* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download instructions for authors - Electrical and Computer Engineering
Spark-gap transmitter wikipedia , lookup
Magnetic core wikipedia , lookup
Operational amplifier wikipedia , lookup
Valve RF amplifier wikipedia , lookup
Integrating ADC wikipedia , lookup
Josephson voltage standard wikipedia , lookup
Resistive opto-isolator wikipedia , lookup
Schmitt trigger wikipedia , lookup
Current mirror wikipedia , lookup
Standing wave ratio wikipedia , lookup
Current source wikipedia , lookup
Opto-isolator wikipedia , lookup
Power electronics wikipedia , lookup
Power MOSFET wikipedia , lookup
Surge protector wikipedia , lookup
Voltage regulator wikipedia , lookup
MITIGATION OF FERRORESONANCE INDUCED BY SINGLE-PHASE OPENING OF A THREE-PHASE TRANSFORMER FEEDER Patrick Picher Léonard Bolduc Bruno Girard Van Nhi Nguyen Institut de recherche Institut de recherche TransÉnergie TransÉnergie Hydro-Québec Hydro-Québec Hydro-Québec Hydro-Québec [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Abstract This paper presents a practical mitigation technique for the ferroresonance induced by the single-phase primary opening of a three-phase 5-legged (wound core) station service transformer. This ferroresonance problem was causing erratic behaviour of the automatic transfer switch between the main and reserve station service transformers. A nonlinear three-phase transformer model, based on the magnetic-circuit theory, was used to reproduce and acquire a deeper understanding of the ferroresonance phenomenon. The model, validated by field measurements, allowed comparison of the effectiveness of resistive and inductive loads for reducing the voltage on the open phase. In previous literature, it has been generally recommended to use a resistive load to damp ferroresonance. This paper demonstrates that an inductive load is more effective and has the advantage of being a more energy-efficient solution. The inductive-load mitigation technique is now in service in HydroQuébec’s Deschambault substation. Keywords: Ferroresonance, mitigation, transformer. causing the voltage to drop again. These erratic permutations will persists until the automatic transfer switch fails. In this case, replacing the overhead line fuses by a threephase switching device or using single-phase transformers would be valid mitigation techniques but economics discourage both these options. A better solution is to connect a permanent load on the transformers to ensure that the voltage remains below the threshold level (in this case 75% of the rated rms voltage) of the automatic transfer switch. In previous literature [1-2], it has been generally recommended to use a resistive load to damp the ferroresonance but this paper demonstrates that an inductive load is more effective and has the advantage of being more energy-efficient. The paper describes the use of a nonlinear three-phase transformer model, based on the magnetic-circuit theory, to reproduce the magnetic coupling between the phases and in so doing acquire a deeper understanding of the ferroresonance phenomenon. 2. Description of the model 1. Introduction The main and reserve station service transformers of Deschambault substation are rated 1.5 MVA, three-phase 5legged wound-core, grounded-wye to grounded-wye, 24940/14400-600/347 V. Both transformers are fed by two separate feeders consisting of 68 m of underground cables in series with overhead lines. The total capacitance of these cables is approximately 20 nF (300 pF/m). Operating problems occur when a fuse opens in a phase of the overhead line feeding the main transformer. This induces a voltage in the open phase because of the closed iron path provided by the three-phase transformer core. The induced voltage, back-fed on the cable capacitance, creates a potential risk of ferroresonance with the nonlinear iron core inductance. If the load on the main transformer is sufficiently high, the single-phase opening is detected by the voltage detection device of the automatic transfer switch and the load is transferred to the reserve transformer connected to the second feeder. Elimination of the load on the first transformer initiates a ferroresonance situation which causes the voltage on the open phase to increase, reaching or exceeding, the rated voltage. The automatic transfer switch detects this recovered voltage and transfers the load back on the main transformer, In order to reproduce the ferroresonance phenomenon, the transformer model must represent the transformer core correctly. The model preferred for such analysis is based on the magnetic-circuit theory and an electrical equivalent circuit is obtained by the duality principle [3]. This model was successfully used for previous investigations into direct-current saturation [4] and load loss unbalance [5]. The magnetic circuit representing the 5-legged core type is shown in Figure 1. Sources of flux represent primary and secondary windings. Each section of the core is represented by a nonlinear reluctance. Linear reluctances are added to represent the leakage flux between windings (leakage reactance). A slightly different version of this model was developed by Mork [6] to better represent the wound core. In the study presented here, the stacked-core model was used and validated by field measurements. The nonlinear characteristic can be obtained by measurements or, as in our case, by using a typical transformer steel B-H curve. The electrical circuit of the transformer is obtained using the principle of duality. Figure 2 shows the complete simulation circuit with the transformer model, the cables (represented by shunt capacitors) and the load. S im u la tio n c a s D e s c h a m b a u lt - P h a s e B o u v e rte - X L b ra n c h é e (9 A ) 2 .5 0 E + 0 4 2 2 2 .0 0 E + 0 4 1 .5 0 E + 0 4 f 3 1 A1 f B1 1 1 (V ) 1 .0 0 E + 0 4 T e n s io n f C1 5 .0 0 E + 0 3 0 .0 0 E + 0 0 3 -5 .0 0 E + 0 3 -1 .0 0 E + 0 4 -1 .5 0 E + 0 4 A2 B2 S im u la tio n c a s D e s c h a m b a u lt - P h a s e B o u v e r te - X L b r a n c h é e (9 A ) C2 -2 .0 0 E + 0 4 2 .5 0 E + 0 4 -2 .5 0 E + 0 4 2 .0 0 E + 0 4 Lf 4 .0 0 E -0 1 4 .0 5 E -0 1 4 .1 0 E -0 1 4 .1 5 E -0 1 4 .2 0 E -0 1 4 .2 5 E -0 1 T e m p s 4 .3 0 E -0 1 4 .3 5 E -0 1 4 .4 0 E -0 1 4 .4 5 E -0 1 (s ) 1 .5 0 E + 0 4 V a V b V c 1 .0 0 E + 0 4 T e n s io n (V ) Figure 1: Magnetic circuit representing 5-legged core. L3 L1 5 .0 0 E + 0 3 0 .0 0 E + 0 0 -5 .0 0 E + 0 3 -1 .0 0 E + 0 4 L2 -1 .5 0 E + 0 4 L1 -2 .0 0 E + 0 4 -2 .5 0 E + 0 4 Lf Figure 3: Comparison of simulations and measurements. Top: open-phase A (no load). Bottom: open-phase B (2.6 kvar load). 4 .0 0 E -0 1 4 .0 5 E -0 1 4 .1 0 E -0 1 4 .1 5 E -0 1 4 .2 0 E -0 1 4 .2 5 E -0 1 L2 L1 Lf L3 Figure 2: Simulation circuit (transformer, cables and mitigation load). The nonlinear inductances of the transformer are adjusted to match the corresponding core dimensions (wound legs f, yokes 2 and return legs 3). The leakage reactance is modeled by reluctance 1. The cross section of the yokes is the same as the return legs and half of the wound legs. The yoke and the return leg lengths were assumed to be 0.375 and 1.75 times the length of the wound legs respectively. Lastly, the magnetizing current was set at 0.5% and the no-load loss at 0.1%. 3. Validation of the model The model was validated using field measurements. Comparisons were done with measurements taken with openphase A, B and C, with and without load. The simulated waveforms were similar to the experimental measurements as shown in Figure 3. Table 1 compares simulated and measured peak and rms voltage values on open-phase A and B. The correlation of the results is better for phase B, the measured values being somewhat higher than the simulated ones for phase A. These small differences can be explained by the various assumptions made for the transformer model (core dimensions, saturation characteristics, core losses, rated magnetizing current, stacked-core model). However, the main objective of the study, to compare active and reactive loads mitigation techniques, did not justify adding more complexity to the transformer model. 4 .3 0 E -0 1 4 .3 5 E -0 1 4 .4 0 E -0 1 4 .4 5 E -0 1 4 .5 0 E -0 1 T e m p s (s ) V a V b V c Table 1: Comparison of simulations with measurements: peak and rms voltages in p.u. (measurements in parentheses) kvar Open Phase: A Open Phase: B Peak RMS Peak RMS 0 1.04 (1.02) 0.91 (0.86) 1.07 (1.02) 0.83 (0.79) 2.6 0.53 (0.67) 0.52 (0.58) 0.57 (0.58) 0.54 (0.50) 4.6 0.39 (0.52) 0.39 (0.47) 0.42 (0.47) 0.39 (0.36) 9 0.23 (0.44) 0.27 (0.37) 0.28 (0.34) 0.26 (0.27) 4. Simulation results All simulations were performed using MATLAB. The simulation length was kept to 0.5 s with variable time steps. The peak voltage and flux in the wound legs were calculated for the period between 0.25 to 0.5 s. A series of simulations was performed to investigate the influence of cable capacitance on the peak voltage obtained on the open phase. Figure 4 shows the results obtained. The simulations demonstrate that the peak flux does not follow the peak voltage. At 40 nF, for instance, the peak voltage reaches 1.8 p.u., and the peak flux is limited to 1.2 p.u., which is a very limited over-excitation. This observation is in accordance with the conclusions presented in [1]. From this graph, it is impossible to identify the mode of ferroresonance (‘period 1’, ‘period 2’, ‘chaotic’, etc.) [7]. For instance, period 2 refers to a waveform with a period twice that of the forcing function (applied voltage). Another representation of waveforms is the phase plane plot (flux versus voltage). The trajectory on the phase plane provided a unique signature of the waveform. Periodic waveforms have trajectories that close back on themselves and repeat. Period 2 can easily be inferred by carefully following the waveform’s trajectory on the phase plane. Figure 5 depicts the waveforms obtained for cable capacitances of 20 and 25 nF. These graphs show clearly that, if the cable 4 .5 0 E -0 1 2 Max voltage, flux (pu) 1,8 1,6 1,4 1,2 1 0,8 1 Vmax on open phase (pu) capacitance is raised from 20 nF to 25 nF, the ferroresonance mode shifts from period 1 to period 2. In the case studied, all field measurements showed ferroresonance in period 1. R-load (peak) 0.75 R-load (RMS) 0.5 0.25 L-load (peak) L-load (RMS) 0,6 0 0,4 0 0,2 5 10 Load (kVA) 0 0 10 20 Cable capacitance (pF) RMS voltage Peak flux 30 40 Peak voltage Figure 4: Effect of cable capacitance on maximum voltage and flux obtained on open phase. 1.5 The effect of reactive load was simulated for different capacitance values. The results are shown in Figure 7. This type of representation could be used to select an appropriate reactive load level for various lengths of feeder cable. 5. Discussion 0.5 0 -0.5 -1 -1.5 0.3 0.32 0.34 0.36 0.38 0.4 Time (s) 1.5 25 nF 20 nF 1 The following intuitive explanation for the case studied is offered. When one phase of the three-phase transformer is opened, the total amount of flux generated by the connected phases returns via the open wound leg and both return legs. Normally, when there is no ferroresonance, the voltage on the open phase should be around half the rated voltage. When a feeder cable is connected to the transformer, a shunt capacitance is then connected in parallel with the transformer’s magnetizing impedance, forming a parallel resonant circuit. This shunt capacitive impedance is approximately 130 kΩ as compared to 70 kΩ for the magnetizing impedance. Without additional load, the parallel resonant impedance is the inductive type and can be calculated using (1). 0.5 1.8 0 1.6 -0.5 -1 -1.5 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 Voltage (pu) 20 nF 25 nF Figure 5: Waveforms for cable capacitances of 25 and 20 nF. Top: voltage. Bottom: phase plane diagram of the voltage. A series of simulations was performed to compare the attenuation of the voltage by active and reactive loads. Figure 6 illustrates the results for peak and rms voltage in p.u. Voltage on open phase (pu) Voltage (V) 20 Figure 6: Comparison of inductive and resistive loads. 1 Flux (pu) 15 1.4 40 35 30 1.2 1 40 nF 25 0.8 20 0.6 15 5 0.4 5 nF 0.2 0 0 5 10 15 Load (kvar) Figure 7: Effect of reactive load for different capacitance values (peak voltage shown). 20 X eq 6. Conclusion X C X mag (1) X C X mag The calculated equivalent reactive load is 150 kΩ. This increase in the inductance is translated by a proportional decrease in the leg’s reluctance in the magnetic circuit, thereby increasing the flux and the voltage in the open phase. To mitigate this resonance, adding inductance in parallel with the magnetizing impedance will reduce the resonant equivalent reactance and increase the leg’s reluctance, forcing the flux out of the open phase and, hence, reducing the voltage. For instance, with a load of 5 kvar (shunt reactance of 125 kΩ on the HV side base), the inductive reactance is reduced to 45 kΩ, and the parallel equivalent impedance with the cable capacitance becomes 69 kΩ. If the voltage is assumed equal to 1 p.u. when there is no load, a parameter similar to the voltage reduction can be obtained by dividing the newly obtained impedance (69) by the reference impedance without load (150), which gives 0.46 p.u. This methodology was used to calculate the reduced voltage for loads between 1 to 20 kvar: the resulting curve (Figure 8) is similar to the simulation results, demonstrating the validity of the proposed explanation. The main contribution of this paper was to compare active and reactive load effectiveness in reducing the voltage on the open phase. In the practical case presented, the automatic transfer switch operates when the voltage drops below 75% of the rated rms voltage. The simulations (Figure 6) show that the minimal inductive and resistive loads required to reduce the rms voltage to 0.75 p.u. are respectively 1 kvar and 2 kW (three-phase, wye-connected). A 4.5-kvar load was permanently connected to the secondary of the three-phase transformers (1.5 kvar per phase, 347 V). The load was connected on the secondary side to reduce the cost, the effectiveness being the same. A permanent load must be connected on the three phases to prevent ferroresonance in all cases of single-phase opening. 1 Calculated voltage (p.u.) 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 0 5 10 Load (kvar) 15 20 Figure 8: Calculated voltage on open phase – discussion methodology. This contribution has presented a novel use of a transformer model to compare the active and reactive load mitigation techniques to deal with the ferroresonance induced by singlephase opening of a 5-legged three-phase transformer. The model showed how the modification of the cable capacitance changes the ferroresonance mode and overvoltages. It was also observed that even in the case of high overvoltages, the crest flux remains at a much lower level. A permanent 4.5-kvar reactive load was connected on the secondary side of the main and reserve 1.5-MVA station service transformers of Hydro-Québec’s Deschambault substation. This load reduces the voltage on the open phase to below the 75% threshold level used by the automatic transfer switch when a fuse opens on the feeder side. The simulations showed that the voltage decrease is even higher than what would have been obtained by an equivalent resistive load, and the active energy consumption is negligible. This mitigation approach corrects the erratic commutations caused by misinterpreting the ferroresonant voltage on the open phase as re-connection of the transformer feeder. References [1] R.A. Walling, K.D. Barker, T.M. Compton, and L.E. Zimmerman, “Ferroresonant overvoltages in grounded wye-wye padmount transformers with low-loss siliconsteel cores,” IEEE Trans. Power Delivery, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 1647-1660, July 1993. [2] M.R. Iravani et al., “Modeling and analysis guidelines for slow transients-Part III: The study of ferroresonance,” IEEE Trans. Power Delivery, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 255-265, January 2000. [3] J.A. Martinez, R. Walling, B.A. Mork, J. Martin-Arnedo, and D. Durbak, “Parameter determination for modeling system transients-Part III: Transformers,” IEEE Trans. Power Delivery, Vol. 20, No. 3, pp.2051-2062, July 2005. [4] P. Picher, L. Bolduc, G. Olivier, “Acceptable direct current in three-phase power transformers: comparative analysis,” IEEE 1997 Canadian Conference Electrical and Computer Engineering, Vol. 1, pp. 157-160, May 1997. [5] P. Picher, L. Bolduc, R. Gagnon, G. Sybille, “Study of the apparent load loss unbalance in three-phase transformers,” IEEE 2005 Canadian Conference Electrical and Computer Engineering, pp. 1481-1484, May 2005. [6] B.A. Mork, “Five-legged wound-core transformer model: derivation, parameters, implementation, and evaluation,” IEEE Trans. Power Delivery, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 15191526. October 1999. [7] B.A. Mork and D.L. Stuehm, “Application of nonlinear dynamics and chaos to ferroresonance in distribution systems,” IEEE Trans. Power Delivery, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 1009-1017, April 1994.