Download Schrödinger`s Equation derived from Newton`s

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

History of Solar System formation and evolution hypotheses wikipedia , lookup

Observational astronomy wikipedia , lookup

Aquarius (constellation) wikipedia , lookup

International Ultraviolet Explorer wikipedia , lookup

Astrobiology wikipedia , lookup

Tropical year wikipedia , lookup

Rare Earth hypothesis wikipedia , lookup

Orrery wikipedia , lookup

Extraterrestrial skies wikipedia , lookup

Extraterrestrial life wikipedia , lookup

Geocentric model wikipedia , lookup

Comparative planetary science wikipedia , lookup

Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems wikipedia , lookup

Astronomical unit wikipedia , lookup

Timeline of astronomy wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
[email protected]
You have to ask yourself the question Alfred: Do I feel lucky? Do ya Alfred?
In 1969 at age 11, I played this real time distance game with 3 numbers
10, 100, and 1000. If an object has a size 10 at 100 meters, then what is the
size of the object at distance 1000 meters?
100 = 100; add and subtract 1000, then:
100 = 1000 - (1000 - 100); divide by 1000
100/1000 = 1000/1000 - (1000 - 100)/1000
100/1000 = 1- (1000 - 100)/1000; multiply by 10
(100/1000) x 10 = 10 - [(1000 - 100)/1000] x 10
(1/10) x 10 = 10 - (9/10) x 10
What I see at distance 1000 = what I see at distance 100 + visual difference
1 = 10 - 9
The answer was very simple (100/1000) x 10 = 1
The visual difference is 10 - 1 = 9
(100/1000) x 10 = 10 - [(1000 - 100)/1000] x 10
I played the same real time distance game with 3 letters instead of three
numbers A, B, and C
A=A
A = B + (A - B)
A/B = B/B + (A - B)/B
A/B = 1 + (A - B)/B
(A/B) C = C + [(A - B)/B] C
This formula gives Einstein's numbers and said Einstein is wrong and NASA is
not needed and not wanted and Alfred Nobel modern physicists can be sent to
work at Macdonald's without loss of subject.
Page 1
Angular velocity θ’0 = 2 π /T0; T0 = orbital period
For Planet Mercury T0 = 88 days x 24 x 3600
Angular velocity accumulation in arc second per century
Is: δ θ’0 = (2 π /T0) [(180/π) (3600) (26526daysx24 hrs x 3600sec/T0)]
And δ θ’0 (Mercury) = 70.75 arc second per century
Everything NASA said about space is all wrong because measuring a planet
motion from two different distances is not the same and it is like seeing a car
from two different distances is not the same. This equation
(A/B) C = C + [(A - B)/B] C
And (A/B) C - C = [(A - B)/B] C
Said: NASA is committing error and the error is a visual effect in the value
of: [(A - B)/B] C that have/had crippled science used by time travelers
to use it as the magic sock to claim all these stupid things about space
If C = δ θ’0 = 70.75; A = Mercury - Sun distance = 58.2 x 109 km/sec
And B = Earth - Sun distance then = 149.6 x 109 km/sec, then
[(A - B)/B] C = ([(58.2 x 109) - (149.6 x 109)]/ (149.6 x 109)] x 70.75
= 43 arc sec per century
Urbain Jean Joseph Le Verrier the French Ass - Tronomer m ade
the same mistake
Levier said
The angular velocity of Mercury around the Sun is: θ m' = v m /r m
And δ θ’0 = (v m /r m) (180/π) (3600) (26526/Tm); Tm = 88 days
And δ θ’0 = 70.75; v m = Mercury orbital velocity around the Sun
And v m = 48.1 km/sec; r m = Mercury - Sun distance
If Planet Mercury angular speed is measured for planet Mercury from
the sun then, then it is θ m' = v m /r m
But Urbain Jean Joseph Le Verrier lethal mistake is
If planet Mercury around the sun measured from earth:
Then θ m' (Earth) = (v m + v e)/r m
And v e Earth orbital velocity around the Sun
Page 2
Earth
Mercury
Sun
And θ m' (Earth) = v
And not v
m
/r
m
/r
m
/r
m
+v
/r
m
m
Le Verrier mistake is: v
e
The angular speed delay is: v*
Or, [(v e/v m) (v
e
e
/r
m
/r m)]
m
Taking into account Earth rotation vº
e
Liverier mistake: Then the angular speed delay:
Is: v
e
/r
m
= [v*
e
/r
m
+/- vº
e
/r m]
In arc second per century multiplying by [(180/ π) (3600) (26526/T)]
Then δ θ’0 = [(v*
e
+/- vº e) /r m] [(180/π) (3600) (26526/T)]
Page 3
And δ θ’0 = [(v* e +/- vº e) /v m)] (v m /r m) [(180/π) (3600) (26526/88)]
With earth orbital speed of v* e = 29.8 km/sec
And spin of Earth vº e = 0.465 km/sec
And v m = 48.14 km/sec
Then: [(v* e +/- vº e) /v m)] =0.61
And (v m /r m) [(180/π) (3600) (26526/88)] = 70.75
And δ θ’0 = 0.61 x 70.75 = 43 arc second per century
Page 4
What is amazing about NASA and the international astronomical Union
is total incompetence to realize that astronomer's study of the same
stars and each have different astronomical values and their values
differ from satellite values is as clear as water.
23.4°
23.4°
When an astronomer starts studying a star using a telescope, Earth
precession changes the direction of the telescope and his reading
changes not only due to star motion but also due to earth precession.
When an astronomer does not read the data in real time he commits an
error and the location of telescope has to have a real time Earth
precession based on his location because Earth precession can have
different readings dependent upon location.
Page 5
At Maximum reading of Earth precession angle of 23.4 a reading of the
perihelion looks twisted as if it is at a different location. There are three
angles involved in this mess axial tilt and motion tilt and rotational tilt.
The total of [sine (θ m +θ r + θ t)] x (v m /r m) [(180/π) (3600) (26526/88)]
Or, [sine (θ m +θ r + θ t)] x (2 π /T m) [(180/π) (3600) (26526/88)]
I - Axial tilt correction factor of θ t = 23.4°
Telescope
23.4
II - Motional tilt θ
m
= sine-1 [(Mercury period)/ (Earth period)]
= sine-1 (Tm/Te) = sine-1 (88/365.26) = 13.94°
Earth
Mercury
Sun
Page 6
III - Rotational tilt: θ r = sine-1 (1/88) = 0.65°
And the answer is:
[Sine (θ
m
+θ r + θ t)] x (2 π /T m) [(180/π) (3600) (26526/88)]
= [Sine (13.94 + 0.65 + 23.4)] x 70.75
= 0.6155 x 70.75 = 43.55
However, the rotational effect is changing from θ r to - θ
r
[Sine (13.94 - 0.65 + 23.4)] x 70.75 =42.27
And averaging (43.55 + 42.27)/2 = 43
Or drop θ r: [Sine (θ
m
+ θ t)] x (2 π /T m) [(180/π) (3600) (26526/88)]
And δ θ’0 = [Sine (13.9 +23.4)] x 70.75 = 0.606 x 70.75 = 43
All rights reserved
Page 7