Download 2. Overview of Beyond CMOS Devices

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Control system wikipedia , lookup

Pulse-width modulation wikipedia , lookup

Electrical substation wikipedia , lookup

Resistive opto-isolator wikipedia , lookup

Rectifier wikipedia , lookup

Transistor wikipedia , lookup

Memristor wikipedia , lookup

Alternating current wikipedia , lookup

Voltage optimisation wikipedia , lookup

Mains electricity wikipedia , lookup

Immunity-aware programming wikipedia , lookup

Variable-frequency drive wikipedia , lookup

Integrated circuit wikipedia , lookup

Surge protector wikipedia , lookup

Power MOSFET wikipedia , lookup

Buck converter wikipedia , lookup

Power electronics wikipedia , lookup

Switched-mode power supply wikipedia , lookup

Rectiverter wikipedia , lookup

Semiconductor device wikipedia , lookup

Opto-isolator wikipedia , lookup

CMOS wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Beyond CMOS computing
2. Overview of Beyond CMOS
Devices
Dmitri Nikonov
Thanks to Ian Young
[email protected]
1
Nikonov 2. Beyond CMOS
Outline



General principles of logic devices
Nomenclature of beyond CMOS devices
How to achieve lower switching energy?
2
Nikonov 2. Beyond CMOS
Why Are We Looking Beyond CMOS
Computation Efficiency needs max. performance at lowest supply (Vdd)
Switching Energy a CVdd2
At Vdd ≤ Vth , performance suffers significantly
Lowest Vth is limited by leakage
Computation efficiency of CMOS limited by 60 mV/dec Id/Vgs
sub-threshold Slope
CMOS Circuit Delay (ps)
•
•
•
•
300
For ITRS LG=20nm
At 1nW Standby Power
250
200
150
100
50
0
0.0
0.3
0.6
0.9
Supply Voltage (V)
3
Nikonov 2. Beyond CMOS
Nanoelectronic Research Initiative
2007-present, few $M, 5 semiconductor co., federal and state governments
Notre Dame
Penn State
Purdue
UT-Dallas
SUNY-Albany
Purdue
MIT
Harvard
GIT
NCSU
Columbia
U. Virginia
(co-funds all centers)
UC Los Angeles
UC Berkeley
UC Irvine
UC Riverside
UC Santa Barbara
Portland State
U. Nebraska-Lincoln
U. Wisconsin-Madison
4
UT-Austin
Rice
UT-Dallas
Texas A&M
U. Maryland
NCSU
Nikonov 2. Beyond CMOS
Brown
Columbia
Illinois-UC
MIT/U.Virginia
Nebraska-Lincoln
Northwestern
Penn State
Princeton / UT-Austin
Purdue
Stanford
U. Alabama
UC Berkeley
Virginia Nanoelectronics
Center (ViNC)
University of Virginia
Old Dominion University
College of William & Mary
Computational Variables
Class
Variables
Example
Charge
Q, I, V
CMOS, TFET
Electric Dipole
P
(FeFET)
Magnetic Dipole
M, Ispin
ASL, SWD, NML
Orbital State
Bose condensate
BisFET
e-
Charge
5
E-Dipole
Magnetic -Dipole
Nikonov 2. Beyond CMOS
Orbital State
Computational Variables and Transduction
Output of a device needs to be the same
computational variable (and same range) as input.
Otherwise a transducer is needed.
A. Transistor-like devices:
(CMOS HP, CMOS LP, III-V FET, HJFET, gnrFET,
spinFET)
also GpnJ, BisFET
B. STT/DW, STOlogic, STTriad
Current-driven = Spin Torque Switching
C. SMG, SWD, NML
Voltage-driven = Magneto-Electric Switching
also ASLD (current driven)
6
Nikonov 2. Beyond CMOS
Requirements to Logic
Non-linear characteristics (related to noise margin and the signal-to-noise ratio)
Power amplification (gain>1)
Concatenation (output of one device can drive another)
Feedback prevention (output does not affect input)
Tenets
of Logic
Complete set of Boolean operators (NOT, AND, OR, or equivalent)
Physical
measures
Size (i.e. scalability)
Switching time
Switching energy (i.e. power dissipation)
Room temperature or higher operation
Low sensitivity to parameters (e.g. fabrication variations)
Operational reliability
CMOS architectural compatibility (interface, connection scheme)
Techno
logical
require
ments
CMOS process compatibility (fabricated on the same wafer)
Comprehending intrinsic and extrinsic parasitic and their interface to interconnect
7
Nikonov 2. Beyond CMOS
Beyond CMOS Devices
1. Electronic
2. Spintronic
Tunneling FET
spin-torque
e
SpinFET
spin-current
All Spin Logic
e
Spin
Torque
Oscillator
Graphene pn Junction
Domain Wall Logic
Spintronic Majority
BisFET
Spin
Torque
Triad
3. Orbitronic
8
Nano Magnet Logic
Spin Wave Device
Nikonov 2. Beyond CMOS
Devices Off the Table
Electronic
Spintronic
SET/binary
decision diagram
RAMA
Resonant
Injection
Enhanced FET
conductor
contacts
Domain
wall ring
Hbi
as
substrate
current
Electron
structure
modulation FET
Phononic
Excitonic FET
Orbitronic
9
MTJ+STT
Nikonov 2. Beyond CMOS
Graphene thermal
transistor
Design Rules and Layout Estimation
Scalable CMOS design rules in terms of l = maximum mask
misalignment
Rules and this layout remain the same between generations
Contacted gate pitch = 8 l
Also contacted gate pitch = 4F
Minimum pitch of electrodes, 4F, determine the devices
density (not the size of intrinsic devices)
10
Nikonov 2. Beyond CMOS
CMOS FET
(+) The incumbent logic device.
(-) Higher active power than other devices.
11
Nikonov 2. Beyond CMOS
Tunneling FET
HomJTFET
HetJTFET
gnrTFET
(+) Higher subthreshold slope => smaller supply voltage.
(-) Smaller on-current than MOSFET.
12
Nikonov 2. Beyond CMOS
Spin FET
Magnetic source
and drain
Spin polarized
carriers might
not have vacant
states
Parallel
magnetizations
= smaller R
Anti-parallel =
larger R
(+) Switch magnetization for better off-current, reconfigurability.
(-) For benchmarked circuits, the spin functionality not used.
13
Nikonov 2. Beyond CMOS
Bipolar pseudoSpintronic = BiSFET
Electrons and holes
Excitons
Exciton condensate
Collective tunneling through an
oxide must be much stronger
Charge imbalance destroys it
(+) Claims of low voltage operation.
(-) No room temperature Bose Einstein condensate observed.
14
Nikonov 2. Beyond CMOS
Graphene p-n Junction
Graphene electrostatically
doped by p or n carriers
Electrons reflect in
interface dep. On angle
Routs electrons by total
internal reflection
Mux configuration
(+) Promises to switch with small voltage.
(-) Practical implementation of reflection struggles.
15
Nikonov 2. Beyond CMOS
All Spin Logic
spin-torque
spin-current
e
e
Spin polarized electrons injected from nanomagnets
Spin polarized current by diffusion
It switches nanomagnets by spin torque
(+) Good unidirectionality predicted.
(-) Problem of spin relaxation = short interconnect.
16
Nikonov 2. Beyond CMOS
Domain Wall Logic
Currents summed and injected through side electrodes
Domain wall moves and changes magnetoresistance under
central electrode
(+) Good scheme for cascading.
(-) Magnetoresistance small for current switching.
17
Nikonov 2. Beyond CMOS
Spin Majority Gate
Similar to spin torque memory
Currents through nanopillars aim to switch magnetization in the
bottom (“free”) layer
Majority wins!
(+) Higher subthreshold slope => smaller supply voltage.
(-) Smaller on-current than MOSFET.
18
Nikonov 2. Beyond CMOS
Spin Torque Triad
Spin torques in A and B switch magnetization in “Out”
Change magnetoresistance
(+) Binary elements, more familiar design.
(-) Many elements in a circuit.
19
Nikonov 2. Beyond CMOS
Spin Torque Oscillators
Spin torque causes magnetization to precess in a periodic orbit.
Several oscillators synchronize determine the frequency of the
output
(+) Frequency modulation robust.
(-) Harder to read off oscillating signal.
20
Nikonov 2. Beyond CMOS
Spin Wave Devices
Ac current causes input magnetization oscillate
Magnetization oscillation propagates as a spin wave
Pulses of spin waves switch output magnets
(+) Uses amplitude and phase, ingenious design of circuits.
(-) Need precise phasing of signals.
21
Nikonov 2. Beyond CMOS
Nano-Magnet Logic
Magnetic fields set nanomagnets in an unstable state
Dipole interactions between them flip magnetization
Magnetization read off by magnetoresistance
(+) Relatively fast switching from unstable state.
(-) Dipole interactions between magnets sensitive to shape.
22
Nikonov 2. Beyond CMOS
Barriers, Collectives, Thermodynamics
source
gate
drain
Energy
+V
e-

-V
e-

Generic Electronic Switch
 /2
0
θ
Generic Spintronic Switch
Barrier
20 kT (from Ion/Ioff)
60 kT (non-volatile)
Voltage
0.5 – 1 V
10-100 mV
Particles
Ne = 200 electrons
Ns = 10000 spins
Switching Energy Limit
4000kT = Ne*20kT
60 kT
Phenomenon
Non collective
Collective
E  eVN ~ 4000 kT
(1)
Leakage determined by barrier
I on I off
23
eV
 exp(
)
kT
(3)
1
E  0  B N s H k ~ 60 kT
2
(2)
Leakage not related to barrier
Nikonov 2. Beyond CMOS
Power Delivery
• Limited by Cu
conductivity.
• I/device=0.1mA
• 1000 devices on
network.
• Size 6um*6um
• Drop 2mV in device
itself.
[Vias not shown]
• Contribution of wires NOT negligible
• Estimated voltage power and ground networks:
Minimum 10mV supply needed.
24
Nikonov 2. Beyond CMOS
Beyond CMOS Devices
1. Electronic
2. Spintronic
Tunneling FET
spin-torque
e
SpinFET
spin-current
All Spin Logic
e
Spin
Torque
Oscillator
Graphene pn Junction
Domain Wall Logic
Spintronic Majority
BisFET
Spin
Torque
Triad
3. Orbitronic
25
Nano Magnet Logic
Spin Wave Device
Nikonov 2. Beyond CMOS
Summary



Beyond CMOS devices are based on various
computational variables. Need to perform
transduction.
13 beyond CMOS devices covered in this study.
More proposals appearing.
Spintronics not relying on lower in the energy
barrier, can be operated at ~10mV.
All references and details at in D. E. Nikonov and
I. A. Young, Proceedings of IEEE, 2013.
26
Nikonov 2. Beyond CMOS