Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Unified neutral theory of biodiversity wikipedia , lookup
Habitat conservation wikipedia , lookup
Introduced species wikipedia , lookup
Occupancy–abundance relationship wikipedia , lookup
Latitudinal gradients in species diversity wikipedia , lookup
Biodiversity action plan wikipedia , lookup
Island restoration wikipedia , lookup
Maximum sustainable yield wikipedia , lookup
Storage effect wikipedia , lookup
SIDNEY PUBLIC SCHOOLS Population Growth Modeling Study How does the Impact of Competing Species Affect the Maximum Population of Competitors? SAMPLE 5/14/2014 Investigation Question If the impact of a competing species in a given environment is increased, what happens to the maximum population of the competitor? Background Research Ecologists study populations to know how and why populations change over time (N.A. Campbell, pg. 726). They are interested in the causes of population change, limits of population growth, the affects that the environment and other organisms in it have on the population of a particular species. Knowing how and why a population is changing can help scientists manage and maintain the integrity of a population whether it be a population of domesticated farm animals, predators affecting other populations in the wild, or pest species that occupy, destroy or otherwise interfere with habitat that might otherwise by occupied by more important species or species more beneficial to humans. In this modeled study, I will be considering how the impact of one species affects a competitor in the same environment. Impact of a species can include various aspects of the organisms considered including size. For example, if you considered grazing animals in grassland environments, American buffalo feed on many of the same grasses and plant life that the cottontail rabbit consumes. Individually and as a population, the bison would have a bigger impact based on its size and the amount of food it consumes. Another example of impact might include the lifespan of organisms. A short life-span will mean that even though an species of organisms may be larger or consume more than a competing species, the species may have a lower impact on a given environment than its competing species with a longer life span. Some of the ways in which I will use the population growth spreadsheet model (Vernier, exp. 18, Modeling Population Growth) to reveal information about how changing the impact of one species affects another can involve the following: 1. monitoring changes in the maximum population of competitor (herbivore) 2 when the impact of competitor (herbivore) 1 is increased. 2. monitoring the number of generations it takes for a competitor (herbivore) 2 to reach the population carrying capacity. 3. comparing the difference in maximum populations reached by the competing organisms. For example, when the impact of competitor (herbivore) 1 is increased by impact increments of .10, how does the maximum population of herbivore 1 compare with the maximum population of herbivore 2? What are the differences in maximum populations of the competitors as the impact of the one competitor is increased? Carrying capacity is the maximum population of a particular species that a given environment can support. This does not always mean that a population will reach the carrying capacity population of the environment. Competition, predators, disease and other factors can affect the actual number of individuals in a population. This includes the impact factors considered in this model. The investigation is intended to look at how the impact of one competing species can affect the ability of another competing species population to grow and approach its carrying capacity. Hypothesis Null hypothesis – Increasing the impact of a competing species will not affect the maximum population of another competitor species in the environment. Alternate hypothesis – Increasing the impact of a competing species will reduce the ability of another competing species population to grow to its environmental carrying capacity. Materials computer, population growth model spreadsheet (Vernier Software and Technology), references (ecology chapters in Biology Text, others as provided – see references/works cited). Variables: Manipulated (independent) – impact of competing species (herbivore 2) Responding (dependent) – population changes of competitor (herbivore 1) Controlled variables (unchanged) – predation, kill rate, death rate, growth rate Procedure 1. Open the population growth modeling spreadsheet provided for the exercise. 2. Use the competition tab to investigate the effect of a competing organism’s impact on the population of a species that it is competing with. Change the impact of the competitor (herbivore 2) from .10 to .70 in .2 increments (ie-.10, .30, .50, .70). If there is no observable changes, try different increments and increment ranges; for example, a range of .20 to .40 in impact increments of .05 3. Print the default settings graph (impact = .10) for a baseline with which to compare the results of other impact levels of one competing species (Herbivore 2) on the population of the competing species (Herbivore 1). 4. Print graphs or data tables for each of the impact settings. (I will test impact settings of .1 to .7). 5. Use graphs to compare to the default. Construct a simple data table comparing the results that you developed. Results View graphs to compare changes in impact vs. population with respect to carrying capacity of competing species. Data Table: Impact of Maximum Population % of carrying Herbivore 2 of Herbivore 1 capacity reached by Herbivore 1 .1 977 97.7 .3 934 93.4 .5 892 89.2 .7 849 84.9 Summary of Results The results show that increasing the impact of a competing species decreases the ability of another competitor to reach its carrying capacity. For the tested range of impacts of the competing organism (H2), the maximum population of the other competing species (H1) is decrease steadily about 42 or 43 individuals of species (H1) for each impact increase of .2 for the competing H2 species. This graph of the changes in impact of H2 and the maximum population shows this inverse relationship. The linear relationship show a slope of about -21.2 individuals of H1 per .1 increase in impact of species H2. The model graphs of the overall population of each competitor also indicates that as the impact of the competing species H2 increases, the stable population of that species continues to increase and close in on its carrying capacity. Meanwhile, the original species (H1) has a stable population that is also decreasing. Conclusion The effect of competitor impact agreed with the hypothesis as stated. Increasing competitor impact does decrease the maximum population of other competing species according to the results of this model. These results do not agree with the null hypothesis that competitor impact has no effect on the maximum that a competing population will reach. Further investigations could consider some of the following ideas. 1. How does the impact level of one species in an environment affect the stable population levels of competing species? 2. How does the carrying capacity of one species impact maximum and/or stable population levels of a competing species? References Campbell, N. A. (2009). Biology: Concepts and Connections. San Fransisco: Pearson Education , Inc. Melville, J. M. (2012). Investigating Biology through Inquiry. Beaverton, OR: Vernier Software and Technology. Experiment 18 - Modeling Population Dynamics Greenwood, Tracy and others. (2012). AP Biology 2 Student Workbook. Hamilton, New Zealand: Biozone International Ltd.