* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download 2011 Essay 2
Survey
Document related concepts
Life history theory wikipedia , lookup
Philosophy of history wikipedia , lookup
Social contract wikipedia , lookup
Dual inheritance theory wikipedia , lookup
Social theory wikipedia , lookup
Sociological theory wikipedia , lookup
Sociocultural evolution wikipedia , lookup
Personnel selection wikipedia , lookup
Social Bonding and Nurture Kinship wikipedia , lookup
Postdevelopment theory wikipedia , lookup
Eusociality wikipedia , lookup
The Selfish Gene wikipedia , lookup
Unilineal evolution wikipedia , lookup
Sociobiology wikipedia , lookup
History of the social sciences wikipedia , lookup
Transcript
Biology 14 Second Essay Assignment, due Thursday, March 24 at 11:30 AM Spring, 2011 Four typewritten, double spaced pages. Minimize introductory remarks and summary, get right to the point, assume your reader understands what you are writing about, and use all four pages. Take the time to make your writing clear, pithy and succinct. The extensions of the theory of natural selection that explain the evolution of social behaviors are kin selection, reciprocal altruism, parent-offspring conflict, and sexual selection.. State what these mechanisms are and why, in the light of the kinds and frequency of social behaviors we find in animals and humans (aggressive, cooperative, conflict, selfishness, altruistic, spite, etc), these mechanisms do or do not provide adequate explanations for social behaviors. Include discussion of the possible levels at which natural selection acts and why these four kinds of natural selection must be thought of as acting proximately (during an individual’s lifetime) on an individual’s phenotype, but ultimately (from one generation to the next) on the individual genes/alleles that an organism passes on to its offspring. Is group selection a likely mechanism of social evolution? Writing this essay requires an understanding of the lectures, reading and handouts in sections (a) through (f) of the section of the course on “Natural Selection and Social Theory” and chapter 6 of the text (G&Z, Biology, Evolution and Human Nature); so see the syllabus for what these are. One article from the previous section of the course, Dawkins’ “God’s Utility Function” is also relevant. The handouts that are particularly pertinent include those on kin selection in social Hymenoptera/ bees, the summary of evolutionary social theories and the handout on level of natural selection; a lot of what is in these handouts repeats what is/ was in the text and lectures, but they include summaries, re-phrasings and explications of the ideas that should be helpful, The handout on “levels of natural selection” should definitely be understood for your thinking about the essay topic. It should help your thinking about the evidence for/ against group selection to know that Darwin thought that the evolution of sterile reproductive castes (female worker) in social insects (bees, ants, wasps) was a fatal objection to his theory of natural selection because he could not imagine how an individual (female worker) could evolve to be sterile!!! So he argued that it was the reproductive success of the colony as a whole---the queen, the workers and the drones together as unit---that was the cause of their social evolution. In other words, he invoked group selection: those bee colonies that out-reproduced other bee colonies (by having a sterile caste, the female workers who do all the work, and a single reproducer, the queen) left more descendant bee colonies than others that did not have reproductive “division of labor” by sterile castes. Note that Hamilton’s theory of kin selection seems to account for the evolution of sterile castes (reproductive altruism) AS WELL AS for the other highly non-altruistic behaviors in bee hives (see handout) that are wasteful and thus bad for the colony as a whole. You might also consider lots of behaviors (conflict, infanticide, siblicide, dominance fighting, territory defense, mating competition, mate choice, etc) and encumbering structures (horns, antlers, male lion manes, peacock tails, etc) in the same way---good for the genes underlying them but bad/ wasteful/ inefficient for the perpetuation of the group (population, species) as a whole. By the way Darwin also thought that human moral “instincts” ---which he thought of (as a good Victorian Englishman and son of a doctor!!) only as indiscriminate altruism for the good of everyone in the group---evolved by group selection. That is, he argued, human groups with more, highly moral people in them were more successful in competing with other human groups over time.