Download topic iv- social psychology applied to health

yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Human bonding wikipedia, lookup

Fear appeal wikipedia, lookup

Impression formation wikipedia, lookup

Social perception wikipedia, lookup

Attitude change wikipedia, lookup

Psychological factors effect all aspects of our physical wellbeing.
Health psychology is the specialty that studies the physical processes
affecting the development , prevention and treatment of physical illness.
Stress and Human Health
Stress refers to human responses elicited by physical or psychological events
that an individual perceives to be harmful or emotionally upsetting. To reduce
the effect of stress people use different types of coping mechanisms and
these can either be effective or not.
Emotional and Physical Effects of Stress
Stress is any physical or psychological event that is perceived as a potential
threat to physical or emotional wellbeing.
Physical illness may be a consequence of stress that is high levels of stress
leads to illness,
Effects of stress increase due to a person’s vulnerability and ability to control
what happens
According to Lazarus (1966) it is person’s interpretation of an event that
influences how stressful they find it. In an experiment he showed people a film
of an industrial accident- worker accidentally cuts of his finger- how upsetting
the film was depended on how people interpreted it. Lazarus instructed some
participants to adopt an intellectual stance when watching the film i.e.
concentrating less on the accident and more on the relationship between
Compared to the group that was given no instruction this group was relatively
unaffected by the film.
Same as --physician ‘s reaction to blood during on operation.
Cohen et-al divided participants into those high and low in stress levels. they
were given nasal drops that contained either a virus that causes common cold
or saline (salt water)- they were then quarantined for several days. The pple
who were experiencing a great deal of stress in their lives were more likely to
catch a cold from the virus. Of those with least amounts of stress 27% got a
cold- the study was unethical.
Importance of Perceived Control
Perceived control over an event determines whether an event will be stressful
or not and how people explain the causes of the event.
PC is the belief that we can influence our environment in ways that determine
whether we experience positive or negative outcomes e.g. fear of illness and
medical procedures for diagnosis and treatment all constitute sources of
stress – to reduce this kind of stress one has to gather as much information
as possible concerning the stress.
Knowledge provides a sense of control, even knowing that a procedure will be
Martin Seligman (1967) experiments with dogs looked at the amount of time it
took for a dog to learn that pressing a button with their noses turned off
electric shock. Most dogs learned this quickly. In the second condition dogs
received the same number and duration of shocks but nothing happened
when they pressed the button – the First group of dogs could control the
shocks but in the second group they could not.
Both groups were put in the same cage and shocks were administered ,those
in the first group performed better than these who had not been shocked .
However these in group 2 reacted differently they assumed that they could not
control the new shocks either and most of them endured the shocks.
Explaining Negative Life Events: Learned Helplessness
The second determinant of stress is how people explain to themselves why a
negative event occurred e.g. 2 college students who both got poor grades
student I said- the professor deliberately made the test diff- will do better next
student 2 said I am not smart enough………………..
The second student is likely to settle into a state of leaned helplessness,
believing that there is nothing he can do to improve his performance.
Making stable, internal and global attributes for negative events leads to
depression, reduced effort and difficulty in learning.
Direct and indirect Effects of Stress
According to Baum (1994) direct and indirect effects stress lead to illness
The indirect effects occur when the negative emotional effects of stress
interfer with health related behavior e.g. eating an unbalanced meal.
Indirect effect on health related behavior
Less compliance with appropriate
Preventive behavior
Delay in seeking medical care
Avoidance of any medical care
indirect effect on fitness
related behavior
↑ in smoking and alcohol
- Choosing less nutritional food to eat
- Sleeping less
Direct physiological effects
- ↑ of amount of fat in the body cell
- High blood pressure
Decreased immunity to viral and bacterial infection
Personality and Health
Individual differences in effects of stress
The dispositional continuum
Diseases prone and self healing personalities
Type A and Type B Personalities
write own notes
Type A Personality
- A cluster of behaviors associated with the development of coronary heart
Excessive competitive drive, aggressiveness, impatience and a worrying
sense of time urgency- deep seated insecurity.
More coronary heat disease
Type B
Not excessively competitive- no free floating hostility and no sense of time urgency
Less susceptible to coronary heat diseases
Coping with Stress
Strategies to deal with stress include
eating nutritious food, getting enough sleep and engaging in regular
exercise results in fitness. Being fit results in a sense of wellbeing and self
o To achieve the above these is need for strong motivation, commitment
and ability to regulate one’s behavior.
2) Coping strategies – two levels
(a) Emotion focused coping- attempts to reduce the negative emotional
responses elicited by the threat and to increase the positive effect eg
(b) Problem focused – attempts to deal with the threat itself and to gain
control of the situation.
3) Social support and Stress Management
According to Sarason et al (1994) – social support is the physical and typical
comfort provided by other people.
Responding to Health Related Information
Comprehending and evaluating health related information
Usually people make judgments about predicted events and behavior as they
are easily available in memory.
News of certain diseases e.g. swine flue or AIDS make people live in fear
and such messages are not remembered. Some messages are comforting
and positive e.g. finding about cancer treatment- more appealing and easily
Some messages have both positive and negative effects – malaria and
Sometimes we overestimate the threat of
diseases and also promise of
instant cures are on the basis of availability heuristic ( define Avail Heuristic)
Rejecting and accepting health related info
People do not always accept information they get about health issues even
when they accept it is not followed by behavior change – WHY?
The effective content of the health warning is at play e.g of message
‘Cigarettes can kill you’ people usually reject such disturbing and anxiety
arousing messages and decide that it is not true.
Health messages should be positively framed, suggesting that altered
behavior will result in gain. Positive framing is most effective in motivating
preventive behavior whereas negatively framed messages suggesting a loss
from failing to act are best for motivating detention behavior
+ve – colgate for a fresher smile
-ve- if you do not want to brush your teeth they will fall out.
- Thinking of something as frightening as breast cancer can activate defense
mechanisms that interfere with a person’s ability to pay attention to a message about
early detention remember it and take appropriate action (Miller, 1997)
Beliefs and expectations contribute to whether or not a person engages in the
necessary health related behavior e.g. Messages about breast self
Many women do not comply with these messages because of-
a) Perceived susceptibility to breast cancer –pple may think that they will never
get cancer. Increase in susceptibility is possible when patients are given
information about risk factors.
b) Perceived confidence that one has the ability to carry out a self examination.this can be solved by having the nurse teach the procedure in a one to one
interaction with the client.
People who ignore health information have a sense of unrealistic optimism or
an optimistic bias (that bad things are not going to happen to an individual)
Using SP to improve Health habits
people can be persuaded to change their health habits. One approach is
attitude change - this can be done by trying to scare people into adapting
better health habits e.g we could show people vivid pictures of people dying of
AIDS, and send the message that if they do not practice safe sex A&B would
happen to them.
Fear appeal can work if they are not too strong and are accompanied by
specific information about how best to deal with the problem.
Cindy Struckman – Johnson et al (1994) showed students messages urging
people to use condoms and to rate how much the commercials increased the
likelihood that they would use condoms with a new sexual partner
The most effective ads were those evoking fear of AIDS e.g. women receiving
result that she is +ve.
Actually changing behavior and saying that one will change such behavior
are two different things. To change ingrained health habits with fear appeals
may be of limited success.
Most of the time there are barriers to change - some people find condoms to
be unromantic and reminder of the disease – something they don’t want to be
reminded of when they are having sex, Aronson et al (1997)
There is usually strong denial – AIDS is a problem, but we are not at risk.
One way to change behavior is to challenge people`s self esteem so that it
becomes to their advantage Psychologically to change their behavior. By
doing so, they feel good about themselves- maintaining their self esteem
The theory of cognitive dissonance can be used.
Aronson et al asked students to compose a speech describing the dangers of
AIDS and advocating the use of condoms ‘every single time you have sex’
The speech alone was not enough there was need to make students mindful
of the time it was impossible for them to use condoms.
By listing the times it was impossible for them to use condoms-Their self
esteem was damaged because of the hypocrisy (saying people should use
condoms but failing to do so).
Therefore they tried to fix their damaged self esteem by practicing what they
Students in the hypocrisy condition showed the greatest willingness to use
condoms in the future and, when given the opportunity, purchased significantly more
condoms for their own use than students in the other group.
Therefore the best way to change people’s behavior is to change their
interpretation of themselves and the social situation.
In the above case no attempt was made to modify the research participant’s
behavior (their use of condoms) directly, they were not rewarded for using
condoms and they were not given information about what would happen if
they didn’t. Researchers altered the way in which the participants interpreted