Download Design and Use of Memory-Specific Test Structures to Ensure

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Transistor wikipedia , lookup

Portable appliance testing wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Design and Use of Memory-Specific Test Structures to
Ensure SRAM Yield and Manufacturability
F. Duan, R. Castagnetti, R. Venkatraman,
O. Kobozeva and S. Ramesh
LSI Logic Corporation
Outline



Products need very high-density and high-performance
memories without sacrificing yield and manufacturability
LSI Logic’s Industry-leading 1.87um2 embedded SRAM
bitcell in 130 nm CMOS SoC technology
Need for SRAM-specific test structures to ensure
robustness and manufacturability
–
–
–
–
–

Accurately shows process-design interaction
Correlate to SRAM yield
Direct feedback for rapid process-improvement
Accurate SRAM device and cell characterization
RAMPCM for design rule robustness validation
Summary
ISQED-2003
2
LSI Logic SRAM Technology for SoC
6T SRAM CELL SIZE (m m2)
6

Smallest production
high-density SRAM in
180nm and 130nm
technology

Fabricated by
standard CMOS SoC
process
LSI Logic
TSMC
INTEL
IBM
NEC
5
4
3
2
1
80
130
180
Technology Node (nm)
“High-Density and High-Performance 6T-SRAM for System-on-Chip in
130 nm CMOS Technology,” 2001 VLSI Technology Symposium, pp. 105-106,
W. Kong, R. Venkatraman, R. Castagnetti, F. Duan and S. Ramesh.
ISQED-2003
3
Why Do We Need for SRAM-specific Test
Structure? An Example
(a)
(b)
(c)
Structures to test metal bridging
ISQED-2003
4
Electrical Test Data
Only structure (a) detects the early metal /contact bridging
ISQED-2003
5
Features of Our Structures

Compared to the conventional structures, our structures:
–
–
–
–
More product-driven than process-development-driven
Accurately show process-design interaction
Correlate to functionality and yield directly
Identify the yield limiting factors quickly for fast process or
design improvements.
– Sensitive enough for ongoing monitoring and process
transfers.
ISQED-2003
6
Test Structure Design and Results




Yield correlation and improvement
SRAM manufacturability
SRAM device and cell characterization
RAMPCM chip
– Functional SRAM test chip
– Used for SRAM design rule validation
ISQED-2003
7
Test Structures of Front-end Critical Layer Monitor



ISQED-2003
Critical layers: island, poly
and contact
Monitor bridging current
from intra- and interlayers
Monitor shared-contact
connection
8
Test Structures of Back-end Monitor

ISQED-2003
Monitor bridging current
from:
– Contact and metal 1
(blue arrows)
– Metal 2 (red arrows)
– Metal 3 (black arrow)
9
Example of a Test Structure For Poly Bridging
Test cell
ISQED-2003
Test array
10
Poly Bridging Data
100,000 cells
No poly bridging found in SRAM
ISQED-2003
11
Metal Bridging and Correlation to SRAM Yield
100,000 cells
Detected early metal /contact bridging
ISQED-2003
12
Yield
Metal Bridging and Correlation to SRAM Yield
(cont.)
1.0E-14
1.0E-12
1.0E-10
1.0E-08
Metal 1 Bridging Leakage Current (A)
Metal bridging identified as yield limiting factor
ISQED-2003
13
Metal 1 Bridging Data after Process Improvement
100,000 cells
No metal bridging seen after improvement
ISQED-2003
14
Test Structures for Manufacturability



An illustration of test structure
List of test structures
Electrical data
ISQED-2003
15
An Illustration of the Test Structure


Sizing poly by 5% per
side
Build test cell to test its
effects on:
– Poly to poly bridging
– Poly to contact bridging
– Pull down transistor
leakage
ISQED-2003
16
List of Test Structures for SRAM Manufacturability




Sizing island
– Island to island bridging
– Transistor leakage
Sizing poly
– Poly to poly bridging
– Poly to contact bridging
– Transistor leakage
Sizing contact
– Contact to poly bridging
– Contact / metal 1 bridging
– Contact resistance
Sizing metal 1
– Metal 1 / contact bridging
ISQED-2003
17
Effect of Poly Sizing – SRAM Poly to Poly Bridging
100,000 cells
Poly to poly spacing in SRAM is robust
ISQED-2003
18
Effect of Poly Sizing – SRAM Poly to Contact
Bridging
100,000 cells
Poly to contact spacing in SRAM is robust
ISQED-2003
19
Effect of Poly Sizing – SRAM Pull Down
Transistor Leakage
100,000 cells
All leakage currents are within device model spec
ISQED-2003
20
Test Structures for Characterization

Transistors in SRAM
– Due to the environmental difference (OPC, etc), transistors
in SRAM may behave differently compared to isolated
devices
– Need to measure transistor in the real SRAM array for
accurate characterization



An illustration of test structures
Electrical data for transistor measurement
Cell characterization
ISQED-2003
21
Illustration of Measuring SRAM Transistor
ISQED-2003
22
Transistors in SRAM Cell

Measure all the 6
transistors in 6T SRAM
– To compare cell
symmetry between left
and right
– To compare with isolated
devices

ISQED-2003
Measure 4 orientations
23
Saturation Current of Pass Gate Transistors
(Left, Right, Isolated Counterpart)
Good symmetry and little difference between iso. / dense
ISQED-2003
24
Saturation Current of Pull Down Transistors
(Left, Right, Isolated Counterpart)
Good symmetry and little difference between iso. / dense
ISQED-2003
25
Threshold Voltage of Pull Down Transistor in
4 Directions (0, 90, 180, 270)
Little difference of 4 different orientations
ISQED-2003
26
SNM and Cell Current of 1.87 um2 Bitcell
(130nm Generation)
1.2
1.0
Vout
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
Vin
Butterfly curve
ISQED-2003
1.0
1.2
0.001
0.003
0.005
0.007
0.009
Cell Current (A)
Cell current (L&R)
27
RAMPCM Test Chip



ISQED-2003
RAMPCM is a functional
SRAM test chip that is
used to prove robustness
of the most critical SRAM
design rules.
Size of the chip is 1M with
1024 row by 1024
columns
Every 64 columns
evaluate one critical
SRAM design rule
28
RAMPCM Test Chip (continued)



ISQED-2003
8 most critical design
rules are evaluated
Each design rule has 4
variations, distributed
across array
Data logs from failing dies
are used to extract
numbers of failing bits per
design rule variation
29
RAMPCM Test Data -- Normalized Failure Rate
Within
process
window
Rule
DR
Tightness 1
x
x-D
x - 2D
x - 3D
1.0
0.9
1.1
1.1
DR
2
DR
3
DR
4
DR
5
DR
6
DR
7
DR
8
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.3
1.0
1.0
1.4
1.3
1.0
1.0
1.3
1.4
1.0
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.0
1.0
0.9
1.1
1.0
0.9
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.1
Note: More than 50Mb data for
each variation.
Design rules used
in 1.87 um2 cell
This data proves the robustness and
manufacturability of the 1.87 um2 bitcell
ISQED-2003
30
Use of Test Structures in 90nm and Beyond




Increased design-process interaction in 90nm and
beyond (Ex. OPC variation)
The test structure methodology we have presented today
becomes even more necessary for 90 nm and beyond
Gate leakage impact for SRAM must be accurately
evaluated
We have designed such necessary test structures for the
90nm node
ISQED-2003
31
Summary



We have designed and used SRAM-specific test
structures as effective tool for SRAM technology
development.
The data from these SRAM test structures provides us
direct feedback on process-design interactions and helps
to identify yield-limiting factors early and quickly.
The data (including from RAMPCM) is analyzed to prove
the robustness and manufacturability of our industryleading 1.87 um2 SRAM cell.
ISQED-2003
32