Download Reverse Remodeling: Does This Work?

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Coronary artery disease wikipedia , lookup

Remote ischemic conditioning wikipedia , lookup

Management of acute coronary syndrome wikipedia , lookup

Electrocardiography wikipedia , lookup

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy wikipedia , lookup

Cardiac surgery wikipedia , lookup

Cardiac contractility modulation wikipedia , lookup

Heart failure wikipedia , lookup

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia wikipedia , lookup

Heart arrhythmia wikipedia , lookup

Antihypertensive drug wikipedia , lookup

Quantium Medical Cardiac Output wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
MAEDICA – a Journal of Clinical Medicine
2015; 10(2): 83-84
Mædica - a Journal of Clinical Medicine
E DITORIAL P OINT
OF
V IEW
Reverse Remodeling:
Does This Work?
Mircea CINTEZAa
a
M
Emergency University Hospital, „Carol Davila” University of Medicine and
Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
ost of the doctors who practice
medicine today learned during
their medical school that heart
failure is an irreversible disease, with irreversible structural changes, with a prognostic identic with cancer and a 2-year- survival in cases with deffinite
diagnosis. Irreversibility is given by a pathologic
remodeling of the ventricle, due to cardiac
overload or injury combined with neurohormonal activation.
Different causes lead to pathologic cardiac
remodeling in common ways (1). There are 3
main models of remodeling: concentric ventricular remodeling in pressure overload, eccentric hypertrophy with dilation in volume
overload and a mixed model after myocardial
infarction. The initial phase of the model may
be adaptative, but soon the maladaptative
model appears and progresses till the terminal
phase of heart failure. There are no clinical or
biohumoral data to define the moment of progression from the adaptative to the maladaptative phase (1)
The main structure involved is the myocyte,
but surrounded by fibroblasts, collagen, other
components of the interstium and vasculature.
Local delivered hormones, like angiotensine,
norepinephrine or endothelin contribute to
myocyte hypertrophy, myocyte rarefaction and
development of fibrosis. The hypertrophied
myocytes are not functionally more competent, they are fewer than the former physiologic number of myocytes and they continue to
deteriorate in the conditon of a bad neurohormonal and larger fibrosis ambient. Sometimes,
in heart failure, a permanent release of small
amounts of troponins does exist in the absence
of ischemia (1), showing that myocyte deterioration is continuous in heart failure. In these
conditions the irreversibility of the myocardial
deterioration in heart failure seems to be demonstrated, as well clinically and pathologically.
And – surprise! More and more data appeared that in some conditions – mainly after
prolonged mechanical support of the failing
heart, but also after sustained therapy with be-
Address for correspondence:
Mircea Cinteza, Department of Cardiology, Emergency University Hospital, 169 Splaiul Independentei, 5th District, Romania.
E-mail: [email protected]
Article received on the 22nd of June 2015. Article accepted on the 24th of June 2015.
Maedica
A Journal of Clinical Medicine, Volume 10 No.2 2015
83
REVERSE REMODELING: DOES THIS WORK?
ta-blockers or angiotensin converting enzyme
inhibitors (ACEIs) – signs of pathological reversibility were demonstrated. In these cases clinical improvement appeared on a medium term,
even in the condition of stopping the mechanical support. Thus, the concept of reverse remodeling developed. The term was introduced
by Kass in 1995 and revised by the author and
Koitabashi in 2012 (2).
The first problem is to recognise the phenomenon. Functional data are useful. Reduction in end-systolic volume or preserving the
same endsystolic volume having a smaller enddiastolic volume denotes better efficacy of the
failing ventricule. But this has to be preserved
for a longer period. There are also histologic
feaures that have to be demonstrated: reduced
myocyte size, reduction of interstitial fibrosis,
increased capillary density, improved beta-adrenergic response, improved calcium handling
or SERCA2 gene upregulation (2,3). These parameters are more difficult to demonstrate in
the clinical follow up.
The second observation is that not all therapies of heart failure succeeded to show elements of reverse remodeling. Mechanical support does this the best: left ventricular (LV)
assist devices, biventricular pacing, resinchronization or diastolic containement devices
(2,3). Beta-blockers, ACEIs and mineralocorticoid receptor inhibitors have positive proves.
On the contrary, calcium antagonists, renin or
Tumor Necrosis Factor inhibitors, endothelin
antagonists or statins had no positive results (2).
There are some encouraging results with
stem cell therapy. However, here is a long way
to progress, starting with the source of stem
cells, continuing the way of injection, the way
to stabilize them in the myocardial tissue and
finally to make them differentate in functional
cells (2,3). Each of these steps are today under
intense investigation.
The results of today show that only about
one third of patients with defined heart failure
due to different ethiologies have signs of reverse remodeling with sustained appropriate
therapy, either mechanical, with drugs or
stemm cells. The prognosis in those cu show
reverese remodeling is much better than in
those who do not present such signs (4).
There are different other ways imagined to
develop a better response of the failing myocardium: inhibition of GMP-specific 3’,5’-cyclic phosphodiesterase 5, upregulation of endoplasmic/sarcoplasmic calcium ATPase 2,
calcium-sensor protein S100 A1 and other, all
tested clinically (2). The solutions not yet tested
in man are even more numerous.
Reverse remodeling is a very important goal
and hope in the therapy of congestive heart
failure. Crucial questions have to be solved in
this direction (5):
• different etiologies of heart failure respond differently to reverse remodeling
therapies?
• Should we have better methods clinically available to monitor the appearance and progression of reverse remodeling?
• should we use different therapies for different subgroups of patients?
For the moment, we may conclude with Eugene Braunwald, citing Winston Churchill (3):
“Now, this is not the end. It is not even the
beginning of the end. But it is, perhaps, the end
of the beginning”.
Conflict of interests: none declared.
Financial support: none declared.
REFERENCES
1.
2.
84
Cohn JN – Cardiac remodeling: Basic
aspects – UpToDate online 2015
Koitabashi N, Kass DA – Reverse
remodeling in heart failure— mechanisms and therapeutic opportunities.
Maedica
3.
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2012;9:147-157
Braunwald E – The war against heart
failure: the Lancet lecture. Lancet 2015;
385: 812-24
A Journal of Clinical Medicine, Volume 10 No.2 2015
4.
5.
Merlo M, Pyxaras SA, Pinamonti B, et
al. – J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;57:1468-76
Carasso S, Amir O – Reverse Remodeling in Dilated Cardiomyopathy: Dream
Come True? IMAJ 2014;16:444-5.