* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Myopic and non-myopic agent optimization in game theory
Survey
Document related concepts
Transcript
Myopic and non-myopic agent optimization in game theory, economics, biology and artificial intelligence Michael J Gagen Institute of Molecular Bioscience University of Queensland Email: [email protected] Kae Nemoto Quantum Information Science National Institute of Informatics, Japan Email: [email protected] Overview: Functional Optimization in Strategic Economics (and AI) Formalized by von Neumann and Morgenstern, Theory of Games and Economic Behavior (1944) Mathematics / Physics (minimize action) Overview: Functional Optimization in Strategic Economics (and AI) Formalized by von Neumann and Morgenstern, Theory of Games and Economic Behavior (1944) Strategic Economics (maximize expected payoff) Functionals: Fully general Not necessarily continuous Not necessarily differentiable Nb: Implicit Assumption of Continuity !! Overview: Functional Optimization in Strategic Economics (and AI) Strategic Economics (maximize expected payoff) von Neumann’s “myopic” assumption Evidence: von Neumann & Nash used fixed point theorems in probability simplex equivalent to a convex subset of a real vector space von Neumann and Morgenstern, Theory of Games and Economic Behavior (1944) J. F. Nash, Equilibrium points in n-person games. PNAS, 36(1):48–49 (1950) Overview: Functional Optimization in Strategic Economics (and AI) Non-myopic Optimization No communications between players Correlations Constraints and forbidden regions Overview: Functional Optimization in Strategic Economics (and AI) “Myopic” Economics (= Physics) Non-myopic Optimization ∞ correlations & ∞ different trees Myopic One Constraint = One Tree constraint sets X Myopic “The” Game Tree lists All play options Myopic = Missing Information! Correlation = Information What Information? Nemoto: “It is not what they are doing, its what they are thinking!” Chess: “Chunking” or pattern recognition in human chess play Experts: Performance in speed chess doesn’t degrade much Rapidly direct attention to good moves Assess less than 100 board positions per move Eye movements fixate only on important positions Re-produce game positions after brief exposure better than novices, but random positions only as well as novices Learning Strategy = Learning information to help win game Optimization and Correlations are Non-Commuting! Complex Systems Theory Emergence of Complexity via correlated signals higher order structure Optimization and Correlations are Non-Commuting! Life Sciences (Evolutionary Optimization) Selfish Gene Theory Mayr: Incompatibility between biology and physics Rosen: “Correlated” Components in biology, rather than “uncorrelated” parts Mattick: Biology informs information science 6 Gbit DNA program more complex than any human program, implicating RNA as correlating signals allowing multi-tasking and developmental control of complex organisms. Mattick: RNA signals in molecular networks Prokaryotic gene Eukaryotic gene Hidden layer mRNA protein mRNA & eRNA networking functions protein Optimization and Correlations are Non-Commuting! Economics Selfish independent agents: “homo economicus” Challenges: Japanese Development Economics, Toyota “Just-In-Time” Production System Optimization and Correlations are Non-Commuting! 1 Player Evolving / Learning Machines (neural and molecular networks) endogenously exploit correlations to alter own decision tree, dynamics and optima o o = F(i) = F(t,d) i = Ft (d) {F(x,y,z), … ,F(x,x,z),…} Functional Programming, Dataflow computation, re-write architectures, … Discrepancies: Myopic Agent Optimization and Observation Heuristic statistics Iterated Prisoner’s Dilemma Iterated Ultimatum Game Chain Store Paradox (Incumbent never fights new market entrants) Myopic Agent Optimization Strategic Form Normal Form Px Py ? von Neumann and Morgenstern (1944): All possible information = All possible move combinations for all histories and all futures ? Sum-Over-Histories or Path Integral formulation Myopic Agent Optimization Optimization Sum over all stages Sum over all paths to nth stage Probability of each path Payoff from each stage for each path Myopic Agent Optimization Myopic agents ( probability distributions) uncorrelated no additional constraints x1 1-p y1 p 0 ≤ p ≤ 1/2 Backwards Induction & Minimax Non-Myopic Agent Optimization Fully general, notationally emphasized by: Optimization Sum over all correlation strategies Constraint set of each strategy Payoff for each path Probability of each strategy Sum over all paths given strategy Conditioned path probability Non-Myopic Agent Optimization in the Iterated Prisoner’s Dilemma In 1950 Melvin Dresher and Merrill Flood devised a game later called the Prisoner’s Dilemma Two prisoners are in separate cells and must decide to cooperate or defect Payoff Matrix Py Px C D Cooperation Defect C (2, 2) (0, 3) CKR: Common Knowledge of Rationality D (3,0) (1,1) Non-Myopic Agent Optimization in the Iterated Prisoner’s Dilemma Myopic agent assumption max Non-Myopic Agent Optimization in the Iterated Prisoner’s Dilemma Myopic agents: N max constraints =1 > 0 PN-1,x,HN-2(1) = 1 =0 > 0 PNx,HN-1(1) = 1 Simultaneous solution Backwards Induction myopic agents always defect Non-Myopic Agent Optimization in the Iterated Prisoner’s Dilemma Correlated Constraints: (deriving Tit For Tat) 2 max constraints < 0 P1x(1) = 0, so Px cooperates < 0 P1y(1) = 0, so Py cooperates Non-Myopic Agent Optimization in the Iterated Prisoner’s Dilemma Families of correlation constraints: k, j index Change of notation: “dot N” = N, “dot dot N” = 2N, “dot dot N-2” = 2N-2, etc Optimize via game theory techniques Many constrained equilibria involving cooperation Cooperation is rational in IPD Further Reading and Contacts Kae Nemoto Email: [email protected] URL: http://www.qis.ex.nii.ac.jp/knemoto.html Michael J Gagen Email: [email protected] URL: http://research.imb.uq.edu.au/~m.gagen/ See: Cooperative equilibria in the finite iterated prisoner's dilemma, K. Nemoto and M. J. Gagen, EconPapers:wpawuwpga/0404001 (http://econpapers.hhs.se/paper/wpawuwpga/0404001.htm)