Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
St. Beck, M. Kontopodis & J. Niewöhner Research Cluster Preventive Self Institute of European Ethnology, Humboldt University of Berlin Transdisciplinary International Workshop ‘Distributed Selves’. Humboldt University of Berlin, June or July 2008 Although the efforts on overcoming dualisms such as subject – object, nature – culture, mind – body are very old, one can observe a booming of relational and network-based approaches in different scientific fields after the 80’s. Theories of distributed cognition, of non-human agents and of actor-networks offer radical alternatives to the dominant notion of the human subject in the humanities and social sciences. At the same time, complexity theory, ecological approaches and theories of biological networks establish a relational understanding of research objects in the sciences. One could refer to examples such as the field of interactome modeling, the study of metabolic networks, network approaches in epidemiology, the ecological approach to visual perception, the notion of “body multiple”, the study of human-computer interaction and of flexible virtual environments in education – to name only a few fields of recent debates. While some of these approaches try to increase theoretical certainty and represent reality more adequately via using network-like mappings other approaches examine the dynamic and unpredictable aspects of network-like interactions (including these between scientific practices of representation and emerging realities) and emphasize uncertainty. The question arises how a relational-processual ontology can be translated into innovative methodological approaches and observational practices. One question for instance might be, what kind of databases could provide entrance points for innovative interpretations of ongoing human and non-human interaction and intra-activity. Our transdisciplinary international workshop aims at bringing together experts of the fields of study of a) distributed cognition, b) actor-network theory and c) biological networks in examining the epistemological, anthropological and practice-related aspects and implications of the relational way of thinking and its variations. Drawing on the research materials of the Research Cluster ‘Preventive Self’ we suggest the use of the field of prevention of obesity, where technoscientific practices, cultural representations, individual strategies and corporeal phenomena merge into each other, as an empirical reference for this investigation. We want to invite the experts of different disciplines in bringing together their approaches and beginning a dialogue which overcomes the disciplinary boundaries of social and life-sciences. The Workshop will take place in June or July 2008 in Berlin and be hosted by the Research Cluster Preventive Self, Collaboratory Social Anthropology and Life-sciences of the Humboldt University of Berlin. Contact: Michalis Kontopodis tel.: +49 30 2093 3716 fax.: +49 30 2093 3739 Email: [email protected] or Prof. Stefan Beck tel.: +49 30 2093 3714 fax.: +49 30 2093 3726 Email: [email protected] Institut für Europäische Ethnologie Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin Mohrenstrasse 40/41 10117 Berlin Germany http://www.csal.de http://www2.hu-berlin.de/ethno/ References Ackerman, M. S. and C. A. Halverson (2000). Re-Examining Organizational Memory. Communications of the ACM 43(1): 58-64. Ansell-Pearson, Keith (2002). Philosophy and the Adventure of the Virtual: Bergson and the Time of Life. London & New York: Routledge. Barabási, Albert-László (2002). Linked: the new science of networks. Cambridge, Mass.: Perseus. Barad, Karen (2006). Meeting the Universe Halfway. Durham: Duke University Press. Cole, Michael & Nicolopoulou Ageliki (1993) Generation and Transmission of Shared Knowledge in the Culture of Collaborative Learning: The Fifth Dimension, Its Play-World, and Its Institutional Contexts. In Ellice A. Forman, Norris Minick, C. Addison Stone (Eds.) Context for Learning: Sociocultural Dynamics in Children's Development. Oxford University Press. DeLanda, Manuel (1997). One thousand years of non linear history. New York: Zone. 2 DeLanda, Manuel (2002). Intensive science and virtual philosophy. London: Continuum. Deleuze, Gilles, & Guattari, Felix (1980/1987). A thousand plateaus. Capitalism and Schizophrenia (trans. and foreword Brian Massumi). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Engeström, , Y. (1987). Learning by Expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki, Orienta-Konsultit Oy. Gibson, J.J. (1979). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception, Houghton Mifflin, Boston. Haraway, Donna (2004). The Haraway Reader. New York & London: Routledge. Hutchins, E. (1995a). How a Cockpit Remembers Its Speeds. Journal of the Cognitive Science Society 19, 265-288. Jeong, H. Tombor, B. Albert, R. Oltvai, Z.N. and Barabási A.-L. (2000)The large-scale organization of metabolic networks. Nature 407, 651-654 Jeong, H. Mason, S. Barabási A.-L. and Oltvai Z. N. (2001)Lethality and centrality in protein networks Nature 411, 41-42. Latour, Bruno (1994). Les objets ont-ils une histoire? Rencontre de Pasteur et de Whitehead dans un bain d’ acide lactique. In : Isabelle Stengers (Ed). L’ effet Whitehead. Paris: Vrin. Latour, Bruno (1999). Pandora’s Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Lave, Jean. and Wenger, Etienne. (1991) Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Law, John (1992) Notes on the Theory of Actor-Network: Ordering, Strategy, and Heterogeneity. Systems Practice 5, 379-393. Law, John (2002). Objects and Spaces. Theory, Culture & Society, 19(5/6): 91–105. Law, John (2004). After Method: Mess in social science research. London & New York: Routledge. Mol, Annemarie (2002). The body multiple: ontology in medical practice. Durham: Duke University Press. Rogers, Y. and J. Ellis (1994). Distributed Cognition: an alternative framework for analysing and explaining collaborative working. Journal of information technology. 9: 119-128 Salomon G. (Ed.) (1993). Distributed cognitions. Psychological and educational considerations. NY: Cambridge University Press. Stengers, Isabelle. (1997b) Cosmopolitiques 1-7. Paris: La Découverte. Williams, R. J. Berlow, E. L. Dunne, J. A. Barabási, A.-L. and Martinez N. D. (2002). Two degrees of separation in complex food webs. Proceedings of the Nat'l Academy of Sciences 99, 12913-12916. 3