* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Topic: High Performance Data Acquisition Systems Analog
Pulse-width modulation wikipedia , lookup
Control system wikipedia , lookup
Sound reinforcement system wikipedia , lookup
Fault tolerance wikipedia , lookup
Multidimensional empirical mode decomposition wikipedia , lookup
Resistive opto-isolator wikipedia , lookup
Ringing artifacts wikipedia , lookup
Chirp spectrum wikipedia , lookup
Mathematics of radio engineering wikipedia , lookup
Regenerative circuit wikipedia , lookup
Negative feedback wikipedia , lookup
Oscilloscope history wikipedia , lookup
Audio power wikipedia , lookup
Instrument amplifier wikipedia , lookup
Oscilloscope types wikipedia , lookup
Opto-isolator wikipedia , lookup
Public address system wikipedia , lookup
Topic: High Performance Data Acquisition Systems Analog Components: High Performance Amplifiers Settling Time Figure 1 High Performance Data Acquisition System Figure 1 shows a high performance data acquisition system (with storage array). As we have discussed in the past, each component within the system contributes to an overall “error budget.” Ideally, the system should convert the signal from the transducer/sensor to an accuracy and resolution that is set by the analog to digital convertor. The design engineer must simply specify and select each component (in its specified circuit configuration) within the system to have cumulative errors (RSS’d) that are sufficiently below the contributed error levels of the ADC. Generally, a high frequency data acquisition systems output response (including errors) is measured in the frequency domain using FFT’s (Fast Fourier Transform algorithms). FFT’s operate on finite data sequences-sets of data with each point discretely and evenly spaced in the time domain. However, the signal that is received and transmitted by the transducer/sensor that is to be transformed (real-life waveforms) are analog in nature. They are continuous in the time domain and therefore must be “sampled” at discrete points (and digitized) before the FFT algorithm can be used to process the data (see Figure 2). In short, the sampled waveform array corresponds to a table of values you might construct from a point-topoint measurement of the waveforms amplitude. The majority of measured time-domain data is real-valued data. This means it has no “complex” (imaginary) component. Therefore, you only need one waveform array to store real time-domain data (usually required for low frequency/high accuracy systems which will be analyzed in later articles). However, in higher frequency systems, usually two waveform arrays are required for the storage of the corresponding frequency domain data. One of these arrays is for the “real” part (or magnitude), and the other is for the imaginary part (or phase). Later, we will discuss the two basic concepts of “windowing” and “sampling” in regards to analog to digital conversion in order to better understand FFT results. But this “sampling” of a continuous waveform at “discrete” time points and then processing the output signal in the frequency domain means that careful consideration must be taken in analyzing the error contributions in BOTH time and frequency domains. Remember the frequency domain is simply the inverse of the time domain (f=1/τ). Therefore both types of errors (f & τ) must taken into consideration when compiling the overall error budget. Figure 2 Finite Data Sequence Discretely and Evenly Space in the Time Domain So far, in regards to the front-end high performance amplifier within the data conversion system, we have thus far looked at noise and distortion in regards to impacting the system level error budget. Now, let’s look into the time domain or “settling” response of the amplifier. Simply speaking, amplifier distortion in frequency domain is just settling errors in the time domain. This is good to observe, because troubleshooting (and trying to minimize the errors within a system) is often times easier to do when measuring responses using an oscilloscope (and DVM), and making settling time/DC measurements. Let’s go over some important issues when determining the time domain (settling time) responses of a high performance amplifier. Amplifier “settling time” is simply the time required for an amplifier to accurately respond to an ideal instantaneous step input to the time at which the closed loop amplifier output has entered and remained within a specified error band (usually symmetrical about the final value.) Of course this “final” value would also include any DC errors of the amplifier, slew rate limitations, overdrive recovery, propagation delay, etc. (see Figure 3). Remember, settling time is influenced by a combination of amplifier factors (linear and nonlinear, internal and external) and it cannot be predicted by individual amplifier specifications such as slew rate, and small signal bandwidth, etc., but all errors must be accounted for. One word of caution in specifying and selecting a high performance amplifier for your system, an amplifiers output can never settle within a given error band if its output noise (or distortion) is comparable to the magnitude of the error band defined for settling! This also includes interference signals that the amplifier receives through the circuit environment such as power supply and ground noise that is not rejected. Figure 3 Settling Time Factors to Consider Let’s look at the time domain settling errors that must be accounted for: -DC Gain: To ensure the fundamental accuracy of the amplifiers required final value within a specified sampling time frame, the “DC gain” of the amplifier must be within the desired error band. For instance, if the amplifier is to settle to within a +/- .01% (1 part in 10,000), this means the DC gain error has to be below this value within the sampling time interval, over the whole input voltage range amplitude, at whatever specified input frequency! -DC Offset & Drift: For high precision applications, again the DC offset and drift (over temperature) must be within the given error band. If the designer again uses a +/-.01% error band with a +/-1Vpp signal, the amplifier would be required to have an offset and drift of less than 100 µV error! This would be a very challenging specification to meet, but fortunately within a data acquisition system, offset errors are easily calibrated and adjustable. -Dynamic Stability: Obviously, amplifiers stability greatly affects the amplifiers settling time. Depending on the amplifiers gain, required output load, and input drive impedance, a high frequency amplifier can be either over-damped (band-limited), under-damped (potentially unstable and ringing), or critically-damped (in-between over and under-damping). Measuring the frequency response of the amplifier (Vout/Vin) and watching for gain “peaking” or “early roll-off” will greatly help the designer assess the amplifiers dynamic stability. -Non-linear Effects: Other factors that impact amplifier settling time include: Slew rate (the ability for the amplifier to drive large signals usually during an open-loop state), Recovery (how the amplifier transitions from an overdriven (saturated) state to a closed-loop final value state), and Propagation Delay (the real time delay for the amplifier to respond to a change at its input). Of course, when evaluating the overall performance of a high speed data acquisition system, each of the above parameters should be well specified and understood and accounted for in the system level error budget. Remember, while the data sheet specifications are helpful in the selection and specification of an amplifier that will work within the required error budget, the designer will generally need to individually measure each of the above parameters- within the real-life circuit/system level environment, for optimal design. Kai ge from CADEKA