Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Biome Paper Name: Institution: Insert Surname 2 Introduction This biome paper is based on my visit to Alafia River in Riverview FL. The organisms I managed to collect from the site are Live oak trees (Quercus virginiana), anhinga birds, gropher tortoise, prickly pear cactus, bream fish and gar fish. Biome Assessment I applied the World Wildlife Fund system so as to conduct the Biome assessment. Basing on this system there exists fourteen biomes which are referred to as major habitat types (Olson et al, 2001). Therefore, the reserve falls under the freshwater biomes (Malicky, 1983). This is because most of the organisms I collected are mostly located in regions of subtropical and tropical rivers. The organisms I acquired from the reserve exhibited various adaptation characteristics that enabled them to flourish. The following are the characteristics of the organisms: Gar fish (Lepisosteus platyrhincus) This fish has a swim bladder that is highly vascularized. The swim bladder is connected to esophagus thus enabling it to act as lung (Porter & Motta, 2004). This adaptive feature enables the gar fish to flourish in waters that are stagnant or poorly oxygenated. This would be difficult for various fish. Prickly pear cactus This type of cactus has flat and fleshy pads that resemble large leaves. However, the pads are modified stems which play various roles such as flower production, photosynthesis and water storage (Washburn, 2011). Furthermore, the prickly pears cactus have prickles that offers it protection by easily penetrating skin and detaching from the plant. Insert Surname 3 Bream fish (Cyprinidae) The bream fish have toothless jaws and also lack a stomach. However, they are able to effectively chew food by using the pharyngeal teeth. These teeth are located in the last gill blow which enables the fish to be able to chew against the skull’s bony process that act as a chewing plate. These teeth are specific to the cyprinidae fish, thus aid during species determination done by specialists. Such strong pharyngeal teeth enable the fish to feed on hard baits like snails (Zaunreiter, et al., 1991). Anhinga Birds The anhinga birds as compared to other aquatic birds, get all of their body feathers completely wet when they come into contact with water. This adaptation allows the anhinga bird to dive more easily through the water when searching for prey underwater. However, due to this feature the birds have minimal buoyancy. Due to the buoyancy limitation, the anhinga bird is able to stay underwater for greater periods of time (Frederick & Siegel-Causey, 2000). Besides, they tend to have challenges when taking flight and quickly lose heat. Another adaptation that enables the bird to flourish is the lack of external nostrils thus they breathe only through the epiglottis. Live oak Trees (Quercus virginiana) The live oak trees when young, develop deep tap-roots that anchor them to the ground. After growth, the root systems become widespread and extensive. Furthermore, the center of gravity of the Live oak trees is low. These two adaptations enable the live oak tree to strongly resist tough and sustained winds, for example during hurricanes (Egan & Ott, 2007). Gropher tortoises Insert Surname 4 The gropher tortoise has forefeet that are specifically modified for burrowing whereas the hind feet are elephantine. Furthermore, the forefeet have scales which offer the tortoise protection when burrowing (Eubanks et al., 2003). There seems to be a relationship between the existence of tortoise and prickly pears cactus. Apparently, the tortoise tend to be huge in biomes that have prickly pears cactus. Whereas, biomes that lack tortoises have prostrate forms of prickly pear cactus. This is because the prickly pears cactus form a basic food source for the tortoises (Lamb, Avise & Gibbons, 1989). Thus they are significant in the food web. On the other hand, the gropher tortoises are a keystone species in this type of biome (Garibaldi & Turner, 2004). This is because the tortoise digs burrows that act as shelter for other species of animals. In case of an extinction of the gopher tortoise then this biome would cease to exist or be dramatically altered. So as to measure the health conditions of this biome I would apply the system of biodiversity. This system focuses on the variation both within and between species and also between ecosystems. Biodiversity measures the range of organisms that are present in various ecosystems. Therefore it can be used to measure the species, ecosystem and genetic variation within a biome (Olson et al, 2001). Far from this obtained organisms existing in this biome, they also offer various ecological services. The live oak trees play a key role in the purification of air. The Bream fish, prickly pear cactus and the gar fish are sources of food. Whereas the gopher tortoises provide recreational experiences such as tourism due to being an endangered species. Conclusion Insert Surname 5 Humans are connected to biomes via their actions. The increasing human activities over the past decades has led to the destruction of various ecological habitats all over the world. For instance the exploitation of particular biomes like forests, marine and fresh waters have great implications. Therefore, it is important that humans protect all forms of biomes as every one of them possesses unique life forms. Insert Surname 6 References Olson, D. M., Dinerstein, E., Wikramanayake, E. D., Burgess, N. D., Powell, G. V., Underwood, E. C., ... & Loucks, C. J. (2001). Terrestrial Ecoregions of the World: A New Map of Life on Earth A new global map of terrestrial ecoregions provides an innovative tool for conserving biodiversity. BioScience, 51(11), 933-938. Malicky, H. (1983). Chorological patterns and biome types of European Trichoptera and other freshwater insects. Archiv fur hydrobiology. Porter, H. T., & Motta, P. J. (2004). A comparison of strike and prey capture kinematics of three species of piscivorous fishes: Florida gar (Lepisosteus platyrhincus), redfin needlefish (Strongylura notata), and great barracuda (Sphyraena barracuda). Marine Biology, 145(5), 989-1000. Washburn, C. (2011). Prickly Pear Cactus. Zaunreiter, M., Junger, H., & Kotrschal, K. (1991). Retinal morphology of cyprinid fishes: a quantitative histological study of ontogenetic changes and interspecific variation. Vision research, 31(3), 383-394. Frederick, P. C., & Siegel-Causey, D. (2000). Anhinga(Anhinga anhinga). The Birds of North America, (522), 24. Egan, S. P., & Ott, J. R. (2007). HOST PLANT QUALITY AND LOCAL ADAPTATION DETERMINE THE DISTRIBUTION OF A GALL‐FORMING HERBIVORE. Ecology, 88(11), 2868-2879. Insert Surname 7 Eubanks, J. O., Michener, W. K., & Guyer, C. (2003). Patterns of movement and burrow use in a population of gopher tortoises (Gopherus polyphemus). Herpetologica, 59(3), 311-321. Lamb, T., Avise, J. C., & Gibbons, J. W. (1989). Phylogeographic patterns in mitochondrial DNA of the desert tortoise (Xerobates agassizi), and evolutionary relationships among the North American gopher tortoises. Evolution, 76-87.