Download Population Structures

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Restoration ecology wikipedia , lookup

Overexploitation wikipedia , lookup

Storage effect wikipedia , lookup

Extinction debt wikipedia , lookup

Unified neutral theory of biodiversity wikipedia , lookup

Island restoration wikipedia , lookup

Mission blue butterfly habitat conservation wikipedia , lookup

Wildlife corridor wikipedia , lookup

Ecological fitting wikipedia , lookup

Maximum sustainable yield wikipedia , lookup

Biodiversity action plan wikipedia , lookup

Reconciliation ecology wikipedia , lookup

History of wildlife tracking technology wikipedia , lookup

Biogeography wikipedia , lookup

Assisted colonization wikipedia , lookup

Decline in amphibian populations wikipedia , lookup

Habitat destruction wikipedia , lookup

Occupancy–abundance relationship wikipedia , lookup

Biological Dynamics of Forest Fragments Project wikipedia , lookup

Theoretical ecology wikipedia , lookup

Habitat conservation wikipedia , lookup

Habitat wikipedia , lookup

Molecular ecology wikipedia , lookup

Source–sink dynamics wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Robert E.
Chapter 10: Distribution and
Spatial Structure of
Populations
Next chapter
 Friday: we’ll do both Chapters 14 and 15
 We’re skipping chapters 11-13
2
Habitat Fragmentation and Landscape
Ecology
 Fragmentation of formerly continuous habitats is
happening worldwide, caused by:
 clearing of forests
 construction of roads
 channeling of rivers
 Landscape ecology addresses how size and
arrangement of habitat patches influence:
 activities of individuals
 growth and regulation of populations
 interactions between species
3
Consequences of Habitat Fragmentation
 Plants and animals can use a habitat patch only if they have
access to it.
 Changes in human land use patterns have reduced such
access.
 Small, isolated populations in habitat fragments are
vulnerable to extinction:
 they suffer from loss of genetic diversity
 they are subject to random perturbations
4
Forest Fragmentation in the Amazon
 When habitats are fragmented, most areas are
closer to edges, often with negative
consequences.
 Forest fragmentation in the Amazon basin results
in greater exposure of trees within 100 m of
forest edges, resulting in:
 drying of vegetation
 excessive wind damage
 losses of up to 15 tons of biomass per hectare annually
5
Habitat fragmentation (Brazil)
Brown-Headed Cowbirds and Kentucky
Warblers
 Cowbirds are nest parasites of other birds, such as the
Kentucky warbler. Cowbirds:
 prefer open farms and fields
 venture into the edges of forests in search of host nests
 In one study, parasitism on warblers was as high as
60% within 300 m of forest edges:
 warblers had to be 1.5 km from the forest edge to escape
parasitism
 Nest predators also venture into forest from edges.
7
Habitat fragmentation can affect population
dynamics
Many species are in decline.
 Warblers and many other forest birds of eastern
North America have declined in recent years.
 Populations of most species have persisted for
millions of years:
 many species are now threatened with extinction, a
cause for great concern
 to understand this problem and potential solutions
we must explore population structures
9
Terminology 1
 A population is made up of the individuals of a species within
a particular area:
 each population lives in patches of suitable habitat
 Habitats naturally exist as a mosaic of different patches:
 many populations are thus broken into somewhat isolated
subpopulations
10
Terminology 2
 Population structure refers to:
 the density and spacing of individuals within suitable
habitat
 the proportions of individuals in various age classes
 mating system
 genetic structure
 Populations exhibit dynamic behavior,
changing through time because of births,
deaths, and movements of individuals.
11
Geographic distributions are determined by
suitable habitats.
 The distribution of a species is its geographic
range.
 Consider the geographic range of sugar maple in
eastern North America:
 broader outlines of the range are determined by
climatic factors
 within its range, the species only occurs in suitable
habitats (absent from many habitats such as marshes
and serpentine barrens)
12
Within a population’s
geographic range, only
suitable habitats are occupied
Barriers to long-range dispersal limit
geographic distribution.
 Introduced species often expand successfully
into new regions:
 160 European starlings were introduced near New
York City in 1890 and 1891; within 60 years, the North
American population of starlings covered more than
3 million square miles
 Other examples of successful introductions:
 dogs in Australia, pigs and rats in Pacific islands
 fast-growing pines and eucalyptus trees worldwide
14
migration
 The geographic range of a population includes ALL of the
areas its members occupy during their ENTIRE life history
 Sockeye salmon  spawning grounds in Canada plus vast
areas of the North Pacific Ocean where individuals grow to
maturity before making the long migration back
 East Africa: migration of many large ungulates…following the
geographic pattern of seasonal rainfall and fresh vegetation
15
Ecological niche modeling
 Map the known occurrences of a species in a geographic
space
 Catalog the combination of ecological conditions (temp and
precipitation) at the locations were the species has been
recorded
 Catalog of ecological conditions = ecological envelope
 Then map the geographic area that has the same
combination of conditions to predict the broader occurrence
of species w/in a region
17
Dispersion of Individuals within
Populations
 Dispersion of individuals within a population
describes their spacing with respect to one
another.
 A variety of patterns is possible:
 clumped (individuals in discrete groups)
 evenly spaced (each individual maintains a minimum
distance from other individuals)
 random (individuals distributed independently of
others within a homogeneous area)
19
Dispersion patterns describe the spacing
of individuals
Causes of Dispersion
 Even spacing may arise from direct interactions
among individuals:
 maintenance of minimum distance between
individuals or direct competition for limited resources
may cause this pattern
 Clumped distribution may arise from:
 social predisposition to form groups
 clumped distribution of resources
 tendency of progeny to remain near parents
21
Evenly spaced desert shrubs in Sonora, Mexico
Vegetative reproduction  clumped distribution
Start here
24
Populations exist in heterogeneous
landscapes.
 Uniform habitats are the exception rather than
the rule:
 most populations are divided into subpopulations
living in suitable habitat patches
 Degree to which members of subpopulations
are isolated from one another depends on:
 distances between subpopulations
 nature of intervening environment
 mobility of the species
25
Causes of Isolation
 Whether or not areas of unfavorable habitat are
substantial barriers to mobility depends on:
 distance between subpopulations
 nature of intervening habitat
 mobility of the species
26
Mobility and Isolation
 The extent of isolation of subpopulations depends on
the mobility of the species:
 snail kites in southern Florida are linked into a single
population
 geckos in Australia are separated by agriculture into
subpopulations between which there is little
movement of individuals
 Several models address patchiness...
27
Genetic differences between populations in small, isolated
habitat patches indicate lack of movement between them
(gecko Oedura reticulata in SW Australia)
Metapopulation Model
 The metapopulation model views a population as a set
of subpopulations occupying patches of a particular
habitat:
 intervening habitat is referred to as the habitat
matrix:
 the matrix is viewed only as a barrier to movement of
individuals between subpopulations
29
Source-Sink Model
 The source-sink model recognizes differences
in quality of suitable habitat patches:
 in source patches, where resources are abundant:
 individuals produce more offspring than needed to
replace themselves
 surplus offspring disperse to other patches
 in sink patches, where resources are scarce:
 populations are maintained by immigration of
individuals from elsewhere
30
Landscape Model
 The landscape model considers effects of
differences in habitat quality within the habitat
matrix:
 the quality of a habitat patch can be affected by the
nature of the surrounding matrix
 quality is enhanced by presence of resources, such as nesting
materials or pollinators
 quality is reduced by presence of predators or disease
organisms
 some matrix habitats are more easily traversed than
others
31
Models of population structure
Ideal Free Distributions 1
 Individuals can make decisions regarding the quality of
habitat patches. Where to live? Where not to live?
 How do they make these decisions?
 Quality of a patch depends on:
 its intrinsic quality
 density of other individuals:
 occupied patches may have fewer remaining resources
 competing individuals may engage in conflicts
33
In an ideal free distribution, each individual
exploits a patch of the same apparent quality
Ideal Free Distributions 2
 Each individual chooses among patches to maximize
its access to resources.
 As a patch with high intrinsic quality fills with
individuals, its resources are depleted and its apparent
quality decreases:
 at some point, a patch with lower intrinsic quality has greater
apparent quality and it too begins to fill
 thus all patches reach the same apparent quality, despite
different intrinsic qualities and different densities of
individuals, the ideal free distribution
36
Individuals move from sources to sinks.
 The ideal free distribution would suggest
equivalent reproductive success among
individuals occupying habitat patches of differing
intrinsic quality:
 this ideal is rarely realized:
 individuals do not have perfect knowledge of patch
quality
 free choice may be reduced in subordinate
individuals
37
Sources and Sinks
 Some patches are population sources and others are
population sinks with net movement from sources to
sinks:
 evident in European blue tit:
 populations in deciduous oak habitats are sources, with
potential for rapid growth
 populations in evergreen oak habitats are sinks, with potential
for rapid decline
38
Estimating population size.
 Population size (number of individuals) is the ultimate measure of a
population:
 we typically wish to know what factors cause size to change and
processes that regulate size
 Total population size has two components:
 density, the number of individuals per unit area
 area occupied
 Density  area occupied = size.
39
How do we measure density?
 A total count may be feasible:
 suitable for small populations where individuals can be
distinctively marked
 often employed for endangered species, particularly for
larger animals such as mammals and birds
 For sessile organisms, local density may be
determined in plots, then extrapolated to entire area
occupied.
 Other techniques may be needed for mobile
organisms.
40
Mark-Recapture Method
 Mark-recapture methods are often used with animal
populations:
 an initial sample is collected and all individuals are distinctively
marked
 marked animals are released into the population and allowed to
mix
 a second sample is collected and marked and unmarked animals
are tallied
41
Mark-Recapture Computations
 For an initial marked sample of size M, a second
sample of size n, containing x marked
individuals, the population size N is:
N = nM/x
 If 20 fish are captured, marked, and returned to
a small pond, and a second sample of 50 fish
contains 6 marked fish, the population estimate
is 50(20)/6 = 167.
42
Variation in Populations over Space and
Time
 Populations tend to vary in size over time.
 Long-term records often reveal fluctuations that might be
overlooked in shorter term:
 infestation by chinch bugs in Illinois monitored over decades reveals
populations fluctuations:
 in some years, populations averaged 1000/m2 over an area of 300,000 km2
 in other years farmers reported little damage
43
Movement of individuals maintains spatial
coherence.
 Movements within populations are referred to as dispersal.
 Movements between subpopulations are referred to as
migrations, or more specifically:
 emigration (leaving a subpopulation)
 immigration (entering a subpopulation)
44
Monitoring Dispersal
 Monitoring dispersal is difficult:
 organisms must be marked and recaptured
 large areas must be covered to ensure an adequate sampling of
movements
 Population biologists often use ingenious methods to monitor
dispersal:
 dispersal in fruit flies was investigated by releasing individuals
with a visible mutation
45
Lifetime Dispersal Distance
 Average lifetime dispersal distance is a useful index of
movement within populations:
 this indicates how far an individual moves from its birthplace to
where it settles and reproduces:
 a circle with radius equal to the lifetime dispersal distance is the lifetime
dispersal area
 the number of individuals within this circle is the neighborhood size of
the population
46
Neighborhood size: # of individuals w/in a circle whose
radius is the average lifetime dispersal distance
European starling
marcoecology
 Analyzing and interpreting the patterns revealed by large
samples of species
 The distribution and population size of a species reflects the
distribution of conditions to which individuals of the species
were well adapted. If these conditions are common 
population should also be common
 Plus: a species should be more abundant at the center of its
distribution where its conditions are most favorable

49
Range size and pop density
 Species adapted to a broad range variety of resources and
conditions are likely to be more abundant in the center of
their distribution than are species that are more specialized
 geographic range and population density in the center of the
distribution should be positively correlated
 Can be tested in a sample of species for which both
geographic range and population density have been
measured – eg: populations of birds within North America
50
Range size and pop density
 1. area occupied by a species
and its max population
density are positively
correlated
 Among457 species - those
species with larger ranges
have higher max abundances
Body size, distribution, and
abundance
Population density decreases
with increasing body size
Why?
52
Pop density in carnivores is closely
related to their food supply