* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Lab #9 - facstaff.bucknell.edu
Distributed element filter wikipedia , lookup
Audio power wikipedia , lookup
Power electronics wikipedia , lookup
Spark-gap transmitter wikipedia , lookup
Audio crossover wikipedia , lookup
Loudspeaker wikipedia , lookup
Phase-locked loop wikipedia , lookup
Opto-isolator wikipedia , lookup
Oscilloscope history wikipedia , lookup
Switched-mode power supply wikipedia , lookup
Mathematics of radio engineering wikipedia , lookup
Operational amplifier wikipedia , lookup
Two-port network wikipedia , lookup
Power MOSFET wikipedia , lookup
Rectiverter wikipedia , lookup
Index of electronics articles wikipedia , lookup
Valve audio amplifier technical specification wikipedia , lookup
Current mirror wikipedia , lookup
Negative-feedback amplifier wikipedia , lookup
Regenerative circuit wikipedia , lookup
Equalization (audio) wikipedia , lookup
Superheterodyne receiver wikipedia , lookup
RLC circuit wikipedia , lookup
Resistive opto-isolator wikipedia , lookup
Wien bridge oscillator wikipedia , lookup
Radio transmitter design wikipedia , lookup
ELEC 351L Electronics II Laboratory Spring 2004 Lab #9: Frequency Response of BJT Amplifiers Introduction Capacitors are used in many amplifier circuits for DC blocking and for AC bypassing. The usual assumption in the initial stages of the design process is that the capacitors are large enough so that they can be regarded as short circuits at AC. However, this assumption is not valid at low frequencies, where the capacitive reactances can be substantially large. Also, there are “stray,” or unintended, capacitances inherent in the physical structures that make up the circuit and in the semiconductor devices themselves. For example, in the 2N2222 transistor there is a junction capacitance of 5-10 pF between the collector and the base. There are also stray inductances. In this lab experiment you will investigate the effects of capacitors and capacitances on the performance of a common-emitter amplifier. Theoretical Background Figure 1 shows a common-emitter amplifier with emitter degeneration. Capacitors Ci and Co provide DC isolation for the bias levels, capacitor CE bypasses the emitter resistor, and capacitor CCC bypasses the power supply. In addition to these four physical capacitors, there is stray capacitance between the component leads and across the pn-junctions inside the transistor. The VCC = +12 V CCC + 22 F Rs 50 vs + − vin R1 30 k RC 3.9 k Co 10 F + + vout Ci 10 F RL R2 9.1 k + RE 2 k CE 22 F Figure 1. Common emitter amplifier with emitter degeneration bypass capacitor and DC blocking capacitors. The operating point of the BJT is IC = 1 mA and VCE = 6.1 V. 1 former type of capacitance (stray capacitance between leads) is usually negligible, at least at frequencies below a few MHz, but the latter (junction capacitance) typically sets the upper useful frequency limit of the amplifier. The junction capacitances are incorporated into the small-signal model as shown in Figure 2. The collector-base capacitance C is on the order of 8 pF for a 2N2222 npn BJT. The baseemitter capacitance varies with the bias level according to the equation C gm o C C 2f T 2f T r where fT is a parameter called the unity-gain frequency, which is the frequency at which the effective small-signal current gain () of the amplifier falls to unity (a value of one). The value of () changes with frequency due to the effects of C and C. For a bias collector current (IC) level of 1 mA and an fT of 250 MHz (typical for the 2N2222), the value of C is around 17 pF. The parameter rx represents the small resistance (around 10 ) of the ohmic contact used to connect the base wire lead to the region of silicon that makes up the base. In many cases rx can be ignored. These small resistances exist at the other two connection points (at the collector and at the emitter), but it is seldom necessary to model their effects. There is also a tiny amount of capacitance between the collector and the emitter, but its effect is also usually negligible. rx C B C + ib C r rce v gmv − E Figure 2. Small-signal model of BJT that includes junction capacitances. Capacitance C is the base-emitter capacitance, and C is the collector-base capacitance. The reactances of C and C are given by X 1 1 C 2fC and X 1 1 , C 2fC so as the frequency rises, their reactance values drop. This has a profound effect on the gain at high frequencies. If the reactance of C is much less than the resistance of r, for example, then the value of v is much smaller than it is at lower frequencies. The implication of this is that the 2 small-signal collector current ic (which is equal to gmv or, equivalently, ()ib) falls at high frequencies. If the frequency is high enough so that C acts essentially as a short, then the transistor will draw no small-signal collector current whatsoever. Capacitance C affects the operation of the transistor at high frequencies as well. If its reactance is low, then current will be drawn away from r, also reducing the value of v, which in turn reduces the available gain. In earlier experiments we have usually designed amplifiers to work at only a single frequency, and we have chosen values for the DC blocking and emitter bypass capacitors such that we could regard them as short circuits at the design frequency. More typically, amplifiers are designed to be used over a range of frequencies. For example, a stereo amplifier must faithfully amplify sound over the range of 20-20,000 Hz or so. At the upper and lower ends of the frequency range the physical capacitors and the junction capacitances affect the gain. The behavior of an amplifier, that is, its gain, input resistance, and output resistance, over a given range of frequencies is called its frequency response. The analysis of frequency response is an important aspect of amplifier design. Fortunately, the effects due to the physical capacitors in the circuit and those due to the junction capacitances can be treated separately. It is therefore possible to draw a low-frequency small-signal model of the circuit and a high-frequency model and avoid an analysis that incorporates all of the capacitances at once, which would be a tedious task. We will concentrate in this experiment on only the lowfrequency model, which is shown in Figure 3. This model includes only those capacitors that cause the gain to drop off at frequencies below the midband range, where the amplifier’s characteristics remain essentially constant with respect to frequency. Figure 3 does not include C and C because the reactances of those capacitors are too large to affect the low-frequency performance of the amplifier significantly. Consequently, those two capacitors can be treated as open circuits at low frequencies. Rs Ci Co vout vin vs + − + R1||R2 r RC v − RL gmv CE RE Figure 3. Low-frequency small-signal model of the common emitter amplifier. Even with C and C missing from the circuit, a full analysis of the voltage gain with the three remaining capacitors is a daunting task. However, a simple procedure can be employed with this 3 type of amplifier to determine its behavior at low frequencies. First, we recognize that the presence of all three capacitors Ci, Co, and CE leads to a reduction in gain at frequencies low enough for their reactances to become an important factor. As the frequency drops and reactance rises, capacitor CE no longer serves as a low-impedance bypass; input capacitor Ci reduces the amount of signal current flowing into the base of the BJT; and output capacitor Co limits the current flowing through RL, which in turn reduces the value of vout. All of these effects cause a reduction in the small-signal voltage gain. The particular frequency below which each capacitor affects the gain varies with the capacitor’s value and with the equivalent resistance “seen” by the capacitor. To obtain a rough estimate of the dominant “breakpoint” frequency, which separates the midband (constant-gain) region from the low-frequency roll-off region, the following procedure can be applied separately to each “low-frequency” capacitor in the circuit: 1. Identify one capacitor, and short-circuit all of the others (because, in the midband frequency range, “low-frequency” capacitors act as shorts). 2. Find the small-signal Thévenin resistance rth “seen” by the capacitor under consideration. (All of the independent voltage and current sources must be turned off.) 3. Calculate the breakpoint radian frequency (the Bode plot pole) associated with that capacitor using 1/Crth, where C is the value of the capacitor. 4. Repeat steps 1-3 for each capacitor, calculating the breakpoint frequency for each one. 5. The overall breakpoint frequency is approximately the sum of all the individual breakpoint frequencies. Applying this procedure to the low-frequency small-signal model shown in Figure 3 leads to pi po pe 1 , Ci Rs R1 R2 r 1 C o RL RC 1 , and r R1 R2 Rs C E RE o , where each pole frequency is associated with one of the three capacitors. If the source resistance Rs is very small compared to the parallel combination of R1, R2, and r, then Rs can be neglected in the first equation. The breakpoint frequency given by the third equation is usually the dominant one because the quantity in parentheses in that equation is typically only a few tens of Ohms, and the value of CE is usually within an order of magnitude of the values of Ci and Co. A similar procedure to that described above can be applied to the “high-frequency” capacitors C and C. Each capacitor is treated separately in turn, but they are replaced with open circuits instead of short circuits. This is because “high-frequency” capacitors act as open circuits in the midband frequency range. The overall breakpoint frequency is the reciprocal of the sum of the reciprocals of the individual breakpoint frequencies (in a manner analogous to the parallelresistor formula). 4 Experimental Procedure Assemble the common emitter amplifier circuit shown in Figure 1 around a 2N2222 or 2N3904 npn BJT. Use the resistor values shown in the figure to establish the bias collector current at 1 mA . Remember that electrolytic capacitors are polarized. Verify that the BJT is operating at the proper Q-point. Of course, these measurements must be taken with no source voltage vs applied to the amplifier. Estimate the low-frequency breakpoints of the amplifier. Note that you will have to find the value of r in order to obtain two of them. You may assume that the ambient temperature is 290 K. The source resistance Rs of the function generator is around 50 . Measure the small-signal voltage transfer function of the amplifier as a function of frequency. This will require you to record |vout| vs. |vs| and the phase shift at each frequency. Remember to keep the input voltage down to only a few tens of mV to ensure that the amplifier operates in its linear region. This may require you to use a voltage divider at the output of the function generator. If you must use a voltage divider, make the Thévenin equivalent resistance of the generator/voltage divider combination close to 50 . Also, remember that you cannot trust the numerical voltage value displayed by the oscilloscope if the waveform on the screen is fuzzy. Take data at a wide enough range of frequencies that the magnitude of the gain at the upper and lower limits of the range is less than one-tenth the value measured in the midband range. (In the midband range, neither the physical capacitors nor the junction capacitances significantly affect the gain. The gain should be “flat,” or relatively unchanging, in this range.) Plot the magnitude of the gain of the amplifier in dB vs. frequency (f). Use a logarithmic scale for the frequency. Recall that the gain expressed is dB is calculated using gain in dB 20 log vout , vs in which the common logarithm (base 10) is used. Also, plot the phase shift in degrees vs. frequency, again using a logarithmic scale for the frequency. Is the lower breakpoint frequency (the dominant one) where you expected it to be? Discuss any discrepancies (significant or insignificant), and explain what the implications of those results might be. Reference M. Wasserman, Laboratory Manual for Microelectronic Circuits and Devices, 2nd ed., PrenticeHall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1996 5