* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Energy in the Fields Linear Momentum
Magnetochemistry wikipedia , lookup
Static electricity wikipedia , lookup
History of electromagnetic theory wikipedia , lookup
Electrostatics wikipedia , lookup
Electricity wikipedia , lookup
History of electrochemistry wikipedia , lookup
Magnetic monopole wikipedia , lookup
Lorentz force wikipedia , lookup
Maxwell's equations wikipedia , lookup
Computational electromagnetics wikipedia , lookup
Electromagnetic field wikipedia , lookup
To review, in our original presentation of Maxwell’s equations, ρall and J~all represented all charges, both “free” and “bound”. Upon separating them, “free” from “bound”, we have (dropping quadripole terms): I For the electric field I I I I I ~ called electric field E P~ called electric polarization is induced field ~ called electric displacement is field of “free charges” D ~ = 0 E ~ + P~ D For the magnetic field I I I I Physics 504, Spring 2011 Electricity and Magnetism Shapiro Poynting, Energy and Momentum in the fields, Tµν Poynting’s Theorem Energy in the Fields The rate of work done by E&M fields on charged particles is: X ~ xj , t), qj ~vj · E(~ ~ called magnetic induction (unfortunately) B ~ called magnetization is the induced field M ~ called magnetic field H ~ = 1B ~ −M ~ H µ0 Harmonic Fields Then the two Maxwell equations with sources, Gauss for ~ and Ampère, get replaced by E ~ ~ · E ~ ×H ~ +H ~ ·∇ ~ ×E ~ = −∇ ~ E ~ ×H ~ −H ~ · ∂B −∇ ∂t where we used Faraday’s law. Thus Physics 504, Spring 2011 Electricity and Magnetism Shapiro Poynting, Energy and Momentum in the fields, Tµν Poynting’s Theorem Dispersion Harmonic Fields dP~mech dt = X j Z = V F~j = X ~ xj ) + ~vj × B(~ ~ xj ) qj E(~ j ~ + J~ × B, ~ ρE provided no particles enter or leave the region V . Let us postulate that the electromagnetic field has a linear momentum density 1 ~ ~ = 0 E ~ × B. ~ ~g = 2 E ×H c ~ ~ ×H ~ − ∂D ∇ ∂t ! ~ · E. we have ∂u ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ = 0. +J ·E+∇· E×H ∂t As this is true for any volume, we may interpret this equation, integrated over some volume V with surface ∂V as saying that the rate of increase in the energy in the fields plus the energy of the charged particles plus the flux of energy out of the volume is zero, that is, no energy is created or destroyed. The flux of energy is then given by the Poynting vector Physics 504, Spring 2011 Electricity and Magnetism Shapiro Poynting, Energy and Momentum in the fields, Tµν Poynting’s Theorem Dispersion Harmonic Fields ~=E ~ × H. ~ S Let us assume the medium is linear without dispersion in ~ ∝H ~ and electric and magnetic properties, that is B ~ ∝ E. ~ Then let us propose that the energy density of D the fields is 1 ~ ~ ~ ·H ~ , u(~x, t) = E·D+B 2 So as not to worry about such complications, let’s restrict our discussion to the fundamental description, or alternatively take our medium to be the vacuum, with the fields interacting with distinct charged particles (mj , qj at ~xj (t)). The mechanical linear momentum in some region of space P is P~mech = j mj ~x˙j , so Harmonic Fields Now by Ampère’s Law, ~ ~ ~ · E ~ ×H ~ +E ~ · ∂D + H ~ · ∂ B + J~ · E ~ = 0. ∇ ∂t ∂t Linear Momentum Dispersion This must be the rate of loss of energy U in the fields themselves, so Z dU ~ − J~ · E. = dt V ~ = J~ · E ~ · (V ~ ×W ~ )=W ~ · (∇ ~ ×V ~)−V ~ · (∇ ~ ×W ~ ), ∇ ~ ×H ~ ·E ~ as so we may rewrite ∇ Poynting’s Theorem V ~ ·D ~ = ρ ∇ ~ ∂ D ~ ×H ~ − ∇ = J~ ∂t From the product rule and the cyclic nature of the triple product, we have for any vector fields Shapiro Poynting, Energy and Momentum in the fields, Tµν or if we describe it by current density, Z ~ J~ · E. Dispersion Physics 504, Spring 2011 Electricity and Magnetism We have made assumptions which only fully hold for the vacuum, as we assumed linearity and no dispersion (the ~ to E ~ independent of time). ratio of D Physics 504, Spring 2011 Electricity and Magnetism Shapiro Poynting, Energy and Momentum in the fields, Tµν Poynting’s Theorem Then the total momentum inside the volume V changes at the rate Z dP~Tot ~ + J~ × B ~ + 0 ∂ (E ~ × B). ~ ρE = dt ∂t V ~ ~ Using Maxwell’s laws to substitute 0 ∇ · E for ρ and ~ ×B ~ − ∂ E/∂t ~ ~ 0 c2 ∇ for J, Dispersion Harmonic Fields dP~Tot dt Z ~ ~ ∇ ~ · E) ~ + c2 (∇ ~ × B) ~ ×B ~ +B ~ × ∂E E( ∂t V ∂ ~ ~ − B×E ∂t Z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ × B) ~ ×B ~ − ∂B × E ~ E(∇ · E) + c2 (∇ = 0 ∂t V Z ~ × B) ~ ×B ~ −E ~× ∇ ~ ×E ~ . ~ ∇ ~ · E) ~ + c2 (∇ = 0 E( = 0 V Physics 504, Spring 2011 Electricity and Magnetism Shapiro Poynting, Energy and Momentum in the fields, Tµν Poynting’s Theorem Dispersion Harmonic Fields Physics 504, Spring 2011 Electricity and Magnetism ~, For any vector field V ~ × (∇ ~ ×V ~ V α = X αβγ Vβ γµν βγµν ∂ Vν ∂xµ Physics 504, Spring 2011 Electricity and Magnetism Shapiro 1 ∂V 2 X ∂Vα − Vβ 2 ∂xα ∂xβ β X ∂ 1 Vα Vβ − V 2 δαβ . = − ∂xβ 2 Poynting, Energy and Momentum in the fields, Tµν = Poynting’s Theorem Dispersion Harmonic Fields β Shapiro Tµν 1~2 1~2 , = 0 Eµ Eν − E δµν + c2 Bµ Bν − B δµν 2 2 which is called the Maxwell stress tensor. Then ! XZ ∂ dP~Tot = Tµν . dt V ∂xν ν Poynting, Energy and Momentum in the fields, Tµν Poynting’s Theorem Dispersion Harmonic Fields µ So we see that the E terms in dP/dt may be written as ∂ 1~2 0 Eα Eβ − E δαβ . ∂xβ 2 By Gauss’s law,Pthe integral of this divergence over V is the integral of β Tαβ n̂β over the surface ∂V of the volune considered, so Tαβ n̂β is the flux of the α component of momentum out of the surface. The same may be done for the magnetic field, as the ~ ·B ~ is zero. Thus we define missing ∇ Complex Fields, Dispersion Physics 504, Spring 2011 Electricity and Magnetism ~ = E ~ and B ~ = µH, ~ but In linear media we can assume D actually this statement is only good for the Fourier transformed (in time) fields, because all media (other than the vacuum) exhibit dispersion, that is, the permittivity and magnetic permeability µ depend on frequency. So we need to deal with the Fourier transformed fields1 Z ∞ ~ x, ω)e−iωt ~ x, t) = dω E(~ E(~ −∞ Z ∞ ~ x, t) = ~ x, ω)e−iωt D(~ dω D(~ Shapiro Poynting, Energy and Momentum in the fields, Tµν Poynting’s Theorem Dispersion Harmonic Fields Note that the electric and magnetic fields in spacetime are supposed to be real, not complex, valued. From Z ∞ ~ x, t) = ~ x, ω)e−iωt E(~ dω E(~ −∞ Z ∞ Z ∞ ~ ∗ (~x, t) = ~ ∗ (~x, ω)eiωt = ~ ∗ (~x, −ω)e−iωt =E dω E dω E −∞ −∞ ~ x, ω) = E ~ ∗ (~x, −ω), and similarly for the which tells us E(~ other fields. Thus the permittivity and permeability also obey (−ω) = ∗ (ω), µ(−ω) = µ∗ (ω). Physics 504, Spring 2011 Electricity and Magnetism Shapiro Poynting, Energy and Momentum in the fields, Tµν Poynting’s Theorem Dispersion Harmonic Fields The power transferred to charged particles includes an integral of ZZ ~ −i(ω−ω 0 )t ~ · ∂D = ~ ∗ (ω 0 )(−iω(ω)) · E(ω)e ~ E , dωdω 0 E ∂t ~ where we took the complex conjugate expression for E(t), but alternatively we could have taken the complex ~ and interchanged ω and ω 0 , conjugate expression for D −∞ and we define linear permittivity as ~ x, ω), and similarly D(~x, ω) = (ω)E(~ ~ x, ω). The inverse fourier transform B(~x, ω) = µ(ω)H(~ does not like multiplication — if (ω) is not constant, we ~ x, t) proportional to E(~ ~ x, t). do not have D(~ 1 The Maxwell Stress Tensor Note the 2π inconsistency with 6.33, and slide 8 of lecture 1. ~ ~ · ∂D = E ∂t ZZ Physics 504, Spring 2011 Electricity and Magnetism 0 −i(ω−ω )t ~ ∗ (ω 0 )(iω 0 ∗ (ω 0 )) · E(ω)e ~ , dωdω 0 E Shapiro or averaging the two expressions ~ ~ ∂D = i E· ∂t 2 ZZ 0 ~∗ 0 0 ∗ 0 −i(ω−ω 0 )t ~ (ω )−ω(ω)]e dωdω E (ω )·E(ω)[ω We are often interested in the situation where the fields are dominately near a given frequency, and if we ignore the rapid oscillations in this expression which come from one ω positive and one negative, we may assume the ω’s differ by an amount for which a first order variation of is enough to consider, so ω 0 ∗ (ω 0 ) ≈ ω∗ (ω) + (ω 0 − ω)d(ω∗ (ω))/dω, and [iω 0 ∗ (ω 0 ) − iω(ω)] = 2ωIm (ω) − i(ω − ω 0 ) d (ω∗ (ω)) dω , Poynting, Energy and Momentum in the fields, Tµν Poynting’s Theorem Dispersion Harmonic Fields ~ · ∂ D/∂t, ~ Inserting this back into E the −i(ω − ω 0 ) can be interpreted as a time derivative, so ZZ ~ 0 ~ · ∂D = ~ ∗ (ω 0 ) · E(ω)ωIm ~ E (ω)e−i(ω−ω )t dωdω 0 E ∂t ZZ ∂ 1 d ∗ −i(ω−ω0 )t ~ ∗ (ω 0 ) · E(ω) ~ + . dωdω 0 E ω (ω) e ∂t 2 dω If were pure real, the first term would not be present, and if were constant, the d[ω∗ (ω)]/dω would be , consistent with the u = 12 E 2 we had in our previous consideration. There is, of course, a similar result from ~ · dB/dt ~ the H term. More generally, we can think of the first term as energy lost to the motion of bound charges ~ which goes within the molecules, not included in J~ · E, into heating the medium, while the second term describes the energy density in the macroscopic electromagnetic fields. Physics 504, Spring 2011 Electricity and Magnetism Shapiro Poynting, Energy and Momentum in the fields, Tµν Poynting’s Theorem Dispersion Harmonic Fields Harmonic Fields We are often interested in considering fields oscillating with a given frequency, so ~ x, t) = Re E(~ i h ~ x)e−iωt = 1 E(~ ~ ∗ (~x)eiωt . ~ x)e−iωt + E E(~ 2 ~ x, t), the dot product If we have another such field, say J(~ is ~ x, t) · E(~ ~ x, t) J(~ i 1 h ~ ~ x)e−iωt + E ~ ∗ (~x)eiωt = J(~x)e−iωt + J~∗ (~x)eiωt · E(~ 4 h i 1 ~ x) + J(~ ~ x) · E(~ ~ x)e−2iωt . = Re J~∗ (~x) · E(~ 2 Physics 504, Spring 2011 Electricity and Magnetism Shapiro Poynting, Energy and Momentum in the fields, Tµν Poynting’s Theorem Dispersion Harmonic Fields The second term is rapidly oscillating, so can generally be ignored, and the average product is just half the product of the two harmonic (fourier transformed) fields, one complex conjugated. ~ = 1E ~ ×H ~ ∗ and We define the complex Poynting vector S 2 the harmonic densities of electric and magnetic energy, ~ ·D ~ ∗ and wm = 1 B ~ ·H ~ ∗ , and thus find (using we = 14 E 4 Gauss’s divergence law) Z I Z 1 ~ · n̂ = 0, ~ + 2iω (we − wm ) + J~∗ · E S 2 V V ∂V which, as a complex equation, contains energy flow. If the medium may be taken as pure lossless dielectrics and magnetics, with real and µ, the real part of this equation says Z I 1 ~ + ~ · n̂ = 0, Re J~∗ · E Re S 2 V ∂V which says that the power transferred to the charges and that flowing out of the region, on a time averaged basis, is zero. But there is also an oscillation of energy between the electric and magnetic fields. For example, with a pure ~ and H ~ in phase, S is real, plane wave in vacuum, with E J~ vanishes, and the imaginary part tells us the electric and magnetic energy densities are equal. Physics 504, Spring 2011 Electricity and Magnetism Shapiro Poynting, Energy and Momentum in the fields, Tµν Poynting’s Theorem Dispersion Harmonic Fields Fourier transforming Maxwell’s equations, for the Harmonic fields, for which ∂/∂t becomes −iω, we see ~ ·B ~ =0 ∇ ~ ~ ∇·D =ρ ~ ×E ~ − iω B ~ =0 ∇ ~ ~ ~ = J~ ∇ × H + iω D Physics 504, Spring 2011 Electricity and Magnetism Shapiro Poynting, Energy and Momentum in the fields, Tµν Poynting’s Theorem The current induced will also be harmonic, so the power Dispersion lost to current is Harmonic Fields Z 1 3 ~∗ ~ d xJ · E 2 Z 1 ~· ∇ ~ ×H ~ ∗ − iω D ~∗ = d3 xE 2 Z i h 1 ~ ×E ~ · H ∗ − iω E ~ · E ~ ×H ~∗ + ∇ ~ ·D ~∗ = d3 x −∇ 2 Z i h 1 ~ · H ∗ − iω E ~ · E ~ ×H ~ ∗ + iω B ~ ·D ~∗ = d3 x −∇ 2 Rotational and PCT properties Let us briefly describe how our fields behave under rotational symmetry, reflection, charge conjugation and time reversal. From mechanics, forces are vectors, so as a charge ~ E ~ is a vector under rotations, experiences a force q E, unchanged under time reversal, reverses in sign under ~ → −E, ~ as a charge conjugation, and under parity E proper vector should.2 Charge and charge density are proper scalars, reversing under charge conjugation (by definition). ~ to be a proper Velocity is a proper vector, so for q~v × B ~ must be a pseudovector, whose vector as well, B components are unchanged under parity, because the cross product (and αβγ ) are multiplied by −1 under parity. Of ~ odd under charge conjugation. course we also have B Physics 504, Spring 2011 Electricity and Magnetism Shapiro Poynting, Energy and Momentum in the fields, Tµν Poynting’s Theorem Dispersion Harmonic Fields 2 under reflection in a mirror, the component perpendicular to the mirror reverses, but parity includes a rotation of 180◦ about that axis, reversing the other two components as well. Physics 504, Spring 2011 Electricity and Magnetism Under time-reversal, forces and acceleration are ~ unchanged (∝ d2 /dt2 ) but velocity changes sign, so E ~ are even under time-reversal, but B ~ (and (and P~ and D) ~ and H) ~ are odd under time-reversal, that is, the get M multiplied by −1. Maxwell’s equations, the Lorentz force law, and all the other formulae we have written are consistent with symmetry under rotations and P,C, and T reflections. That means the laws themselves are invariant under these symmetries. Energy in Harmonic Fields Shapiro Poynting, Energy and Momentum in the fields, Tµν Poynting’s Theorem Dispersion Harmonic Fields Magnetic Monopoles ~ and B ~ almost In vacuum, Maxwell’s equations treat E ! ~ E ~ identically. Then if we consider a doublet D = ~ the cB two Gauss’ laws say ~ ·D ~ = 0, ∇ ~ ~ × D + iσ2 1 ∂ D = 0, ∇ c ∂t 0 1 where iσ2 = . This not only lets us write 4 laws −1 0 as 2, but shows that the equations would be unchanged by a rotation in this two dimensional space. But this symmetry is broken by our having observed electric charges and currents but no magnetic charges (magnetic monopoles). But maybe we just haven’t found them yet, and we should add them in. Physics 504, Spring 2011 Electricity and Magnetism Shapiro Poynting, Energy and Momentum in the fields, Tµν Poynting’s Theorem Dispersion Harmonic Fields Maxwell with Monopoles Physics 504, Spring 2011 Electricity and Magnetism Then Maxwell’s equations become ~ ~ ×H ~ = ∂ D + J~e Shapiro ∇ ∂t Poynting, ~ Energy and ~ ·B ~ = ρm , ~ ×E ~ = ∂ B + J~m ∇ −∇ Momentum in ∂t the fields, Tµν Poynting’s From these equations and our previous symmetry Theorem Dispersion properties, we see that ρe is a scalar, ρm is a pseudoscalar, Harmonic Fields J~e a proper vector and J~m a pseudovector. Define the doublets3 ! ! ! ! 1 1 1 1 2 ~ 2 ~ µ02 ρe µ02 J~e ~ = µ01 D ~ = 01 E R= B J~ = H 1 1 ~ ~ µ02 H 02 B 02 J~m 02 ρm ~ ·D ~ = ρe , ∇ Physics 504, Spring 2011 Electricity and Magnetism Shapiro Thus we see that the equations are invariant under a simultaneous rotation of these doublets in the two dimensional space, in particular ~ →E ~ cos ξ + Z0 H ~ sin ξ. E ~ is a proper vector and H ~ is But this is very pecular, as E a pseudovector. So such an object would not have a well defined parity. Poynting, Energy and Momentum in the fields, Tµν Poynting’s Theorem Dispersion Harmonic Fields so Maxwell’s equations become ~ ·B ~ = R, ∇ ~ ~ × H = ∂ B + J~ . iσ2 ∇ ∂t √ √ 3 The 0 and µ0 are due to the unfortunate SI units we are p using. Let Z0 = µ0 /0 . Quantization of Charge Dirac noticed that a point charge and a point monopole, both at rest, gives a momentum density and an angular momentum density in the electromagnetic fields. Consider a monopole at the origin, ρm = gδ(~x), and a point charge ρe = qδ(~x − (0, 0, D)) on the z axis a distance D away. Physics 504, Spring 2011 Electricity and Magnetism Shapiro Poynting, Energy and Momentum in the fields, Tµν Poynting’s Theorem We have magnetic and electric fields But the angular momentum density, ~r × ~g , has a component everywhere in the −z direction, so its integral will not vanish. ~ = L = Dispersion ~ = H g êr , 4πµ0 r2 ~ = E q êr0 . 4π0 r0 2 Harmonic Fields B r’ The momentum density in the fields ~ × H, ~ which points in the is ~g = c12 E aximuthal direction, ∝ êφ in spherical coordinates. As the magnitude is independent of φ, when we integrate this vector in φ, we will get zero, so the total momentum vanishes. g r E e2 h2 0 = 4 = 4π0 e µ0 h0 c e2 g0 4π g0 4π Z ~ × ~r) g ~r × (E ~ × H) ~ = d3 r ~r × (E d3 r 2 4πµ0 c r3 Z Z ~ − ~r(~r · E) ~ r2 E g0 ~ · ∇) ~ ~r = d3 r d3 r (E r3 4π r I Z ~ r ~ r ~ ·E ~ ~ − ∇ n̂ · E r ∂V V r Shapiro Poynting, Energy and Momentum in the fields, Tµν Poynting’s Theorem Dispersion Harmonic Fields ~ = − qg êz . L 4π There are several interesting things about this result. One is that it is independent of how far apart the two objects are. But even more crucial, if we accept from quantum mechanics the requirement that angular momentum is quantized in usits of ~/2, we see that if just one monopole of magnetic charge g exists anywhere, all purely electric charges must be qn = nh/g where n is an integer. Furthermore, as there are electrons, the smallest nonzero monopole has a “charge” at least h/e, and the Coulomb force between two such charges would be Z Taking the volume to be a large sphere, the first term ~ is constant/r2 , so the integral is vanishes because n̂ · E R ∝ dΩn̂ = 0. In the second term ~ ·E ~ = qδ 3 (~r − (0, 0, D)/0 so overall ∇ L density Charge Quantization g2 4πµ0 = 1 c2 Physics 504, Spring 2011 Electricity and Magnetism 2 = 137 2 2 ∼ 4700 times as big as the electric force between two electrons at the same separation. Physics 504, Spring 2011 Electricity and Magnetism Shapiro Poynting, Energy and Momentum in the fields, Tµν Poynting’s Theorem Dispersion Harmonic Fields Vector Potential and Monopoles The ability to define vector and scalar potentials to represent the electromagnetic fields depended on the two sourceless Maxwell equations. If we have monopoles, these conditions don’t apply whereever a monopole exists, ~ is not divergenceless everywhere. Even if ∇ ~ ·B ~ so that B ~ cannot be fails to vanish at only one point, it means B written as a curl throughout space. Poincaré’s Lemma tells us it is possible on a contractible domain, which is not true for a sphere surrounding the monopole. One can ~ consistently everywhere other than on a “Dirac define A ~ is string” extending from the monopole to infinity, but A not defined on the string. Physics 504, Spring 2011 Electricity and Magnetism Shapiro Poynting, Energy and Momentum in the fields, Tµν Poynting’s Theorem Dispersion Harmonic Fields