Download CISN Report, Part I - California Integrated Seismic Network

The California
Integrated Seismic Network:
Project Status
Program Management Group
Presented to
CISN Steering and Advisory Committees
at UC Berkeley, 30 August 2006
Quick Review
of
Technical Status
Statewide Monitoring
Inventory
Urban Strong Motion
974
Broadband + Strong Motion
208
Short Period + Strong Motion
Analog Short Period
77
500
Borehole
51
Geotechnical Arrays
22
Buildings
221
Bridges
70
Dams
26
Others
13
Others
13
New/Upgraded/Moved in 2006
UCB (USArray)
3
NCSN (SAFOD)
4
SCSN (USArray)
7
CGS (reference/structures)
18/34
Focused Urban
Monitoring
Dual Data
Transmission
• CGS
CIT
– 5 strong motion
stations in metropolitan
Los Angeles region
• UCB
CIT
– 30 strong motion &
broadband stations
statewide
– Goal to exchange 60
stations
CISN Backbone
• 5 dedicated T1 links
• Auto-failover to
Internet via IP tunnels
• Monitoring/alarming
software operational
• Networks now
exchanging CISN
seismic data
Integration and
Standardization
• Real and near real-time
integration of parametric
and waveform data from
13 seismic networks
– PG&E as of 8/17/2006
– Calpine soon?
• Developing software to
integrate of CGS,
CI/USGS, NCSN, and
UCB real-time systems
CISN Webpage
Progress toward Statewide
Monitoring
through
CISN Software
• Same software across
CISN means:
– Same configurations,
same products
– Full parametric exchange
– All waveforms used
(including NSMP, CGS)
– New methods easier to
implement
– Failover behavior can be
• Melding of many
complex systems
– Earthworm front-end
– TriNet back-end
– NCEDC/SCEDC data
archiving
– Java, C, C++, Perl,
SQL, Fortran, Solaris,
Windows, Oracle, etc..
modeled and understood
• Code is now developed by all partners
– An example of how CISN works well
– An example of how CISN doesn’t work well
SCSN: RT system
NC ≠ SC
Menlo Park
Berkeley
• Network split across the
SF Bay
– Requirement for robust
operation if one half fails
• Different systems
–
–
–
–
Field hardware
Telemetry
Institutions
Software
• Cannot compute ML for
all quakes
Required development
for NC implementation
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Replaced proprietary
messaging software with
CMS software
Implementation of
“location” codes (statewide)
Station metadata
Proxy waveserver
Implementation of Md in
Trinet software
ML calibration (statewide)
Testing, testing, testing
NCSS Software
Transition Status
• Post-processing
– Prototype functional as
of July, 2006
– Md implemented and
Q/C’ed
– SNC → SNCL ready
– Testing and training
– 10/15/2006 switch
• Real-time processing
– After post-processing
switch
– Conversion of
alarming software
– New quick-review
– Testing
– 12/31/2006 switch
CISN: Statewide Version 1.0
•
•
•
•
•
Will rely on three real-time services:
– Continuous “reduced” amplitude
exchange
– “Pick” exchange
– Proxy waveserver for post-processing
Real-time alarming
– NC and SC will each alarm for their
authoritative box for M<4.0 and
statewide for M≥4.0.
– The QDM filter will post the first
solution, which in some cases may be
superseded by the authoritative
solution, or possibly NEIC.
Statewide ShakeMap
– Produce statewide ShakeMap at three
centers (PAS, MP/BK, and CGS).
– Operate one statewide web portal for
ShakeMap
Post-Processing and Archiving
– Each center (PAS and MP/BK) will
post-process and archive parameters
and waveforms in it's region of
responsibility.
– CGS will post-process and distribute
SM data and engineering quick
reports.
Timeline: Prototype by 30 June 2007
Budget
and
Funding
Funding Status (review)
• The CISN Strategic Plan goals were established
for the level of funding that we anticipated in
2001.
• At its inception in 2001 the CISN asked OES for
$6.6M per year.
– This funding was cut to and has remained at the $2.4M
per year for the last three years.
• Full ANSS funding expected in 2001 and
subsequent years has not occurred.
– level-funding for CIT, UCB, and USGS NCSN/SCSN
and NSMP network operations for the last three years
CISN 2005 Funding
Overview
• USGS/ANSS $7.7M
• CGS/CSMIP $5.4M
• OES $2.4M
•
•
•
•
•
– NCSN (USGS Menlo
Park)
– UCB/REDI and
UCB/NCEDC
– SCSN (Caltech & USGS
Pasadena) SCEDC
– UCLA (Factor)
– UCSD (Anza)
– NSMP apportioned
– Caltech
– UCB
– CGS
– Buildings
– Lifelines
– Ground response (~1/3
of budget effort)
UC Berkeley $0.5M
SCEC $0.15M
Caltech ~$0.2M
USArray ~$0.2M
NOAA - $0.1M
CISN Funding
CGS $5.4M
OES $2.4M
14%
UC Berkeley $0.5M
SCEC $0.15M
32%
Caltech $0.2M
USArray $0.2M
NOAA $0.1M
46%
USGS $7.7M
Total ~$16.65M
CISN Expenditures
Expenditures for California
Seismic Monitoring
Operate and
maintain stations
DataCenters
9%
12%
47%
15%
New/Upgraded
stations
Real-time operations
and response
10% Management
7%
Process
improvement
new products
New
Developments
CISN Display
• V1.3 released 8/29/2006
–
–
–
–
–
–
“Web services” support
Better GIS layers
Email integration
Scale dependent GIS layers
Sort on magnitude
Events with tsunami info tagged
• ~420 users registered
• ~75 users connected
Connected Users of CISN Display
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
abc.com
atsb-malaysia.com.my
BNSF.com
dot.ca.gov
calquake.com
cityofalhambra.org
co.monterey.ca.us
co.sanmateo.ca.us
conservation.ca.gov
dogami.state.or.us
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
dot.ca.gov
emd.wa.gov
hko.gov.hk
kmi.com
lacofd.org
meteorology.gov.mv
morganhill.ca.gov
mwdh2o.com
nbcuni.com
noaa.gov
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
oes.ca.gov
rdmd.ocgov.com
redlandspolice.org
scd.hawaii.gov
semprautilites.com
solanocounty.com
tribune.com
usace.army.mil
water.ca.gov
wsdot.wa.gov
ENS:
Earthquake
Notification
System
• User-configurable
E-mail & SMS
messages
• Adopted by ANSS
• 41,000+ users
CISN Alert Map
(prototype)
CISN and EarthScope
• SAFOD
• USArray
– Data recording
by NCSN
– Data archiving at
NCEDC
– Data Sharing from
existing stations
– Sharing of
technology
• Plate Boundary
Observatory
– Borehole stations
near fault zones
– GPS
CISN/USGS/SCEC
Collaboration on Earthquake
Early Warning
• CISN
– Provide waveforms and implement front end processing
• Caltech/USGS/ UC Berkeley
– Development and testing of individual algorithms
• SCEC
– Comparison of performance of algorithms
– Testing for great earthquakes using synthetics
Conversion of NCSN
backbone telemetry
• Data collected at
nodes
• Analog telemetry
precluded upgrades
• Mix of satellite, leased
land lines, and
microwave
• 6 year project
NetQuakes RFP
• USGS SEED funding
to develop new SM
instrumentation for
urban areas
• Designed to
accelerate rate of
new installations
• Current bottlenecks
–
–
–
–
Purchase Cost
Permitting
Installation
Telemetry costs
CISN & ANSS
TriNet
San
Fernando
CI
BK
NC
NP
CE
19
70
19
73
19
76
19
79
19
82
19
85
19
88
19
91
19
94
19
97
20
00
20
03
Number/Yr
Number/Yr
200
180
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
Time
3600 more stations needed
to achieve Vision 2005 goal
of 5500 stations
It will take ~70
years at this rate
NetQuakes hardware
• COTS computer hardware (~$500)
–
–
–
–
–
–
Removable memory cards
Full O/S (Linux?)
Wireless (802.11g) capability
AC power with modest battery backup
No GPS
NTP synchronization (±10 msec accuracy)
• ANSS TIC WG-D Class “C-B” hardware (~$300)
– Digitizer: ≥ 16bits resolution
– Sensor: ≥ 87dB dynamic range over 0.1-35Hz
Functionality
• Triggered only
• Data queued until successfully uploaded
• Uploaded data used when event is detected
by regional seismic network
• Periodic SOH messages issued
• Periodic queries to check for new software
• Periodic NTP synchronization
• Ability to add new algorithms
Installation and
Servicing
• Volunteer hosts solicited
• Technician installs device
– Bolt cradle, orient device, configure device,
determine GPS coordinates
• Hosts swap out batteries and bad units (not
technicians)
NetQuakes Status
• Proposals from vendors due 9/6/2006
• Award to be made by 9/26/2006
– At least 3 prototypes
– Up to 250 more units
• Prototypes due no later than 6/30/2007
• Goal is 100+ new urban SM stations/year