Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
The California Integrated Seismic Network: Project Status Program Management Group Presented to CISN Steering and Advisory Committees at UC Berkeley, 30 August 2006 Quick Review of Technical Status Statewide Monitoring Inventory Urban Strong Motion 974 Broadband + Strong Motion 208 Short Period + Strong Motion Analog Short Period 77 500 Borehole 51 Geotechnical Arrays 22 Buildings 221 Bridges 70 Dams 26 Others 13 Others 13 New/Upgraded/Moved in 2006 UCB (USArray) 3 NCSN (SAFOD) 4 SCSN (USArray) 7 CGS (reference/structures) 18/34 Focused Urban Monitoring Dual Data Transmission • CGS CIT – 5 strong motion stations in metropolitan Los Angeles region • UCB CIT – 30 strong motion & broadband stations statewide – Goal to exchange 60 stations CISN Backbone • 5 dedicated T1 links • Auto-failover to Internet via IP tunnels • Monitoring/alarming software operational • Networks now exchanging CISN seismic data Integration and Standardization • Real and near real-time integration of parametric and waveform data from 13 seismic networks – PG&E as of 8/17/2006 – Calpine soon? • Developing software to integrate of CGS, CI/USGS, NCSN, and UCB real-time systems CISN Webpage Progress toward Statewide Monitoring through CISN Software • Same software across CISN means: – Same configurations, same products – Full parametric exchange – All waveforms used (including NSMP, CGS) – New methods easier to implement – Failover behavior can be • Melding of many complex systems – Earthworm front-end – TriNet back-end – NCEDC/SCEDC data archiving – Java, C, C++, Perl, SQL, Fortran, Solaris, Windows, Oracle, etc.. modeled and understood • Code is now developed by all partners – An example of how CISN works well – An example of how CISN doesn’t work well SCSN: RT system NC ≠ SC Menlo Park Berkeley • Network split across the SF Bay – Requirement for robust operation if one half fails • Different systems – – – – Field hardware Telemetry Institutions Software • Cannot compute ML for all quakes Required development for NC implementation • • • • • • • Replaced proprietary messaging software with CMS software Implementation of “location” codes (statewide) Station metadata Proxy waveserver Implementation of Md in Trinet software ML calibration (statewide) Testing, testing, testing NCSS Software Transition Status • Post-processing – Prototype functional as of July, 2006 – Md implemented and Q/C’ed – SNC → SNCL ready – Testing and training – 10/15/2006 switch • Real-time processing – After post-processing switch – Conversion of alarming software – New quick-review – Testing – 12/31/2006 switch CISN: Statewide Version 1.0 • • • • • Will rely on three real-time services: – Continuous “reduced” amplitude exchange – “Pick” exchange – Proxy waveserver for post-processing Real-time alarming – NC and SC will each alarm for their authoritative box for M<4.0 and statewide for M≥4.0. – The QDM filter will post the first solution, which in some cases may be superseded by the authoritative solution, or possibly NEIC. Statewide ShakeMap – Produce statewide ShakeMap at three centers (PAS, MP/BK, and CGS). – Operate one statewide web portal for ShakeMap Post-Processing and Archiving – Each center (PAS and MP/BK) will post-process and archive parameters and waveforms in it's region of responsibility. – CGS will post-process and distribute SM data and engineering quick reports. Timeline: Prototype by 30 June 2007 Budget and Funding Funding Status (review) • The CISN Strategic Plan goals were established for the level of funding that we anticipated in 2001. • At its inception in 2001 the CISN asked OES for $6.6M per year. – This funding was cut to and has remained at the $2.4M per year for the last three years. • Full ANSS funding expected in 2001 and subsequent years has not occurred. – level-funding for CIT, UCB, and USGS NCSN/SCSN and NSMP network operations for the last three years CISN 2005 Funding Overview • USGS/ANSS $7.7M • CGS/CSMIP $5.4M • OES $2.4M • • • • • – NCSN (USGS Menlo Park) – UCB/REDI and UCB/NCEDC – SCSN (Caltech & USGS Pasadena) SCEDC – UCLA (Factor) – UCSD (Anza) – NSMP apportioned – Caltech – UCB – CGS – Buildings – Lifelines – Ground response (~1/3 of budget effort) UC Berkeley $0.5M SCEC $0.15M Caltech ~$0.2M USArray ~$0.2M NOAA - $0.1M CISN Funding CGS $5.4M OES $2.4M 14% UC Berkeley $0.5M SCEC $0.15M 32% Caltech $0.2M USArray $0.2M NOAA $0.1M 46% USGS $7.7M Total ~$16.65M CISN Expenditures Expenditures for California Seismic Monitoring Operate and maintain stations DataCenters 9% 12% 47% 15% New/Upgraded stations Real-time operations and response 10% Management 7% Process improvement new products New Developments CISN Display • V1.3 released 8/29/2006 – – – – – – “Web services” support Better GIS layers Email integration Scale dependent GIS layers Sort on magnitude Events with tsunami info tagged • ~420 users registered • ~75 users connected Connected Users of CISN Display • • • • • • • • • • abc.com atsb-malaysia.com.my BNSF.com dot.ca.gov calquake.com cityofalhambra.org co.monterey.ca.us co.sanmateo.ca.us conservation.ca.gov dogami.state.or.us • • • • • • • • • • dot.ca.gov emd.wa.gov hko.gov.hk kmi.com lacofd.org meteorology.gov.mv morganhill.ca.gov mwdh2o.com nbcuni.com noaa.gov • • • • • • • • • • oes.ca.gov rdmd.ocgov.com redlandspolice.org scd.hawaii.gov semprautilites.com solanocounty.com tribune.com usace.army.mil water.ca.gov wsdot.wa.gov ENS: Earthquake Notification System • User-configurable E-mail & SMS messages • Adopted by ANSS • 41,000+ users CISN Alert Map (prototype) CISN and EarthScope • SAFOD • USArray – Data recording by NCSN – Data archiving at NCEDC – Data Sharing from existing stations – Sharing of technology • Plate Boundary Observatory – Borehole stations near fault zones – GPS CISN/USGS/SCEC Collaboration on Earthquake Early Warning • CISN – Provide waveforms and implement front end processing • Caltech/USGS/ UC Berkeley – Development and testing of individual algorithms • SCEC – Comparison of performance of algorithms – Testing for great earthquakes using synthetics Conversion of NCSN backbone telemetry • Data collected at nodes • Analog telemetry precluded upgrades • Mix of satellite, leased land lines, and microwave • 6 year project NetQuakes RFP • USGS SEED funding to develop new SM instrumentation for urban areas • Designed to accelerate rate of new installations • Current bottlenecks – – – – Purchase Cost Permitting Installation Telemetry costs CISN & ANSS TriNet San Fernando CI BK NC NP CE 19 70 19 73 19 76 19 79 19 82 19 85 19 88 19 91 19 94 19 97 20 00 20 03 Number/Yr Number/Yr 200 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 Time 3600 more stations needed to achieve Vision 2005 goal of 5500 stations It will take ~70 years at this rate NetQuakes hardware • COTS computer hardware (~$500) – – – – – – Removable memory cards Full O/S (Linux?) Wireless (802.11g) capability AC power with modest battery backup No GPS NTP synchronization (±10 msec accuracy) • ANSS TIC WG-D Class “C-B” hardware (~$300) – Digitizer: ≥ 16bits resolution – Sensor: ≥ 87dB dynamic range over 0.1-35Hz Functionality • Triggered only • Data queued until successfully uploaded • Uploaded data used when event is detected by regional seismic network • Periodic SOH messages issued • Periodic queries to check for new software • Periodic NTP synchronization • Ability to add new algorithms Installation and Servicing • Volunteer hosts solicited • Technician installs device – Bolt cradle, orient device, configure device, determine GPS coordinates • Hosts swap out batteries and bad units (not technicians) NetQuakes Status • Proposals from vendors due 9/6/2006 • Award to be made by 9/26/2006 – At least 3 prototypes – Up to 250 more units • Prototypes due no later than 6/30/2007 • Goal is 100+ new urban SM stations/year