitor printed board directly connected to the module. current monitor model 2878. Spacers are used to facilitate the installation of a current transformer to monitor the module current. The current transformer stages: a first stage consisting of 10 turns LINK CAPACITOR BANK consists of twoSPACERS MODULE Test Point 1 nH 20.8 nH 5.3 nH around a Ferroxcube TX22/14/6.4-3E27 core; and4.5 the second stage is a Person Electronics (TP1) LC1 LS1 current monitor model 2878. LINK CAPACITOR BANK 5.3 nH LC1 Test Point 1 (TP1) SPACERS 4.5 nH MODULE 20.8 nH LM1 LS1 LM1 LM2 800V LM3 LM2 Test Point 2 (TP2) 800V LM3 Test Point 2 (TP2) LM4 LC2 LS2 Test Point Reference LC2 Figure 8: First Order Parasitics LS2 Test Point Reference LCT1 LM4 CURRENT TRANSFORMER LCT1 5.5 nH CURRENT TRANSFORMER 5.5 nH The individual were carefully measured at 1MHz. However, at these low Figure 8: First Order Parasitics Figure 8: Firstinductances Order Parasitics inductance values, there always is a slight amount of ambiguity caused by the repeatability of the impedance meter test fixture, as well as other factors in theHowever, measurement process. The Theindividual individual inductances were carefully measured at 1MHz. at these low values, The inductances were carefully measured at 1MHz. However, at these low inductance inductance breakdown of the module, spacers, and current transformer is shown in Figure 9. inductance values, always is a slight amount of ambiguity caused the repeatability there always is a slightthere amount of ambiguity caused by the repeatability of the by impedance meter testof the impedance test fixture, well as other factorsThe in inductance the measurement process. The fixture, as well as meter other factors in theas measurement process. breakdown of the module, spacers, and current transformer is shown spacers, in Figure 9. inductance breakdown of the module, and current transformer is shown in Figure 9. Module = 20.8nH Module = 20.8nH Module + spacers = 25.31nH Spacers = 4.5nH Module + spacers = 25.31nH Spacers = 4.5nH Module + spacers + current transformer = 30.81nH Current+ transformer = 5.5nH Module spacers + current transformer = 30.81nH Current transformer = 5.5nH Figure 9: Module and interface inductances. CPWR-AN12, REV A 6 Understanding the Effects of Parasitic Inductance 6 This document is provided for informational purposes only and is not a warranty or a specification. For product specifications, please see the data sheets available at www.cree.com/power. For warranty information, please contact Cree Sales at [email protected]. 6 The link capacitor printed circuit board is a parallel array of individual capacitors carefully The link capacitor printedplate circuitstructure board is atoparallel array of individual capacitors carefullyof designed in a designed in a parallel minimize stray inductance. A schematic the capacitor parallel plate structure to minimize stray inductance. A schematic of the capacitor bank is shown in Figure 10. bank is shown in Figure 10. D1 +LINK R1 220k 2W R2 220k 2W MID R3 220k 2W R4 220k 2W -LINK C1 16 uF 700VDC C3 16 uF 700VDC C5 16 uF 700VDC C7 16 uF 700VDC C9 16 uF 700VDC C11 16 uF 700VDC C13 8 uF 700VDC MID C2 16 uF 700VDC C4 16 uF 700VDC C6 16 uF 700VDC C8 16 uF 700VDC C10 16 uF 700VDC C12 16 uF 700VDC C14 8 uF 700VDC S2 Figure 10: Link capacitor board schematic The parallel array of series connected was designed to meet voltage requirements Figure 10:capacitors Link capacitor board schematic and to provide a midpoint connection to create a half-bridge inverter if desired. There are six sets of 16µF 700V capacitors and one set of 8µF 700V capacitors, giving total capacitance of The parallel array of series connected capacitors was designed to meet voltage requirements and to provide 52µF, with a total voltage rating of 1.4kV. Each 16µF capacitor has an equivalent series a midpoint connection to create a half-bridge inverter if desired. There are six sets of 16μF 700V capacitors inductance (ESL) of 30nH and each 8µF capacitor has an ESL of 27nH. A careful connection and one set of 8μF 700V capacitors, giving total capacitance of 52μF, with a total voltage rating of 1.4kV. using parallel plane transmission line techniques results in a total parasitic inductance of 5.3nH. Each 16μF capacitor has an equivalent series inductance (ESL) of 30nH and each 8μF capacitor has an ESL Thus, the total inductance of the test setup is approximately 37.5nH. of 27nH. A careful connection using parallel plane transmission line techniques results in a total parasitic inductance of 5.3nH. Thus, the total inductance of the test setup is approximately 36.1nH. The other reactive component in this analysis is Coss, which refers to the module output capacitance withcomponent the gates in tied toanalysis their respective sources. depletion capacitance, The other reactive this is Coss, which refers Being to the a module output capacitance C with oss the gates tied to their respective a depletion capacitance, varies with voltage and is sources. shown inBeing graph form as Figure 11. Coss varies with voltage and is shown in graph form as Figure 11. 100 Measured Data Diode Model Energy Based Coss (nF) 10 1 0.1 0 200 400 600 VDS (V) 800 1000 1200 Figure 11: Module Coss 7 as a function of VDS CPWR-AN12, REV A 7 Understanding the Effects of Parasitic Inductance This document is provided for informational purposes only and is not a warranty or a specification. For product specifications, please see the data sheets available at www.cree.com/power. For warranty information, please contact Cree Sales at [email protected]. The graph contains three curves: The first is a set of data points showing the direct Coss measured data; the second is a solid line showing the fit of a spice model of Coss; and the third is a plot of Coss calculated based on energy. Because Coss significantly varies as a function of VDS, a simple first order analysis is difficult. However, a reasonable simplifying assumption to analyze resonant behavior around a given steady state voltage is to use equivalent capacitance based on energy. This energy-based equivalent capacitance vs. voltage is also provided in Figure 11. Experimental Results: An initial two-pulse inductive test was done to evaluate the performance of the test setup. With the link voltage set to 800V and the peak switching current set to 100A, the initial results are shown in Figure 12. The voltage was measured from voltage TP1 to the test point reference point and the current was measured by the current transformer, as shown in Figure 8. Test conditions: Ipulse = 100A Vlink = 800V Vgate = 20/-5V Rgate = 0 Ω Load Inductance = 200 μH 1000 250 TP2 to Ref Current 200 600 150 400 100 200 50 0 -200 Module Current (A) Point 1 Voltage (V) 800 0 0 50 100 150 200 Time (nsec) 250 300 350 400 -50 Figure 12: Observable module turn-on characteristics CPWR-AN12, REV A 8 Understanding the Effects of Parasitic Inductance This document is provided for informational purposes only and is not a warranty or a specification. For product specifications, please see the data sheets available at www.cree.com/power. For warranty information, please contact Cree Sales at [email protected]. This test was done with the external gate resistor set to zero. This was done to accentuate the Although this test was done with the external gate resistor set to zero to accentuate the amount ringing. with Operation with of zero ohms gate resistance is not recommended. ofamount ringing,ofoperation zero ohms gate resistance is not recommended. There is a There is a substantial amount of ringing present in both signals. The steady state frequency is of 25ringing, MHz Although this test was done with the external gate resistor set to zero to accentuate the amount substantial amount of ringing present in both signals. The steady state frequency is 25MHz and and this was measured at 300 nsec to insure that the internal voltages achieved an average operation with zero ohms of gate resistance is not recommended. There is a substantial amount of ringing this was measured at 300nsec to ensure that the internal voltages achieved an average steady steady statesignals. current. note thatfrequency the response is clearly Therefore, present in both TheAlso steady is 25MHz and thisunderdamped. was measured 300nsec to the ensure state current. Also note that thestate response is clearly under-damped; therefore,atthe resonant that the internal voltages achieved an average steady state current. Also note that the response is clearly resonant frequency will be very close to the system natural frequency. A check of the measured frequency will be extremely close to the system natural frequency. A check of the measured under-damped; therefore, the resonant frequency will be extremely close to theand system natural frequency. parasiticsiscan be made calculating estimated resonant frequency and comparing to the parasitics performed by by calculating thethe estimated resonant frequency comparing it to itthe A check of the measured parasitics is performed by calculating the estimated resonant frequency and measure result using the aforementioned equations. The voltage shown in Figure 12 is measured result, using the aforementioned equations. The voltage shown in Figure 12 is comparing it to the measured result,the the aforementioned equations. The across voltage the shown in Figure essentially voltage across lower switch. Hence, the voltage upper MOSFET essentially thethe voltage across theusing lower switch; thus, the voltage across the upper MOSFET is12 is essentially the voltage across the lower switch; thus, the voltage across the upper MOSFET is rising to is rising to 800V steady state. equivalent for at Coss at 800V is 1.045 nF. Using this 800V is 1.045 nF. Using this value, rising to 800V steady state. The The equivalent valuevalue for Coss 800V steady state. The equivalent value for C at 800V is 1.045 nF. Using this value, along with 36.1nH valuewith along with 36.1 nHinductance for the inductance the calculated natural frequency is: along 37.5nH for the the oss calculated natural frequency is: for the inductance the calculated natural frequency is: 11 ݂௦ ≈ ൎ𝑓𝑓!݂== ൌ ʹͷǤͻݖܪܯ = 25.4 𝑀𝑀𝑀𝑀𝑀𝑀 𝑓𝑓!"# ͳ כǤͲͶͷ݊ܨ 2𝜋𝜋ʹߨ√͵Ǥͳ݊ܪ 37.5 𝑛𝑛𝑛𝑛 ∗ 1.045 𝑛𝑛𝑛𝑛 This closely agrees withwith the measured frequency of 25MHz. This closely agrees the measured frequency of 25MHz. This closely agrees with the measured frequency of 25 MHz. More insight can be gained by doing a simple AC analysis at the resonant frequency. The simplifying More gained byby doing a simple analysis at the resonant The Moreinsight insight canbebe gained doing a plot simple AC analysis atofthe resonant frequency. The assumptions arecan illustrated in Figure 13. This isAC a representation the modulefrequency. current from 200nsec simplifying assumptions are illustrated in Figure 13. This plot is a representation of the module simplifying assumptions are illustrated in Figure 13. This plot is a representation of the to 400nsec. First, consider the actual current case where a peak current of 150A occurs at 200nsec, module current from 400nsec. consider the actual current case where a peak current currentdown from200nsec nsec to 400 nsec. First, consider the actual current case where a peak decaying to200 130A atto400nsec. TheFirst, first simplifying assumptions are that the 100A load current iscurrent of 150A occurs at 200nsec, decaying down to 130A at 400nsec. The first simplifying of 150A occurs at 200 nsec decaying down to 130A at 400 nsec. The first simplifying constant, and that the circuit is lossless, so the current remains at a constant amplitude. The second assumptions are 100A load current isstate constant, and thethe circuit is lossless, soso the assumptions arethat that the 100A load current is constant and that circuit is lossless the simplifying assumption isthe that only the AC steady condition is that considered, so the load current is now current remains at a constant amplitude. The second simplifying assumption is that only the AC zero. The result is a constant 50A The peak,second 25MHz sine wave suitable for AC analysis. current remains constantamplitude amplitude. simplifying assumption is that only the AC steady is is considered, load current is is now zero. The result is aisconstant steadystate statecondition condition consideredsosothe the load current now zero. The result a constant amplitude 50A peak, 25MHz sine wave suitable for AC analysis. amplitude 50A peak 25 MHz sine wave suitable for AC analysis. 200 200 Current Current(A) (A) 150 150 100 100 Actual Actual Lossless Lossless AC Steady StateState AC Steady 50 50 0 0 -50 -50 -100 -100 200 200 250 250 300 Time300 (nsec) Time (nsec) Time (nsec) 350 350 400 400 Figure 13: Rationalization of steady state sinusoidal analysis Figure 13: Rationalization of steady state sinusoidal analysis Figure 13: Rationalization of steady state sinusoidal analysis The inductive reactance of 1nH of stray inductance (XL = 2*π*fr*L) at 25 MHz is approximately 0.157 Ω. Using the 50A peak value in the AC steady state analysis, a voltage drop of 7.85V/nH 9 9 CPWR-AN12, REV A 9 Understanding the Effects of Parasitic Inductance This document is provided for informational purposes only and is not a warranty or a specification. For product specifications, please see the data sheets available at www.cree.com/power. For warranty information, please contact Cree Sales at [email protected]. of stray inductance will occur which is about 1% of the link voltage. This is significant because The inductive reactance of 1nH of stray inductance (XL=2*π*fr*L) at 25MHz is approximately 0.157Ω. Using the general ‘rule of thumb’ for trace inductance is 10nH/cm which equates to 10% of the link the 50A peak value in the AC steady state analysis, a voltage drop of 7.85V/nH of stray inductance will voltage per cm. occur, which is about 1% of the link voltage. This is significant, because the general ‘rule of thumb’ for Straytrace inductance willisaffect voltage measurements. the ring visible on the TP2 inductance 10nH/cm, which equates to 10% In of Figure the link 12, voltage per cm. voltage trace actually exceeds 100V for several cycles. The peak current flowing through the inductance measurements. In Figure ring one visible on the TP2 voltage trace lowerStray MOSFET is onwill theaffect ordervoltage of 200A. Assuming an RDS(on)12, of the 16mΩ, would expect a actually exceeds 100V for several cycles. The peak current flowing through the lower MOSFET is on the maximum voltage drop of approximately 3.2V across the switch. However, as shown in Figure of 200A. Assuming an the RDS(on) of 16mΩ, wouldthe expect a maximum approximately 8, theorder voltage at TP2 includes voltage dropone across switch plus the voltage voltagedrop dropofacross 3.2V across the switch. However, as shown in Figure 8, the voltage at TP2 includes the voltage the stray inductance between the switch and the reference point. Using the aforementioneddrop ACacross the switch plus the voltage drop across the stray inductance between the switch and the reference point. steady state technique 100V peak voltage drop at 50A would be due to perhaps 13 nH of stray Using the aforementioned AC steady state technique, 100V peak voltage drop at 50A would be due to inductance which is reasonable based upon the measurements previously presented. Another approximately 13nH of stray inductance, which is reasonable based upon the measurements previously indicator that the voltage observed at TP2 includes stray inductance effects is the approximately presented. Another indicator that the voltage observed at TP2 includes stray inductance effects is the 90° phase shift between the voltage observed at TP2 and the current through the module. approximate 90° phase shift between the voltage observed at TP2 and the current through the module. The amount of series resistancefor forcritical criticaldamping damping can as and follows: The amount of series resistance canbe becalculated calculated is as follows: 1 ͵Ǥͳ݊ܪ ܴ௧ = ඨ ൌ ʹǤͻͶߗ 2 ͳǤͲͶͷ݊ܨ To completely mitigate the initial overshoot, the value of R would have to be equal to or greater completely mitigate initial overshoot, R wouldan have to be equal toΩ orinto greater than To 2.94 Ω. RDS(on) of thisthe module is typicallythe 16value mΩ. ofPlacing additional 2.94 the than high 2.94Ω. The R of this module is typically 16mΩ. Placing an additional 2.94Ω into the high current portion ofDS(on) this circuit to completely damp this parasitic resonance is not a practicalcurrent portion of possible this circuittotoreduce completely damp this is notthe practical; however, it is possible solution. It is the amount ofparasitic ring by resonance slowing down switching speed but to reduce the amount of ring by slowing down the switching speed (but this in turn increases the this increases the amount of switching loss. One of the key advantages of the SiC MOSFET amount is of switching loss). One of the key advantages of the SiC MOSFET is fast switching speed and it is possible fast switching speed. It is possible to nullify this key advantage by slowing the switching speed nullify this key advantage by slowing the switching speed down too much. Recognizing that there will downtotoo much. There will always be some amount of ringing present. An engineering tradeoff always be some amount of ringing present,an engineering tradeoff needs to be made to ensure that needs to be done to insure that the voltage overshoot does not damage the device while voltage overshoot does not damage the device while preserving the switching speed advantage. preserving the switching speed advantage. Switching Speed vs. Overshoot: Switching Speed vs. Overshoot: The critical issue that needs to be addressed is how to select the optimum switching speed that manages the internal overshoot sacrificing too to much of the MOSFET’s speed advantage. The critical issuevoltage that needs to bewithout addressed is how select an SiC optimum switching speed thatAn analytic solution to this problem is not possible because of the nonlinear behavior of C manages the internal voltage overshoot without sacrificing too much of the SiC MOSFET’s oss. However, an equivalent RLC circuit can be simulated using a model for C . The schematic of this simulation is shown speed advantage. An analytic solution to this problem is not oss possible because of the nonlinear in Figure 14. The results of this analysis provide heuristic guidance for the adjustment of switching behavior of Coss. However, an equivalent RLC circuit can be simulated using model for C oss. speed without the of tedium of a rigorous solution. The schematic the simulation is analytic shown in Figure 14. The results of this analysis provide heuristic guidance for the selection of switching speed without the tedium of a rigorous analytic solution. 10 CPWR-AN12, REV A 10 Understanding the Effects of Parasitic Inductance This document is provided for informational purposes only and is not a warranty or a specification. For product specifications, please see the data sheets available at www.cree.com/power. For warranty information, please contact Cree Sales at [email protected]. L1 = 37nH Coss RDS(on) DC Link Equivalent circuit for Coss Pulse voltage source to mimic switch Figure 14: Simulation schematic Figure 14: Simulation schematic A comprehensive “all-parasitics” simulation is extremely complex and time-consuming, however,this can be simplified by is creating a circuit thatand simulates conditions at the instant A comprehensivetask “all-parasitics” simulation extremely complex time-consuming, however, this that the lower switch starts to turn on. In this case, the lower switch is represented with switch an ideal task can be simplified by creating a circuit that simulates conditions at the instant that the lower pulsed voltage source. This is a reasonable simplification, since during MOSFET turn-on, the is starts to turn on. In this case, the lower switch is represented with an ideal pulsed voltage source. This combination of gate resistance and Miller effect cause the drain dV/dt to be constant. This also a reasonable simplification, since during MOSFET turn-on, the combination of gate resistance and Miller has the practical aspect that the dV/dt can be directly controlled by the selection of the effect cause the drain dV/dt to be constant. This also has the practical aspect that the dV/dt can be directly appropriate gate resistor. The MOSFET’s behavior voltage behavior fall time during is mimicked controlled by the selection of the appropriate gate resistor.during The MOSFET’s voltageby fallan time as a function of voltage ideal pulsed voltage source with a finite fall time. The behavior of C oss is mimicked by an ideal pulsed voltage source with a finite fall time. The behavior of Coss as a function is with by using by a diode capacitor. The model accurately fits the change of C of simulated voltage is simulated using and a diode and capacitor. The model accurately fits the change ofoss Coss with the MOSFET a fixed resistor. voltage. resistor simply models the RofDS(on) voltage. TheThe resistor simply models the RDS(on) the of MOSFET as a fixedasresistor. The simulation runvarious for various voltage fall times, and two data were gathered. Thehas The simulation waswas run for voltage fall times, and two sets of sets data of were gathered. The first set set has fall time to below the period of the resonantThese circuitresults (25.4MHz). thefirst voltage fall the timevoltage set to below the set period of the resonant circuit (25.4MHz). are shown in These Figure 15.results are shown in Figure 15. 11 CPWR-AN12, REV A 11 Understanding the Effects of Parasitic Inductance This document is provided for informational purposes only and is not a warranty or a specification. For product specifications, please see the data sheets available at www.cree.com/power. For warranty information, please contact Cree Sales at [email protected]. V(coss) 1.8KV Key: 1.6KV Green: Blue: Red: Gray: 0.25*tres 0.50*tres 0.75*tres 1.00*tres 50ns 60ns 1.4KV 1.2KV 1.0KV 0.8KV 0.6KV 0.4KV 0.2KV 0.0KV 0ns 10ns 20ns 30ns 40ns 70ns 80ns 90ns Figure 15: Voltage overshoot as a function of switching speed shorter than resonant period Figure 15: Voltage overshoot as a function of switching speed shorter than resonant period The switching speed steps were chosen to be a function of the period of fres where tres = 1/fres. The shows the res switch voltage Theswitching switching speed steps 0.25*t res. of The speed steps wereare chosen tores betoa 1.0*t function thebottom period graph of fres where tres=1/f . The switching As shown, and the topare shows voltage C oss. graph speed steps 0.25*tthe 1.0*tres.across The bottom showsthe thepeak switchvoltage voltageactually and the reaches top shows the res to point.The avalanche forCoss the 0.25 and the 0.5 peak case.voltage The peak voltage continues to for drop voltage across . As shown, actually reaches avalanche theuntil 0.25the and1/f 0.5 res case. peak to drop until the 1/fres point.voltage The general conclusion that the overshoot voltage The voltage generalcontinues conclusion is that the overshoot decreases withisincreasing switching time. decreases with increasing switching time. The second set of simulations involved switching speeds from 1/fres to 2/fres in five steps. The The second of simulations switching speeds from 1/fres to 2/fres in five steps. The results are results areset shown in Figureinvolved 16. shown in Figure 16. 12 CPWR-AN12, REV A 12 Understanding the Effects of Parasitic Inductance This document is provided for informational purposes only and is not a warranty or a specification. For product specifications, please see the data sheets available at www.cree.com/power. For warranty information, please contact Cree Sales at [email protected]. V(coss) 1.8KV Key: 1.6KV Green: Blue: Red: Gray: Pink: 1.4KV 1.00*tres 1.25*tres 1.50*tres 1.75*tres 2.00*tres 2nd maxima higher than 1st maxima 1.2KV 1.0KV 0.8KV 0.6KV 0.4KV 0.2KV 0.0KV 0ns 10ns 20ns 30ns 40ns 50ns 60ns 70ns 80ns 90ns Figure 16: Voltage overshoot as a function of switching speed longer than resonant period Figure 16: Voltage overshoot as a function of switching speed longer than resonant period These results are particularly interesting, in that the overshoot keeps decreasing with increased switching however, the maximum value shifts from the first peak to the peak. This These resultstime; are particularly interesting, in that the overshoot keeps decreasing withsecond increased switching time; however, the is maximum valueswitching shifts from the first to the second peak. This infers that there is infers that there a particular speed thatpeak minimizes overshoot. Several simulations a were particular switching speedthis. that A minimizes were run to investigate this. A run to investigate measureovershoot. script wasSeveral writtensimulations to report the maximum peak voltage measure script written the maximum voltagewas regardless of which peak it occurs on, and regardless ofwas which peaktoitreport occurs on, and thispeak simulation done for several values of link this simulation done for several values of link The baseline resonant frequency the analysis voltage. Thewas baseline resonant frequency forvoltage. the analysis was calculated using the for total was calculatedand using total inductance the energy value of Coss at the particular linkThe at the particular link voltage of interest. inductance thethe energy referencedand value of Coss referenced voltage interest. The resultsofare shown in results Figure are 17.shown in Figure 17. 13 CPWR-AN12, REV A 13 Understanding the Effects of Parasitic Inductance This document is provided for informational purposes only and is not a warranty or a specification. For product specifications, please see the data sheets available at www.cree.com/power. For warranty information, please contact Cree Sales at [email protected]. Figure 17: Observed minimum overshoot points as a function of relative fall time for various values of link voltage. The results show that minimum overshoot occurs for a voltage fall time slightly longer than one period of the resonant frequency. There are repeated minimums at fall times equal to integer multiples of the resonant period. Also note that there are relative maximas that occur for multiples of approximately n+1/2. It would be of great benefit to get some kind of measurement of the voltage overshoot without the parasitic effects to confirm that voltage ratings are being observed. Parasitic inductance makes it difficult to directly measure the overshoot voltage of the upper device during turn-on. However, a fairly simple simulation can be done to predict the overvoltage. The schematic shown in Figure 18 uses measured module current data, drive the simulated Coss and observe the voltage. The measured module load current is a table-based piecewise linear current source the module current during turn on. As before, the diode and capacitor simulate the behavior of Coss with voltage. The load current is modeled as a constant current source. CPWR-AN12, REV A 14 Understanding the Effects of Parasitic Inductance This document is provided for informational purposes only and is not a warranty or a specification. For product specifications, please see the data sheets available at www.cree.com/power. For warranty information, please contact Cree Sales at [email protected]. out2 Measured module current Equivalent circuit for Coss Empirically set load current Figure 18: Overshoot voltage estimation simulation Figure 18: Overshoot voltage estimation simulation Some empirical tuning needs to be done during the simulation to set the load current to the Some tuning to be done during the simulation to set the load to the which value that valueempirical that forces theneeds overshoot voltage to asymptotically approach the current link voltage, in this forces the overshoot voltage to asymptotically approach the link voltage, which in this case is 800V. case is 800V. The CAS100H12AM1 module was used to investigate this method of assessing the voltage overshoot. The The CAS100H12AM1 module was used to investigate this method of assessing the voltage module current was gathered in a test circuit shown in Figure 19. overshoot. The module current was gathered in a test circuit shown in Figure 19. Figure 19 Module test circuit schematic for the CAS100H12AM1 Figure 19: Module test circuit schematic for the CAS100H12AM1 15 CPWR-AN12, REV A 15 Understanding the Effects of Parasitic Inductance This document is provided for informational purposes only and is not a warranty or a specification. For product specifications, please see the data sheets available at www.cree.com/power. For warranty information, please contact Cree Sales at [email protected]. The conditions of the test were: Test conditions: Ipulse = 100A Vlink = 800V Vgate = 20/-5V Rgate = 5.1 Ω Load Inductance = 200 μH The measured waveforms are shown in Figure 20. 1600 160 Module Current 1200 VTP2 (V) 140 TP2 to Ref 120 1000 100 800 80 600 60 400 40 200 20 0 -200 Imodule (A) 1400 0 0 50 100 150 200 Time (nsec) 250 300 350 400 -20 Figure 20: Module test waveforms The lower trace is the actual module current and the upper trace is the overshoot voltage. The load current source was tuned to 100.7A to allow the overshoot voltage to asymptotically approach 800V steady state as shown. In this case, the overshoot voltage was approximately 900V and occurred on the third peak. CPWR-AN12, REV A 16 Understanding the Effects of Parasitic Inductance This document is provided for informational purposes only and is not a warranty or a specification. For product specifications, please see the data sheets available at www.cree.com/power. For warranty information, please contact Cree Sales at [email protected]. V(out2) 1.0KV V(800v) 0.9KV 0.8KV 0.7KV 0.6KV Estimated overshoot voltage 0.5KV 0.4KV 0.3KV 0.2KV 0.1KV 0.0KV -0.1KV I(I1) 160A Measured module current 140A 120A 100A 80A 60A 40A 20A 0A -20A 0ns 40ns 80ns 120ns 160ns 200ns 240ns 280ns 320ns Figure 21: Approximation of voltage overshoot using measured module current 360ns 400ns Figure 21: Approximation of voltage overshoot using measured module current 17 CPWR-AN12, REV A 17 Understanding the Effects of Parasitic Inductance This document is provided for informational purposes only and is not a warranty or a specification. For product specifications, please see the data sheets available at www.cree.com/power. For warranty information, please contact Cree Sales at [email protected]. EMI EMIConsiderations: Considerations: EMI Considerations: The Thefaster fasterswitching switchingspeed speedofofthe theSiC SiCMOSFET MOSFETmodule modulecan cangive giverise risetotoEMI EMIissues issuesbeyond beyond The faster switching speed the modules. SiC MOSFET give rise to gets EMI issues beyond what is end of what isiscustomary for IGBT typical practice, EMI near the what customary forSi Siof IGBT modules. InInmodule typicalcan practice, EMI getsaddressed addressed near the end of customary for Si IGBT modules. In typical practice, EMI gets addressed near the end of the product the theproduct productdevelopment developmentprocess processwhen whenlarge largesections sectionsofofthe thedesign designare arefrozen; frozen;however, however,this this development process when large sectionsfreedom of the design are frozen; however,The severely limits the severely the ofofdesign totomitigate EMI isistoto severelylimits limits thedegrees degrees design freedom mitigate EMIissues. issues. this Theusual usualsolution solution degrees ofswitching design freedom todown mitigate EMI The usual solution is to Unfortunately, slow the switching speed down slow until the EMI are method slowthe the switchingspeed speed down until theissues. EMIrequirements requirements aremet. met. Unfortunately,this this method until the EMI requirements are met. Unfortunately, this method compromises the key speed advantage compromises compromisesthe thekey keyspeed speedadvantage advantageofofSiC SiCMOSFETs. MOSFETs. Therefore, Therefore,ititisisimportant importanttotoaddress addressof SiC MOSFETs. Therefore, it is important to address EMI early in the design process. EMI early in the design process. EMI early in the design process. One of the critical things to address in the EMI design is the effects of fast dV/dt. Changing the voltage One things the design isisthe effects Oneofaofthe thecritical critical things toaddress address theEMI EMI design the effectsofoffast fastdV/dt. dV/dt. Changing Changingthe the across capacitor results into current flowinin given by the following equation: voltage voltageacross acrossaacapacitor capacitorresults resultsinincurrent currentflow flowgiven givenby bythe thefollowing followingequation: equation: 𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑 𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑 𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼==𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶 𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑 𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑 AAsmall smallyet yetfinite finitecapacitance capacitanceexists existsbetween betweenthe thetraces tracesininthe theSiC SiCMOSFET MOSFETmodule modulesubstrate substrate A small yet finite capacitance exists between the traces in the SiC MOSFET module substrate and and andthe themounting mountingbaseplate. baseplate. The Thehigh highvalues valuesofofdV/dt dV/dtgive giverise risetotoextremely extremelyfast fastand and the mounting baseplate. The high values of dV/dt give rise to extremely fast and significantly large significantly large displacement current spikes that get injected into the module heat sink. significantly large displacement current spikes that get injected into the module heat sink. This This displacement current spikes that get injected into the module heat sink. This path also exists when using path also exists when using a SiC IGBT module; however, the dV/dt is significantly slower. This path also exists when using a SiC IGBT module; however, the dV/dt is significantly slower. This a SiC IGBT module; however, the dV/dt is significantly slower. This situation is illustrated in Figure 22. situation situationisisillustrated illustratedininFigure Figure22. 22. AC AC MAINS MAINS AC AC M1 M1 Common Common mode modechoke choke CD1 CD1 HF HF OUTPUT OUTPUT AC AC M2 M2 Heatsink Heatsink CD2 CD2 YY Capacitors Capacitors Displacement Displacementcurrent currentpath path LLSTRAY STRAY Common Commonmode modecurrent current Ground Ground Misc Miscconductive conductivepathways pathways through throughthe theenclosure enclosure Figure Figure22: 22: Displacement Displacementcurrent currentpath path Figure 22: Displacement current path The Themodule modulesubstrate substratecoupling couplingcapacitances capacitancesare areidentified identifiedas asCD1 CD1and andCD2. CD2. The Thefast fastdV/dt dV/dt present atatthe output OUTPUT) causes flow present thehigh highfrequency frequency output(HF (HFare OUTPUT) causes displacement currents to flowinto into The module substrate coupling capacitances identified as CD1displacement and CD2. The currents fast dV/dtto present at the the Consider M2 isisaathe rapid change ininvoltage theheatsink. heatsink.output Consider thecase casewhen whenMOSFET MOSFET M2switches: switches: there rapid change voltage high frequency (HF the OUTPUT) causes displacement currents tothere flow into heatsink. Consider the on which isisswitches: connected totothe OUTPUT, and aadisplacement through onthe thedrain drain which connected the HF OUTPUT, and displacement current flows through case when MOSFET M2 there is aHF rapid change in voltage on the draincurrent which isflows connected to the CD2 and heatsink. current flows through conductive pathways such CD2 andinto into the heatsink.The The current flows through miscellaneous conductive pathways such HF OUTPUT, andthe a displacement current flows through CD2miscellaneous and into the heatsink. The current flows through as mounting brackets enclosure itself. YYcapacitors asfasteners, fasteners,conductive mountingpathways bracketsand andthe thefasteners, enclosure itself. The The capacitors willhave havesome someThe Y miscellaneous such as mounting brackets and the will enclosure itself. capacitors will have some effect on directing this current back to the source of M2; however, some stray 18 18 CPWR-AN12, REV A 18 Understanding the Effects of Parasitic Inductance This document is provided for informational purposes only and is not a warranty or a specification. For product specifications, please see the data sheets available at www.cree.com/power. For warranty information, please contact Cree Sales at [email protected]. effect on directing this current back to the source of M2; however, some stray inductance will be present to limit their effectiveness. The remainder of the displacement current flows into the mains ground lead, resulting in additional conductive EMI. Furthermore, this displacement current flowing difficult-to-identify paths inside the actdisplacement as a loop antenna, inductance will be in present to limit their effectiveness. The enclosure remainder will of the current flows injecting voltage spikes nearby wires andconductive conductors. This can be problematic with control into the mains ground lead,onto resulting in additional EMI. Furthermore, this displacement current loops in and fault detection circuits. flowing difficult-to-identify paths inside the enclosure will act as a loop antenna, injecting voltage spikes onto nearby wires and conductors. This can be problematic with control loops and fault detection circuits. One of the most effective ways to mitigate this issue is to provide a definite local return path for One of the most effective ways to mitigate this issue is to provide a definite local return path for the the displacement current. There are some general approaches to mitigating displacement displacement current. There are some general approaches to mitigating displacement current by essentially current by essentially breaking the loop and providing a local return path for the displacement breaking the loop and providing a local return path for the displacement currents. The first approach currents. The first approach is to simply float the heatsink and provide a current path back to is to simply float the heatsink and provide a current path back to the source of M2 using an additional the source of M2 using an additional capacitor. This approach is shown in Figure 23. This capacitor. This approach is shown in Figure 23. This effectively breaks the path; however, it might not effectively breaks the path; however, it might not always be possible to do this because of always be possible to do this because of mechanical or safety constraints. Another option is to connect the mechanical or safety constraints. Another option is to connect the heatsink to ground through heatsink to ground through some high permeability choke as shown in Figure 24. The choke will introduce some high permeability choke as shown in Figure 24. The choke will introduce high impedance high impedance at high frequencies, while providing a low resistance connection to ground at the mains at high frequencies, while providing a low resistance connection to ground at the mains frequency. This approach retains the safety feature of keeping the heat sink grounded. frequency. This approach retains the safety feature of keeping the heat sink grounded. CD1 M1 CD1 M1 HF OUTPUT HF OUTPUT M2 Heatsink M2 Heatsink CD2 CD2 C L C Ground Figure 23: Float heatsink Figure 24: Inductively isolate heat sink Figure 23: Float heatsink Figure 24: Inductively isolate heat sink 19 CPWR-AN12, REV A 19 Understanding the Effects of Parasitic Inductance This document is provided for informational purposes only and is not a warranty or a specification. For product specifications, please see the data sheets available at www.cree.com/power. For warranty information, please contact Cree Sales at [email protected]. Conclusions and Recommendations: The customary application guidelines for Si IGBT modules are only a subset of what is needed to optimally apply SiC MOSFET modules. Power circuit parasitic inductances and capacitances form resonant circuits that lead to voltage overshoots under hard switched conditions. Due to the extremely fast switching speeds attainable with SiC MOSFETs, the voltage overshoot occurring at turn-on can easily exceed the maximum device voltage rating. Introducing loss into the power circuit to damp the overshoots is typically impractical. Control of the overshoots (without reverting to a snubber) can be effectively accomplished by controlling the voltage fall time of the corresponding MOSFET that is turning on. This can easily be accomplished by selecting the appropriate turn-off gate resistance to ensure that the fall time is greater than the period of the natural frequency of the resonance. Multiple points of minimum overshoot exist at approximate integer multiples of the resonant frequency period. The fastest allowable switching speed is achieved by designing the power circuit to push the resonant frequency as high as possible. The capacitive portion of the resonant circuit is part of the SiC MOSFET/JBS diode combination and is therefore fixed. The parasitic inductance can be minimized by careful layout practices. The fast switching speed of the SiC MOSFET module also requires careful attention to EMI considerations, which need to be addressed early in the design cycle. Simply slowing down the switching speed to meet EMI requirements defeats the purpose of using SiC MOSFETs. One of the chief concerns is the displacement currents flowing through the module baseplate following path. It is recommended that steps be taken to break unintentional paths by providing highly localized displacement current paths. Copyright © 2013 Cree, Inc. All rights reserved. The information in this document is subject to change without notice. Cree, the Cree logo, and Zero Recovery are registered trademarks of Cree, Inc. This document is provided for informational purposes only and is not a warranty or a specification. This product is currently available for evaluation and testing purposes only, and is provided “as is” without warranty. For preliminary, non-binding product specifications, please see the preliminary data sheet available at www.cree.com/power. 20 CPWR-AN12, REV A Understanding the Effects of Parasitic Inductance Cree, Inc. 4600 Silicon Drive Durham, NC 27703 USA Tel: +1.919.313.5300 Fax: +1.919.313.5451 www.cree.com/power