* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Living with a Red Dwarf - Center for Space and Habitability (CSH)
Space Interferometry Mission wikipedia , lookup
Perseus (constellation) wikipedia , lookup
Cygnus (constellation) wikipedia , lookup
Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems wikipedia , lookup
International Ultraviolet Explorer wikipedia , lookup
IAU definition of planet wikipedia , lookup
Observational astronomy wikipedia , lookup
Astrobiology wikipedia , lookup
Future of an expanding universe wikipedia , lookup
Stellar classification wikipedia , lookup
Formation and evolution of the Solar System wikipedia , lookup
Corvus (constellation) wikipedia , lookup
Circumstellar habitable zone wikipedia , lookup
History of Solar System formation and evolution hypotheses wikipedia , lookup
Definition of planet wikipedia , lookup
Aquarius (constellation) wikipedia , lookup
Exoplanetology wikipedia , lookup
Rare Earth hypothesis wikipedia , lookup
Stellar kinematics wikipedia , lookup
Stellar evolution wikipedia , lookup
Extraterrestrial atmosphere wikipedia , lookup
Planetary system wikipedia , lookup
Astronomical spectroscopy wikipedia , lookup
Extraterrestrial life wikipedia , lookup
Star formation wikipedia , lookup
Exoclimes 2014, Davos Living with a Red Dwarf Raymond T. Pierrehumbert The University of Chicago 1 Exoclimes 2014, Davos The H-R diagram 2 Exoclimes 2014, Davos What makes a star shine? • Fusion of light elements into heavy elements • Hydrogen is by far the most abundant fuel in the Universe • Main sequence stars burn H into He • 90% of stars are main sequence stars • Stars do not evolve along the Main Sequence. they enter the Main Sequence when they start fusing H, and leave it when H fuel is exhausted 3 Exoclimes 2014, Davos The mass-luminosity relation Luminosity: The power output of a star For stars burning H to He, L∼ M 4 M 2.3 ifM > .4M ifM < .4M → Low-mass stars are dimmer 4 Exoclimes 2014, Davos Relation between color, luminosity and mass • For any radiating body, dominant wavelength is inversely proportional to temperature • Cooler = more red. Hotter = more blue • Relevant temperature for star is ”surface” (photosphere) temperature, where light escapes from 5 Exoclimes 2014, Davos Relation between color, luminosity and mass L = 4πr2σT 4, so T 4 ∼ L/r(M )2 r(M ) ∼ M α, (e.g. α = 1 3 if mean density were constant). Then: T ∼ M 1− 12 α M .575− 1 2α ifM > .4M ifM < .4M → Low-mass stars smaller, cooler and redder 6 Exoclimes 2014, Davos How long does a main sequence star shine? e p p n He 4.3 x 10-12 joules p n p E = 6.4 x 1014 joules/(kg H) p p e Total conversion lifetime t∞ = M · E/L 100 billion years for Sun, – vs 10 billion years actual main sequence lifetime for a Sunlike star 7 Exoclimes 2014, Davos To burn H, you have to mix it into the core Helium “ash” accumulates here e Photosp tiv ive re iat Conve c Rad H H H Fusion H He re he n gio High Mass Star H He He H H Fusion He H He H Low Mass Star 8 Exoclimes 2014, Davos From mass-luminosity relation, total conversion lifetime is: t∞,( M )−3 M t∞ = E·M = L 4.7t∞,( M )−1.3 M ifM > .4M ifM < .4M e.g. 2.2 trillion years for M = .3M (like GJ581) M stars are extremely long-lived, evolve slowly 9 Exoclimes 2014, Davos M stars in the Universe Commonly estimated that 70% of stars (76% of main-sequence stars) are M-dwarfs But our ability to do a complete census of dim stars is limited, even in our own galaxy. 10 Exoclimes 2014, Davos M stars in our neighborhood 1 0.6 54% 0.4 The Sun Fraction of stars 0.8 0.2 0 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000 Temperature (K) Gliese catalog of the ∼ 3, 803 stars within 25 parsecs (82 light years) 11 Exoclimes 2014, Davos 46 of the 71 stars in the 50 nearest systems are M stars 12 Exoclimes 2014, Davos Our closest neighbor is an M-star A B α Centauri 400 Nept une orbi ts Proxima Centauri T = 3042 K L = .0017Lsun 13 Exoclimes 2014, Davos Radial velocity surveys e.g. HARPS (Chile) 14 Exoclimes 2014, Davos Transit method 15 Exoclimes 2014, Davos Ground based transit surveys MEarth WASP/Super-WASP 16 Exoclimes 2014, Davos Kepler: Space-based transit survey 17 Exoclimes 2014, Davos Do planets form around M-stars? Planets with known mass 100 Too Cold Too Hot 1 Gas Giants (no surface) 0.1 0.01 0.001 0.0001 0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 Solar Energy Received (Relative to Earth) 100 Lose Atmosphere Planet Mass (in Jupiters) 10 18 Exoclimes 2014, Davos Do planets form around M-stars? =7-/$'#%F.'*%G/"F/%+-8.1#%05+-/#.'%8$'$3'."/#4 5""%6"78 5""%9"' <: < ,-#%,.-/'# %0/"%#1+2-3$4 :;< :;:< :;::< :;:::< :;:::< :;::< :;:< :;< < <: @"7-+%A/$+BC%D$3$.E$8%0D$7-'.E$%'"%A-+'*4 <:: !"#$% &'("#)*$+$ =7-/$'%>"71($%0./%?1).'$+#4 <:: 19 Exoclimes 2014, Davos Red dwarfs are redder than the Sun... 1.2 irradiance (ADLEO) Planck3390K Irradiance (Sun) Planck5780K Normalized irradiance 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 1 2 3 Wavelength (microns) 4 5 20 Exoclimes 2014, Davos ... but not so red as the name implies 21 Exoclimes 2014, Davos Consequences: Not as much blue to make the sky blue Atmosphere reflects much energy back to space Atmosphere reflects little energy back to space All other things being equal, M-dwarf planets absorb more of the incident stellar radiation 22 Exoclimes 2014, Davos But more of the stellar radiation is deposited high in the atmosphere, less at the ground and in deep atmosphere 23 Exoclimes 2014, Davos Implies weaker convection, shallower troposphere absorption here T(z ) T(z ) absorption here G star (Earthlike case) M-star planet 24 Exoclimes 2014, Davos Consequences:Ice and snow are not as ”white” as on Earth Planck 3000K Planck 6000K -1 10 6 1 10 4 0.8 100 0.6 1 0.4 0.01 0.2 Normalized stellar spectrum Extinction coeff (cm ) water ice absorption 0 0.0001 0.1 1 10 100 Wavelength (microns) 1000 25 Exoclimes 2014, Davos Reduced reflectivity contrast between ice/snow and ocean makes it harder for a planet to freeze over and turn into a Snowball Shields, et al Astrobiology 2013, computed with 300ppm CO2 26 But this doesn’t affect the outer edge of the habitable zone, because the dense atmospheres needed to make a planet habitable there make the planetary reflectivity nearly independent of the surface characteristics. Exoclimes 2014, Davos For dim stars, habitable zone planets are in close orbits L~ = RL2 (L in units of Solar luminosity, R = orbital dist. in a.u.) L~ = 1 → R = 1 2 L = .44M 1.15 (M measured in Solar masses) Orbital period (Earth years): P = R1.5/M .5 = .39M 1.22 e.g for Gliese 581: M = .3 → R = .11 a.u. P = .09 years = 33 Earth days 27 Exoclimes 2014, Davos Strong tidal stresses slow the planets rotation e c or centrifugal gravity , ity av d gr war g n on d i str ulle p f y l t vi rd uga a gr twa trif ak ou cen e w led y b l Pu Stress: M/r3 = 11.7M −2.45 (e.g. 1 for Earth, 17.25 for Mercury, 223 for the HZ of GJ581) For circular orbit, end-state is tide-locked 28 Exoclimes 2014, Davos Tide-locked planets in circular orbits have permanent dayside and nightside Substellar point (local noon, where star is directly overhead) is geographically fixed 29 Exoclimes 2014, Davos Slow rotation → weak Coriolis force → weak temperature gradients in the atmosphere i.e. atmosphere doesn’t condense out onto the nightside 30 Exoclimes 2014, Davos But there can be strong temperature gradients near the surface, 31 Exoclimes 2014, Davos ... and even ice formation if the planet has an ocean 32 Exoclimes 2014, Davos But if the orbit is elliptical ... • Variation in orbital angular speed with distance from star means that exact tide-locked states are no longer possible. • Quasi-synchronous states, where substellar point rocks back and forth a bit • Low-order spin-orbit resonances. (e.g. 3 days per two years, as for Mercury 33 Exoclimes 2014, Davos So, neighborhood of M-dwarfs is great real estate, but there’s a catch ... M-star rotation and deep convection make strong magnetic fields, promote flaring, activity → Strong extreme ultraviolet and X-ray emission (relative to luminosity) 34 Exoclimes 2014, Davos Ultraviolet (UV) is important because ... • Very shortwave ultraviolet (EUV) and X-rays are absorbed high up in the atmosphere, and heat it to the point where the atmosphere can escape to space. • i.e. it’s the rocket fuel that brings molecules up to escape velocity and can launch atmosphere out of the gravity well. • Shorter wave ultraviolet drives photochemistry, and can break up heavy molecules into lighter components that escape more easily. • Low mass stars can take a half billion years to enter the main sequence, and UV/X-ray luminosity is further elevated throughout this time. • But as M stars age on the main sequence, they can quiet down If planets can regenerate an atmosphere later, habitability could be recovered. (but no easy way to regenerate a nitrogen atmosphere). • More on all this in Lecture 2 35 Exoclimes 2014, Davos Summary • There are likely to be many planets in the habitable zone of M stars • With an atmosphere, they would have unusual seasonal/diurnal cycles, shallower tropospheres with weak convection. • Weak horizontal temperature gradients aloft, monsoonal circulations with most of rainfall and warm waters under the substellar point • ... but none of this is a threat to habitability • The main question is whether any of these planets formed with, and retained volatiles (atmosphere, ocean). • But we know some are all atmosphere! (cf. GJ1214b, more in Lecture 3) • Essential next step is a catalog of which M star planets have retained an atmosphere 36