* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Migrate talk slides - Networks and Mobile Systems
Survey
Document related concepts
Airborne Networking wikipedia , lookup
Piggybacking (Internet access) wikipedia , lookup
Internet protocol suite wikipedia , lookup
TCP congestion control wikipedia , lookup
Recursive InterNetwork Architecture (RINA) wikipedia , lookup
Zero-configuration networking wikipedia , lookup
Transcript
Connection Migration: Why & How Hari Balakrishnan Networks and Mobile Systems Group MIT Lab for Computer Science http://nms.lcs.mit.edu/ Joint work with Alex Snoeren & Dave Andersen Anatomy of a connection Some socket on breeze.lcs.mit.edu 18.31.0.83:5678 www.cnn.com’s HTTP service (port) 207.25.71.23:80 • Connection defined by IPA:PortA IPB:PortB • An IP address does not identify a host; it only identifies a network interface • Is this a good definition of a connection? Problem #1: Host mobility • Cerf’s comment from DoD Internet paper: “If a host were to move, its network (and host) addresses would change and this would affect the connection identifiers used by the TCP. This is rather like a problem called "dynamic reconnection" which has plagued network designers since the inception of the ARPANET project in 1968.” • Two options today for connections: Terminate and retry Somehow preserve IP address and continue • “Horizontal” mobility isn’t quite enough... Vertical mobility: Seamless inter-provider movement Regional-Area/ ”wireless cable” Metro-Area Campus-Area Packet Radio In-building & In-room Problem #2: Unreliable components cnn.com • Individual components rather unreliable • Replicate for improved reliability and availability • What happens to a bound connection on failure or unresponsiveness? Possible solutions • 1. Force constant IP address for end-point Mobile IP Layer-N switches with “Virtual IPs” • 2. Make names routable All packets identify destination by name, which serves as routing identifier Intentional naming (late binding), TRIAD • 3. In-band migration Don’t confound end-point and routing identifiers! Address constancy: Mobile IP Correspondent Hosts D Foreign Agent (FA) “Detunnel” to D on addr dtmp D Mobile Host D Home Agent Intercepts “Tunnel” to FA pkts dFA D Temporary address dtmp changes with mobility Why Mobile IP isn’t right • Requires additional network support and infrastructure (HA, FA, authentication,…) • Triangle routing even for “local” interactions • Many types of mobile applications Connections that don’t care for seamlessness Connection initiators Both initiators and responders • Ingress filtering reverse tunneling too! • Vertical mobility can’t be properly handled • Applications can’t be made aware of mobility Address constancy: Layer-N switching With work can solve: Local distribution Client But we want: Global distribution Name-based routing (example) Intentional name [service = camera] [building = NE43 [room = 510]] Lookup image Intentional name resolvers form an overlay network Late binding: integrate resolution and message routing What should a connection be? • Between communicating applications, not network interfaces • Should be possible for an application to easily change network interface of connection: While preserving good unicast routes Securely • Should not require a priori knowledge of valid network interfaces • Dynamism should not affect semantics or correctness, nor worsen reliability If done right, can solve both problems at once! Migrate overview Location Query (DNS Lookup) Location Update (Dynamic DNS Update) Name server Connection Initiation Connection Migration Fixed Host Migrating Host foo.bar.edu yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx Problems • Consistency of name mapping • Correctness Handling packet losses around time of movement What if someone else gets your old address? • Security Connection hijacking Denial-of-service protection • Semantics How to maintain semantics of connection sequence across different nodes? Dynamic name mappings • Zero TTL on A-records for migratable names • Use Dynamic DNS (RFC 2136, 2137) for Internet names • Potential problems: Race condition between name update and movement • Simply retry! This isn’t a new failure mode What about old BIND implementations? • Pray that they’ll vanish off the face of the earth What about extra DNS load? • What load? Ask Akamai! Migrating a connection • Initiate migration from new network address Identify previous connection with token, on SYN Secure token to protect against hijacking Requires some state machine changes to guarantee correctness • Preserves service model to application • Handles “middle boxes” Works with most NATs, PEPs, stateful firewalls • Requires changes to transport protocol Kernel TCP, SCTP, RTP (linked library) TCP Connection Migration 1. Initial SYN 2. SYN/ACK 3. ACK (with data) 4. Normal data transfer 5. Migrate SYN 6. Migrate SYN/ACK 7. ACK (with data) TCP Connection Migration 1. Initial SYN 2. SYN/ACK 3. ACK (with data) 4. Normal data transfer 5. Migrate SYN 6. Migrate SYN/ACK 7. ACK (with data) TCP Connection Migration 1. Initial SYN 2. SYN/ACK 3. ACK (with data) 4. Normal data transfer 5. Migrate SYN 6. Migrate SYN/ACK 7. ACK (with data) Two correctness issues • SYN uses 1 byte of sequence space; what should SYN ACK value be set to? Needed to correctly handle lost segments • What if someone else gets your previous address? Peer TCP will reset connection Correctness: SYN ACK corresponds to data 1. Initial SYN 2. SYN/ACK 3. ACK (with data) 4. Normal data transfer 5. Migrate SYN 6. Migrate SYN/ACK 7. ACK (with data) • 2 new transitions between existing states - and • 1 new state handles potential race condition due to rapid readdressing recv: SYN (migrate T, R) send: SYN, ACK Modified TCP State Machine MIGRATE_WAIT 2MSL timeout Securing the Migration • Problem: Increased vulnerability to hijacking Ingress filtering (RFC 2827) doesn’t help Attacker only needs token and sequence space • Solution: Keep the token secret Negotiate it using Diffie-Hellman exchange (Elliptic-Curve DH) Use sequence numbers to prevent replay Complete crypto exchange in SYN handshake • Result: Connections are as secure as standard TCP Use IPsec or SSH for real security Semantics of multi-machine migration ACK 9000 7801-9000 • Sequence spaces across different machines may not have same application-layer semantics One solution: Soft-state synchronzation foo.mp3 ISN = I Token = T caddr = Ca cport = Cp preload-tcb Health Monitor ACK 9000 7801-9000 • Technique for static content (e.g., file) • Information about mapping between filename and TCP initial sequence periodically disseminated Implementation • Use application-specific stream mapper to map between sequence space and app (e.g., HTTP range requests) Client request HTTP GET parser/creator HTTP header parser/ Response stripper handler Data relay To client HTTP range request Backend HTTP Response server • Stream mapper involved in initial connection processing and in re-establishment Experiment #1: Mobility Mobile client initiates a transfer… Mobile Location 1 19.2Kbps Modem Fixed Server 100Mbps Ethernet Fixed Basestation 19.2Kbps Modem …then moves to a new location Mobile Location 2 Migration Trace SYN/ACK Buffered Packets (old address) Migrate SYN A Lossy Trace with SACK SYN/ACK Buffered Packets (old address) ACK w/SACK Migrate SYN Experiment #2: Failover works! 0.000 cl.1065 > sA.8080: . ack 0505 win 31856 ----> (Erroneous) sA death pronouncement issued 0.080 sA.8080 > cl.1065: P 0505:1953(1448) ack 1 win 31856 ----> Successful connection migration to sB 0.095 sB.1033 > cl.1065: S 0:0(0) win 0 <migrate PRELOAD 1> 0.096 cl.1065 > sB.1033: S 0:0(0) ack 1953 win 32120 0.142 sB.1033 > cl.1065: . ack 1 win 32120 ----> Continued data transmission from sA (Reset by client) 0.174 sA.8080 > cl.1065: P 0505:1953(1448) ack 1 win 31856 0.174 cl.1065 > sA.8080: R 1:1(0) win 0 ----> Resumed data transmission from sB 0.241 sB.1033 > cl.1065: P 1953:3413(1460) ack 1 win 32120 ... Oscillations aren’t a problem Summary • Host mobility and service failover are examples of the same fundamental problem: Connections must be between applications • The Migrate architecture enables connections to be separated from, and move between, IP addresses • Mobility & service failover are both really end-to-end issues! • Got code? Networks and Mobile Systems Migrate code for Linux 2.2 available from: http://nms.lcs.mit.edu/software/ Migrate project Web page: http://nms.lcs.mit.edu/projects/migrate/