* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Role of cardiac structural and functional abnormalities in the
Survey
Document related concepts
Coronary artery disease wikipedia , lookup
Remote ischemic conditioning wikipedia , lookup
Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia wikipedia , lookup
Cardiac contractility modulation wikipedia , lookup
Antihypertensive drug wikipedia , lookup
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy wikipedia , lookup
Transcript
Clinical Science (1999) 97, 259–267 (Printed in Great Britain) Role of cardiac structural and functional abnormalities in the pathogenesis of hyperdynamic circulation and renal sodium retention in cirrhosis Florence WONG*, Peter LIU†, Lesley LILLY*, Arieh BOMZON‡ and Laurence BLENDIS*§ *Division of Gastroenterology, The Toronto Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, †Division of Cardiology, The Toronto Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, ‡Department of Pharmacology, Technion Medical School, Haifa, Israel, and §Institute of Gastroenterology, Ichilov Hospital, Tel Aviv, Israel A B S T R A C T The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between subtle cardiovascular abnormalities and abnormal sodium handling in cirrhosis. A total of 35 biopsy-proven patients with cirrhosis with or without ascites and 14 age-matched controls underwent two-dimensional echocardiography and radionuclide angiography for assessment of cardiac volumes, structural changes and systolic and diastolic functions under strict metabolic conditions of a sodium intake of 22 mmol/day. Cardiac output, systemic vascular resistance and pressure/volume relationship (an index of cardiac contractility) were calculated. Eight controls and 14 patients with non-ascitic cirrhosis underwent repeat volume measurements and the pressure/volume relationship was reevaluated after consuming a diet containing 200 mmol of sodium/day for 7 days. Ascitic cirrhotic patients had significant reductions in (i) cardiac pre-load (end diastolic volume 106p9 ml ; P 0.05 compared with controls), due to relatively thicker left ventricular wall and septum (P 0.05) ; (ii) afterload (systemic vascular resistance 992p84 dyn:s:cm−5 ; P 0.05 compared with controls) due to systemic arterial vasodilatation ; and (iii) reversal of the pressure/volume relationship, indicating contractility dysfunction. Increased cardiac output (6.12p0.45 litres/ min ; P 0.05 compared with controls) was due to a significantly increased heart rate. Pre-ascitic cirrhotic patients had contractile dysfunction, which was accentuated when challenged with a dietary sodium load, associated with renal sodium retention (urinary sodium excretion 162p12 mmol/day, compared with 197p12 mmol/day in controls ; P 0.05). Cardiac output was maintained, since the pre-load was normal or increased, despite a mild degree of ventricular thickening, indicating some diastolic dysfunction. We conclude that : (i) contractile dysfunction is present in cirrhosis and is aggravated by a sodium load ; (ii) an increased pre-load in the preascitic patients compensates for the cardiac dysfunction ; and (iii) in ascitic patients, a reduced afterload, manifested as systemic arterial vasodilatation, compensates for a reduced pre-load and contractile dysfunction. Cirrhotic cardiomyopathy may well play a pathogenic role in the complications of cirrhosis. Key words : cardiomyopathy, cirrhosis, hyperdynamic circulation, sodium retention. Abbreviations : E\A ratio, E velocity is early maximal ventricular filling velocity, and A velocity is late diastolic or atrial velocity ; EDV, end diastolic volume ; EF, ejection fraction ; ESV, end systolic volume. Correspondence : Dr Florence Wong, Room 220, 9th Floor, Eaton Wing, Toronto Hospital, 200 Elizabeth Street, Toronto M5G 2C4, Ontario, Canada. # 1999 The Biochemical Society and the Medical Research Society 259 260 F. Wong and others INTRODUCTION In cirrhosis, cardiac function, in the absence of intrinsic cardiac disease or clinically evident dilated alcoholic cardiomyopathy, appears to be normal, as indicated by the conventional ejection fraction (EF) [1]. Cardiac output seems to increase appropriately when challenged with an increased pre-load following a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent shunt [2,3] or after peritoneovenous shunting [4]. However, occasional cases of unexpected death due to heart failure have been reported following liver transplantation [5], transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent shunt [6] and surgical portocaval shunts [7]. This raises the possibility of cardiac dysfunction related to cirrhosis. Indeed, in animal studies, the cardiac pre-load reserve, a parameter of cardiac contractile function, has been documented to be significantly lowered in cirrhotic rats [8]. In another study, cirrhotic rats have also been found to have abnormalities in cardiac β-adrenergic receptors and conduction pathways [9]. These findings suggest that cirrhotic cardiomyopathy does occur. This is supported by reports of mechanical, electrophysiological and structural cardiac changes [10–13] and decreased cardiac performance, especially in response to stress [10,11,14], in patients with cirrhosis of non-alcoholic aetiologies. The clinical significance of cirrhotic cardiomyopathy has never been evaluated. Could cirrhotic cardiomyopathy, as a result of ‘ forward failure ’, play a role in the pathogenesis of the abnormal sodium and water homoeostasis and hyperdynamic circulation that accompany cirrhosis ? Thus the aims of the present study were to assess (i) cardiac structural and functional abnormalities in cirrhosis, and (ii) the possible relationship between these abnormalities and abnormal sodium handling in these patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS Ethical approval for the study was granted by the Ethics Committee of The Toronto Hospital. All control subjects and patients with cirrhosis gave informed consent for the study. Patients A total of 35 patients (32 males and 3 females ; mean age 52p4 years) with biopsy-proven cirrhosis were recruited from the Liver Clinics of The Toronto Hospital. Of these, 16 patients had no history of ascites or diuretic use. Absence of ascites was confirmed by ultrasound before enrolment. These patients were therefore termed preascitic cirrhotic patients. The remaining 19 patients had obvious ascites clinically. Twenty-four patients had alcoholic cirrhosis, but had been abstinent from alcohol for at least 6 months before entering the study. Cirrhosis # 1999 The Biochemical Society and the Medical Research Society was related to hepatitis C infection in four patients and to hepatitis B infection in another three. One patient had both alcoholic cirrhosis and hepatitis C infection, while the remaining three patients had cirrhosis due to α " antitrypsin deficiency, haemochromatosis and steatohepatitis respectively. All patients were stable and had been free of gastrointestinal bleeding within the previous 3 months. Cardiovascular disease was excluded by a normal examination by a cardiologist, a normal ECG and chest X-ray. Intrinsic renal disease was excluded by history, examination of the urinary sediment and confirmation of normal-sized kidneys on ultrasound. Fourteen age-matched healthy individuals with no history of cardiac or renal disease served as controls. Demographics of all study subjects and results of baseline liver function tests, including the Pugh score, in all cirrhotic patients are given in Table 1. Study design Both cardiac structure and function were assessed. Left ventricular systolic and diastolic chamber dimensions, interventricular septal thickness and left ventricular relative wall thickness were measured during twodimensional echocardiograph examination as assessments of cardiac structure [15]. Cardiac systolic or contractile function was assessed non-invasively using radionuclide angiography. The parameters measured were left ventricular volumes, EF and the pressure\volume relationship, a highly reproducible and reliable measure of left ventricular contractility [16,17]. Diastolic function was assessed using two-dimensional echocardiograph by measuring (i) the E\A ratio (E velocity is early maximal ventricular filling velocity, and A velocity is late diastolic or atrial velocity), an assessment of the atrial contribution of the ventricular volume, (ii) deceleration time, and (iii) isovolumic relaxation time. An increase in the deceleration time of the venous return [13,18] and an increase in the ventricular relaxation time suggest impedance to ventricular filling, i.e. increased ventricular stiffness or diastolic dysfunction. The study was performed with all study subjects consuming a metabolic diet containing 22 mmol of sodium and 1.0 litre of fluid per day. Control subjects and pre-ascitic patients do not retain sodium while on this sodium intake, whereas the ascitic patients retain sodium avidly even on this low-sodium diet. This was to permit correlation of cardiac abnormalities with the extent of sodium retention. The control subjects and pre-ascitic cirrhotic patients were then asked to consume a highsodium diet of 200 mmol\day together with a 1.5 litre\day fluid restriction, since pre-ascitic cirrhotic patients have been shown to have subtle sodium retention after remaining on this diet for 7 days [19]. This would permit the relationship between cardiac function and the state of sodium retention to be assessed at an earlier stage of liver cirrhosis. Cardiac dysfunction in cirrhosis Table 1 Baseline demographics of control subjects and patients with cirrhosis n Age (years) Sex (male/female) Prothrombin time (s) Albumin (g/l) Bilirubin (µmol/l) Pugh score Aetiology of cirrhosis Alcohol Hepatitis C virus Alcohol plus hepatitis C virus Hepatitis B virus α1-Antitrypsin deficiency Haemochromatosis Steatohepatitis Controls Pre-ascitic cirrhosis Ascitic cirrhosis 14 48p3 14/0 10–13 40p2 10p2 – 16 50p6 16/0 12.1p1.0 36p3 19p4 6.4p0.3 19 55p3 16/3 14.1p0.9 31p2 37p6 8.8p1.1 10 3 0 0 1 1 1 14 1 1 3 0 0 0 Protocol The study began with all study subjects being maintained on a sodium-restricted diet of 22 mmol\day, with a 1 litre fluid restriction per day. Day 1 of the study was the first day of the diet. All diuretics were withheld from the ascitic patients. All study subjects were monitored by daily weighing and 24 h urine collections to determine their urinary sodium excretion. Urinary creatinine concentrations were used as an indicator of completeness of the urine collections. On day 7 of the study, both control subjects and cirrhotic patients, after having fasted and remained supine for at least 6 h, underwent radionuclide angiography for measurement of total central blood volume and cardiac chamber volume in the Nuclear Cardiology Department. The technique for measurement of central blood volume has been described previously [1]. Automatic blood pressure and pulse monitoring (Dinamap, model 845XT ; Critikon, Tampa, FL, U.S.A.) was performed regularly during radionuclide angiography. The peak systolic blood pressure, together with the end systolic volume (ESV), were used to calculate the peak systolic pressure\ ESV relationship, a surrogate index of cardiac contractility [16,17]. Quality assurance studies in our Nuclear Cardiology Laboratory have established the standard error of the ventricular volume calculation to be less than 5 ml [20]. On the same afternoon, all subjects underwent a two-dimensional echocardiological examination for measurement of cardiac chamber dimensions and parameters of diastolic function. After completion of the above baseline studies, the control subjects and pre-ascitic cirrhotic patients were placed on a diet containing 200 mmol of sodium and 1.5 litres of fluid per day for a further 7 days. Radionuclide angiography was repeated and the pressure\volume relationship was re-evaluated to assess cardiac contractile function with sodium loading. Laboratory analysis Urinary sodium concentrations were determined by flame photometry. Urinary creatinine was measured by the Jaffe reaction. Calculations Total central blood volume, pulmonary vascular volumes, left end diastolic volume (EDV) and left ESV were measured directly during radionuclide angiography based on actual cardiopulmonary and blood sample radioactivities. The left-sided systolic stroke volume was calculated as EDVkESV. Cardiac output and systemic vascular resistance were then calculated from standard formulae using stroke volume, heart rate and mean arterial pressure [5]. Statistical analysis All results are expressed as meanspS.E.M. Regression analysis was used to determine the relationship between systolic arterial blood pressure and ESV during ingestion of the low-sodium diet. Differences between the three study groups were assessed by analysis of variance, while the differences between the control subjects and the preascitic patients during the period of the high-sodium diet were assessed using the unpaired Student’s t test. A P value of 0.05 was considered statistically significant. # 1999 The Biochemical Society and the Medical Research Society 261 262 F. Wong and others RESULTS Diet of 22 mmol of sodium/day At the end of 7 days on the low-sodium diet, mean urinary sodium excretion was similar between the control subjects (21p2 mmol\day) and the pre-ascitic cirrhotic patients (19p2 mmol\day), but significantly reduced in the patients with ascites (5p1 mmol\day ; P 0.05 compared with controls and pre-ascitic cirrhotics). Mean urinary creatinine levels during intake of the low-sodium diet in the male subjects were 20.1p0.4 mmol\day for the controls, 18.2p1.2 mmol\day for the pre-ascitic cirrhotic patients and 13.4p1.4 mmol\day for the ascitic cirrhotic patients (normal range 9–22 mmol\day). The mean urinary creatinine output for the female patients, all of whom had ascites, was 8.1p1.0 mmol\day (normal range 5–15 mmol\day). These levels represented complete daily urine collections. Assessment of cardiac function The controls and the pre-ascitic cirrhotics had similar values for systolic blood pressure, mean arterial blood pressure and heart rate. In contrast, the ascitic patients had a significantly lower systolic blood pressure (P 0.05), a normal but slightly lower mean arterial pressure and a significantly higher heart rate (P 0.05) (Table 2). Table 2 Baseline haemodynamic and cardiac chamber volume measurements in control subjects and patients with cirrhosis while on a diet containing 22 mmol of sodium/day Significance of differences : *P 0.05 compared with controls ; †P n Heart rate (beats/min) Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) Mean arterial pressure (mmHg) Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) EF ( %) Stroke volume (ml) EDV (ml) ESV (ml) Central blood volume (ml) Cardiac output (litres/min) Systemic vascular resistance (dyn:s:cm−5) 0.05 pre-ascitics compared with ascitics. Controls Pre-ascitic cirrhosis Ascitic cirrhosis 14 64p3 121p4 87p3 70p3 58.5p1.6 83p9 142p16 59p4 1612p121 5.13p0.37 1309p112 16 62p3 122p4 90p2 74p2 60.8p2.3 94p12 156p18 62p8 2011p204* 5.83p0.36 1233p121 19 78p3*† 109p3*† 82p5 69p3 65.1p1.3* 72p5† 106p9*† 37p6*† 2144p216* 6.12p0.45* 992p84*† Table 3 Systolic and diastolic functions and cardiac dimensions in control subjects and patients with cirrhosis while on a diet containing 22 mmol of sodium/day Measurements were obtained from a two-dimensional echocardiograph. Significance of differences : *P compared with controls ; †P 0.05 compared with pre-ascitics. n Left atrial size (mm) Left ventricular size at end diastole (mm) Left ventricular size at end systole (mm) E/A ratio Deceleration time (ms) Isovolumic relaxation time (ms) Interventricular septal thickness (mm) Left ventricular relative wall thickness ( %) # 1999 The Biochemical Society and the Medical Research Society 0.05, **P 0.01 Controls Pre-ascitic cirrhosis Ascitic cirrhosis 14 31p2 47p2 16 41p2* 50p2 19 40p1* 41p1*† 31p2 30p1 25p1* 1.3p0.4 172p8 63p11 8.5p1.1 1.2p0.3 218p12* 88p3* 10.5p0.9* 0.9p0.1* 214p11* 86p4* 10.9p0.1* 35p3 42p4 51p6** Cardiac dysfunction in cirrhosis being significantly higher than in the pre-ascitic patients and the controls (Table 2). Keeping in mind that the EF is a ratio between stroke volume and the EDV, the higher EF in the ascitic cirrhotic patients was due to a lower stroke volume divided by a much reduced EDV. This was also associated with significantly smaller left-ventricular dimensions in the ascitic patients, both at the end of diastole and at the end of systole (Table 3). When the systolic blood pressure was correlated with the leftventricular ESV in the control subjects, a normal physiological relationship of a positive correlation was observed, i.e. the higher the systolic blood pressure, the greater the ESV (Figure 1a). In contrast, in both the pre-ascitic and ascitic patients, the pressure\volume relationship was reversed, with the larger cardiac volumes being associated with lower systolic blood pressure (Figures 1b and 1c). (b) Diastolic function. The isovolumic relaxation time was significantly prolonged in both the pre-ascitic and ascitic patients (Table 3). This was associated with a significantly prolonged deceleration time in both patient groups (Table 3). The E\A ratio, a measure of the atrial contribution to the EDV, was significantly decreased in the ascitic patients only (P 0.05 compared with controls) (Table 3). The left atrial diameter was significantly increased in both the pre-ascitic and ascitic patients compared with the controls (Table 3). Assessment of cardiac structure The interventricular septal thickness was significantly increased in the pre-ascitic and ascitic patients compared with the controls (Table 3). The left-ventricular relative wall thickness was also significantly greater in the ascitic patients, but not in the pre-ascitic patients, when compared with the controls (Table 3). Figure 1 Single-beat systolic pressure/volume relationship in (a) healthy controls, (b) pre-ascitic cirrhotic patients and (c) ascitic cirrhotic patients while on a diet containing 22 mmol of sodium/day The stroke volume and cardiac chamber volumes were similar between the controls and the pre-ascitic cirrhotic patients, but with the latter tending towards increased chamber volumes. The ascitic cirrhotic patients, however, had lower values of stroke volume, EDV and ESV, with the EDV and ESV being significantly decreased compared with both controls and pre-ascitic patients (P 0.05) (Table 2). The significantly higher heart rate in the ascitic patients resulted in a significantly increased cardiac output when compared with the controls (P 0.05), and the low normal mean arterial pressure resulted in a significantly reduced systemic vascular resistance compared with both the controls and the pre-ascitic cirrhotic patients (P 0.05) (Table 2). (a) Systolic function. The EF was in the normal range in all three study groups, with that in the ascitic patients Diet of 200 mmol of sodium/day Eight control subjects and 14 pre-ascitic cirrhotic patients consented to sodium loading for 7 days. This subset of pre-ascitic cirrhotic patients had significantly higher EDV and stroke volume values, a trend demonstrated by the group as a whole (Table 2). At the end of 7 days on the high-sodium diet, the mean 24 h urinary sodium excretion in the pre-ascitic cirrhotic patients was 162p12 mmol, significantly lower than that in the control subjects (197p12 mmol ; P 0.05), who, unlike the cirrhotics, remained in sodium balance. The control subjects had a weight gain of 2.2p0.4 kg at the end of the sodium loading period, while that in the pre-ascitic patients was 3.8p0.3 kg. There was a significant increase in total central blood volume, EDV and ESV in the control subjects (Table 4). In contrast, the pre-ascitic cirrhotic patients only had a significant increase in ESV, and the changes in EDV and central blood volume were not statistically significant. When the pressure\volume relationship was reexamined in the control subjects, they showed a physio# 1999 The Biochemical Society and the Medical Research Society 263 264 F. Wong and others Table 4 Effects of sodium loading on systemic haemodynamics and cardiac volume measurements in control subjects and patients with pre-ascitic cirrhosis The low-sodium diet contained 22 mmol of sodium/day, and the high-sodium diet contained 200 mmol of sodium/day. Significance of differences : *P with controls ; †P 0.05 compared with low-sodium diet. Controls (n l 8) Heart rate (beats/min) Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) Mean arterial pressure (mmHg) EDV (ml) ESV (ml) Stroke volume (ml) EF ( %) Central blood volume (ml) 0.05 compared Pre-ascitic cirrhosis (n l 14) Low sodium High sodium Low sodium High sodium 67p3 119p4 84p4 142p9 55p3 81p5 57.4p2.5 1525p111 67p2 128p3† 87p3 164p8† 75p4† 94p3† 58.9p2.6 1891p107† 63p4 121p4 89p4 162p12* 61p5 97p8* 62.7p3.6 1901p94* 62p3 125p3 89p2 164p11 73p4† 94p6 61.1p2.5 2110p124 On analysing the responses of the individual cirrhotic patients to sodium loading, eight patients showed a normal systolic pressure increase associated with the increase in the ESV, whereas the remaining six patients had an abnormal response, with a reduction in their systolic blood pressure in association with an increase in ESV (Figure 2b). Those pre-ascitic cirrhotic patients who showed an abnormal response to sodium loading had a significantly higher mean peak systolic blood pressure (131p5 mmHg) compared with those who showed a normal response (114p4 mmHg ; P l 0.02). DISCUSSION Figure 2 Individual single-beat systolic pressure/volume relationships before and after sodium loading with 200 mmol of sodium/day in (a) healthy controls and (b) pre-ascitic cirrhotic patients logical cardiovascular response, i.e. the increase in cardiac volume after sodium loading was associated with an increase in the systolic blood pressure (Figure 2a). This normal response was observed in all control subjects (Figure 2a). In contrast, the pre-ascitic cirrhotic patients, as a group, showed a minimal increase in systolic blood pressure, despite a significant increase in ESV (Table 4). # 1999 The Biochemical Society and the Medical Research Society Cirrhotic patients demonstrated both structural and functional cardiac abnormalities, resulting in systolic and diastolic dysfunction, which appeared to correlate with the severity of the liver disease. Cardiac systolic performance is governed by the preload, the afterload and cardiac contractility. The preload, in turn, is best expressed non-invasively as the EDV, which is determined by both the volume of the venous return and the stiffness or the diastolic function of the heart. The pre-load in the pre-ascitic cirrhotic patients was normal or even increased, despite evidence of diastolic abnormalities. In contrast, the patients with ascitic cirrhosis, who also had diastolic dysfunction, demonstrated significantly reduced cardiac pre-load or EDV. Could the difference in pre-load between the preascitic and ascitic cirrhotic patients simply be a function of the severity of the diastolic dysfunction ? Indeed, the ascitic patients had a thicker left ventricular wall and a lower E\A ratio, indicating greater impedance to venous inflow. An increased venous return, indirectly reflected by a significantly increased central blood volume in the pre-ascitic cirrhotic patients, appeared to have been able to maintain the pre-load. In contrast, the same increase in Cardiac dysfunction in cirrhosis central blood volume in the ascitic cirrhotic patients resulted in a smaller pre-load in the presence of a stiffer left ventricle. In other words, the pre-ascitic cirrhotic patients would have had a reduced pre-load if it were not for their intravascular volume expansion, and the ascitic cirrhotic patients were relatively ‘ under-volumed ’ for their degree of diastolic dysfunction. That is, the stiff heart has prevented adequate filling of the ventricle. This does not mean that the ascitic cirrhotic patients had a reduced total blood volume, but rather that the blood volume was maldistributed elsewhere, such as the splanchnic vascular bed, rather than to the heart. The afterload is largely determined by the impedance to ventricular ejection, which is represented noninvasively as the systemic vascular resistance. Normally, lower impedance should lead to a greater stroke volume. Decreased afterload was evident in the ascitic, but not the pre-ascitic, patients. The presence of excess vasodilators, especially in decompensated cirrhosis, is thought to be responsible for the systemic arterial vasodilatation [21], which has been implicated in the hyperdynamic circulation and sodium retention in these patients [22]. Despite the many detrimental effects of systemic arterial vasodilatation in cirrhosis, it seems that Nature has provided the perfect solution to the development of cirrhotic cardiomyopathy. The reduction in afterload has probably helped to protect the cirrhotic heart from florid decompensation, especially in ascitic patients. Finally, cardiac contractility is best determined by a pressure\volume relationship, simplified as the peak systolic pressure\ESV ratio ; the greater the ratio, the better the intrinsic contractility of the heart [23]. Contractility was abnormal in both the pre-ascitic and ascitic cirrhotic patients, as estimated by the peak systolic pressure\volume relationship. This seems paradoxical in the presence of a ‘ normal ’ EF. One must keep in mind that EF is an extensively load-dependent parameter. It is simply a mathematical expression of the ratio between the stroke volume and the EDV. In cirrhosis, the change in stroke volume parallels the change in the EDV, thereby maintaining the EF in the ‘ pseudonormal ’ range. Despite the presence of contractile dysfunction, the pre-ascitic cirrhotic patients were able to maintain a normal stroke volume and mean arterial pressure because of their normal pre-load and afterload. However, the response of the pre-ascitic cirrhotic patients was abnormal when challenged by a physiological stress, such as a highsodium diet ; an increased ESV due to the sodium load resulted in overall unchanged systolic pressure rather than an increase. It appears that, in a subset of pre-ascitic cirrhotic patients who had a higher baseline systolic pressure, the higher afterload had accentuated the contractile dysfunction in the presence of a physiological stress. That is, they did not show the decrease in afterload to protect the heart in conditions of stress. Whether these pre-ascitic cirrhotic patients will develop further compli- cations of cirrhotic cardiomyopathy will require further studies. As a corollary of this observation, it seems prudent to advise pre-ascitic cirrhotic patients with high systolic blood pressure to consume a low-sodium diet. The ascitic cirrhotic patients, unlike the pre-ascitic patients, were unable to generate an adequate stroke volume, despite a significantly reduced afterload. The contractile dysfunction, coupled with a relative decrease in the pre-load, was most probably responsible for this. This decrease in stroke volume in the ascitic cirrhotic patients was partly compensated by increased chronotropy, or the hyperdynamic circulation. A reduced cardiac pre-load seems paradoxical in the presence of an increased total central blood volume in the ascitic cirrhotic patients. Preferential distribution of the central blood volume to the right side of the circulation [24] and to the dilated pulmonary circulation [1], coupled with decreased compliance of the left ventricle, would have reduced the venous return to the left ventricle. In contrast with dilating alcoholic cardiomyopathy [25–28], cirrhotic cardiomyopathy characterized by normal or increased EF and normal or decreased ventricular volumes is increasingly being reported, in both nonascitic and ascitic patients [10,13,14,29]. Furthermore, evidence of contractile dysfunction has been demonstrated at rest and after exercise [10,29], and in response to tilting [14]. The major histological abnormality of the myocardium in such patients was myocardial hypertrophy [30,31]. One possible explanation for this would be myocardial adaptation to a chronically elevated blood volume [1,32]. Alternatively, ventricular hypertrophy or remodelling could be related to the trophic effects of activated neurohormonal systems such as noradrenaline [33], or angiotensin II with or without the synergistic effects of endothelin-1 [34,35]. Pre-ascitic cirrhotic patients tend to have normal or suppressed circulating levels of neurohormones [32,36]. However, these may not reflect the intra-organ concentrations, as seen with the renal renin–angiotensin system in pre-ascitic patients [24] and the disparity between the cardiac coronary sinus and systemic levels of atrial natriuretic peptide in cirrhosis [37]. Myocardial contractile dysfunction, in contrast, may be related to the local effects of liberated cytokines [38,39], with the generation of nitric oxide and cGMP as intermediaries [40–43]. In 1992, Lewis and colleagues [44] first reported a decrease in ESV in relation to a higher mean arterial pressure in pre-ascitic cirrhotic patients. Therefore it is of interest that we have found, in the same subgroup of cirrhotic patients, a reversal of the normal physiological response to sodium loading. Perhaps the cardiac abnormalities may be explained by overactivity of the vasoconstrictor systems in response to increased nitric oxide production in cirrhosis. Given that cardiomyopathy exists in cirrhosis, is there a relationship between myocardial dysfunction, haemodynamic changes, hormonal status and sodium retention # 1999 The Biochemical Society and the Medical Research Society 265 266 F. Wong and others in cirrhosis ? Cirrhosis, with the development of portal hypertension, is associated with haemodynamic changes and altered neurohormonal activities. The activated hormonal systems, in turn, appear to play a pathogenic role in the development of cirrhotic cardiomyopathy. Increased production of nitric oxide, while involved in the pathogenesis of myocardial contractile dysfunction, also produces systemic arterial vasodilatation by virtue of its vasodilator properties. The reduction in afterload thus permits the heart to maintain a normal cardiac output even in the presence of contractile dysfunction and a reduced pre-load, as in the ascitic cirrhotic patients. However, an inadequate cardiac response for the extent of the decrease in the afterload may aggravate the sodium handling abnormality that is already present in cirrhosis ; in turn, sodium retention may aggravate myocardial dysfunction, hastening the development of refractory ascites. Thus a ‘ vicious cycle ’ may be set up. Therefore manipulations of any link in this pathophysiological chain may help to improve haemodynamic status, myocardial function and hence sodium handling in cirrhosis. In summary, patients with decompensated cirrhosis and ascites had a decreased pre-load, decreased afterload and abnormal left-ventricular contractility. They showed an inability to generate a normal stroke volume, and the cardiac output was maintained by an increased heart rate. Pre-ascitic cirrhotic patients, despite their contractile dysfunction, were able to maintain a normal stroke volume because of their normal or increased pre-load. However, those patients with higher mean systolic pressure were unable to increase cardiac performance when challenged by a sodium load. In conclusion, regardless of aetiology, cirrhosis is associated with significant myocardial dysfunction. The pathophysiological changes leading to the development of cirrhotic cardiomyopathy and its consequences may well be involved in the pathogenesis of the hyperdynamic circulation and sodium\water retention which are so commonly observed in these patients. ACKNOWLEDGMENT Special thanks are extended to Yasmin Allidina of the Nuclear Cardiology Department for image analysis and data entry. P.L. holds the Heart and Stroke Foundation Chair of Cardiovascular Research, Toronto, Canada. This study was partly supported by grants from The Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario, Canada REFERENCES 1 Wong, F., Liu, P., Tobe, S., Morali, G. and Blendis, L. M. (1994) Central blood volume in cirrhosis : measurement by radionuclide angiography. Hepatology 19, 312–321 # 1999 The Biochemical Society and the Medical Research Society 2 Azoulay, D., Castaing, D., Dennison, A., Martino, W., Eyraud, D. and Bismuth, H. (1994) Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt worsens the hyperdynamic circulatory state of the cirrhotic patient : preliminary report of a prospective study. Hepatology 19, 129–132 3 Wong, F., Sniderman, K., Liu, P. and Blendis, L. M. (1997) The mechanism of the initial two stage natriuresis following normalization of portal pressure post-TIPS in cirrhotic patients with refractory ascites. Gastroenterology 112, 889–907 4 Blendis, L. M., Greig, P. D., Langer, B., Baigrie, R. S., Ruse, J. and Taylor, B. R. (1979) The renal and hemodynamic effects of the peritoneovenous shunt for intractable hepatic ascites. Gastroenterology 77, 250–257 5 Rayes, N., Bechstein, W. O., Keck, H., Blumhardt, G., Lohmann, R. and Neuhaus, P. (1995) Causes of death after liver transplantation : an analysis of 41 cases in 382 patients. Zentralbl. Chir. 120, 435–438 6 Lebrec, D., Giuily, N., Hadenque, A. et al. (1996) Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt : comparison with paracentesis in patients with cirrhosis and refractory ascites : a randomized trial. J. Hepatol. 25, 135–144 7 Franco, D., Vons, C., Traynor, O. and de Smadja, C. (1988) Should portocaval shunt be reconsidered in the treatment of intractable ascites in cirrhosis ? Arch. Surg. 123, 987–991 8 Ingles, A. C., Hernandez, I., Carcia-Estan, J., Quesada, T. and Carbonell, L. F. (1991) Limited cardiac preload reserve in conscious cirrhotic rats. Am. J. Physiol. 260, H1912–H1917 9 Ma, Z., Miyamoto, A. and Lee, S. S. (1996) Role of the altered β-adrenoreceptor signal transduction in the pathogenesis of cirrhotic cardiomyopathy in rats. Gastroenterology 110, 1191–1198 10 Bernardi, M., Rubboli, A., Trevisani, F. et al. (1991) Reduced cardiovascular responsiveness to exercise-induced sympathoadrenergic stimulation in patients with cirrhosis. J. Hepatol. 12, 207–216 11 Bernardi, M., Calandra, S., Colantoni, A. et al. (1998) Q–T interval prolongation in cirrhosis : prevalence, relationship with severity and etiology of the disease, and possible pathogenetic factors. Hepatology 27, 28–34 12 Finucci, G., Desideri, A., Sacerdoti, D. et al. (1996) Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in liver cirrhosis. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 31, 279–284 13 Pozzi, M., Carugo, S., Boari, G. et al. (1997) Functional and structural cardiac abnormalities in cirrhotic patients with and without ascites. Hepatology 26, 1131–1137 14 Laffi, G., Barletta, G., La Villa, G. et al. (1997) Altered cardiovascular responsiveness to active tilting in nonalcoholic cirrhosis. Gastroenterology 113, 891–898 15 Otto, C. M. and Pearlman, A. S. (1995) Echocardiographic evaluation of left and right systolic and diastolic function. In Textbook of Clinical Echocardiography (Otto, C. M. and Pearlman, A. S., eds.), pp. 85–136, W. B. Saunders, Philadelphia 16 Senzaki, H., Chen, C. H. and Kass, D. A. (1996) Singlebeat estimation of end-systolic pressure–volume relation in humans. Circulation 94, 2497–2506 17 Sagawa, K., Suga, H., Shoukas, A. and Bakalar, K. M. (1997) End-systolic pressure\volume ratio : a new index of ventricular contractility. Am. J. Cardiol. 40, 748–753 18 Finucci, G., Desideri, A., Sacerdoti, D. et al. (1996) Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in liver cirrhosis. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 31, 279–284 19 Wong, F., Liu, P., Allidina, Y. and Blendis, L. M. (1995) Pattern of sodium handling and its consequences in preascitic cirrhosis. Gastroenterology 108, 1820–1827 20 Goodman, J. M., McLaughlin, P. R., Plyley, M. J. et al. (1992) Impaired cardiopulmonary responses to exercise in moderate hypertension. Can. J. Cardiol. 8, 363–371 21 Sherlock, S. (1990) Vasodilatation associated with hepatocellular disease : relation to functional organ failure. Gut 31, 365–367 22 Schrier, R., Arroyo, V., Bernardi, M., Epstein, M., Henriksen, J. and Rodes, J. (1988) Peripheral arterial vasodilatation hypothesis : a proposal for the initiation of Cardiac dysfunction in cirrhosis 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 renal sodium and water retention in cirrhosis. Hepatology 8, 1151–1157 Cohn, P. (1985) Cardiac pumping action and its regulation. In Clinical Cardiovascular Physiology (Cohn, P. F., Brown, E. J. and Vlay, S. C., eds.), pp. 61–103, W. B. Saunders, Philadelphia Wong, F., Sniderman, K. and Blendis, L. M. (1998) The renal sympathetic and renin–angiotensin response to lower body negative pressure in well compensated cirrhosis. Gastroenterology 115, 397–405 Steinberg, J. D. and Hayden, M. T. (1981) Prevalence of clinically occult cardiomyopathy in chronic alcoholism. Am. Heart J. 101, 461–464 Zambrano, S. S., Mazzotta, J. F., Sherman, D. and Spodick, D. H. (1974) Cardiac dysfunction in unselected chronic alcoholic patients : non-invasive screening by systolic time interval. Am. Heart J. 87, 318–320 Wu, C. F., Sudhaker, M., Jaferi, G., Ahmed, S. S. and Regan, T. J. (1976) Pre-clinical cardiomyopathy in alcoholic cirrhotics : a sex difference. Am. Heart J. 91, 281–286 Mathews, E. C., Gardin, J. M., Henry, W. L. et al. (1981) Echocardiological abnormalities in chronic alcoholics with and without overt congestive heart failure. Am. J. Cardiol. 47, 570–578 Grose, R. D., Nolan, J., Dillon, J. F. et al. (1995) Exerciseinduced left ventricular dysfunction in alcoholic and nonalcoholic cirrhosis. J. Hepatol. 22, 326–332 Lunseth, J. H., Olmstead, E. G., Forks, G. and Abboud, F. (1958) A study of heart disease in one hundred and eight hospitalized patients dying with portal cirrhosis. Arch. Intern. Med. 102, 405–413 Hall, E. M., Olsen, A. Y. and Davis, E. E. (1953) Portal cirrhosis : clinical and pathological review of 782 cases from 16,600 necropsies. Am. J. Pathol. 29, 993–1027 Bernardi, M., Trevisani, F., Santini, C., de Palma, R. and Gasbarrini, G. (1983) Aldosterone related blood volume expansion in cirrhosis before and during the early phase of ascites formation. Gut 24, 761–766 Zierhut, W. and Zimmer, H. G. (1989) Significance of myocardial α- and β-adrenoreceptors in catecholamine induced cardiac hypertrophy. Circ. Res. 65, 1417–1425 34 Yamazaki, T., Komuro, I., Kudoh, S. et al. (1995) Angiotensin II partly mediates mechanical stress-induced cardiac hypertrophy. Circ. Res. 77, 258–265 35 Yamazaki, T., Komuro, I., Kudoh, S. et al. (1996) Endothelin-1 is involved in mechanical stress-induced cardiomyocyte hypertrophy. J. Biol. Chem. 271, 3221–3228 36 Wong, F., Logan, A. G. and Blendis, L. M. (1995) Systemic hemodynamic, forearm vascular, renal and humoral responses to sustained cardiopulmonary baroreceptor deactivation in cirrhosis. Hepatology 21, 1238–1247 37 Gines, P., Jimenez, W., Arroyo, V. et al. (1988) Atrial natriuretic factor in cirrhosis with ascites : plasma levels, cardiac release and splanchnic extraction. Hepatology 8, 636–642 38 Gulick, T. S., Chung, M. K., Pieper, S. J., Lange, L. G. and Schreiner, G. F. (1989) Interleukin 1 and tumor necrosis factor inhibit cardiac myocyte beta adrenergic responsiveness. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 86, 6753–6757 39 Ma, Z., Meddings, J. and Lee, S. S. (1994) Membrane physical properties determine cardiac β-adrenergic receptor function in cirrhotic rats. Am. J. Physiol. 267, G87–G93 40 Chung, M. K., Gulick, T. S., Rotondo, R. E., Schreiner, G. F. and Lange, L. G. (1990) Mechanism of cytokine inhibition of β-adrenergic agonist stimulation of cyclic AMP in rat cardiac myocytes. Impairment of signal transduction. Circ. Res. 67, 753–763 41 Finkel, M. S., Oddis, C. V., Jacob, T. D., Watkins, S. C., Hattler, B. G. and Simmons, R. L. (1992) Negative inotropic effects of cytokines on the heart mediated by nitric oxide. Science 257, 387–389 42 Schulz, R., Panas, D. L., Catena, R., Moncada, S., Olley, P. M. and Lopaschuk, G. D. (1995) The role of nitric oxide in cardiac depression induced by interleukin-1β and tumor necrosis factor-α. Br. J. Pharmacol. 114, 27–34 43 Ungureanu-Longrois, D., Balligand, J. L., Kelly, R. A. and Smith, T. W. (1995) Myocardial contractile dysfunction in systemic inflammatory response syndrome : role of cytokine-inducible nitric oxide synthase in cardiac myocytes. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 27, 155–167 44 Lewis, F. W., Adair, O. and Rector, Jr., W. G. (1992) Arterial vasodilatation is not the cause of increased cardiac output in cirrhosis. Gastroenterology 102, 1024–1029 Received 14 January 1999/25 March 1999; accepted 7 May 1999 # 1999 The Biochemical Society and the Medical Research Society 267