* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download preliminary plan
Survey
Document related concepts
Dynamic range compression wikipedia , lookup
Current source wikipedia , lookup
Pulse-width modulation wikipedia , lookup
Alternating current wikipedia , lookup
Photomultiplier wikipedia , lookup
Buck converter wikipedia , lookup
Schmitt trigger wikipedia , lookup
Stray voltage wikipedia , lookup
Resistive opto-isolator wikipedia , lookup
Switched-mode power supply wikipedia , lookup
Voltage regulator wikipedia , lookup
Voltage optimisation wikipedia , lookup
Transcript
University of Leicester PLUME Ref: PLM-PAY-LaserPrePlan-037-1 Date: 25/01/2010 Preliminary PPB laser testing plan Philip Peterson Date Updated Reference Number change 25/01/2010 PLM-PAY-LaserPrePlan-037-1 First draft The first laser test using the NIM amplifiers produced very good results, an example pulse height distribution is given in figure 1 below. The peak from the laser corresponds to an input charge cloud of 3x106 electrons. Figure 1: A pulse height distribution for the laser experiment using the NIM electronics; each channel corresponds to around 3,750 electrons. Features from left to right: background noise, noise from the laser pump’s power supply, laser signals. The NIM electronics have a much better noise profile than the PPB, but even then they were inadequate for detecting x-ray events. Typical peak-to-peak noise values for the PPB at the moment are between 1V for low gain and 4V for high gain settings. The PPB is designed to have a voltage gain range of 10 to 100 and a 1pF feedback capacitance on the preamp. Calibration reveals the true gain range to be 13 to 90, so a single electron would produce an output voltage between 2x10-6 and 1.4x10-5V. From this, an input of 3x106 electrons to the PPB would produce outputs between 6.24V and 43.2V; these voltages are beyond the 4.4V maximum output swing of the PPB and would saturate Page 1 of 2 University of Leicester PLUME Ref: PLM-PAY-LaserPrePlan-037-1 Date: 25/01/2010 the amplifiers. This merits a reduction in the lower bound of the PPB’s gain range – this is a simple operation that involves replacing a resistor to change the PPB’s designed minimum gain from 10 to 5, say. At the low gain setting, this would give a laser experiment a voltage of approximately 3V, which should provide sufficient resolution at a voltage level low enough for the PPB to handle. At this stage it seems plausible that with such a modification, the PPB could be used successfully with the laser experiment. The theoretical signal to noise ratio of the PPB with the laser is around 6 to 1, worse than the NIM experiment but still good enough that the laser peak should be easily distinguishable. Our immediate course of action is to modify the PPB to give lower gain and recalibrate it. A brief test using a pulse generator to ensure that the saturation voltage of the amps is well above the expected signal voltage would be sensible - the pulse generator’s test output should be 480mV for this exercise. Before the test plan for the PPB laser experiment can be written, the plate voltage for the first experiment must be determined as part of the next experiment will involve varying the high voltage and seeing the effect this has on gain. Page 2 of 2