Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Measuring well-being and the progress of societies : the OECD’s perspective European Economic and Social Council Brussels, 26 January 2012 Martine Durand OECD Chief Statistician and Director of Statistics Contents 1. Background 2. OECD’s Better Life Initiative 3. The policy link 4. Involving the public 1. Background Background • Gap between the official statistics and people’s perceptions of their own conditions – ‘Felt’ inflation; Pouvoir d’achat; averages vs distribution • Credibility of official statistics, and ultimately public policies and the functioning of democratic processes • Partly, this disconnect reflects over-reliance on GDP as the measuring rod for living standards and quality of life • OECD started to work on these issues around 2004 • Discussion about limits of GDP not new but now highlevel political interest Well-Being and the Crisis • Crisis has put focus back to economic growth and jobs • However, Beyond GDP agenda more relevant than ever if past mistakes are not to be repeated – What kind of growth and for whom? – More than just growth: quality of life, democratic voice, sustainability • from the Arab Spring to Occupy Wall Street and Los Indignados… • Remains a high priority for the OECD 5 2. 6 The OECD Better Life Initiative Building on almost 10 years of OECD work under the Global Project Now moving to measuring what matters most in PEOPLE’s life How’s Life? (report) OECD Better Life InitiativeYour Better Life Index (interactive web tool) OECD@50: Better policies for better lives Scope • Well-being here and now – Quality of Life – Material Living Conditions • Well-being in the future – Sustainability • Complementary: OECD work on Green Growth Focus • Households and people, not just GDP • Outcomes, not inputs or outputs • Assessing inequalities alongside averages • Including both objective and subjective aspects of well-being The OECD well-being framework An evolutionary process • Now: – Indicators under each dimension based on existing data; all indicators reviewed by National Statistical Offices – But not all indicators satisfy all quality criteria equally well and many gaps remain How’s Life? identifies a large unfinished statistical agenda for the future • In future: – New and improved indicators as results from OECD work, research and other initiatives become available – More than just environmental sustainability (economic, human and social) Selected Highlights from How’s Life? No country performs best in all dimensions Number of green lights out of 22 headline indicators Average country performance by dimension 60% Number of red lights out of 22 headline indicators Source : OECD calculations Strengths and weaknesses differ among countries Subjective wellbeing United States Income and wealth 10 France Jobs and earnings 8 6 Personal security Housing 4 2 0 Environmental quality Work and life balance Civic engagement and governance Social connections Health status Education and skills Source : OECD calculations Well-being is both objective and subjective For every person assaulted there are ten who feel unsafe 90 80 self-reported victimisation 70 feelings of insecurity 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Percentage of the population, 2010 Source : UNODC and Gallup World Poll Environmental sustainability Demand-based CO2 emissions grew faster than productionbased emissions in the OECD area Production Demand 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 OECD Other major economies Production-based and demand-based CO2 emissions, Rate of change per year, 1995-2005 Source : OECD, Towards Green Growth: Monitoring Progress – OECD Indicators Inequality…a cross-cutting issue in How’s Life? A few examples Inequalities in well-being : income Large income inequalities in many OECD countries… 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10 0.00 Gini coefficient, 2010 Inequalities in well-being: income … which have increased in a number of them 6 4 2 0 -2 -4 -6 -8 -10 Point changes in Gini coefficient, from mid-1990s to late-2000s Inequalities in well-being: health Low-income people report lower health status 100 Highest income quintile 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Lowest income quintile Inequalities in well-being: social connections Lower-educated and lower-income people also have… … weaker social ties… … and lower trust in others 95 40 35 90 30 85 25 80 20 15 75 10 70 5 0 65 Primary Secondary Tertiary Education 1 2 3 4 Incomequintile Percentage of people reporting that they have someone to count on in times of need, 2010 5 Axis Title Primary Secondary Tertiary Education 1 2 4 3 Income quintile Percentage of people reporting trusting others, 2010 5 Axis Title Inequalities in well-being: jobs Long-term unemployment much higher among youth 25-54 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Long-term unemployment rate, 2010 15-24 3. The policy link The policy link • Major challenge: outcome perspective makes it more difficult to identify most effective policies – need multi-dimensional, integrated approach that takes into account interdependencies and trade-offs -> difficult and ambitious endeavour • Some country experience emerging – Well-being policy frameworks in Australian Treasury; New-Zealand Treasury – United Kingdom: Measuring National Well-Being follow-up; Green book on valuing social impacts… • Key role of elected assemblies and civil society 4. Involving the public Involving the public • Engaging with civil society has been one of the goals of the OECD-hosted Global Project • How’s Life? is accompanied by interactive web tool (Your Better Life Index) aimed at involving the public Your Better Life Index What matters most to people ? 11.00% 10.50% 10.00% Female 37% Male 63% 9.50% 9.00% All Male Female 8.50% 8.00% 7.50% What’s next? • Extending the well-being agenda to developing countries as part of the new OECD Development Strategy • Actively promoting effective use of new measures for policymaking: developing well-being policy frameworks at regional, national and international level • Continued engagement with civil society – 4th OECD World Forum in India in October 2012 Thank you http://www.oecdbetterlifeinitiative.org/ http://www.oecdbetterlifeindex.org/ 30