* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Improved 2nd-Order Multi-bit Noise-Coupled Sigma
Signal-flow graph wikipedia , lookup
Immunity-aware programming wikipedia , lookup
Spectral density wikipedia , lookup
Electronic engineering wikipedia , lookup
Dynamic range compression wikipedia , lookup
Resistive opto-isolator wikipedia , lookup
Ground loop (electricity) wikipedia , lookup
Time-to-digital converter wikipedia , lookup
Flip-flop (electronics) wikipedia , lookup
Buck converter wikipedia , lookup
Pulse-width modulation wikipedia , lookup
Power electronics wikipedia , lookup
Tektronix analog oscilloscopes wikipedia , lookup
Control system wikipedia , lookup
Oscilloscope history wikipedia , lookup
Regenerative circuit wikipedia , lookup
Schmitt trigger wikipedia , lookup
Negative feedback wikipedia , lookup
Quantization (signal processing) wikipedia , lookup
Integrating ADC wikipedia , lookup
Switched-mode power supply wikipedia , lookup
北 京 大 学学 报 (自 然 科 学版 ), 第 48 卷 , 第 2 期 , 2012 年 3 月 Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis, Vol. 48, No. 2 (Mar. 2012) Improved 2nd-Order Multi-bit Noise-Coupled Sigma-Delta Modulator for GSM Standard LI Hongyi, WANG Yuan†, JIA Song, ZHANG Xing Key Laboratory of Microelectronic Devices and Circuits, Institute of Microelectronics, Peking University, Beijing 100871; † Corresponding author, E-mail: [email protected] Abstract The authors propose an improved 2nd-order 3-bit noise-coupled SDM in which all the summation before quantizer is moved to the input of the 2nd integrator, and time-constraint of the feedback DAC is relaxed by introducing feedback path and delayed input signal. The modulator was designed and fabricated in a 0.35 μm CMOS process using two active blocks. Under 100 kHz signal bandwidth and 12.8 MHz sampling frequency, 86.4 dB SNDR and 95.8 dB DR can be reached dissipating 9.84 mW power from a 3.3 V supply. The modulator can satisfy the requirements of GSM systems. Key words sigma-delta modulator; noise-coupled; feedforward; multi-bit; switched-capacitor circuit 改进的基于 GSM 标准二阶多位噪声耦合过采样调制器 王源 † 李宏义 贾嵩 张兴 北京大学微电子研究院器件与线路重点实验室, 北京 100871; † 通信作者, E-mail: [email protected] 提出一个改进的二阶三位噪声耦合过采样调制器, 它将量化器前所有的加法运算移动到第 2 个积分器的前 摘要 面, 并通过引入反馈通道和延时输入信号, 使反馈数模转换器的苛刻时序得到缓解。此调制器在 0.35 μm CMOS 工艺下设计并生产, 整个调制器使用了两个有源模块。在 100 kHz 信号带宽和 12.8 MHz 时钟频率下, 完成 了 86.4 dB 的 SNDR 和 95.8 dB 的 DR, 3.3 V 电源电压下, 消耗 9.84 mW。此调制器能满足 GSM 系统的需求。 关键词 过采样调制器; 噪声耦合; 前馈; 多位; 开关电容线路 中图分类号 TN492 Sigma-delta analog-to-digital converter (SDADC) using oversampling shaping oversampling ratio and quantizer & feedback DAC techniques is widely used under global system for (digital-to-analog converter) resolution, respectively. mobile where As seen from Eq. (1), the DR can be enhanced by dB high dynamic range (DR) and increasing anyone of the above three parameters, 100 kHz medium signal bandwidth with low power however, besides the limitation of power dissipation communications typically 80-90 and (GSM) noise where L, OSR and B denote loop filter order, standard [1] dissipation are required . The performance of a and die area, high L results in instability, the device fT SD-ADC is dominated by its sigma-delta modulator and wideband limit OSR, and B is constrained due to [2] (SDM), the DR of which can be expressed ideally as: DR = 1.5 ⋅ (2 B − 1) 2 ⋅ (2 L + 1) ⋅ OSR π2 L (2 L +1) , (1) the exponential growth in circuit complexity. Thus, to make a good trade-off among these design parameters, novel and effective structures are needed to be 国家杰出青年科学基金(60925015)资助 收稿日期: 2011-03-25; 修回日期: 2011-06-17; 网络出版日期: 2011-12-21 网络出版地址: http://www.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.2442.N.20111221.1620.014.html 200 第2期 李 宏义 等 : 改 进 的 基于 GSM 标 准 二阶 多 位 噪声 耦合 过 采 样调 制器 since developed continuously. it has well-defined gain and increased [5] Among all kinds of SDM topologies, noise- no-overload range . And moreover, sampled-data coupled (NC) with low-distortion, as shown in Fig.1, method is more used for high resolution and medium [3] is no doubt a high power efficiency choice . After bandwidth than continuous-time’s which suffers from calculation, the output of Fig. 1 can be shown as clock jitter, excess loop delay and poor linearity of the Y ( z ) = STF( z ) ⋅ U ( z ) + NTF( z ) ⋅ E ( z ) , where STF( z ) = 1 , NTF( z ) = (2) 1 − C ( z) . Here H(z) is 1 + H ( z) the loop filter, U(z) and E(z) are modulator’s input signal and quantization error, STF(z) and NTF(z) stand for signal and noise transfer function, respectively. As shown in Fig. 1, in a noise-coupled modulator, the shaped quantization noise is introduced feedback DAC[6]. In this paper, an improved 2nd-order single-loop 3-bit noise-coupled SDM has been fabricated in a 0.35 μm CMOS technology. The integrated modulator shows a 95.8 dB DR with a signal bandwidth of 100 kHz and 12.8 MHz sampling rate, and the total power consumption is 9.84 mW from a 3.3 V supply. 1 1.1 Proposed SDM Architecture Modulator structure by the additional C(z) branch. From Eq. (2), when C(z) A classic 2nd-order 3-bit noise-coupled low- =z−1, the quantization noise is extracted and then distortion discrete-time SDM, as displayed in Fig. 2, subtracted from the output of loop filter after a owns all the advantages mentioned above. However, one-cycle delay so that a 1st-order noise-shaping there are two evidently drawbacks that restrict its enhancement is obtained without an extra integrator . circuit realization. On one hand, a fast adder for And meanwhile, through adding a direct feedforward summing up the modulator’s input, integrators’ output path from the modulator input to the quantizer, ideally, and noise-coupled output is required before the low-distortion structure can cancel the input signal quantizer so that an unpractical power-hungry active form the loop filter and this leads to the reduced adder or passive adder without signal attenuation has [3] multi-bit to be employed. On the other hand, multi-bit feedback quantizer should be used to improve loop stability, DAC can not provide a delay-free path to cancel the internal signal [4] swings . In addition, input signal at the input of the loop filter entirely. As a result, ideal low-distortion cannot be realized using non-ideal circuit blocks. For the sake of overcoming the drawbacks of the traditional noise-coupled feedforward SDM, a new Fig. 1 Linear model of a single-loop noise-coupled low-distortion SDM with an ideal feedback DAC Fig. 2 structure has been proposed in Fig. 3. Here, a series of signal flow graph (SGF) transformations have been Block diagram of the traditional 2nd-order 3-bit noise-coupled feedforward SDM 201 北 京 大 学学 报 (自 然 科 学版 ) Fig. 3 第 48 卷 Block diagram of the proposed 2nd-order 3-bit noise-coupled SDM performed as following. First, the input feedforward b1 = 11/25, c2 = 12/25, d1 = 39/50, g = 0.0025 have path to the quantizer has been moved to the been chosen, and other coefficients of Fig. 3 can be 2nd-integrator’s input by introducing (1+b2z−1) calculated by the above relations. feedforward branch, d1 feedback path and a one-cycle delay of the modulator input[7]. Second, the noise-coupled path has been coupled to the loop filter 1.2 Stability analysis After determining the topology and coefficients, the NTF of Fig. 3 can be calculated as: from quantizer input to the 2nd-integrator’s input by NTF( z ) = the d2 branch. And then zero optimization of NTF has z 3 − 3z 2 + 3 z − 1 . z − 1.2175z 2 + 0.4287z 3 (4) been realized by importing g path[8]. Consequently, From Eq. (4), we know that h(0) = NTF(∞) = 1 , the adder before quantizer is cancelled completely and where h(n) is the inverse z-transform of NTF(z). the strict time-constraint of the feedback DAC is Therefore, there is no physically unrealizable delay- relaxed by importing feedback path and delayed input free loop in the SDM of Fig. 3 so that the proposed signal to the loop filter. The STF of the proposed structure is efficient[6]. modulator could be obtained by signal flow graph Performing long division to Eq. (4), it yields (SGF) and be shown as NTF( z ) = 1 − 1.7825 ⋅ z −1 + 0.4011 ⋅ z −2 −1 STF( z ) = z ⋅ −2 + 0.2526 ⋅ z −3 + 0.1355 ⋅ z −4 + ... −1 c3 (b1c2 − b2 ) ⋅ z + c3 (b2 − 1) ⋅ z + c3 , [1 + c3 (b1c2 − d1 − g )] ⋅ z −2 + [c3 (d1 + g ) − 2] ⋅ z −1 + 1 (3) and h(n) = 1.2175h(n − 1) − 0.4287 h(n − 2), n = 4,5, 6,... When After simple proof, we can obtain ⎧c3 = 1, ⎨ ⎩b2 = d1 + g − 1, h 1 = ∑ n = 0 h(n) ≈ 3.72 . ∞ (5) Owing to multi-bit quantization, using Eq. (5), we can obtain STF( z ) = z −1 , any input with i.e. a unity STF with a simple delay. Using the max u (n) ≤ 2 B + 2 − h 1 = 23 + 2 − 3.72 = 6.28 n well-known “delsig” toolbox[9] with 64x OSR and an inverse Chebyshev NTF whose maximum out-of-band is guaranteed not to overload the 3-bit SDM, and that gain is 1.5, the coefficients of Fig. 2 can be obtained. is −2.1 dBFS input amplitude[6]. Otherwise, along with the transformations from Fig. 2 1.3 to Fig. 3, d2 = 1/c3 has to be satisfied. Consequently, 202 Ideal behavior simulation The ideal output spectrum of the traditional and 第2期 李 宏义 等 : 改 进 的 基于 GSM 标 准 二阶 多 位 噪声 耦合 过 采 样调 制器 proposed 2nd-order 3-bit noise-coupled SDM are 2 shown in Fig. 4 using 31.25 kHz and −5 dBFS sine wave input with 8k samples. We can find an obvious 3rd-order noise shaping characteristic in both the two SDMs, and an in-band notch appears in the output spectrum of proposed SDM thanks to the zero optimization scheme. Ideally, the two modulators both can present more than 16-bit resolution. After further signal scaling, the histogram of integrators’ output swings of the proposed structure is shown in Fig. 5. Since the output swings of the two integrators are both suppressed to less than 25% of the reference voltage. The swing requirements of their operational transconductance amplifiers (OTAs) can be relaxed. Circuit Design A fully-differential switched-capacitor (SC) circuit shown in Fig. 6 realized the proposed 2nd-order 3-bit noise-coupled SDM as Fig. 3. Two phase, non-overlapping clocks Φ1 and Φ2 provide the sampling and integrating phase for the overall modulator, and the delay functions are implemented by the Φ1e, Φ1o, Φ2e, Φ2o phases shown in Fig. 6 where delayed clocks are used to reduce the effects of charge injection. As for delay operation, a sampling branch is divided into two absolute ones controlled by the two pairs of non-overlapping clocks Φ1e, Φ2o, and Φ1o, Φ2e respectively, and Φe and Φo will be only one efficient during every Φ period. In the phase of Φ1o, the input signal is sampled onto its branch. After a half cycle, Φ2o arrives, and then the preceding input signal sampled at adjacent Φ1e before one cycle of the Φ1o mentioned above and held in this Φ2o branch will be extracted for integrating. The following operations perform the same. Thus, input delay can be realized. By the above delay paths, an extra active component[3] can be avoided to realize the noise-coupled function. The input and output common-mode volta- ges are both set to VDD/2 (1.65 V), and the reference voltages Vref+ and Vref− are chosen as the single power supply rails VDD (3.3 V) and ground. The key building blocks of the modulator are explained as follows. Fig. 4 Simulated output power spectrum density of the SDMs shown as Fig. 2 and Fig. 3 2.1 Integrators A fully-differential SC integrator typically consists of an OTA, capacitors and switches, and their non-idealities all can limit the performance of the overall SDM[2]. Since the non-idealities of the latter integrators could be suppressed by all the former ones in a SDM, the 1st integrator dominates the performance of the overall modulator. As for an equivalent 3rd order, 3-bit SDM, using linear and ideal analysis[2], the in-band quantization noise power PQ can be calculated as PQ = Δ 2 ⋅ π2 L 12 ⋅ (2 B − 1) 2 L +1 ⋅ (2 L + 1) ⋅ OSR 2 L +1 , (6) where Δ is the full-scale range of the differential Fig. 5 Integrators’ output swings of the proposed SDM as Fig. 3 (Normallizing Vref+/− to +1/−1) circuit. Using the parameters in this design, an ideal −116.36 dB in-band quantization noise power can be 203 北 京 大 学学 报 (自 然 科 学版 ) Fig. 6 第 48 卷 Schematic of the proposed SC 2nd-order 3-bit noise-coupled SDM obtained. And then, the thermal noise power PkT/C for where Sn is the 1st OTA’s input-referred noise power the fully-differential SC circuit is about: 4kT , PkT/C = Cs1 ⋅ OSR spectral density. When 80 MHz GBW, 1 kΩ Ron and 10 (7) where Cs1 is the sampling capacitor of the 1st integrator. If Cs1 is chosen as 4 pF, a −101.9 dB kT/C noise power is expected. Furthermore, the OTA’s noise leakage and defective settling error power POTA also limits the accuracy available of the SDM. On the one hand, the noise leakage error due to finite OTA DC gain of the 1st integrator can be estimated as: b12 ⋅ Δ 2 ⋅ π2 L − 2 , Pg = 12 ⋅ A2 ⋅ (2 L − 1) ⋅ OSR 2L −1 nV/(Hz)1/2 OTA input-referred noise are chosen, the noise power can reach −101.07 dB. From the above analysis, we can see that, under ideal quantization, integrator dynamic response and the value of sampling capacitor dominant the performance of the overall SDM. Based on the above specifications, real SC circuits could be implemented with essential design margins. Two traditional two-stage OTA with powerefficient dynamic common mode feedback loop (8) (CMFB)[10] has been used for the two integrators. Table 1 presents the basic performance parameters of the OTA used in the first integrator with 10 pF load where A is the 1st OTA’s finite open-loop DC gain. As capacitor. As seen from the table, the parameters of A = 50 dB, the noise power could be −128.95 dB. On real OTA circuit reach the specifications as above the other hand, taking the integrator dynamic response analysis. The output and input common mode voltage into account, the OTA’s gain-bandwidth product were both set to be VDD/2. Since the noise caused by (GBW) and switch on-resistance Ron affect proper the non-idealities of the 2nd integrator can be shaped integrator settling, and their noise contribution can be by the front-end one, its OTA could be relaxed and shown as: implemented based on smaller current consumption. π ⋅ GBW ⋅ S n , Pd = OSR ⋅ (1 + 4π ⋅ GBW ⋅ Ron ⋅ Cs1 ) 204 (9) In addition, correlated double sampling (CDS) technique, which is a particular case of autozero (AZ) 第2期 李 宏义 等 : 改 进 的 基于 GSM 标 准 二阶 多 位 噪声 耦合 过 采 样调 制器 Table 1 1st OTAs’ performance (10 pF load capacitor) Parameter OTA’s is used up by the DEM circuit. Furthermore, in order to realize a 3-bit feedback DAC path, compared Value DC gain 50.5 dB with 1-bit one, extra fourteen SC branches have to be GBW 125.1 MHz used for a fully-differential circuit so lots of extra Phase margin 64.2° power and die area would be consumed. Slew rate 82.5 MV/s Output swing ± 3.1 V In this work, a fully-differential flash topology with static input scheme and a resistor ladder DAC[2] Input-referred noise 9.6 nV/(Hz) Power consumption 2.1 mW 1/2 are used as the 3-bit quantizer and 3-bit feedback DAC, respectively, as shown in Fig. 7. By using this structure, fifty-six SC branches for the feedback technique based on sampling, is used to further reduce DACs have been avoided, thus, plenty of power and the effect of low-frequency flicker noise, offset and die area for the extra switches are saved and the layout finite DC gain of the 1st OTA. The hold capacitor, workload is also relaxed. And moreover, as stated in Ccds, which is used to store OTA’s noise and offset is Ref. [12], resistor-based DACs have enough linearity set to be large and equal to Ci1 as shown in Fig. 6 for to implement multi-bit SDMs without DEM, and it minimizing the flicker noise and enhancing the also was proved by the 3-bit designs of Ref. [2]. In the settling speed during integration phase[11]. flash ADC, the differential input signal is compared Considering the above kT/C noise requirements, OTAs’ load capacity, the realization of small feedback coefficient of g path, and the design margin of real circuits, the integrating capacitors of the 1st and 2nd integrator have been chosen as 10 pF and 2.5 pF, respectively. And then, the capacitance of other capacitors can be obtained using with a differential reference voltage, generated by the resistor ladder, using a four inputs fully-differential pre-amplifier, as shown in Fig. 8, followed by a traditional latched comparator[13]. The seven latched comparators provide thermometer code, and then, a modulator’s coefficients. In addition, sharing sampling capacitors and redundant switches techniques are used to save power and chip area. Here, both the input and feedback signals are sampled onto the same sampling capacitors to reduce kT/C noise effect, and the two switches which connect the bottom plates of the sampling capacitor have been simplified with a single switch which shorts the bottom plates together. All switches are realized by transmission gates and driven by a pair of invert clock signals, and moreover, large signal input positions have to use large size ones to suppress switch non-idealities. 2.2 3-bit quantizer and feedback DAC Multi-bit quantization with dynamic element matching (DEM) is the most popular choices for the realization of multi-bit SDMs. However, its penalty is too large power consumption especially for a noised-coupled SDM[3]. As seen from Ref. [3], over 40% of overall power which is comparable with all the Fig. 7 Simplified schematic of the 3-bit ADA 205 北 京 大 学学 报 (自 然 科 学版 ) 第 48 卷 estimate. The final experiment results are summarized in Table 2. A −6 dB to full-scale magnitude 11.13 kHz sinusoidal differential signal, which was used to include the most significant 3rd, 5th and 7th harmonic distortions within the bandwidth, was used as the input of the presented SDM under a 12.8 MHz clock rate, and the modulator’s output output power voltage spectrum was where normalized to reference voltage is shown in Fig. 10 where the 1st-order noise-shaping enhancement could be found. Fig. 8 Schematic of the fully-differential pre-amplifier The plot of SNR and SNDR versus relative input amplitude (dBFS) using 11.13 kHz input signal is series of AND gates translate it into a 1-of-8 output displayed in Fig. 11. As seen from the above two code for the following encoder as shown in Fig. 6. The figures, when the input amplitude becomes higher, the 1-of-8 output code is also used to select one of the odd harmonic distortions appear, as a result, the voltage references from the resistor ladder, and then SNDR will be degraded. The figure-of-merit of the DAC send it to modulator’s loop filter as feedback SDMs[13] is defined as: ⎛ BW ⎞ FOM dB = DR + 10 log ⎜ ⎟. ⎝ P ⎠ voltage. Fourteen 1 kΩ equal resistors are selected to minimize the settling error of the generated reference voltages, resistance mismatch and power consumption. 2.3 Other building blocks (10) A performance comparison of several designs using 0.35 μm CMOS technology or noise-coupled Two-phase non-overlapping clocks Φ1 and Φ2 as shown in Fig. 6 were generated by a traditional clock generator as Ref. [2], and other clocks for delayed operation were generated by frequency dividers, NAND gates and a series of inverters. As a result, there were eight clocks to control the transmission gate switches used for delay, and other eight clocks to provide common non-delayed, invert non-delayed, delayed delayed, phases for invert the transmission gates. A common ROM with clock control is used to convert the 1-of-8 code to 3-bit output. 3 Experiment Results The proposed 2nd-order 3-bit noise-coupled Fig. 9 Chip microphotograph of the proposed SDM Table 2 Modulator performance summary Parameter Value Supply voltage 3.3 V Technology Chartered 0.35 μm 2P4M CMOS Sampling frequency 12.8 MHz Oversampling ratio 64 Signal bandwidth 100 kHz SDM was implemented using a 0.35 μm 2P4M CMOS Peak SNR 94.7 dB process, and Fig. 9 shows the die photo of the Peak SNDR 86.4 dB fabricated chip. The test bench was set up by Agilent Dynamic range 95.8 dB 93 k SOC test environment and the output waves ENOB 14.2 bits present correct function. The output of the modulator Power consumption 9.84 mW was sent to an ideal 3-bit DAC the output of which Core area 1.5 nm×0.6 mm was further sent to a Matlab program for performance FOM 165.9 dB 206 第2期 李 宏义 等 : 改 进 的 基于 GSM 标 准 二阶 多 位 噪声 耦合 过 采 样调 制器 Fig. 10 Output power spectrum density with 65k samples of the SDM Table 3 Reference Dessouky, et al. Yang, et al. Ahn, et al. [14] [15] [16] Structure Technology Fig. 11 SNR and SNDR versus input amplitude of the SDM Performance comparison VDD/V BW/kHz SNDR/dB DR/dB P/mW FOM/dB SC 1-bit 0.35 µm CMOS 1 25 85 88 0.95 162.2 SC 4-bit 0.35 µm CMOS 5 20 105 114 55 169.6 Switched RC 0.35 µm CMOS 0.6 20 81 82 1 155 Nguyen et al. [17] Hybrid CTDT 0.35 µm CMOS 3.3 20 98 106 18 166.5 Lee et al.[3] SC 3.9-bit NC 0.18µm CMOS 1.5 1900 81 82 8.1 165.7 This work SC 3-bit NC 0.35µm CMOS 3.3 100 86.4 95.8 9.84 165.9 technique based on Eq. (10) was shown in Table 3. We branches achieve delay function so that power-hungry can see that this work presented excellent power- active blocks are avoided. Consequently, the proposed efficiency among them, so the effectiveness of the SDM presents competitive FOM among a series of proposed modulator could be validated. mature designs. 4 Conclusion References Noise-coupled low-distortion SDMs have the advantage of noise-shaping enhancement and reduced internal signal swings. However, complicated summation before quantizer, especially in a multi-bit [1] Rusu A, Llera González D R, Ismail M. Reconfigurable ADCs enable smart radios for 4 G wireless connectivity. IEEE Circuits and Devices Magazine, 2006, 22(3): 6–11 structure, and the delay of feedback DAC become [2] Rio R, Medeiro F, Perez-Verdu B, et al. CMOS bottleneck to realize expected noise-shaping enhance- cascade sigma-delta modulators for sensors and ment and low-distortion. In this work, using a series of telecom: SGF transformations, the signal adder has been moved error analysis and practical design. Dordrecht: Springer, 2006 from quantizer to the 2nd integrator. Although this [3] Lee K, Miller M R, Temes G C. An 8.1 mW, 82 dB topology imports a full-cycle delay to the STF, delta-sigma ADC with 1.9 MHz BW and −98 dB reduced internal signal swings could still be obtained THD. IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, 2009, by signal scaling. In circuit level design, passive SC 44(8): 2202–2211 207 北 京 大 学学 报 (自 然 科 学版 ) 第 48 卷 [4] Silva J, Moon U, Steensgaard J, et al. Wideband [12] Bonizzoni E, Perez A P, Maloberti F, et al. Two low-distortion delta-sigma ADC topology. Electronics op-amps third-order sigma-delta modulator with 61 Letters, 2001, 37(12): 737–738 dB SNDR, 6-MHz bandwidth and 6-mW power [5] Geerts Y, Steyaert M. Design of multi-bit delta-sigma A/D converters. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002 [6] Schreier R, Temes G C. Understanding delta-sigma data converters. New York: Wiley/IEEE Press, 2004 [7] Lee K, Temes G C. Improved low-distortion ∆ΣADC topology // IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS). Taipei, 2009: 1341–1344 [8] Zanbaghi R, Fiez T S, Temes G C. A new zerooptimization scheme for noise-coupled ∆ΣADCs // IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS). Pairs, 2010: 2163–2166 [9] Schreier R. Delta sigma toolbox. Matlab Central File Exchange [CP/OL]. (2009−07−06) [2011−02−01]. http://www.mathworks.com/ma-tlabcentral/fileex-change/19-delta-sigma-toolbox consumption. Analog Integrated Circuits and Signal Processing, 2011, 66(3): 381–388 [13] Choi Y, Roh J, Roh H, et al. A 99-dB DR fourth-order delta-sigma modulator for 20 kHz bandwidth sensor applications. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 2009, 58(7): 2264–2273 [14] Dessouky M, Kaiser A. Very low-voltage digital-audio ∆Σ modulator with 88-dB dynamic range using local switch bootstrapping. IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, 2001, 36(3): 349–355 [15] Yang Y Q, Chokhawala A, Alexander M, et al. A 114-dB 68-mW chopper-stabilized stereo multibit audio ADC in 5.62 mm 2 . IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, 2003, 38(12): 2061–2068 [16] Ahn G H, Chang D Y, Brown M E, et al. A 0.6-V [10] Rabii S, Wooley B A. The design of low-voltage, 82-dB Delta-Sigma audio ADC using switched-RC low-power, sigma-delta modulators. Boston: Kluwer integrators. IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, Academic Publishers, 1999 2005, 40(12): 2398−2407 [11] Oliaei O. Noise analysis of correlated double [17] Nguyen K, Adams R, Sweetland K, et al. A 106-dB sampling SC-integrators // IEEE International Sympo- SNR hybrid oversampling analog-to-digital converter sium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS). Scottsdale, for digital audio. IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, 2002: 445–448 2005, 40(12): 2408−2415 208