* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download 1. Introduction The Dravidian language family is spoken in South
Malay grammar wikipedia , lookup
Germanic strong verb wikipedia , lookup
Zulu grammar wikipedia , lookup
Japanese grammar wikipedia , lookup
Georgian grammar wikipedia , lookup
Arabic grammar wikipedia , lookup
Modern Hebrew grammar wikipedia , lookup
Udmurt grammar wikipedia , lookup
Ojibwe grammar wikipedia , lookup
Portuguese grammar wikipedia , lookup
Spanish grammar wikipedia , lookup
Esperanto grammar wikipedia , lookup
Sanskrit grammar wikipedia , lookup
Latin syntax wikipedia , lookup
Lithuanian grammar wikipedia , lookup
Pipil grammar wikipedia , lookup
Romanian nouns wikipedia , lookup
Modern Greek grammar wikipedia , lookup
Latvian declension wikipedia , lookup
Icelandic grammar wikipedia , lookup
Italian grammar wikipedia , lookup
Kannada grammar wikipedia , lookup
Turkish grammar wikipedia , lookup
Ukrainian grammar wikipedia , lookup
Russian declension wikipedia , lookup
French grammar wikipedia , lookup
Swedish grammar wikipedia , lookup
Scottish Gaelic grammar wikipedia , lookup
Ancient Greek grammar wikipedia , lookup
Old Irish grammar wikipedia , lookup
Old English grammar wikipedia , lookup
Yiddish grammar wikipedia , lookup
Old Norse morphology wikipedia , lookup
THE DRAVIDIAN LANGUAGE OF SPOKEN KANNADA 1. Introduction The Dravidian language family is spoken in South Asia, primarily in India, Sri Lanka, and as far east as Malaysia. This paper will focus primarily on the morphology and morphophonology of Spoken Kannada, a Dravidian language of the Indian state of Karnataka, with particular emphasis on the Bangalore/Mysore dialect because it is the most widely accepted (Schiffman 1983: xx). Kannada shows diglossia between Literary Kannada (LK) and its more colloquial variety Spoken Kannada (SK), used in more familiar contexts "since to speak the literary variety is to sound like a book" (Schiffman 1983: xviii). The following conventions are used in this paper (mostly following the conventions used by Schiffman): T, D, N, S, and L represent the retroflex counterparts of the same symbols representing those sounds. For example, T is a voiceless retroflex stop, while t is a voiceless alveolar stop. Retroflex is a contrastive place of articulation in Kannada (Schiffman 1983: 7-8). The glides [j] and [u] are represented as y and v (as Kannada has no voiced labiodental fricative) respectively. Long vowels will be written with two symbols, e.g., aa. Morpheme boundaries are given with the symbol '+'. The symbol '→' is used for 'is rewritten as'. Finally, whenever there is nothing but a page number in parentheses as a reference, this refers to Schiffman 1983, as he is my main source. 1.1 Morphonology Kannada's underlying forms are assumed to be those of LK, with representations coming to the surface in their SK forms "by positing a set of rules that operates on these LK forms" (150, footnote 4). The following are the most important morphophonemics that occur when either two words or two morphemes within a word come together in SK (16-21). Schiffman does not always say explicitly which of these rules have applied, nor the order in which they have applied, because the intention of these rules is descriptive only, to help shed light on the language and not as a strict formalization of its grammar. I am including them here because of their influence on the language as a whole, as well as the direct relevance they have for the morphology in the rest of this paper. (a) Vowel Deletion/Reduction. Very often, when a short vowel follows the first syllable of a word, it is either deleted or "reduced to an extremely short sound" (19). The precise rules for short vowel reduction were not known as of the publication of Schiffman's book (151, footnote 8). (b) Consonant Reduction/Assimilation. This is a rule "that operates on the output of the short vowel reduction/deletion rule" (20) reducing geminates to a single consonant when they are followed by another consonant (after short vowel deletion): iddaru → iddru → idru 'he was', or the reduction of a nasal + homorganic cluster with another consonant: gdmf`rt → gdmfrt → gdMrt 'woman' (20). I assume that here the g left its trace by changing the nasal from an alveolar to a velar. (c) Consonant Gemination. When a syllable has a short vowel, the consonant in the syllable coda usually geminates: kap 'cup' → kapp + u (enunciative) → kappu (d) Glide Epenthesis. "When words ending in front vowels (i, ii, e, ee) are followed by other words or morphemes beginning with a vowel, y is generally inserted" (18): mane 'house' + -aa 'question' → maneyaa 'a house?' (e) Glide Reduction. Often in casual speech, glides are eliminated when they come between two vowels. Instead, the initial vowel of the V+glide+V sequence is doubled. For example, a form such as maneyaa (which has inserted a glide at the morpheme boundary between two vowels) will undergo one further change (in casual speech) to manee. Here is a schematic of the reduction in general: iyV → ii; eyV → ee; uvV → uu; avV → aa With verbs, however, -uva and -uvu are reduced to -oo: maaD 'make, do' + -uvudu (adjectival participle affix) → maaDoodu '(the act of) doing' (f) Vowel Shortening. "After glide reduction [. . .], long vowels (particularly when final) are shortened:" (20) irtiiya 'you (sg.) are' → irtiii → irtii (the 3 [i]s are reduced to two). 2. Inflection As with Dravidian languages in general, SK inflection (and derivation) is primarily suffixal (Steever 1998: 131). 2.1. Nominal Inflection. Spoken Kannada has a rich case system. It also inflects for PNG (Person, Number, Gender), especially on "pronouns that refer to masculine and feminine nouns" (23). I will discuss PNG on third person nouns first, then mention pronominal inflection, and finally talk about the case system of SK. 2.1.1.1 Nouns Gender (3rd Person Nouns). The genders distinguished in Kannada are masculine and feminine within "rational" beings, or beings capable of thought: humans, gods and spirits, and "some 'higher' animals" (23). All non-rational nouns are neuter, but I could not find any standardized endings for the neuters. Feminine markers: -(a)Lu, -i, -e. Masculine marker: (a)nu I assume the notation with parentheses means that either the 'a' or the 'nu' (for stems ending in vowels) are possible, but this is not made explicit in Schiffman. Also "not all masculine and feminine nouns are so marked" (23). Here is an example of a rational noun, marked with either the masculine or feminine ending (I chose this noun because it was the only one that showed two feminine endings instead of just one): Stem: sevak- 'servant' Feminine: sevaki, sevakaLu 'female servant' Masculine: sevaka(nu) 'male servant' Number. There are only two numbers in SK: singular and plural. These two are the only numbers that have been distinguished since Proto-Dravidian (Steever 1998: 21). Furthermore, neuter nouns (irrationals) in SK are only marked for the plural optionally. The plural ending is -aru: haD(u)ga 'boy' → haD(u)garu 'boys'. "Feminine nouns ending in a vowel reduce the sequences -iya and -eya to ii and ee respectively" (24), so that a full representation of (e.g.) sose 'daughter-in-law' is as follows (see section 1.1 Morphonology for the rules used): 1. sose → sosearu plural 2. sosearu → soseyaru (d) Glide Epenthesis 3. soseyaru → soseeru (e) Glide Reduction It is interesting that in the Dravidian languages generally, case marking comes after plural marking (Steever 21; Schiffman 33). We turn to case just after a short discussion on pronouns. 2.1.1.2 Pronouns Kannada has a rich system of pronouns, marked for every person (1, 2, 3), every number in the language (singular, plural), and every gender (rational feminine and masculine, and non-rational neuter), and varying across nominative, genitive, accusative, dative, locative, and instrumental/ablative cases (40-43). To indicate politeness, Kannada will often use plural pronouns for a singular referent in the second and third persons. Further, there is an ultrapolite form taavu, also when speaking in the second and third persons (37). The basic (nominative) pronouns are: naanu/naavu 'I/we'; niinu/niivu 'you/you (pl)'; avanu/avaru 'he/ he, they'; avaaLu/avaru 'she/ she, they'; adu/avu 'it/ they (those things)' (38). 2.1.1.3 Case Marking SK has seven case markers that are actually used: nominative, genitive, accusative, dative, locative, ablative/instrumental, and vocative. It also has an oblique case marker, generally used as the "form to which some other case markers are added" (27). The oblique form is the same as the genitive form, and the genitive -a (see below) does not occur twice (i.e., it is not the case that within the same word, the -a occurs once for the oblique, and again for the genitive). Unless explicitly mentioned otherwise, all case markers are added to the oblique stem. Nominative. This is the subject/predicate nominal form of the noun, and "in SK, the nominative case marker can be considered a 'zero' [Ø]" (25): mane 'house' (in subject position) and idu mane 'this is (a) house' (predicate nominal). Genitive. This case is primarily for possession, marked (primarily) with -a. For nonrationals (neuters) which already end in -a, the genitive is -da. For rationals, -n(u) and -L(u) must come before the genitive -a, so that we get for example: magaL(u) 'daughter' + -a (genitive) → magaLa, where the -L(u) comes before the genitive marker. Several morphonological rules can apply to particular words marked for case, so that on their surface these words appear as though they are not marked (25): 1. mane 'house' + -a (genitive) → manea 2. manea → maneya (d) Glide Epenthesis 3. maneya → manee (e) Glide Reduction 4. manee → mane (f) Vowel Shortening. Accusative. This is the objective case, whereby the noun is the object (or patient) of the verb. Its ending is -anna, added to the nominative (not oblique) stem (27). Dative. The dative marker is used to show the goal of an action, or when a noun acts as benefactor to some action (like giving; 28). The marker is -ige for rationals, -kke for neuters (28). Locative. The case of location, or the instrumental case for locomotion (29). Nonrationals take -alli as their Locative case marker. "Rational nouns require the postposition hattira either instead of or before -alli" (30), like so: Instead of -alli: nan 'I (obl.) + hattira 'locative' → nan hatra 'by/near/on me' (applying rules (ab) from section 1.1 above). Before -alli: nan 'I (obl.) + hattirad 'locative (oblique)' + -alli → nan hattiradalli 'by/near/on me' Ablative/Instrumental -inda is used for both the ablative ('away from') and the instrumental ('by means of') case. Often the locomotive locative (-alli) is freely substitutable with this case. Vocative. The 'calling' case, "used with rational nouns to indicate a calling or summons" (32). the vocative marker is -ee for all rationals that do not end in -i or -a. For -a, a simple lengthening to -aa applies. The -i is doubled to -ii. 2.2 Verbal Inflection. There are two forms any verb can take: its finite form, which "can have nothing added" (51) and so is complete (a full word), and its non-finite form, which "cannot stand alone" (51) and makes up the stems to which other morphemes are added. Finite verbs are marked with PNG (Person, Number, and Gender). Non-finite verbs are not so marked. PNG markers differ for present tense, past tense, and the contingent, which translates to English as 'might (do something)' (58). There are too many variations in verbal forms to talk about in this short essay. However, there are certain key points as follows. The present tense is marked with -tt- (59). The past tense is marked with -id- or (to a lesser extent) -t-, and the past has many changes that occur in very specific frames (60). The stems vary depending on whether the root ends in a nasal consonant [n, N], a lateral [l, L], the glide [j], the approximant [r], the voiced retroflex alveolar D, the front vowel [i] as opposed to the back vowel [o]. Each of these has a different form in its tenses. Verbal moods are imperative (which includes hortative and optative, each of which has a different form but is just another way of giving an order) and indicative. Each of the verbal aspect markers is really syntactic, "giving certain semantic nuances to the meaning of the sentence" (81) and not the word, and so lies outside the scope of morphology. I will give three full verbs, that is, verbs having tense and PNG marking, so that the overall structure can be seen, where morphemes always occur in the following order (56): Verb Stem + Tense Marker + PNG Marker → Full Verb hoog- 'go' + -tt- 'present' + -iini 'first singular [rational]' → hoogtini 'I go' maaD- 'do' + -id- 'past' + -(a)ru 'second plural [rational]' → maaDru 'he did' bar- 'come' + -nd- 'past' + -e(nu) 'first singular [rational]' → bande 'I came' The last verb stem has the rule '/r/ → [n] before [d]' applied (56). 2.2.1 Participles "Participles are non-finite verb forms that function verbally or adjectivally" (68). For adjectival participles, see the derivation of the adjective below. However the verbal participle is an inflectional class, and so I will outline it here. Participles are divided into the present verbal participle and the past participle. Furthermore, they have discrete endings (at least) underlyingly for their negative forms. The suffix -aa added to the present stem -tt-, and creates the present participle: maaDtaa 'making'. Oftentimes -aa is deleted, again because of the morphonological rules outlined in 1.1. The present participle can form a new tense, similar to the English progressive, when followed by the (highly) irregular iru 'be' (69): maDt-iddiini 'I am doing (something)', where maDt- has undergone the -aa deletion. The past participle has no marker (69). Rather it is the same as the past stem for irregular verbs (-id-/-nd-); the d of the stem is deleted for regular verbs (69): maaD-id 'did' → maaDi 'having done'. For regular past tense stems ending in -id-, the [d] is deleted. Those past stems ending in -t- do not delete the [t]. One of the interesting facts about SK is that the negative form of a participle, either present or past, is formed in its own way. The negatives cannot take a tense marker (-tt-, -id-, -t-), but instead take -ade to indicate negativity. For example, bar- 'to come' is barade 'not coming (present) / not having come (past)' (70). This is true generally: negative forms are created separately from positive forms, unlike in English where not is simply added. 3. Derivation In SK, there are "true", i.e., underived, adjectives (44), and by extension, nouns and verbs as well. The noun is simply the addition of a case-marking suffix onto a root, which is not considered by Schiffman to be derivation in the true sense. The verb is brought about by adding inflectional markings onto the root. The "true" adjective has an underlying form that ends in -a, but its surface representation can vary because of the morphonological processes discussed in section 1.1. 3.1 The Derived Adjective Adjectives occur before nouns, and although they modify nouns, adjectives "do not vary in form according to the gender, number, or case of the noun modified" (44). Adjectives can be derived from verbs or nouns. Forming adjectives from verbs "is the main way of forming adjectives in Kannada" (70). Adjectives from Verbs Adjectives can be created from either present or past participles, changing the category of the verb to an adjective and so making this a case of derivational morphology. Adding an -oo suffix to the present verb stem creates an adjective in SK from LK -uva, undergoing the usual morphophonological transformations delineated in section 1.1, without final vowel shortening: baroo varaa 'the coming week/next week' (70). Similarly, adding -a will derive the past adjectival participle, though this -a will not always surface because of morphophonological processes (especially because of the first morphonological rule mentioned in this paper). In SK, unlike English, any verb can be used to create an adjective: banD(a) huDga: 'the boy who came' (lit. 'came boy') (70). Adjectives from Nouns. Usually when an adjective is derived from a noun, the suffix -aada or -iroo is added to a noun (45). These are in fact the past participles of the verbs aagu 'become' and iru 'be' (45), but they are treated as derivational affixes that can be added to nouns, and not the actual participles of those verbs which indicate "that the action or state of the participial verb preceded that of the main verb" (68). Adjectives with -aada "indicate an intrinsic, inherent, or inalienable quality" (45) while adjectives formed from -idoo "suggest an alienable, extrinsic, or temporary state"1 (45). 3.2 The Derived Noun. Nouns are either 'true' (underived), or they can be derived. Adjectival Nominals Adjectives of any sort, including adjectives that have been derived from nouns, can create nouns (45). Of interest is that Kannada has no predicate adjectives; any time, then, that an adjective "does not precede a noun [as is the usual case], it must be nominalized" (45-46). If a third person pronoun is added to an adjective, it becomes a nominal: 1. doDDa 'big' + avanu 'he' → doDDavnu (f) Vowel Shortening (-DDaav- → -DDav-) 2. doDDavnu → doDDoonu (e) Glide reduction. Nominals from Verbs To derive an element that functions like a noun from a verb, a demonstrative pronoun must be added to an adjectival participle (71): maaD 'do' + -oo (present adjectival participle) + adu (third person neuter demonstrative) → maaDoodu 'the act/fact of doing' (71). 1 As a side note, I would think they would be the other way around: -aada means (in its verbal form) 'to become', i.e., it is taking on an extrinsic state, while -idoo means 'to be', so that this state simply is (and so is intrinsic). Negative Nouns from Verbs Negativity in nouns can be expressed much the same way that it can for adjectives: -ada is affixed to the stem, forming a negative adjectival participle, and then adding a nominalizing suffix: maaD + -ada (negative adjective) + -adu (third person neuter demonstrative) → maaD + -ada + -adu → maaDaddu ~ maaDdaddu 'the act/fact of not doing' (71). 3.3 The Derived Verb. Yet another interesting fact about Spoken Kannada is there appears to be no way to derive verbs (in the special sense of derivation given in section 3) by adding an affix (equivalent to e.g., the English -ize). The way to turn nouns into verbs is through compounding, to which we now turn and with which I will close my brief exposition. 4. Compounding In SK, there are several verbs that can be added to (primarily) nouns to create VPs (91). Compounding is very productive in SK. The two most common of these verbs are maaDu 'make, do' and aagu 'become'. The causative suffix -isu is added to maaDu to derive maaDisu 'make (someone) do' (90). In LK causative verbs can be made double causative by adding another causative affix: maaD-isisu, but this "does not seem to be the case in SK" (90). The verb maaDu is used to create transitive action verbs, especially out of borrowed words. The verb aagu on the other hand is used to create "stative [verbs] rather than active [verbs] (indicating a state or change of state rather than an action performed on an object)" (92). My source for compounds (Steever 1993: 28-29) keeps the words separate while explicitly stating that they are compounds, e.g.: 1. maduve 'marriage' → maduve aagu 'get married' 2. haaLu 'destruction' → haaLu maaDu 'destroy' We can see in the first example that that had these words should, according to our morphonological rules, continue being derived at least until we get: 1. maduveaagu → maduveyaagu (d) Glide Epenthesis 2. maduveyaagu → maduveeagu (e) Glide Reduction 3. maduveeagu → *maduveagu (f) Vowel Shortening As far as I can see, then, compounding, or creating one free morpheme from two roots, does not involve any distinct morphonological rules; rather, it avoids applying normal morphophonological rules to compounds. The same rules (or lack of rules) seem to apply in Schiffman 91-93, where he terms compounds the product of "verbalizers"; however there he gave no compounds which consisted of two words, one ending in a vowel before the next word which also begins in a vowel. Unfortunately, a detailed guide to Spoken Kannada compounding is lacking. References Schiffman, H. F. (1983). A reference grammar of spoken Kannada. Seattle: University of Washington Press. Steever, S. B. (1998). Introduction to the Dravidian languages. In Steever, S.B. (Ed.), The Dravidian languages (pp. 1-39). London: Routlidge. Steever, S. B. (1998). Kannada. In Steever, S.B. (Ed.), The Dravidian languages (pp. 129-157). London: Routlidge.