* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download About telescopes
Hubble Space Telescope wikipedia , lookup
Arecibo Observatory wikipedia , lookup
Leibniz Institute for Astrophysics Potsdam wikipedia , lookup
Lovell Telescope wikipedia , lookup
James Webb Space Telescope wikipedia , lookup
Allen Telescope Array wikipedia , lookup
Spitzer Space Telescope wikipedia , lookup
International Ultraviolet Explorer wikipedia , lookup
Optical telescope wikipedia , lookup
CfA 1.2 m Millimeter-Wave Telescope wikipedia , lookup
Telescopes Amateur and Professional Galileo 1609 The Moon as a World Jupiter has Moons Refracting telescopes Long focus refractors were awkward but suffered less from chromatic aberration Isaac Newton’s reflecting telescope Mirrors do not have chromatic aberration Reflecting telescope Objective mirrors instead of lenses Three Powers • Magnifying • Resolving • Light Gathering Magnifying Power • Ability to make objects appear larger in angular size • One can change the magnifying power of a telescope by changing the eyepiece used with it • Mag Power = focal length of objective divided by the focal length of the eyepiece Resolving Power • Ability to see fine detail • Depends on the diameter of the objective lens or mirror Light Gathering Power • The ability to make faint objects look brighter • Depends on the area of the objective lens or mirror • Thus a telescope with an objective lens 2 inches in diameter has 4 times the light gathering power of a telescope with a lens 1 inch in diameter Herschel & Lord Rosse 19th century: epoch of the large refractors Refracting telescopes Lick Vienna Yerkes Observatory Largest refracting telescope with a one meter objective 20th century Large Reflectors Come of Age Mount Wilson Observatory 1.5m (1908) and 2.5m (1918) Palomar 5-m (entered operation in 1948) 4 meter Reflecting telescope Objective Mirror Dome of 4 meter Kitt Peak Keck Telescopes SOAR Telescope 4.1 meter SOAR Telescope -- Cerro Pachon SOAR Observing Room SOAR Image of the planetary nebula NGC 2440 MSU Campus Observatory Boller & Chivens reflecting telescope with a 24inch objective mirror More on resolution • Eagle-eyed Dawes • The Dawes Limit R = 4.56/D Where R = resolution in seconds of arc D = diameter of objective in inches More appropriate for visible light and small telescopes A more general expression for the theoretical resolving power • Imagine that star images look like Airy disks Minimum Angle that can be resolved • R = 1.22 x 206,265 l / d R = resolution in seconds of arc l = wavelength of light d = diameter of the objective lens or mirror Note that the wavelength of light and the diameter of the objective should be in the same units Examples • For Visible light around 500nm Our 24-inch telescope R = 0.20 seconds This may be compared with the Dawes limit of 0.19 seconds But with large ground-based telescopes it is difficult to achieve this Astronomical “seeing” • Blurring effect of looking through air • Causes stars to twinkle and planetary detail to blur – At the SOAR site: good seeing means stellar images better than about 0.7 seconds of arc – In Michigan, good seeing means better than about 3 seconds of arc – Not to be confused with good transparency Bad seeing on this side Good seeing on this side Electromagnetic Spectrum Radio Telescopes Arecibo Very Large Array Radio telescope resolution l = 1m d = 100m R = 2500 seconds = 42 minutes! Even though radio telescopes are much bigger, their resolving power is much worse than for optical telescopes Interferometric arrays get around this Very Large Array Interferometry Size of array = 10 km for a VLA This becomes the effective d Now R becomes 25 secsec for a 1-m wavelength For VLBI (very long baseline interfeormetry) the d = 10,000km and R = 0.025 seconds Observing from space • No clouds • Perfect seeing • Can see wavelengths of light blocked by the earth’s atmosphere Hubble Space Telescope Rooftop telescopes