Download High or Standard Definition Computed Tomography for Coronary

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Remote ischemic conditioning wikipedia , lookup

Quantium Medical Cardiac Output wikipedia , lookup

Saturated fat and cardiovascular disease wikipedia , lookup

Cardiovascular disease wikipedia , lookup

Cardiac surgery wikipedia , lookup

Angina wikipedia , lookup

History of invasive and interventional cardiology wikipedia , lookup

Management of acute coronary syndrome wikipedia , lookup

Coronary artery disease wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
High or Standard Definition Computed Tomography for
Coronary Artery Imaging: an in-vivo study
Poster No.:
C-0564
Congress:
ECR 2013
Type:
Scientific Exhibit
Authors:
A. Akta#, Ö. Y#lmaz, M. Kayan, B. De#irmenci, M. Koroglu, M.
Çetin; Isparta/TR
Keywords:
Computer Applications-Detection, diagnosis, CT-High Resolution,
CT-Angiography, CT, Computer applications, Cardiovascular
system, Cardiac, Artifacts
DOI:
10.1594/ecr2013/C-0564
Any information contained in this pdf file is automatically generated from digital material
submitted to EPOS by third parties in the form of scientific presentations. References
to any names, marks, products, or services of third parties or hypertext links to thirdparty sites or information are provided solely as a convenience to you and do not in
any way constitute or imply ECR's endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation of the
third party, information, product or service. ECR is not responsible for the content of
these pages and does not make any representations regarding the content or accuracy
of material in this file.
As per copyright regulations, any unauthorised use of the material or parts thereof as
well as commercial reproduction or multiple distribution by any traditional or electronically
based reproduction/publication method ist strictly prohibited.
You agree to defend, indemnify, and hold ECR harmless from and against any and all
claims, damages, costs, and expenses, including attorneys' fees, arising from or related
to your use of these pages.
Please note: Links to movies, ppt slideshows and any other multimedia files are not
available in the pdf version of presentations.
www.myESR.org
Page 1 of 7
Purpose
The purpose of this study was to compare a high-definition CT (HDCT) with a
conventional 64-row standard-definition CT (SDCT) angiography as to radiation dose,
image quality, accuracy of vessel diameter measurement for imaging small caliber
coronary arteries in vivo.
Images for this section:
Fig. 1: Coronary artery diameter measurement from inner portion of artery wall.
Page 2 of 7
Fig. 2: Coronary artery diameter measurement from outer portion of artery wall.
Page 3 of 7
Fig. 3: Statistics of high and standart definition CT measurements.
Page 4 of 7
Methods and Materials
28 patients from different University hospitals with history of coronary artery disease has
singed the informed concent form and scanned by HDCT (Discovery CT750 HD) and
SDCT (Somatom Definition AS). Totally 280 measurements from 140 coronary arteries
were analyzed by 2 independent radiologist.The scan modes were bothaxial prospective
ECG-triggered. The vessel diameters of ascending aorta(AA), left main coronary artery
(LM), left anterior decending coronary artery (LAD), left circumflex artery(Cx), rigth
coronary artery (RCA) and vessel attenuation valuesof each were measured by two
experienced radiologists. The luminal diameter obtained at the proximal portions of each
coronary vessels and the mean luminal diameters were also calculated. All data were
analyzed by intraclass correlation test. Image quality graded by motion and stairstep
artifacts (grade 1, poor, to grade 4, excellent), accuracy of vessel inner and outer
diameters were compared between the two CT units using the independent samples ttest and Mann-Whitney U test.
Results
The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of measured vessel attenuation values in
SDCT between the two radiologists was very good. The ICC was higher in HDCT
according to inner and outer diameters of Cx, LAD and also outer diameters of LM. But
ICC was higher in SDCT according to inner and outer diameters of AA and RCA.
First radiologist image quality score and the attenuation value measurements are higher
than second radiologist in HDCT and visa versa for SDCT. The radiation dose of high
definition CT angiography (HDCTA) (14,3 mSv) was higher than that of SDCTA (6,5 mSv)
when the mean tube current was 180 (mA) in HDCT and 147(mA) in SDCT with the same
tube voltage (kVp). CTA images were assigned a satisfactory image quality rating as 3
by both radiologists in stable heart rate up to 75 beats per minute (bpm) when using the
minimal X-ray exposure time.
Conclusion
On the basis of this in vivo study, HDCT has a higher radiation dose than SDCT but has
much more atenuation and the spatial resolution which improve measurement accuracy
for imaging coronary arteries.
Page 5 of 7
References
* Schuijf JD, Pundziute G, Jukema JW, Lamb HJ, Tuinenburg JC, van der Hoeven BL, et
al. Evaluation of patients with previous coronary stent implantation with 64-section CT.
Radiology.2007;245:416-423.
*G.L. Raff, M.J. Gallagher, W.W. O'Neill, J. Goldstein Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive
coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography J Am Coll Cardiol, 46
(2005), pp. 552-557
*Vartuli JS, Lyons RJ, Vess CJ et al (2008) GE Healthcare's New Computed Tomography
Scintillator-Gemstone. Symposium on Radiation Measurement and Applications, June
2-5, Berkeley, California
* Wykrzykowska JJ, Arbab-Zadeh A, Godoy G, Miller JM, Lin S, Vavere A, et al.
Assessment of in-stent restenosis using 64-MDCT: analysis of the CORE-64 Multicenter
International Trial. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;194:85-92.
*
M.J. Budoff, D. Dowe, J.G. Jollis, M. Gitter, J. Sutherland, E. Halamert, M. Scherer,
R. Bellinger, A. Martin, R. Benton, A. Delago, J.K. Min Diagnostic performance of
64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of
coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results
from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed
Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography)
trial J Am Coll Cardiol, 52 (2008), pp. 1724-1732
*M. Hamon, G.G. Biondi-Zoccai, P. Malagutti, P. Agostoni, R. Morello, M. Valgimigli, M.
Hamon Diagnostic performance of multislice spiral computed tomography of coronary
arteries as compared with conventional invasive coronary angiography: a meta-analysis
J Am Coll Cardiol, 48 (2006), pp. 1896-1910
*Ropers D, Rixe J, Anders K, et al. Usefulness of multidetector row computed tomography
with 64-× 0.6-mm collimation and 330-ms rotation for the noninvasive detection of
significant coronary artery stenoses. Am J Cardiol2006;97 : 343-348
*Fine JJ, Hopkins CB, Ruff N, Newton FC. Comparison of accuracy of 64-slice
cardiovascular computed tomography with coronary angiography in patients with
suspected coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 2006; 97:173 -174
*Hoffmann U, Moselewski F, Cury RC, et al. Predictive value of 16-slice multidetector
spiral computed tomography to detect significant obstructive coronary artery disease
in patients at high risk for coronary disease: patient versus segment-based analysis.
Circulation 2004;110 :2638 -2643
Page 6 of 7
*Cordeiro MA, Miller JM, Schmidt A, et al. Noninvasive half millimetre 32 detector row
computed tomography angiography accurately excludes significant stenoses in patients
with advanced coronary artery disease and high calcium scores. Heart 2006;92 : 589-597
*Yang, W.Yang, W.Chen, K.Pang, L.Pan High-Definition Computed Tomography for
Coronary Artery Stent Imaging: a Phantom StudyKorean J Radiol. 2012 Jan-Feb; 13(1):
20-26.
*Hausleiter J, Meyer T, Hadamitzky M, et al. Radiation dose estimates from cardiac
multislice computed tomography in daily practice: impact of different scanning protocols
on effective dose estimates. Circulation 2006;113 :1305-1310
*Coles DR, Smail MA, Negus IS, et al. Comparison of radiation doses from multislice
computed tomography coronary angiography and conventional diagnostic angiography.
J Am Coll Cardiol2006 ; 47:1840 -1845
*J.B. Thibault, K.D. Sauer, C.A. Bouman, J. Hsieh A three-dimensional statistical
approach to improved image quality for multislice helical CT Med Phys, 34 (2007), pp.
4526-4544
Personal Information
Aykut Recep Aktas, MD, Department of Radiology,
Süleyman Demirel University Faculty of Medicine, Isparta Turkey. Tel: 090(246)
2112050,
Email: [email protected]
Page 7 of 7