Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Spanish conquest of the Aztec Empire wikipedia , lookup
Tepotzotlán wikipedia , lookup
Fall of Tenochtitlan wikipedia , lookup
National Palace (Mexico) wikipedia , lookup
Bernardino de Sahagún wikipedia , lookup
Human sacrifice in Aztec culture wikipedia , lookup
Aztec religion wikipedia , lookup
Aztec Empire wikipedia , lookup
Aztec warfare wikipedia , lookup
Costume and Control: Aztec Sumptuary Laws Author(s): Patricia Anawalt Source: Archaeology, Vol. 33, No. 1 (January/February 1980), pp. 33-43 Published by: Archaeological Institute of America Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/41726816 Accessed: 06-04-2016 14:15 UTC Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://about.jstor.org/terms JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected] Archaeological Institute of America is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Archaeology This content downloaded from 130.182.24.140 on Wed, 06 Apr 2016 14:15:14 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms Costume and Control Aztec Sumptuaiy Laws by PATRICIA ANAWALT only what certain occupational groups must In only wear. wear. today's what Aside Aside world, certain from from dress occupational religious religious regulations orders, orders, groups can the the dictate police, must police, firemen, waitresses and waiters or the military, sartorial style usually depends on whim, the pocketbook and an individual's reaction to the arbiters of fashion. If the means are available, one can freely imitate the style of the richest and most powerful members of our society. Not so in the past. As sociologist Gideon Sjoberg points out, the upper classes in early pre-industrial societies symbolized their position and set themselves apart from the masses by accentuating particular patterns of speech, manners and dress. As a visual symbol and display of position and wealth, elaborate clothing served most effectively to trumpet social status. Quauhtlatzacuilotly a lord of Tetzcoco , carries a flower bouquet and a smoking tube. His cream-colored cloak bears the repeated design of the conch shell trumpety a fertility symbol. His red loincloth is decorated with four insects , perhaps butterflies , and his sandals appear to be made of jaguar skin. To guard these prerogatives of power and to prevent imitation by the lower classes, since earliest times the elite have attempted to dictate who can wear what by passing sumptuary laws - edicts that have proved nearly impossible to enforce. Attempts to limit the ladies of ancient Athens to three traveling dresses failed. Republican Rome during the second century b.c. had no greater success in regulating the wearing of gold ornaments and multicolored garments. By the early fourteenth century after Christ, the French Crown admitted failure in its attempts to restrict by decree her citizens' expenditures on clothes according to class and wealth. Enterprising tailors, cobblers and dressmakers could always be found to satisfy the illegal demand for imitations of expensive and stylish apparel. Right up into the eighteenth century, rulers persisted in their futile attempts to prevent the lower classes from copying the court. Is this irrepressible urge to adorn the person unique to the Old World and the western European experience? Apparently not. This basic human drive can also be observed in the labora- tory of the New World among the well docu- January/ February 1980 33 This content downloaded from 130.182.24.140 on Wed, 06 Apr 2016 14:15:14 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms The feathered warrior costumes and attendant mantles presented by the Aztec emperor to military grades . These warrior ranks reflect the number of prisoners captured on the field of battle. mented Aztecs of pre-Hispanic Mexico, who are reputed to have tighdy controlled the dress of their sharply stratified society. The Aztec social system was divided into five categories. At the top were the aristocratic lineages which included the ruler, his relatives and other noble lines. These lords were supported by their private lands and their sons were educated in special schools. Directly below the ruling class were the highly specialized artisans - those who produced luxury goods - and the professional long-distance merchants. Both of these groups enjoyed special privileges not available to the class below them. The majority of Aztec citizens, however, were free commoners who were organized into corporate land-holding groups. Their elders were responsi- ble for the distribution of the land according to the needs and industriousness of each family. A surprising amount of mobility was available to the free commoners through service to the State. As a result of prowess in warfare, even a man of this class could attain a prominent position in Aztec society. Below the free commoners were a group of landless workers who maintained the estates of the nobles. Since this group had no land-holding affiliation with its attendant usufruct rights, they were tied to the estates for their subsistence. The lowest class of Aztec society was the slaves who had no access to land. Slaves owed their labor to their master who was usually a noble. A person became a slave only through adversity which 34 ARCHAEOLOGY This content downloaded from 130.182.24.140 on Wed, 06 Apr 2016 14:15:14 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms sometimes forced people to sell themselves or their children. But slave status was reversible and one could buy out of bondage. Furthermore, the child of a slave was born free. Famine and gambling were two factors that often drove people into slavery. Many of the tameme or porters, the only carriers in Mesoamerica, were slaves. Although war captives were also occasionally enslaved, the majority became sacrificial victims. The Aztecs sought to dictate through sumptuary laws not only the fiber and ornamentation of each class's clothing, but the manner in which it was worn as well. Although no actual pre- Hispanic costumes have survived because of climate and ancient burial methods, a surprising amount is known about the apparel and clothing practices of the Indians of Middle America at the time of Spanish contact. This information exists thanks to one of the most remarkable intellectual achievements of the Mesoamerican people, the development of a pictographic writing system a "picture writing" that employed recognizable graphic images. Thousands of pictographs survive today, set down in books of bark paper or deer skin. Many of these symbols depict individuals engaged in a variety of activities, each requiring an appropriate costume. Through these indigenous pictures as well as the accounts of the sixteenth-century Catholic missionaries, details about many facets of Aztec culture have survived. Much credit goes to the Fran- ciscan Fray Bernardino de Sahagún. This early missionary learned the native language and worked with elderly Indian informants, whose best years predated the first contact with the Spanish in a.d. 1519. The twelve books of Sahagún's resulting work, known as the Florentine Codex , and now housed in the Biblioteca Medicea Laurenziana in Florence, Italy, is the most encyclopedic coverage of Aztec pre-Hispanic society. Another missionary, the Dominican Fray Diego de Durán set down the laws, ordinances and statutes decreed by the Aztec emperor Moctezuma I (a.d. 1440-1469) in a book called History of the Indies of New Spain . According to Durán, Moctezuma set forth a group of laws before a gathering of all the chieftains of Mexico and its allied states. Among them were regulations on dress: "Only the king is to wear the fine mantles of cotton embroidered with designs and threads of different colors and featherwork. He is to decide which cloak is to be worn by the royal person to distinguish him from the rest." It also stipulated that "The great The luxurious clothing of the Aztec nobility at the time of Spanish contact in A.D 1519. The design of the cloak worn by this Aztec lord appears to be very similar to that of NezahualpilWs cloak. Like the ruler , this noble also wears a similar gold earring and quetzal feather pom-pom in his hair. The tenixyo border appears on his cloak and also on one of the illustrated mantles. Januaiy/Februaiy 1980 35 This content downloaded from 130.182.24.140 on Wed, 06 Apr 2016 14:15:14 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms The climbing of the xocotl pole, a competition which took place during one of the 18 monthly Aztec ceremonies. The winner who grabbed the image of the god on top was awarded a prestigious cloak. lords, who are twelve, may wear certain mantles, and the minor lords wear other" and . . . "The common soldier may wear only the simplest type of mantle and is prohibited from using any special designs or fine embroidery that might set him off from the rest." Finally, "The common people will not be allowed to wear cotton clothing, under pain of death, but only garments of maguey fiber." Durán goes on to describe how even the length of men's cloaks was prescribed. The com- mon man's mantle was not to be worn below the knee. If it reached the ankle, the penalty was death, except in the case of a warrior wounded in the leg, who was permitted a longer cloak until he 36 Archaeology This content downloaded from 130.182.24.140 on Wed, 06 Apr 2016 14:15:14 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms An Aztec mother instructing her 14-year-old daughter to weave on the backstrap loom . recovered. For the majority of the male population these cloaks were tied over the right shoulder; certain nobles and priests, however, were allowed to tie the cloak in front, under the chin. To this stricture Sahagún adds that only the highest ranking nobles could wear sandals, except in the presence of the emperor, whom they should approach barefoot. From these missionary sources, the following rigid Aztec sumptuary laws can be defined: 1) the common people were allowed only garments of maguey, yucca or palm fibers; 2) only the upper classes wore cotton clothing; 3) the decoration, colors and amount of feather work permissible on upper class garments were clearly specified; and 4) the manner of wearing cloaks, sandals and ornaments was tightly controlled. What emerges is a picture of a sharply stratified Aztec society in which the appropriate apparel for each class, even for each individual, was precisely assigned by law. Is this possible? Could a New World society have succeeded in completely controlling personal adornment, an aspect of human behavior repeatedly proved to be all but ungovernable in Old World civilizations? Did the good friars present a realistic version of Aztec customs and practices in dress? Or did they oversimplify? In order to understand the effectiveness of Aztec sumptuary laws, it is first necessary to understand the fundamentals of Mesoamerican apparel. Unlike contemporary clothing, which is cut and tailored, most Aztec garments consisted of unsewn pieces of cloth, draped on the body as loincloths, cloaks and wrap-around skirts. Slightly more complicated garments, such as women's blouses and men's simple jackets, were created by sewing together the selvages of two or more pieces of material. Throughout Mesoamerica, the size of this basic unit of clothing construction - a single piece of handwoven cloth - was determined by the capacity of the backstrap loom. This simple twobeamed weaving apparatus was attached at one end to a post or tree and at the other to the weaver's waist. The resulting product was a relatively narrow web of material, finished on all four sides, which could be put to use without further processing. The manufacture of these textiles was the sole domain of women, and it was a major aspect of their life throughout Mesoamerica. While watching her young children, a mother aided by her older daughters could weave the family's clothing on the backstrap loom in the doorway of her house. Although neither the friars' accounts nor the codices specify how sumptuary laws affected women, they probably dressed in a style that reflected the status of their men; the priestesses, of course, were exceptions. The sixteenthcentury sources indicate that women wove more cloth than their own families required, creating a surplus of textiles which became an indispensable part of the complex economy and social structure of Aztec society. Januaiy/Februaiy 1980 37 This content downloaded from 130.182.24.140 on Wed, 06 Apr 2016 14:15:14 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms The Aztec Emperor Moctezuma II awarding high-status clothing and accouterments to successful warriors . When the Spanish first arrived in a.d. 1519 the Aztec Empire consisted of 38 provinces extending workers than those of the tierra caliente [the coastal hotlands]. Thus some towns gave cotton and from the Gulf Coast to the Pacific. Each of these others turned it into cloth." regions was required to pay tribute on a regular 80-day schedule. This tribute then flowed to the imperial capital, the island city of Tenochtitlan, modern Mexico City, located on Lake Tetzcoco in the 7,200-foot-high Valley of Mexico. Tenochtitlan, along with the lakeside cities of Tlacopan and Tetzcoco, constituted the Triple Alliance powers that controlled the Aztec Empire. The imperial tribute payments included both raw materials such as feathers, gems and unprocessed cotton as well as fabricated goods, including woven cloth, which may or may not have been produced in the province where its basic fiber was grown. Cotton's role in this exchange was described by the sixteenth-century Spanish judge, Alfonso de Zorita. He speaks of the areas which "did not grow cotton but worked it into a very good cloth. This excellent cloth was made by people of the tierra fria [the colder land of the high Central Mexican plateau] who are better Although all classes of Aztec society wore the same kinds of uncomplicated garments made from handwoven webs of material, the status of the wearer was differentiated by the fiber of the cloth itself plus the type and degree of decoration. The maguey fiber, assigned to the lower classes and known as ixtli in the ancient Nahuad lan- guage, grew in ample supply at the high elevation of Central Mexico. However, the status fiber of the upper classes, cotton or ichcatl, could not be grown at elevations above 6,000 feet and had to be imported from the tropical coastal hotlands either through trade or the elaborate system of tribute. This supply of raw textile materials and finished fabric through trade and tribute made possible the variety of clothing and decorations required by this stratified society's sumptuary laws. But in addition to serving as wearing apparel, textiles were also used as religious offerings, decorations for sacred effigies, temple and palace 38 Archaeology This content downloaded from 130.182.24.140 on Wed, 06 Apr 2016 14:15:14 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms A merchant displaying his wares in the marketplace. He holds up a cloak with the prestigious tem^yonavîn^yê^n the edge " border design. On the woven reed mat in front of him are valuable quetzal feathers , a necklace of precious stones , a woman's blouse (huípil) and a sleeved colonial garment. A bound bunch of feathers is also depicted. hangings, household items, dowry payments, marriage ceremonial accouterments, gifts for ritual and social occasions, and wrappings for the mummy bundles which were usually cremated. It is also known that large, rectangular pieces of cloth, referred to as quachtli, were used as media of exchange. Indeed, tremendous quantities of woven cloth must have existed in the great urban centers of the Valley of Mexico, which at the time of the Spanish contact had an estimated population of two-and-one-half million. For both nobles and free-born commoners the key to attaining the permitted degree of sartorial splendor was their outstanding service to the State. Although a noble was born with the right to wear cotton clothing, the degree of its elaboration depended on his achievements. By the same token, a free commoner could don some of the society's more desired attire by dint of personal effort. For both groups the principal means of advancement was warfare. According to Friar Durán, this avenue of upward mobility was introduced in the fifteenth century during the reign of the emperor Moctezuma I, great-grandfather of Moctezuma II, Cortési adversary. During the time of Moctezuma I, a system of ritual battles evolved in which the Triple Alliance powers fought neighboring city states. These famous "Flowery Wars" or xochiyaoyotl were a regularly scheduled series of limited engagements which took place at a specified time and location. Their purpose was neither conquest nor killing but rather the capture of prisoners for human sac- rifice. The Aztecs believed that the universe and its natural cycles would cease to function unless their gods were sustained with the most precious of foods - the hearts and blood of man. As the chosen people of the sun, the Aztecs had a cosmic duty to maintain a continual supply of sacrificial victims. The ritual Flowery Wars were devised to provide some of the necessary prisoners. The continual and far more prosaic wars of imperial expansion further contributed to the supply. Durán tells us that these Flowery Wars created a kind of military marketplace in which prestigious items such as lip plugs, arm bands, shields, Januaiy/ February 1980 39 This content downloaded from 130.182.24.140 on Wed, 06 Apr 2016 14:15:14 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms weapons, insignia, loincloths and cloaks could be obtained. The emperor forbade the purchase of this paraphernalia in the actual market and announced that the desirable status clothing and decoration would only be delivered by himself as payment for memorable deeds in battle: Each one of you, when he goes to war to fight, must think that he has journeyed to a marketplace where he will find precious stones. He who does not dare to go to war, even though he be the king's son, from now on will be deprived of all these things. He will have to wear the clothing of the common man. And in this way his cowardice, his weak heart, will be known to all. He will not wear cotton garments. He will not wear feathers, he will not receive flowers like the great lords . . . The distribution of these status symbols is confirmed by Sahagún in the Florentine Codex , which explains the organization of the military into grades that correspond to the number of captives taken in battle. Each rank not only had its own flamboyant feathered warrior suit, but also a special tilmatli, the Nahautl term for a garment variously translated as cloak, cape or mantle. The status of a warrior could be recognized on and off the field of battle by the particular cloak he wore. This effectively turned the tilmatli into the most highly visible and supremely sought after status garment in Aztec society. Small wonder that Moctezuma I reserved the right of dispensing it to ensure aggressive motivation in battle and to recognize military prowess. T he Codex Mendoza, now in the Bodleian Library at Oxford University, England, is a sixteenthcentury colonial document named after Mexico's first viceroy. It is an invaluable source for descriptions of Aztec daily life, including military costumes and accompanying cloaks for six military grades. If a warrior captured one prisoner, he received a coloxtlapilli mantle with a flower design. The capture of two prisoners was rewarded with an orange bordered tilmatli and a cuextlan feathered warrior costume; three prisoners with a butterfly warrior costume; four prisoners with a nacazminqui cloak and a jaguar warrior costume; five or six with a xopilli costume. A red tilmatli with red and white borders was awarded to the most famous warriors, supposedly in all cases, by the emperor himself at great public ceremonies. Long-distance merchants on the road. The pic to graph for a journey are the footprints. Each merchant wears a simple cloak that is tucked up under his carrying board , the cacaxtli. The loads , reported to weigh up to 50 pounds , could be carried for five leagues and were supported by the tumpline worn over the forehead. 40 Archaeology This content downloaded from 130.182.24.140 on Wed, 06 Apr 2016 14:15:14 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms One may well inquire just how realistic a picture the preceding account presents. It can be partially checked by the frequency of the various tilmatli in the surviving records of tribute payments, assuming that different warrior grades reflect the military ranking system, and that the greatest number of tilmatli mentioned would be the type awarded to the lowest grade. In Codex Mendozďs record of tribute sent from the 38 provinces to the capital, the coloxlapilli cloak awarded for the capture of one prisoner is, in fact, most prominent. But beyond that the correlation no longer holds. It appears that not all of the mandes required by the higher ranks were supplied by tribute. An alternative source was trade, represented by one distinct professional class called pochteca, While many Aztecs engaged in trade from time to time, this hereditary group controlled the long-distance trade which involved caravans of porters that went from the Valley of Mexico to the remote provinces on the Pacific or Gulf coasts. These mer- chants exported manufactured goods and imported luxurious foreign commodities such as rare feathers, gold dust, jade and turquoise as well as magnificent multicolored textiles. Since the value of the caravan's cargo sometimes invited attack, the pochteca often had to be both merchants and soldiers. During the reign of the emperor Ahuit- zotl (a.d. 1486-1502), a group of these traders was beseiged for four years in the remote Isthmus of Tehuantepec area. By fighting valiantly they finally extricated themselves and returned to Tenochtitlan laden with spoils taken from their attackers. In gratitude, the emperor gave the merchants the rights to wear certain jewels and specific designs of tilmatli. This special privilege was limited to particular holidays, however, while the ruling class had the right of wearing their finery without restrictions. As the Aztec empire expanded and became wealthier, the need for luxury goods traded by the pochteca increased. Their growing affluence and importance threatened the nobles, and this social tension prompted the rich pochteca to behave with abject humility. In order to maintain a safe low profile, the pochteca secretly brought their goods into the capital's warehouses by night, often storing them under the name of a friend or relative. In dress, the pochteca were equally discreet, wearing a patched and homely cloak for daily business and reserving their prestigious tilmatli for specific ceremonial occasions. Only when entertaining in the privacy of their homes did the pochteca allow themselves to display their wealth and position by exchanging rich gifts and beauti- ful textiles. In all, 57 mantle designs appear in the Codex Magliabechiano, a sixteenth-century colonial document now in the Biblioteca Nazionale in Florence, Italy. Only a portion of these can be found in other pictorial sources, which also portray additional tilmatli patterns associated with merchant or warrior roles. Still other patterns occur in the tribute records. From all these depictions, it is obvious that tilmatli circulated in Aztec society through means other than those recognized by the official sumptuary laws. It appears that many of these cloaks were sold in the public marketplace. According to the glowing eyewitness accounts of the conquistadors, highly desirable luxury items were indeed available in the urban markets of the Valley of Mexico. The Spaniards admired the size, orderliness and extent of the merchandise, particularly in the marketplace of Tlatelolco, the contiguous, trade-oriented twin city of Tenochtitlan, where as many as 25,000 people gathered each day. Every fifth day a special market was held, attended by 40,000 to 50,000 market goers. Jewelry of gold and silver, precious stones, bright feathers, fabric and clothing - every conceivable product was offered for sale, although these items were supposedly tightly controlled by sumptuary laws. According to Sahagún, even the closely guarded tilmatli were regularly offered in a special area. He mentions "great capes, costly capes, embroidered capes, large common capes, maguey fiber capes and thin maguey fiber capes." Sahagún goes on to note that "the ruler took care of directing the marketplace and all things sold," although it is highly questionable that much control could have been exercised over such a busy, crowded market. Other sources relate how judges at the Tlatelolco market had the duty of maintaining order and settling disputes, without mentioning their responsibility to dictate who could buy what status symbol. Presumably the buying public was free to purchase what it wished, including cloaks. Pesides sale in the marketplace, these cloaks were distributed through other unofficial avenues. Not only were tilmatli given as offerings at temples, but they also served as gifts at funerals and at feasts given by merchants to fete each other. Parents offered coyote fur capes to priests or older warriors in charge of instructing their sons. Inheritance also determined the distribution of these prized cloaks. In the case of a noble youth found drunk - a capital offense in Aztec society the hapless young man would be secretly strangled. But before his execution he could arrange to bequeath his friends his collection of mantles which could number up to as many as 20. Januaiy/ February 1980 41 This content downloaded from 130.182.24.140 on Wed, 06 Apr 2016 14:15:14 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms dent that status capes were awarded not only to high achievers but to all those who took part in the activities, and that both of these groups winners and participants - had the right to sell their prizes. Since such behavior clearly con- tradicts the orthodox view that tilmatli distribution was tightly regulated by strict sumptuary laws, perhaps the same laxness extended to controlling how this attire was worn. T he sumptuary laws drew a sharp distinction between the dress of commoners and nobles. By implication, the lower classes wore only undecorated apparel made of coarse bast fibers, while the nobility wore only the status fiber - cotton. The sources, however, give contradictory d z a: in Book 10, The People y Sahagún discusses a man who sells coarse maguey fiber capes that not only have wavy and flower designs but other patterns as well. Their names conjure up strange and confusing images: "whirlpool design, as if with eyes painted"; "with the small face"; "the one with broken chords, with husks outlined in black." These descriptions suggest that the so-called poor and wretched lower class Aztecs wore coarse maguey fiber cloaks that were both colorful and varied. The plain mantle of a common warrior. These simple , unadorned cloaks were made of maguey , yucca or palm fiber. His loincloth was no doubt made of the same fabric. Clearly, tilmatli circulated far more widely and far more freely than the sumptuary laws would indicate. In Book 2, The Ceremonies , Sahagún describes a game connected with a feast day of Mixcoatl, the ancient hunting god of the Otomi, a neighboring people of the Aztecs. Young Aztec men formed a human rope to encircle deer, coyotes, rabbits and hares in an area. The youth who caught a deer or coyote was favored by the Emperor with a special cape whose edges were striped with feathers. Sahagún suggests that this mantle could be worn if one was a captor of an animal, but also "if one were not a captor, one might only place [his cape] in a basket and sell it." In the same book Sahagún discusses the festival of the tenth month, Hueymiccailhuitl, when boys competed to be first to scramble up a pole, the xolotl , to grab the image of a god that had been placed on top. A brown-striped cloak edged in feathers was awarded to the winner. The text points out, however, that "if one were not captor, he might only keep one [such cape] care, and mayhap he might sell it when he poor or sick." From these two examples, it such a in his was is evi- Moreover, Sahagún comments that maguey fiber mantles were enhanced by washing them in a gruel of corn dough to make them firm. When dried and burnished, these cloaks had a high and pleasing luster. If this reinforced cloth was rapped, it apparently emitted a sound like a pottery rattle. Obviously the lower classes were not too inhibited to devise ways of imitating the dress of their betters. Recalcitrant nobles, Durán contends, were forced by the Emperor to wear lowly maguey fiber capes as a form of punishment. In one instance the Emperor penalized the lords of the conquered city of Tlatelolco for not making timely tribute payment: "The noblemen of that city were no longer to wear splendid mantles. From now on they must use cloaks of maguey fiber, like people of low rank." Similar chastisement was given out by the Aztec ruler to his own captains, officers and old warriors when they were badly beaten in battle: ". . .justices were sent to the homes of the officers to shear their hair and take their insignia away from them. They were forbidden to wear cotton mantles; from now on these officers were to wear cloaks of maguey fiber like those of the common man." This harsh behavior is in keeping with the sharp class distinction proclaimed by the sumptuary laws. Despite the idealized version of these ordinances, however, the documentary sources make it clear that not only the lower 42 Archaeology This content downloaded from 130.182.24.140 on Wed, 06 Apr 2016 14:15:14 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms classes but also the nobles used maguey fiber capes, and the latter by choice. One noble is described wearing a maguey fiber cape with an ocelot pendant and a shining maguey fiber mantle ornamented with designs of flattened heads. In another instance, the last emperor Quauahtemoc (a.D. 1520-1524), after surrendering to the Spaniards when Tenochtitlan fell, reportedly wrapped himself in a shining maguey fiber cloak. Even the effigies of the great Aztec god Huitzilopochtli sometimes wore a maguey fiber cape. During the fifth month, Toxcatl, an effigy of this same deity was covered during the celebration with a mantle of maguey fiber. Since the lords and nobles could apparently wear either cotton or maguey, their choice had to have been based on a garment's decoration rather than its material. For the upper classes, then, the design appears to have been more socially significant than fabric. But whatever the fiber of the lorďs prestigious capes, the most important of these status garments were apparently not worn for everyday. Sahagún reports that then the lords wore only finely woven yucca fiber capes "... but they always tied these garments in their usual manner as the noble men were very circumspect and punctilious." Three major points emerge from this analysis of how tilmatli were used as status symbols. First, the maguey mantles of both nobles and lower classes had a varied range of color and design. Second, since the nobles were permitted to wear cloaks of either maguey or cotton, the design rather than the fiber must have been the critical deciding factor for their choice, whether for social or aesthetic reasons. Finally, everyday dress differed from the status clothing worn to mark social distinctions on ceremonial occasions. It would fol- low that these awesome sumptuary laws must have been applied principally to this latter category the ritualistic and official side of Aztec life. It also seems likely that the iron-clad control over Aztec clothing imposed by the emperor and described by the Spanish chroniclers was greatly exaggerated. A detailed study of the chronicles makes it apparent that Aztec society was becoming increasingly dependent on luxury goods. In so doing, it abandoned the frugality of earlier days, an echo of which survived in the official severity of the sumptuary laws. No doubt the descriptions of these regulations, which come to us from the contemporary Indian informants, represent an idealized image of the military and political order in pre-Conquest Tenochtitlan. As such, the recorded laws reflect a creed more than a reality. In the sharply stratified Aztec society, the ceremonial processions of noblemen adorned with jewels, plumes and magnificent colored clothing proclaimed their superior social position. These nobles, replete with brightly embroidered capes and feather ornaments and carrying delicate flower bouquets, served as forms of symbolic control for the State. No doubt the masses ob- serving from the sidelines were bedazzled by this expression of power and wealth, thus confirming its very existence. Yet the vaunted sumptuary laws did not actually dictate what people wore every day but rather provided a set of rules governing clothing used for ceremonial and ritual occasions. This limited control corresponds to the effectiveness of similar regulations elsewhere. Through the ages in pre-industrial stratified societies, authoritarian efforts to govern artistic expression as reflected in dress have seldom been successful and personal adornment irrepressibly appears to be people's favorite art. For Further Reading on the Aztecs: Patricia Rieff Anawalt, Pan-Mesoamerican Costume Repertory at the Time of Spanish Contact , (University Micro- films 76-8973, Ann Arbor, Michigan 1976), is a detailed study of pre- Hispanic clothing; "What Price Aztec Pageantry?" Archaeology 30(1977):226-233; The Aztecs : The History of the Indies of New Spain , translated by Doris Heyden and Fernando Horcasitas (Orion Press, New York 1964) and Book of the Gods and Rites and the Ancient Calendar , translated and edited by Fernando Horcasitas and Doris Heyden (University of Oklahoma Press, Norman, Oklahoma 1971), are written by Sahagûn's contemporary, the Dominican Diego Duràn; Frances Frei Berdan, Trade , Tribute , and Market in the Aztec Empire , (University Microfilms 76-8111, Ann Arbor, Michigan 1976), is a comprehensive coverage of the economics of preConquest Central Mexico; Nigel Davies, The Aztecs (G. P. Putnam's Sons, New York 1974), is a political history of the Aztecs from their nomadic beginnings to rulers of the mighty New World empire; The Florentine Codex : General History of the Things of New Spain , translated by Arthur J. O. Anderson and Charles E. Dibble (University of Utah and School of American Research, Santa Fe, New Mexico 1950-1969), this encyclopedic compendium of Aztec life in 12 books was compiled by the sixteenth-century Franciscan missionary, Fray Bernardino de Sahagün using Indian informants; Gideon Sjoberg, The Pre-industrial City , Past and Present (The Free Press, New York 1960), for a comprehensive discussion of complex state societies; Jacques Soustelle, Daily Life of the Aztecs (Stanford University Press, Stanford, California 1961), presents a general summary of Aztec life just before the Spanish conquest. January/ February 1980 43 This content downloaded from 130.182.24.140 on Wed, 06 Apr 2016 14:15:14 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms