* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Mitsubishi Heavy Industries
Three-phase electric power wikipedia , lookup
Electric machine wikipedia , lookup
Electrical substation wikipedia , lookup
Ground (electricity) wikipedia , lookup
Resistive opto-isolator wikipedia , lookup
Electromagnetic compatibility wikipedia , lookup
Power engineering wikipedia , lookup
Electrification wikipedia , lookup
Voltage optimisation wikipedia , lookup
Switched-mode power supply wikipedia , lookup
Mercury-arc valve wikipedia , lookup
Current source wikipedia , lookup
Opto-isolator wikipedia , lookup
Stray voltage wikipedia , lookup
History of electric power transmission wikipedia , lookup
Buck converter wikipedia , lookup
Mains electricity wikipedia , lookup
Surge protector wikipedia , lookup
The 2006-02 - 04th edition 1 2006年 9月 第28回雷保護国際会議 ICLP 2006 KANAZAWA(金沢)発表論文 Reproduction and Test Method of FRP Blade Failure for Wind Power Generators by Lightning Masahiro Hanai, Hiroshi Koyama, Toshiba Corporation, Norio Kubo, Ishikawajima-Harima Heavy Industries Co. Ltd., Yoichi Hashimoto, JFE Engineering Corporation, Isamu Suzuki, Daioh Construction Co. Ltd., Ueda Yoshinori, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Co. Ltd., Haruo Sakamoto, Kochi University of Technology Abstract -- In Japan, the lightning damage to the FRP blade for wind power generators is increasing together with the increase in wind power generator installation in recent years. Since lightning of Japan looks severely than that of Europe and the U.S., lightning damage is a big issue of Japan. In Kochi (Japan), six grade generators which are 600 to 750 kW are installed. Moreover, some of them were damaged by lightning several times. After investigating literature, we got to know what the cause of serious damage does not understand yet. Therefore, we are establishing a test method, while clarifying destructive climate by this lightning, and being able to be made to perform examination of the prevention method of destruction. In the high voltage test, it was shown clearly that lightning penetrates easily FRP that does not perform conductive processing. Moreover, the large current examination showed reappearance of the blade damaged there, and showed the conformity of the failure mechanism and the test method. It turned out that the breakdown situation of a real machine can be explained by the mechanism. If a lightning passes inside a FRP blade, the temperature of air inside a blade will rise. As a result, pressure goes up and a blade is damaged. Moreover, it turned out that breakdown of positive polarity (winter) lightning can be performed by the large current examination with a short circuit generator. The experiment was conducted mainly in the Toshiba Hamakawasaki High Voltage and High Power Testing Laboratory. This testing laboratory is one of the biggest testing laboratories for an experiment about the high voltage and high power in the world. Contact address : Masahiro Hanai Toshiba Corporation 2-1 Ukishima-cho, Kawasaki-ku, Kawasaki 201-0082, Japan. E-mail: [email protected] Index term -- Wind power generator, Lightening protection, FRP blade, Short-circuit generator, Lightning impulse generator, Test method, Pressure I. INTRODUCTION According to the latest global tendency of consideration of maintainable ecology like renewable energy technology, wind power became popular. In Japan, although the power in 1999 was only 2.3x104 kW, the wind power in the termination of the fiscal year in 2001 reached 3x105 kW. The increasing rate of the power generation capacity in wind power is very large. Moreover, the target of wind power generator installation was changed by the Japanese government to 300 to 3000 MW by 2010 in 2001. However, lightning damage is increasing with the increase in installation of an wind power generator. The business-related department of Kochi Prefecture requested Kochi University of Technology in 2002 to inquire by the lightning protection for a FRP blade. We are going to establish protection technology, have consulted literature and have investigated the present knowledge which can be used then since then. However, the acquired information was not essential about a FRP blade lightning damage mechanism and the direct information about protection. A certain information about the lightning protection for the airplane material of non-conductivity was aluminum coating [1] [2]. We tried to check the validity of aluminum coating from the experiment conducted on a previous paper [3] and [4]. An experimental result to aluminum coating is effective in protection of lightning damage. However, aluminum coating will burn by lightning or will melt. As a result, a color changes and it The 2006-02 - 04th edition looks dirtily. For this reason, it is thought that aluminum coating gives one of the methods leading new protection. However, it seems that aluminum coating needs to be improved to a slight degree. Author have done various examinations, in order to investigate the damage mechanism of a FRP blade. In a paper, while explaining the mechanism of damage to a FRP blade, reference is made about that measurement method. In the present experiment, we are using 1/2 scale size model that imitated actual blade composition. Authors have so far done various examinations, in order to investigate the damage mechanism of a FRP blade. In a paper, while explaining the mechanism of damage to a FRP blade, reference is made about that measurement method. In the present experiment, we are using 1/2 scale size model that imitated actual blade composition. The prepared model was prepared three kinds. They are a FRP plate, one half of the scale size test models of a 250kW wind power generator blade, and the 250kW wind power generator full scale blade which divided into four parts. The experiment carried out the high-voltage examination, which verifies whether a lightning penetrates a FRP blade easily, and the large current examination, which verifies whether a FRP blade explodes with the current of a lightning. The failure of examinations showed reproduction for the actual blade failure at site by a lightning almost correctly, and the result proved the compatibility of the measurement method. II. THE FEATURE OF A LIGHTNING, AND ITS SIMULATION The lightning has simultaneously a high voltage and large current (energy). For this reason, we need to have test equipment that generates the high voltage and large current (energy) which a lightning has as shown in Figure 1 about a method, in order to conduct the experiment that imitated the lightning. The high voltage determines the root. Moreover, the amount of large current & electric charges determines the damage that a lightning generates. However, we cannot fulfill two conditions by existing test 2 equipment simultaneously. Therefore, the experiment examined with the equipment made to generate either the high voltage or large current. At the first step of the reappearance examination, even if there was no conductive material behind FRP, we checked whether a lightning would penetrate a FRP blade easily by the high-voltage examination. At the second step, when a lightning passed along the inside of a FRP blade by large current examination, it was checked whether a FRP blade would explode. All of the high-voltage examination and large current examination that simulated the lightning were performed in Hamakawasaki high-voltage and large current testing laboratory of Toshiba. III. HIGH VOLTAGE EXPERIMENT A. High-voltage impulse test The rated capacity 6MV impulse voltage generator is used in testing as shown in Figure 2. The size of a specimen is a FRP board with a length of 2,500mm, a width of 430mm, and a thickness of 4mm. The FRP board fixed at the lower part, and as a test piece did not break, it stood and installed it. The distance between a FRP board and a high-voltage electrode is 500mm. Three kinds of FRP materials are used for an experiment. They are two kinds of FRP containing glass fiber, and FRP in which the copper mesh is contained with glass fiber. And aluminum coating was performed to each FRP test specimen again. And a total of six kinds of test specimen were prepared. As follows, the procedure of the experiment charged the impulse voltage generator to 2MV, and applied it to the high voltage rod electrode. The air gap between a high-voltage electrode and a test piece generated electric discharge in 400 to 1,000 kV, discharge current flowed through the surface of FRP. The peak current at that time was about 20kA. Ten electric discharge examinations were carried out to each test specimen. The days when the experiment was conducted were 74% of humidity, the temperature of 4-degree Celsius, and the atmospheric pressure of 1,015 hPa. High Voltage Electrode Discharge FRP Plate Figure 1 Approach to Lightning with High Voltage and High Power Equipment Figure 2 6MV Impulse Voltage Generator and Set-up of FRP Plate for High Voltage Experiment The 2006-02 - 04th edition B. Result Table 1 shows the result of each experiment. All electric discharge of the lightning flowed through the course of aluminum coating about the sample equipped with aluminum coating. Although there were some points that aluminum showed dissolution partially, there was no penetration of FRP. FRP damaged area of two kinds of FRP samples that do not carry out aluminum coating on the other hand. In FRP of 45 degrees textile, electric discharge penetrated FRP, and generated damage about 30mm in diameter through the same course with 10 times. Also, electric discharge penetrated FRP of special textile, also made the small hole in several places, and penetrated. On the other hand, although FRP containing a copper mesh did not carry out penetration. But the serious burn happened along the internal copper mesh. As mentioned above, in FRP that does not perform conductive processing, it turned out that a lightning is penetrated easily and it trespasses upon an inside. For this reason, at the following step, it was investigated whether a site accident could be reproduced when large current would be sent inside a blade. 3 Table 2 IEC Protection Level [5] Protection Level IEC 61024-1-1 I II III Peak current (kA) 200 150 100 Specific energy (kJ/Ω) 10000 5600 2500 Average rate Total current of current rise transfer (kA/µs) (C) 200 300 150 225 100 150 Table 3 Parametric Values in Experiments by Short Circuit Generator Protection Level I Equivalent II Equivalent III Equivalent IV (Option) Peak current (kA) 47.1 35.3 23.6 12.5 Specific energy (kJ/Ω) 11100 6230 2780 Average rate Total current of current rise transfer (kA/µs) (C) 0.0109 300 0.0082 225 0.0055 150 80 1m IV. LARGE CURRENT EXAMINATION A. An experimental condition and a setup According to the technical report of IEC-International Electrotechnical Commission (TR61400-24) [5], the experimental conditions were determined. Table 2 shows the IEC values describing the lightning parameter. The protection levels I is the highest total current transfer. Using the short circuit generator to conduct the large current & charge experiment, we set the protection level shown in Table 3. Although the peak current and average rate of current rise between Tables 2 and 3 are different, the specific energy and total current transfer are almost the same in two cases. We think that the total current transfer is the most effective value. Since the lowest total current transfer in Table 2 is 150 C, we add the 80 C as our optional value in Table 3. The test piece of the 1/2 size model is 1/2 width and 1/2 thickness of those for the 250 kW power generator. However, the length was determined to be 1 m, although the length of actual blade is 12.6 m. Figure 3 shows the set-up of the 1/2 scale size model blade. The electricity to the electrode shown at the upper side of the figure comes from the short circuit generator shown in Figure 4. The guidance of the electric was selected in two ways. One is on the surface of the blade, being guided by a copper Table 1 High Voltage Experiment Results 45 degree GPRP Special weave GPRP GFRP with copper mesh With aluminum coating Without aluminum coating Passed the aluminum coating portion Passed the aluminum coating portion Penetrated on the back side of FRP Penetrated on the back side of FRP Penetrated into the copper mesh portion in FRP Passed the aluminum coating portion Figure 3 Set up of 1/2 Scale Size Model Specimens Figure 4 Short Circuit Generator for Large Current Experiment small wire. The other is in the inside of the blade, and the wire is guided into the blade from the tip of the electrode. For the 1/4 cut piece of the actual blade (The location is 2/4 from the tip side), the same lightning experiment was conducted. Figure 5 shows the set-up. The figure shows that the 1/4 blade was put on the floor, and the electrode is upper on the blade. The electricity guidance to the inside of the blade is from the tip side face of the test piece about 1m (left hand of the right figure) to the artificial hole (right of the right figure) The 2006-02 - 04th edition 4 1m Figure 5 Set-up of Full Scale 1/4 Cut Model Specimens B. Result 1) The experimental result by one half of size specimens A result is summarized to Table 4. The first three experiments are the ones for the surface current. Table 4 also shows the number of the tests at the left hand. No. 13 are sides A-1 and A-2. Figures 6 shows the result of No. 3, that is one of blade burned. Although No.1 and 2 in Table 4 is not shown in figures, bu the result is almost same, and the blade was burned. Therefore, if the current flows on the surface of the blade, the surface is burned, and no explosion. There remains smoke and soot. It looks that the function of the FRP blade is capable to be used again. However, when the lightning current once flows into the blade, the blade explodes. Figure 7 shows the results of Actual current and Arc voltage waveform for the No. 4 in Table 4 test, which is the one of the inside current case using TP-1. The TP-1 was used after the tests No.1-3 were finished. The result was explosion of the blade as shown in figure 8. As well as the case of No. 4, No. 5 using TP-2 exploded. In the tests of 1-3, the lightning current flew on the surface of the blade. The state of smoke and soot did not depend on the total current transferred. 2) The experimental result by enough size specimens The result of the full scale 1/4 cut model specimens is shown in Figure 9. Size blade with a sufficient portion of 2/4 from the chip side also exploded. Since the power of the burst was frightful, the blade was fixed with the rope, Figure 6 Results for 1/2 Scale Size Model Specimens (Surface Current of 281C) 10ms Terminal Voltage Current Arc Voltage 1kV Figure 7 Current and Arc Voltage Waveform of Large Current Test (Inside Current of 146C) Table 4 Conditions and Results of Large Current Test Actual condition Copper Planned Peak Total Wire Level Current Current Location (kA) (C) Surface 11.9 70.3 IV Side A-1 1/2 21.4 129 III Model TP-1 Surface 45.6 281 I Side A-2 No. Test Piece Result & Figures 1 Surface Burned 2 3 4 Inside 5 1/2 Inside TP-2 FULL Inside -1(2/4) 6 Surface Burned Surface Burned IV 11.1 66.4 Exploded III 22.9 146 Exploded I 42.2 264 Exploded Figure 8 Results for 1/2 Scale Size Model Specimens (Inside Current of 66.4C) but the blade was damaged at the place where this rope was rolled. Immediately after conducting a lightning experiment, as we needed to use the fire extinguisher, smoke and fire arose. The 2006-02 - 04th edition 4m Figure 9 Results for Full Scale 1/4 Cut Model Specimens V. DISCUTTION A. The simulation of a positive polarity (winter) lightning with a short circuit This time, the large current examination that determines the damage of a lightning was performed using the waveform of the commercial frequency current of 50Hz with the short circuit generator. On the other hand, as shown in Tables 2 and 3, in the examination using the current of the lightning parameter decided by IEC TR-61400-24, and this commercial frequency, current increasing rates differ greatly. However, the lightning strike current of the positive polarity (winter) lightning actually surveyed in Japan Sea has a very small current increasing rate to Figure 10 [6]. It turns out that especially the first peak current has rise time with a frequency of about 50Hz. For this reason, even if simulating current using a short circuit generator, it is considered that the current of a positive polarity (winter) lightning with such a low current increasing rate is satisfactory. Current (kA) 15 10ms: 1/2 cycle of 50Hz 10 5 be occurred also at the total charges of 75C. The following things can be considered as this cause. First, the heat by current flowing occurs. For this reason, air inside a blade expands and high pressure is occurred. As a result, a blade explodes, without the ability to bear high internal pressure. As shown in Figure 8, it turned out that the arc in an air is shared in the voltage of 1000 V/m at 23kA current from this experimental result. As a result, the calorific value (W) per 1 meter by an arc is following. W=∫(V*I) dt = V*∫ (I) dt =V*Q (1) where W is the calorific value (J), V is the arc voltage (V), I is the arc current (A) and Q is the total amounts of electric charges (C). When arc voltages are assumed to be 1000 V/m and the total amount 75C of electric charges, the quantity of heat of 90 kJ/m will occur inside a blade. We can calculate the temperature rise of the air in the 1/2 Scale Size Model Specimen using the specific heat and volume of air. At total current is 146C, the temperature rise of the air will become about 14000 degrees Celsius and air will expand, if it calculates by making it a base, and it contributes to the pressure increase of a blade altogether, the pressure inside a blade will rise to about 50 atm. Since it seems that it has still sufficiently high pressure even if air by this expansion escapes through the hole of a blade etc., it can explain that a blade explodes. Since an actual blade is 4 times the volume of this 1/2 scale size model, the almost same pressure increase occurs in 300C whose amount of electric charges is 4 times of the 75C, and it can explain that a blade explodes similarly. As mentioned above, FRP blade failure of the wind power generator by a lightning showed clearly that it is reproducible with the high-voltage examination by lightning impulse voltage generating equipment, and the large current examination, which uses a short circuit generator. VI. CONCLUSION 5 0 0 10 20 30 Time (ms) 40 50 Figure 10 Observed Waveform of Positive Polarity Lightning Current [6] B. The mechanism of blade failure From the result of a high-voltage examination, when the blade has conductivity, a lightning does not invade the inside of a blade. On the other hand, when the blade is using FRP with high insulation performance, a lightning penetrates FRP easily and can invade the inside of a blade. From the result of a large current test examination, if a lightning invades the inside of a blade, an explosion will In order to solve the mechanism in which a lightning does damage to the blade of a wind power generator and to work on the measure, the high-voltage examination and the large current examination were carried out. As a result, the following things became clear. 1. By high-voltage examination, a lightning penetrates the board made from FRP of an insulator easily. 2. At the blade model of 1/2 scale, in the large current examination which uses a short circuit generator, when the course of the lightning went into the inside of a blade, the explosion was occurred at 66C. This value is below the total amount 80C of electric charge transfers, which is a 50% value of a positive polarity (winter) lightning. 3. When the course of a lightning was the blade surface, it became damage only to a little burn of the surface also in the total amount 281C of electric charge transfers The 2006-02 - 04th edition equivalent to level I. 4. The survey current wave type of the positive polarity (winter) lightning resembles well the half-wave of the alternating voltage, which uses a short circuit generator. 5. The damage situation of the blade model in the large current examination performed with alternating voltage resembles damage to the blade of a real machine. And it turned out that verification of the lightning strike damage decided by IEC TR 61400-24 could be performed in the large current examination, which used the short circuit generator. 6. FRP blade failure of the wind power generator by a lightning showed clearly that it is reproducible with the high-voltage examination by lightning impulse voltage generating equipment, and the large current examination with a short circuit generator. VII. RECOGNITION The authors greatly acknowledge the support from the Kochi prefecture government VIII. REFERENCE [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] R.H. Golde, Lightning Volume 2, Lightning Protection, Academic Press,1977 F.A. Fisher, J.A. Plumer, and et al, Lightning Protection of Aircraft, Lightning Technology Inc., 1999 H. Sakamoto, et al, “Lightning Protection of FRP Blades for Wind Power Generators”, World Renewable Energy Conference Denver, Colorado, Sept. 2004 H. Sakamoto and M. Hanai, “Reproduction and Mechanism of FRP Blades Failure for Wind Power Generators”, Journal, JSME, to be submitted 2005. Wind turbine generator systems-Part24: Lightning Protection, IEC TR 61400-24 K. Yamashita, Y. Mizutani, D. Tanaka, M.Yoda and I. Miyachi, ”Positive and Negative Current Wveform of RocketTriggered Lightning”, in Proc. 1999 Annual Meeting Record of IEE of Japan , No.1639, pp.7-30 6