Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
BRIEFING PAPER Number CBP07956, 28 April 2017 NATO Brussels Summit 2017: a preview By Louisa Brooke-Holland The next NATO Summit will be held in Brussels on 25 May 2017. It will be the first summit for Prime Minister Theresa May, US President Donald Trump and the new President of France. The summit will be held at NATO’s new headquarters in Brussels. This briefing paper looks at some of the expected areas of discussion. It will not be updated before the UK general election (8 June 2017). The last two summits have been dominated by discussion on how to respond to Russia.1 The headline decision of the 2016 Warsaw summit was to deploy four multinational battalions to Poland and the Baltic States. This Enhanced Forward Presence (EFP) is designed to act both as a deterrent to Russia and to reassure those states of NATO’s commitment to collective defence. All four battalions are expected to be operational by June. “NATO is in the process of implementing the biggest reinforcement of our collective The UK is leading the battlegroup in Estonia with 800 troops from 5th defence since the battalion The Rifles (5 Rifles) and the Queen’s Royal Hussars. An additional end of the Cold 150 troops from the Light Dragoons are in Poland with the US-led War.” battalion. Four RAF Typhoon aircraft have deployed to Romania to support NATO SecretaryNATO’s Southern Air Policing mission from May 2017. The Russian General, 12 April Ambassador to UK has accused the Government and NATO of increasing 2017 tensions in Europe. Another major issue is defence spending. President Trump has made clear his displeasure at the imbalance in spending among NATO allies.2 In 2006 NATO agreed a guideline for allies to spend 2% of GDP on defence. Allies recommitted to that guideline at the 2014 Wales summit, pledging to: halt any decline in defence expenditure; to increase defence expenditure in real terms as GDP grows; and to aim to move towards the 2% guideline within a decade. NATO reaffirmed this commitment in Warsaw. The US is pushing this issue further, demanding that Allies agree in Brussels to produce national plans that will “clearly articulate how, with annual milestone progress commitments, the (Defence Investment) Pledge will be fulfilled”. 1 2 For further information see House of Commons Library, NATO’s military response to Russia: November 2016 update, 4 November 2016 NATO estimates for 2016 suggest US spending on defence amounts to 3.61% of GDP compared to 1.47% for NATO Europe. www.parliament.uk/commons-library | intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library | [email protected] | @commonslibrary 2 NATO Brussels Summit 2017: a preview Jens Stoltenberg has confirmed NATO is looking at developing national plans as a way of “strengthening the transatlantic bond” through “fair burden sharing.” Stoltenberg has also said he welcomes the US stance as “it helps me in pushing all allies to deliver on what they promised in 2014 on defence investments”. However Stoltenberg has also cautioned against focusing solely on defence spending: “burden sharing is not only about spending, burden sharing is also about contributing with forces, with capabilities, with troops to different NATO missions and operations”. The German Chancellor made a similar point to the US President when they met in Washington and the German Foreign Minister has described spending 2% of GDP on defence as neither reachable nor desirable for Germany.3 Currently only five allies (the US, UK, Estonia, Greece and Poland) meet the 2% target, although NATO’s Secretary-General says Romania, Latvia and Lithuania are expected to reach the 2% target either this year or next. How to respond to the myriad challenges emanating from the Middle East and North Africa, in particular countering the threat of terrorism, will also be discussed in Brussels. The Warsaw summit communiqué said terrorism “represents an immediate and direct threat” and the US Secretary of State has explicitly called on NATO to do more to fight terrorism. NATO is not formally part of the US-led coalition against Daesh/ISIS in Iraq and Syria, although it is providing NATO AWACS (advanced Airborne Warning and Control System) aircraft to provide surveillance and situational awareness. NATO runs a training programme for Iraqi security forces and foreign ministers agreed in February to provide additional training for paramedics armoured vehicles/tanks maintenance. NATO is to create a new regional hub in the south, based at NATO’s Joint Force Command in Naples, to collect information and improve situational awareness on developments in the Middle East and North Africa. This was agreed by NATO defence ministers in February. As the UK plans to leave the European Union, so NATO and the EU pursue closer ties. A joint NATO-EU declaration was agreed in Warsaw and Jens Stoltenberg attended the recent EU defence ministers meeting in Malta. Particular areas of cooperation are cyber defence, hybrid challenges, exercises and maritime security. Further decisions on potential areas of joint working are likely to be agreed at the summit. NATO declared Cyberspace a separate operational domain along the same lines of land, sea and air domains in Warsaw. In February NATO defence ministers approved an updated Cyber Defence Plan and a roadmap to implement cyberspace as an operational domain. NATO held its largest cyber defence exercise in Estonia in April, exercising the defence of a military airbase against cyber-attacks. NATO’s Ballistic Missile Defence capability may also be discussed. The Libyan Government of National Accord formally requested NATO assistance in February for building security and defence institutions. The Summit may also discuss the latest on NATO’s ballistic missile defence capabilities. Montenegro is set to become the 29th member of the Alliance this year. 3 The EU Commission President has also said European countries should not feel pushed into spending more on their armed forces by the United States. 3 Commons Library Briefing, 28 April 2017 Box 1: About NATO The North Atlantic Treaty Organisation was formed in 1949 as an Alliance of 12 nations dedicated to ensuring their collective security and preservation and intended to counter the perceived threat from the Soviet Union and later the countries of the Warsaw Pact. The main tenet of the Alliance is Article 5 of the Washington Treaty which states unequivocally that an armed attack against one shall be considered an attack against all. From its inception through the Cold War, NATO looked eastwards to the Soviet Union. That focus shifted in the 1990s and relations with Russia improved - NATO and Russia signed a Founding Act in 1997 and established a Council in 2002. However events in Ukraine in 2014, coupled with what NATO perceives to be aggressive military action by Russia - violations of NATO allied airspace, provocative military activity near NATO borders - has prompted a significant re-evaluation of that relationship. Russia suggests it is NATO, not Russia, which is the aggressor. Moscow judges NATO to be a significant external threat to Russia, pointing to the deployment of military forces near the border of the Russian Federation and further expansion of the Alliance. President Putin argues NATO requires an 'enemy' to justify its ongoing existence. NATO currently has 28 members. This will increase to 29 when the formal ratification process for Montenegro is complete. Key people: Secretary-General: Jens Stoltenberg Deputy Secretary-General: Rose Gottemoeller Supreme Allied Commander Europe (SACEUR): General Curtis M. Scaparrotti Deputy Supreme Allied Command, Europe (DSACEUR): General Sir James Everard (UK) Further library material House of Lords Library, NATO Alliance: Recent Developments, 16 March 2017 House of Commons Library, NATO’s military response to Russia: November 2016 update, 4 November 2016 Warsaw Summit Communiqué, 9 July 2016 Wales Summit Declaration, 5 September 2014 About the Library The House of Commons Library research service provides MPs and their staff with the impartial briefing and evidence base they need to do their work in scrutinising Government, proposing legislation, and supporting constituents. As well as providing MPs with a confidential service we publish open briefing papers, which are available on the Parliament website. Every effort is made to ensure that the information contained in these publically available research briefings is correct at the time of publication. Readers should be aware however that briefings are not necessarily updated or otherwise amended to reflect subsequent changes. If you have any comments on our briefings please email [email protected]. Authors are available to discuss the content of this briefing only with Members and their staff. If you have any general questions about the work of the House of Commons you can email [email protected]. Disclaimer This information is provided to Members of Parliament in support of their parliamentary duties. It is a general briefing only and should not be relied on as a substitute for specific advice. The House of Commons or the author(s) shall not be liable for any errors or omissions, or for any loss or damage of any kind arising from its use, and may remove, vary or amend any information at any time without prior notice. The House of Commons accepts no responsibility for any references or links to, or the content of, information maintained by third parties. This information is provided subject to the conditions of the Open Parliament Licence.