Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Addresser, Address, Addressee three main components of any act of communication: someone (addresser) communicates something (address) to someone (addressee) subject position: 'speaking subject' (first person, I/we) 'spoken-about subject' (third person she/he/they/it) 'spoken-to subject' (second person, you) Other ways to express relation, depending on medium speech: speaker-speech-audience writing, print: writer-text-reader theatre, film, TV: performer-play-audience, producer-programme/film-viewer We see ADDRESS as something caught in the act between ADDRESSER and ADDRESSEE we cannot concentrate only on 'words on the page' = NEW CRITICISM or form and structure of text itself = FORMALIST cannot be fully grasped independantly of relationship between the elements This equals a FUNCTIONALIST and CONTEXTUAL approach to communication ROMAN JAKOBSON drew attention to other elements takes place in a general context: (1960s, Nigeria, President Obama’s bedroom) involves a specific moment of contact: (meeting in a bar by chance) form of a specific message: (sequence of words or images) draws on a particular code: (spoken, written, photography, film) Addresser-centered communication is expressive (I feel I need to tell someone...) Addressee-centered communication is directive (You, tell him) Context-centered communication is referential (That is what she said) Context-centered communication is phatic and checks that channels of communication are open (You know she said that, OK?) Message-centered communication is poetic and plays around wtih the materiality of the message (Telling-shmelling) Code-centered communication is metalinguistic, a comment on language in language (I'm telling you in her very words) Can help break down act into functions, but basically for a monologic (one-way, linear) model direct flow from addresser to addressee, ignores two way, many-way, dialogic communication addresser and addresee are usually changing places exchange and interaction, not just send and receive distinguish between 'actual' and 'implied' addresees: NARRATIVE more than one moment involved can be a base if all these things kept in mind Jakobson Language must be investigated in all the variety of its functions. Before discussing the poetic function we must define its place among the other functions of language. An outline of those functions demands a concise survey of the constitutive factors in any speech event, in any act of verbal communication. The addresser sends a message to the addressee. To be operative, the message requires a context referred to, seizable by the addressee, and either verbal or capable of being verbalized; a code fully, or at least partially, common to the addresser and the addressee; and finally, a contact, a physical channel and psychological connection betweeen the addresser and the addressee, enabling both of them to enter and stay in communication. - from “Linguistics and Poetics” From Beowulf, lines 863-873 At times the war-band broke into a gallop, letting their chestnut horses race whenever they found the going good on those well-known tracks. Meanwhile, a thane of the king’s household, a carrier of tales, a traditional singer deeply schooled in the lore of the past, linked a new theme to a strict meter. The man started to recite with skill, rehearsing Beowulf’s triumphs and feats in well-fashioned lines, entwining his words. Stephen Herben, “The Ruin” MLN (1939) The poem usually called “The Ruin is to be found on f. 124 of the Exeter Book, except for its first seven words which form the last line of the preceeding folio. The last twelve pages of this codex have been mutilated by fire, apparently by a brand which fell upon the book when it was face down, destroying many lines of text. About one quater of the poem here considered is thus irrevocably lost; what remains is excessively puzzling. The fragment abounds in hapax legomena, scribal errors and ambiguities. The poem itself is a ruin. “The Ruin” Well-wrought this wall: Wierds broke it. The stronghold burst.... Snapped rooftrees, towers fallen, The work of the Giants, the stonesmiths, Mouldereth. Rime scoureth gatetowers rime on mortar. Shattered the showershields, roofs ruined, age under-ate them. And the wielders & wrights? Earthgrip holds them – gone, long gone, Fast in gravesgrip while fifty fathers And sons have passed.