Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
GEOMICROBIOLOGICAL INTERACTIONS AMONG IRON SULFIDE MINERALS AND METHANOGENIC CONSORTIA 1 Jerry W. Gander, 2Gene F. Parkin, and 3Michelle M. Scherer 1,2,3 Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The University of Iowa, 2130 Seamans Center, Iowa City, IA 52242; 1Phone: (319) 335-6164; 1Email: [email protected]; 2 Phone: (319) 355-5655, 2Email: [email protected];3Phone: (319) 355-5654, 3Email: [email protected]. Iron sulfide minerals are common soil constituents that have been identified in a number of anaerobic aquatic systems. Iron sulfide minerals are produced primarily via anaerobic microbial activity where hydrogen sulfide produced by sulfate-reducing bacteria reacts with various iron species. The initial iron sulfide species formed is mackinawite, FeS1+x. Changes in the environmental conditions, including pH, temperature and exposure to sulfate-reducing bacteria, however, will alter the iron sulfide minerals to other crystalline structures such as greigite, Fe3S4, and pyrrhotite, FeS1+x. Pyrite, FeS2, (i.e., fool's gold) is the most stable form of iron sulfide mineral, and sulfate-reducing bacteria can produce pyrite from mackinawite when elemental sulfur is present. Iron sulfide minerals represent a potential reductant in the natural attenuation of chlorinated aliphatic hydrocarbons (CAHs) in reduced anaerobic environments, and it may have application as an additive in certain passive remediation applications using iron metal as a reductant. Iron sulfide reactions with hexachloroethane have been shown to be insensitive to many organic amendments and mild changes in ionic strength, suggesting that iron sulfide may retain its reactivity in diverse environments. In some cases, iron sulfides may prove to be more beneficial than iron metal in CAH degradation. This hypothesis is particularly promising, given that one iron sulfide form, troilite, has been shown to react much faster than iron metal in trichloroethane degradation. Along with independent abiotic transformation processes, iron sulfide minerals could serve a purpose in CAH degradation during biological productive dechlorination processes as well. Methanogenic microbial populations need sources of both ferrous iron and sulfide to maintain normal metabolic processes. This requirement for ferrous iron and sulfide implies that iron sulfide is present in environments where methanogens thrive. Both methanogenic populations and iron sulfide minerals have been shown to reduce CAHs through independent processes. What has not been investigated is the relationship, if any, between the iron sulfide degradation reactions and the reductive dechlorination processes of methanogens. To this end, we are investigating the role of iron sulfide minerals as a source of CAH reduction, both in the presence and absence of methanogenic populations. This will aid in determining any relationships between iron sulfide transformation reactions and the reductive dechlorination processes of methanogens, and it could help predict which mechanism(s) dominate within these combined abiotic/biotic environments. To assess the interaction of iron sulfide minerals and methanogenic cultures, a number of laboratory techniques will be used. Preliminary laboratory work has provided a method of iron sulfide mineral synthesis that has been confirmed with X-ray powder diffraction (XRD). Formation of iron sulfide minerals has also been observed via the reduction of sulfate by iron metal. Due to the high sensitivity to oxygen of both iron sulfide minerals and methanogenic cultures, synthesis and materials preparation will be conducted in an anaerobic chamber, and all reactors will be prepared with methods that simulate anaerobic conditions. Batch and column studies will be conducted to investigate the reaction kinetics and product distribution of CAH reduction in the following systems: (1) iron sulfide + CAH contaminant, (2) methanogenic culture + CAH contaminant, and (3) iron sulfide + methanogenic culture + CAH contaminant. Conclusions drawn based on comparisons of the performance of these various experimental systems will aid in defining the roles of both iron sulfide minerals and methanogenic populations in natural attenuation of CAH contaminants. Preliminary results have shown that reduction of 1,1,1-trichloroethane by iron sulfide minerals occurs with a half-life of approximately three days. The products resulting from this reaction have not yet been identified and are currently being investigated. Key words: chlorinated hydrocarbons, iron reactive barriers