* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download The proposal seems to consider power contact with commercial
Standby power wikipedia , lookup
Power inverter wikipedia , lookup
Wireless power transfer wikipedia , lookup
Power factor wikipedia , lookup
Portable appliance testing wikipedia , lookup
Immunity-aware programming wikipedia , lookup
Power over Ethernet wikipedia , lookup
Audio power wikipedia , lookup
Ground (electricity) wikipedia , lookup
Three-phase electric power wikipedia , lookup
Fault tolerance wikipedia , lookup
Buck converter wikipedia , lookup
Electrification wikipedia , lookup
Power electronics wikipedia , lookup
Electric power system wikipedia , lookup
Voltage optimisation wikipedia , lookup
Stray voltage wikipedia , lookup
Earthing system wikipedia , lookup
Electrical substation wikipedia , lookup
Amtrak's 25 Hz traction power system wikipedia , lookup
Switched-mode power supply wikipedia , lookup
History of electric power transmission wikipedia , lookup
Power engineering wikipedia , lookup
TR41.7.1_03-02-006_(Power Contact Proposal Draft) TR41.7_03-02-004_(TR41.7.1-Power Contact Proposal Draft) To: Bill Bryans cc: Tom Burke, Rich Pescatore, Tom Killam From TR41.7 Discussed in TR41.7.1 agreed to by TR41.7 approved by TR41. Agree in principle to the addition of power contact requirements to IEC60950. The proposal only considers power contact with commercial power secondary mains distribution. In North America we are also concerned with interaction of primary power distribution systems with the TELECOMMUNICATIONS NETWORK. Based on its covering only secondary power contact issues, the proposal is not less severe but is incomplete with respect to the power fault environment that the testing done in the USA and Canada covers. A note should be added to 6.4.1 after the first paragraph (line 91) as follows: Note 1: These requirements address contact between secondary power distribution systems and TELECOMMUNICATIONS NETWORK conductors and do not cover the interaction (i.e. contact, induction, etc.) between primary power distribution systems and TELECOMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS. Note 2: In the USA and Canada, additional requirements addressing primary distribution power interaction apply. Under section 3 “Rationale”, line 57 it is stated that the source voltage should equal the local mains supply. Clause 6.4.1 lines 100 and 114 should reflect the worst-case nominal voltages that may be encountered in different areas around the globe. Recommend changing the test voltage to 240V. Also, add the following note: Note: Where the above voltages do not represent the local mains supply, the nominal voltage of the local mains should be considered. We are not familiar with the rationale in K44 concerning the line and contact impedance estimates. Generally in NA the fault current path in a secondary power distribution fault to communications systems is considered to be of relatively low impedance. In addition, low current faults that are known to occur are covered during the testing associated with primary distribution power contact testing (L3, L4). An “in some countries note” should be added after line 115 to take into account the additional testing performed in NA. Note: In the US and Canada, the test is conducted with an open circuit voltage of 120 or 240 V and a short circuit current of 25A. Low current testing is addressed as part of the primary distribution power evaluation.