* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download 2014-10-Chandrasekaran-Heidelberg-Abstract
Survey
Document related concepts
Transcript
IMC October 9-11, 2014 PATIENT SPECIFIC INDUCED PLURIPOTENT STEM CELLS AND THEIR NEURONAL DIFFERENTIATION Abinaya Chandrasekaran1 – Lone Neelchen Roesingh1,2 – Csilla Nemes1– Eszter Varga11,3– Istvan Bock1,3– Shuling Zhou1,4– Anna Ochalek Dorota3 – Viktor Szegedi1– Hasan Avci1– András Dinnyés1,3,5 and Julianna Kobolák1 1 Biotalentum Ltd; Gödöllő, Hungary 2 University of Geneva; Dept Pathology and Immunology, Geneva, Switzerland 3 Molecular Animal Biotechnology Lab; Szent Istvan University, Godollo, Hungary 4 Institute for Veterinary Science, University of Copenhagen, Denmark 5 Departments of Equine Sciences and Farm Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine; Utrecht University, The Netherlands Keywords: Induced Pluripotent stem cells; neural stem cells; SMAD inhibition; Alzheimer’s disease. Patient-derived induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) are providing a useful tool to model the pathology of certain diseases, especially when the affected tissue is hard to study, like in the CNS. Pluripotent cells, carrying the genotype of a given patient, can be differentiated in vitro to neural precursor cells (NPCs) which are then used to obtain neuronal and glial cells in culture. These cells offer a valuable platform which allows the investigation of the patient-specific pathomechanism of a disease. Furthermore, NPCs and their derivates can be used for in vitro drug testing assays. Finally, these cells serve as an unlimited source of immune compatible cells for cell replacement therapies to treat neurodegenerative disease such as Parkinson’s or Alzheimer’s disease. Our aim is to develop a highly efficient and reproducible assay to generate neurons and glial cells from healthy and diseased iPSCs. Here we compared the usage of various small molecules and recombinant proteins in a step-wise manner, which selectively induces neural differentiation of iPSCs into NPCs and, later, into different neural linages. The treatment induced neural rosette formation followed by the occurrence of neuroepithelial cells (NEPs) resulting in a homogenous population of NPCs. At the NPC stage all small molecules were withdrawn allowing for the terminal differentiation of mature post-mitotic neurons. Neuronal lineage was confirmed by immunocytochemistry (ICC) and RT-qPCR for neural and neuronal specific genes. Furthermore, 2D and 3D neuronal cultures were investigated in electrophysiological measurements. We have established a highly reproducible and efficient procedure to generate patient-specific neuronal cells form iPSCs. References 1. S.Yamanaka et al. “Modeling Alzheimer’s Disease with iPSCs Reveals Stress Phenotypes Associated with Intracellular Ab and Differential Drug Responsiveness”,Cell Stem Cell., Elsevier Inc., pp.487-496, 2013. 2. Isaac S. Kohane et al. “iPSC-derived neurons as a higher-throughput readout for autism: promises and pitfalls”, Trends in Molecular Medicine., pp.1-14, 2013. This work was supported by grants from EU FP7 projects (STEMMAD, PIAPP-GA-2012-324451; STEMCAM, PIAP-GA-2009-25118; Anistem, PIAPP-GA-2011-286264; EpiHealth, HEALTH-2012-F2-278418; EpiHealthNet, PITN-GA-2012-317146; D-BOARD, FP7-HEALTH-2012-INNOVATION-1-305815).