Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Prevention in the Elderly: Good Clinical Care or Oxymoron? Daniel E. Forman, MD Associate Professor, Harvard Medical School Director, Cardiac Rehabilitation and The Exercise Testing Laboratory Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital Physician Scientist, New England Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System Chair, Council on Cardiovascular Care for Older Adults, American College of Cardiology Burgeoning Population of Elderly 80 Adults >65 yrs (Millions) Between 2000-2050 389% population > age 85 US Census Bureau Increasing Life Expectancy Improvements in acute care, prevention, and medical technology. Over ½ the current U.S. population can anticipate living to age 80 % total U.S. population Percent U.S. Population Aged ≥65 years • Between 2000-2050 389% population > age 85 • >½ the current U.S. population can anticipate living to age 80 UN World Population Prospects, 2008 % total Chinese population Percent Chinese Population Aged ≥65 years Population Reference Bureau, http://www.prb.org Compression of Morbidity J. Fries, 1980 Percentage of Population Prevalence of Cardiovascular Disease in the U.S. 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 20-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 Men 55-64 Women 65-74 75+ NHANES III CVD Hospitalizations and Mortality >65 yo (~13% of the population) ● disproportionate CV events & mortality ___Admissions___ Total * >65 yrs Acute MI Deaths >65 yrs 858 65.5% 81.2% 1280 53.5% 85.7% Arrhythmias 731 71.0% 73.3% Heart failure 1040 77.4% 92.7% Cerebrovascular Dz 1044 72.6% 74.6% Coronary disease * in thousands National Hospital Discharge Survey, 2000 U.S. Cardiovascular Procedures Number of Procedures* Total Diagnostic catheterization 1322 PCI 1265 637 50.4% Coronary bypass surgery 469 Permanent pacemaker 180 Implantable defibrillator Endarterectomy 103 82 65 years 659 49.9% 265 56.5% 155 86.1% 91 50 54.6% 79.6% * in thousands AHA, Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics , 2008 Update, www.amhrt.org/statistics/index.html Insidious Subclinical CV Disease • Functional Decline: Aerobic, Strength, Endurance • Cognitive Decline • Renal Insufficiency • ↑ “Geriatric Syndromes” – Confusion, Syncope, Falls • ACS: Geriatric Cardiology Patient wishes POLYPHARMACY Conundrum •Cognition •Independence •Frailty COMPLICATIONS Arrhythmias Bleeding Stroke Rupture Renal failure PRESENTATION (Delayed) Atypical symptoms AGE-RELATED PHYSIOLOGY (dyspnea, confusion) Ventricular-vascular stiffness Abnl ECG Systolic limits Diastolic limits Conduction abnl COMORBIDITIES Renal insufficiency Pulmonary Anemia Hypertension GIB Cancers Strokes Prevention in Relation to Aging ? Prevention in Relation to Aging • “Prevention” to help achieve an aging course that better preserves functional capacity (physical, cognitive, emotional), quality of living, and self-efficacy despite senescence. • A career opportunity… Age as a risk factor for CVD Aging Physiology: Predictable CV Disease Physiologic Changes ↑ Central arterial stiffness Delayed early LV filling ↑ Central arterial stiffness Clinical Syndrome Isolated systolic hypertension Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction ↓Neurohormonal regulation ↓ Baroreflex sensitivity Orthostatic hypotension ↑ LV stiffness → ↑LV pressure ↑ Atrial pressure/size Atrial fibrillation Central arterial stiffness ↑ Central arterial stiffness Endothelial dysfunction Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) Chymase Oxidative Stress E. Lakatta Telomeres – Specialized structure at the end of chromosomes that shorten with each replication until cells’ biological capacity is compromised. – Size inversely correlates to oxidative stress and areas of high cell turnover (areas of higher cell repair). • Shorter at vessel bifurcations Arterial Phenotypic Changes with Aging Vascular thickening ↓ Elastin, ↑ Collagen, ↑Calcium ↑ Advanced Glycation – Endproducts (AGE) ↑ Smooth muscle cell migration Endothelial performance ↓ Vasomotor responses ↓ Athero-inhibiting benefit Senescent flow mechanics: lower threshold to disease • Differences in vascular stiffness and endothelium • Flow mechanics and atherosclerosis • Broad Implications: CAD, Stroke, Kidney Disease Blood Pressure and Age Pulse pressure National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Cardiovascular Mortality Myocardial Changes with Aging Aorta stiff and dilated LV Hypertrophy LA dilates Valves thicken LVH and stiffening • More vulnerable to ischemia • Diastolic filling changes • More vulnerable to arrhythmia • Ventricular Hypertrophy & Stiffening LV diastolic pressure --Impedes Ventricular Filling Endsystole Stiff AGING Enddiastole LV diastolic volume --Congestion as blood backs into the lungs Normal Risk Factor Burden Over a Lifetime Prostate CA Breast CA 19% 12.5% Lloyd-Jones D, et al. Circulation 2006;113:791-98 Predictability and Complexity of CVD With Aging Risk Factors: Duration and Number • ↑ Cholesterol, HTN, DM, Tobacco, Sedentary, Obesity Aging Physiology: • Oxidative Stress • ↓ telomere length Socioeconomic: • Lifestyle (exercise, diet, isolation) • Financial Multiple Concurrent Diseases • Heart Failure • CAD, Valvular Dz • Arrhythmia (afib) • Hypertension (PP) • • • • • • • DM, Metabolic Synd Infections Renal Insufficiency Anemia COPD, Sarcopenia Depression Cognitive Change Comorbidity Frailty Disability ↓Cognition ↑Depression ↓ Weight ↑ Weakness ↑ Muscle Wasting ↓Physical Function ↑Fatigue “Old Age” still many years of life ahead • Men • Women Lifetable 75 yo — 80 yo — 85 yo — 90 yo — 75.2 yrs 80.4 yrs men women 10.5 12.5 7.9 9.5 5.9 6.6 4.3 5.0 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Barbara Walters: Regis Philbin: Birthdate: 9/25/29 Birthdate: 8/25/31 Prevention starts in middle age • Diet, Weight, Physical Activity, Stress • Pollution, Sleep, Tobacco, ETOH • DM, HTN, Inflammation • Screening • ASA, BP, cholesterol Primary Prevention: Ventricular Stiffness Arbab-Zadeh A et al. Circulation 2004;110:1799-1805 Physical capacity varies significantly with lifelong patterns VO2max in older endurance athletes Key Implication: Healthy older adults retain the ability to respond to a habitual exercise stimulus with an in maximal aerobic capacity Heath et al., J. Appl. Physiol. 51: 634-40, 1981 Oxidative Stress Relative MitoSox Fluorescence Anti-Oxidants • Resveratrol Caloric Restriction and Longevity (mouse model) Roth GS. J Am Geriatr Soc 2005;53:S280-283 Calorie Restriction and Diastolic Function: Echo Parameters WD (N=25) CR (N=22) p-value F. shortening 36% 34% NS E-peak, cm/s 64.3 70.8 NS A-peak, cm/s 53.0 45.7 0.011 E/A 1.24 1.61 0.001 DT, ms 192.6 173.8 0.012 E’Sept cm/s 9.7 11.8 0.02 E’Lat cm/s 10.2 14.3 0.001 WD=Western diet; CR=Calorie restriction T Meyer, MD, L Fontana, JACC 2006;47:398-402 Age-Associated Physiologic Changes Cardiac Non-Cardiac Heart Failure, CAD, HTN, Arrhythmia, Vascular Stiffening, Valvular Disease, LVH, Conduction Abnl, Lipid Abnl, Inflammation Diabetes, Anemia, Renal Failure, COPD, Infections, Cognition, Depression Lifestyle (risk) • Sedentary • Diet; High Fat, High Salt • Altered Sleep • Over Sedation Age-Associated Physiologic Changes • Falls • Cognitive/Functional ∆ • Confusion • Incontinence • Fatigue • Independence Cardiac Non-Cardiac Heart Failure, CAD, HTN, Arrhythmia, Vascular Stiffening, Valvular Disease, LVH, Conduction Abnl, Lipid Abnl, Inflammation Diabetes, Anemia, Renal Failure, COPD, Infections, Cognition, Depression Lifestyle (risk) • Sedentary • Diet; High Fat, High Salt • Altered Sleep • Over Sedation CVD Prevention for Elderly • Cardiac Disease arises from the substrate of aging… • Cardiac Disease is intrinsically linked to non-cardiac pathophysiology •Blood pressure •Exercise •Cholesterol •Obesity Heterogenity of Patients • Frail to Robust – – – – Medications Cognition Multi-morbidity Frailty (speed, strength, wt loss, ↓acuity) Treatment has to fit the needs of the patient: Patient-Centered Care?? Relevance of Social Context Aging is affected by many dimensions of life • Physiological as well as Cultural – Religion, Community, Architecture (Housing, Urban) – Regional differences • Socioeconomics • Family Heterogeneous Assumptions Regarding Living and Feeling Well Different Perception of Care • • • • Imaging Procedures 1995 2005 Technology Pharmacological Imaging Lifestyle Benefit vs Risk Conundrum • Which elderly would benefit most from prevention? • Are there markers to determine who would benefit most from aggressive therapy? Relative risk reduction Relative Risk Reduction Control Intervention Absolute Risk Reduction Absolute risk reduction But also greater inatrogenesis and complexity of management Blood Pressure • Systolic BP • Poorly controlled in most elderly (often require 2 meds) • Reduced CV endpoints – Effects on mortality inconsistent, especially with advancing age – Side effects, cost HYVET Protocol Age 80-105 with stage 2 HTN Perindopril 4 mg/d Perindopril 2 mg/d Indapamide SR 1.5 mg/d Placebo double-blind open FU goal BP: <150/80 mmHg Placebo Placebo Placebo –2 –1 0 +3 +6 +9 +12 +18 +24 +60 mo. Beckett NG et al, NEJM. 2008; 358: 1887-98 HYVET trial in the very elderly HR 95% CI P value All stroke - 34% 0.46 - 0.95 0.025 Total mortality - 28% 0.59 - 0.88 0.001 Fatal stroke - 45% 0.33 - 0.93 0.021 Cardiovascular mortality - 27% 0.55-0.97 0.029 Heart failure - 72% 0.17-0.48 <0.001 Cardiovascular events - 37% 0.51-0.71 <0.001 Per Protocol Beckett N. N Engl J Med. 2008;358. Key Points • CVA, CVD improved (benefits manifest quickly) • Progression to Heart Failure, CAD improved • Still: – Side effects, cost, polypharmacy remain notorious impediments – Therapeutic targets still unclear • Non-pharmacological therapies are important BP-Lowering Treatment Trialists Comparisons in respect to CV events, CV mortality, and total mortality BP Difference Relative Risk (mm Hg) RR (95% CI) Major CV events ACEI vs D/BB CA vs D/BB ACEI vs CA CV mortality ACEI vs D/BB 2/0 1/0 1/1 1.02 (0.98, 1.07) 1.04 (0.99, 1.08) 0.97 (0.95, 1.03) 2/0 1.03 (0.95, 1.11) CA vs D/BB 1/0 1.05 (0.97, 1.13) ACEI vs CA 1/1 1.03 (0.94, 1.13) 2/0 1/0 1/1 1.00 (0.95, 1.05) Total mortality ACEI vs D/BB CA vs D/BB ACEI vs CA 0.99 (0.95, 1.04) 1.04 (0.98, 1.10) 0.5 1.0 2.0 Favors First Listed Favors Second Listed Blood Pressure Lowering Treatment Trialists’ Collaboration. Lancet. 2003;362:1527-1535. Are there other BP treatment endpoints to consider?? I Hajjar et al. Arch Intern Med. 2012; 172 (5):442 Gray Zones…. • Intermittent application of most standard therapies that are used for younger adults. – – – – J-curve Orthostasis Energy Mood/appetite/confusion The significance of functional capacity • Functional Decline: key determinant of CV health as well as a gauge of health and/or therapeutic benefit Preventive benefits of exercise Exercise: Pleotropic Benefits • Exercise as an essential aspect of homeostasis Restores/preserves healthful physiology – Anti-oxidant, anti-inflammatory – Plaque Stability, Metabolism – Bone and joint stability, Behavioral • Anti-aging remodeling, endothelial responsiveness diastolic performance bone/muscle Reinforce other Risk Factor Modification Goals • • • • • Blood pressure Obesity Hypercholesterolemia Insulin sensitivity Cognition Physical Activity and CVD Risk in Women % of Risk Reduction Explained by Various Risk Factors All Risk Factors 59% Inflammatory Markers 32.6% 27.1% Blood Pressure/ Hypertension Traditional Lipids 19.1% 15.5% Novel Lipids 10.1% Body Mass Index 8.9% Hemoglobin A1c/ Diabetes 0.7% Homocysteine 0 10 20 30 40 50 % Risk Reduction Mora et al, Circ 2007;116: 2110 60 70 Modifiable Vascular Stiffness with Exercise Tanaka H, et al. Circ. 2000; 102:1270-5 Modifiable Ventricular Stiffness with Exercise Edelmann et al. JACC. 2011;58:1780-91 •Aging •Diabetes •Starvation •Renal Dz •Cancer •COPD •Aging •Diabetes •Starvation •Renal Dz •Cancer •COPD Exercise!! Mitochondria Architecture Before and After Resistance Training Pre Training M Post Training M Z band M What kind of exercise? • Intensity, Frequency Mode (Aerobic, Strength, Inspiratory, Tai chi) • Each has different physiological benefits – – – – – – Aerobic Strength Balance Respiratory Cognition Genetic 707 nonsmoking retired men, ages 61-81 12 year follow-up: Those who walked <1 mile/day were nearly twice as likely to die as those who walked >2 miles a day PCI compared with Exercise Training Exercise Rx Event EventFree free Survival Stent Rx survival (%) Exercise Capacity, Symptoms, Costs: Superior with exercise training R. Hambrecht, Circulation. 2004;109:1271-8 Strength training to modify aerobic changes in older HF patients Results Pre-Ex Post-Ex p-value Peak VO2 (ml O2/min) 906±65 1066±69 p<.05 Ventilatory Anaerobic Threshold (VAT) 671±34 755±34 p<.04 6 Min Walk (m) 388±13 452±7 p<.0007 No significant changes in BMI, RER, or heart rate • Resistance training improves muscle strength and endurance by 25% to 100% in men and women of all ages Exercise as Therapy • Mortality, Morbidity, Impact other RF (e.g., BP and weight • Coaching: aerobic, strength, balance – Safety (especially in context of frailty and multi-morbidity) • Behavior • Logistics • Cost Ironically: Relatively Few Older Patients are Referred to CR Suaya J, et al. Circulation. 2007;116:1653-62 Paradigm of Cardiac Rehabilitation (1970’s-1980’s) • Is it still relevant? – Completed MI – Ischemic cardiomyopathy • Pro-ischemic • Pro-arrhythmic • Hemodynamically unstable Obstacles to Exercise: paradoxical behaviors Cardiac Rehabilitation and Survival Cumulative Mortality Rate N=601,099 21-34% Mortality Reduction • Advanced ages • Socioeconomic range • Severity of dz • Extent of comorbidity Months from Discharge Suaya JA, et al. JACC. 2009 Other Relevant CR Endpoints • Risk Factors • Functional Capacity – Physical – Cognitive • QOL, Self-efficacy, Dyspnea, Energy • Rehospitalization Multiple Therapeutic Concerns Addressed in Cardiac Rehabilitation • Compliance, Education, Polypharmacology • Depression, ETOH • Sleep, OSA • Diet (esp. in relation to fluctuating psychosocial circumstances) Expanding Role of Cardiac Rehabilitation in a Capitated Medical Environment World Statins (hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl co-enzyme A reductase inhibitor) • Cholesterol benefits • Pleotropic benefits – Potent anti-atherogenic benefit – Anti-inflammatory – Anti-oxidant • Favorable safety profile Epidemiological Distortion • Low cholesterol, good or bad? Major Secondary Prevention Statin Study Trials Treatment; duration; % elderly Risk Reduction ≥65 yrs <65 yrs -28% death -42% CHD death -35% events 4S (4444) Simvastatin 20-40 mg 5.4 yrs 23% elderly (65-70) -34% death -43% CHD death -34% events CARE (4159) Pravastatin 40 mg 5 yrs 31% elderly -45% CHD death -23% events NS CHD death -19% events PROVE-IT (4162) Atorvastatin 80 mg Pravastatin 40 mg 2 yrs; 30% elderly -20% events -21% events Primary and Secondary Prevention HPS (20,536) (10,697 ≥65 yrs) (5806 ≥70 yrs) (1265 75-80) Simvastatin 40 mg 5 years Benefits even for those with baseline chol <100 All-cause mortality -13% Vasc death 17% Vasc events -25% Revascularization -29% -5% absolute risk reduction in the 75-80 yr population PROSPER (5,804) (70-82 yrs) Pravastatin 40 mg 3.2 years -24% CHD death -15% events -2.1% absolute reduction of CHD events Statins to Prevent Mortality in Older Adults Hierarchical Bayesian Meta-Analysis N=19, 569, age 65-82 Statin therapy reduced the incidence of all-cause mortality by 22%. # needed to treat: 28. Afilalo J, J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;51:37–45) Age-Specific Impact May be Benefits of Statins post AMI Relevant in Advanced Age Hazard Ratio Age 80 yrs Age Foody JM, et al. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006; 54(3): 421–430 Probability of Prescribing Statins Relative to Age and Baseline Risk (396,077 Ontario Residents with known CAD) Highest risk patients are the Lo least likely to receive a statin Probability of Statin Use Low Median High • CVA • PAD Age Ko DT, JAMA 2004;291:1864–70 Effect of Statin Withdrawal on MMSE • 18 pts with mild cognitive impairment or dementia on statins • Mean age 77 yrs, 78% women • Statins withdrawn for a mean of 4.8 weeks • Change in MMSE score: 18.8 ± 5.6 to 22.4 ± 5.1 mean increase 19%, p < 0.001 J Am Geriatr Soc 2010;58:1214-6 Statin Therapy, Muscle Function, and Falls Risk in Community-Dwelling Older Adults D Scott, et al. QJ Med. 2009;102:625-33 • Statins exacerbating muscle decline and proclivity to falls Utility of Statins for Nonagenarians Clas s Recommendation LOE IIa It is reasonable to use statins for secondary prevention in robust nonagenarians who value length of life. D IIb Statins may be considered for secondary prevention in nonagenarians of average health who value length of life. Statins may be considered for secondary prevention in robust nonagenarians who value quality of life D III Statins are not indicated for secondary prevention in nonagenarians in frail health. Statins are not indicated for primary prevention in nonagenarians regardless of health status. D Michael Rich, Washington University Unresolved Issues • Dose, Type • Clinical goals • Side effects – Cognition – Myalgias – Diabetes • 2 years for trial benefits Obesity in US Adults 2003 Obesity in US Adults 2003 Epidemiological Distortion • Is weight loss good or bad? Obesity • Over a third of adults are obese (likely underestimate): physical activity and metabolism. • Weight loss protective but also a risk. • Weight reduction: – blood pressure control – insulin sensitivity – physical function Diabetes Prevention Program 31% 58% • 7% weight loss • 150 minutes exercise/week WC Knowler et al, NEJM. 2002;346:393-403 How to Increase Age-Specific Relevance of Evidence Based Medicine? • Mortality endpoints often less relevant to seniors than quality of life – ↓ Hospitalizations; Improved transitions – ↑ Personal independence; ↓disability, ↓dependency – Relieve symptoms, ↑ functional capacity – ↓ Costs – Improve manner and quality of death Multimorbidity Depression COPD Heart Failure Conclusions • Prevention of aging, Prevention of CVD – National and International – Primary, Secondary – Best to start early • BP, exercise, cholesterol, weight control important prevention goals • Better risk stratification needed • Broad effects of meds need to be better studied • Therapeutic goals and clinical endpoints pertinent to elderly need to be clarified. Biology