Download Parameter label: Non-periphrastic causatives Values: NoNonpfrCC

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Yiddish grammar wikipedia , lookup

Integrational theory of language wikipedia , lookup

Old Irish grammar wikipedia , lookup

Old English grammar wikipedia , lookup

Inflection wikipedia , lookup

Georgian grammar wikipedia , lookup

Pleonasm wikipedia , lookup

Kannada grammar wikipedia , lookup

Malay grammar wikipedia , lookup

Morphology (linguistics) wikipedia , lookup

Macedonian grammar wikipedia , lookup

Scottish Gaelic grammar wikipedia , lookup

Antisymmetry wikipedia , lookup

Agglutination wikipedia , lookup

Serbo-Croatian grammar wikipedia , lookup

Sotho verbs wikipedia , lookup

Pipil grammar wikipedia , lookup

Lexical semantics wikipedia , lookup

Causative wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Parameter label: Non-periphrastic causatives
Values:
NoNonpfrCC
MorfNonpfrCC
FlexNonpfrCC
VVNonpfrCC
Reference: W 111
Commentary
Causative constructions (CC) describe a situation involving two events: (1) the
causing event, in which the causer does or initiates something; and (2) the caused event, in
which the causee carries out an action, or undergoes a change of condition or state as a result
of the causer’s action. Causation can be expressed one of three ways: lexically1,
morphologically, or syntactically (also known as analytically or periphrastically). This
parameter considers only non-periphrastic strategies for expressing causation.
Non-periphrastic syntactic causatives fulfill the following three criteria:
1. The causing event and caused event appear in the same clause, expressed by a
single (one- or two-verb) predicate.
2. The causer appears in a higher grammatical position in the sentence than the causee.
For example, the causer might appear as the grammatical agent2, while the causee appears as
the grammatical patient3 or in an adverbial phrase.
3. The grammatical strategy used to mark the causative function fulfills no other
semantic purpose in the sentence.
Types:
NoNonpfrCC: The language does not have non-periphrastic causatives.4
MorfNonpfrCC: Causatives are expressed using a non-periphrastic, morphological
strategy.5
1
Lexical causatives are those words that simultaneously express the causing event and caused event, such as kill
(‘cause to die’) and push (‘cause to move’). In some cases, causative and non-causative verb pairs may differ
only in terms of internal flexion or other phonological contrast (for example, English fall  fell). However,
these contrasts are generally not systematic. All languages use lexical causatives in addition to relying on either
morphological or periphrastic strategies to form new causatives. For this reason, only morphological and
periphrastic strategies are worth considering for typological classification.
2
In nominative languages, this is the subject.
3
In nominative languages, this is the object.
4
If this value applies, the value of Morphological causatives should be NoMorphCC.
5
This value indicates that causation is expressed by the use of an affix, which attaches to the verb. If this value
applies, the value NoMorphCC cannot apply for the parameter Morphological causation.
FlexNonpfrCC: Causatives are expressed using a non-periphrastic,
morphophonological strategy.6
VVNonpfrCC: Causatives are expressed using a non-periphrastic, compound-verb
strategy.7
Keywords: causation.
6
Such strategies may include internal flexion or the use of tone to mark the causative function, as long as use of
the strategy is consistent (not lexically based). If this value applies, the value ElseMorfCC must apply for the
parameter Morphological causation.
7
In the compound-verb strategy, two verbs appear directly alongside each other: one expresses the caused event
and the other fulfills a causative function. This strategy should not be confused with either morphological
causatives or periphrastic, two-clause strategies.