Download GES_14-2015-09_JRC_D1 workshop

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Introduced species wikipedia , lookup

Theoretical ecology wikipedia , lookup

Biogeography wikipedia , lookup

Molecular ecology wikipedia , lookup

Latitudinal gradients in species diversity wikipedia , lookup

Island restoration wikipedia , lookup

Biological Dynamics of Forest Fragments Project wikipedia , lookup

Unified neutral theory of biodiversity wikipedia , lookup

Bifrenaria wikipedia , lookup

Occupancy–abundance relationship wikipedia , lookup

Reconciliation ecology wikipedia , lookup

Biodiversity action plan wikipedia , lookup

Habitat conservation wikipedia , lookup

Habitat wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
MSFD Com Dec
2010/477/EU review
Recommendations for D1
14th meeting of the Working Group on
Good Environmental Status (WG GES)
5th-6th October 2015
Francesca Somma - JRC
D1
Biological diversity
STATE OF PLAY
Since the 7th of April the final version of the review manual is
available on CIRCABC
Outstanding issues addressed at a workshop held on the 7-9
September 2015
Workshop report circulated for the WG GES meeting
Key outcomes from the D1
workshop
• Common revised list of species and
habitats groups as the minimum
assessment unit for biodiversity
• Selection criteria for inclusion of species
and habitats in a group
• Updated criteria and indicators for D1
• Assessment frameworks for species and
habitats (from data to GES assessment
at the group level)
Common list of elements:
Species level
Proposal for a revised list of species groups as the minimum D1
assessment elements
Biodiversity Biodiversity groups
Components (assessment units):
Species group
1. Grazing feeders
2. Wading feeders
Birds
3. Surface feeders
4. Pelagic feeders
5. Benthic feeders
1. Small toothed cetacean
2. Deep divers toothed cetacean
Mammals
3. Baleen whales
4. Seals
Reptiles
1. Turtles
1. Coastal
Fish
Cephalopod
s
SEC(2011)1255
2. Pelagic fish & elasmobranchs
3. Demersal fish & elasmobranchs
4.Demersal
deep-sea
fish
&
elasmobranchs
1.
Coastal/shelf
pelagic
cephalopods
2. Deep-sea pelagic cephalopods
Common list of elements:
Habitats level
Proposal for a revised list of habitats groups as the minimum D1 assessment
elements; Correspondence between biodiversity habitats groups (minimum
requirements) and proposed EUNIS 2015 typology
Biodiversity
Biodiversity habitat groups
Components
Benthic (former Littoral rock and biogenic reef
seabed) habitats Littoral sediment
Infralittoral rock and biogenic reef
Infralittoral coarse sediment
Infralittoral sand
Infralittoral mud
Infralittoral mixed sediment
Circalittoral rock and biogenic reef
Circalittoral coarse sediment
Circalittoral sand
Circalittoral mud
Circalittoral mixed sediment
Upper bathyal rock and biogenic reef
Upper bathyal sediment
Lower bathyal rock and biogenic reef
Lower bathyal sediment
Abyssal rock and biogenic reef
Abyssal sediment
Pelagic (former Coastal
water
column) Shelf
habitats
Oceanic
SEC(2011)1255
Selection/deselection criteria
for the inclusion of species
and habitats in a group
Primary scientific criteria – ecological relevance for D1:
•
Representativeness of an ecosystem component
•
Species/ habitats vulnerable to a pressure
•
Key functional role of species/habitats
•
Sufficiently present across (sub)region
•
Present in sufficient numbers
Secondary practical criteria: Practical consideration, but which cannot substitute
to primary requirements:
•
Monitoring/technical feasibility
•
Monitoring costs
•
Reliable time series
Updated criteria and
indicators for D1
Species Level
1.1 Species geographic distribution
– 1.1.1 distributional range
– 1.1.2 distributional pattern, where relevant
– 1.1.3 area covered by species, where relevant
1.2 Population size
– 1.2.1 population abundance and/or biomass, as appropriate
1.3 Population condition
– 1.3.1 Population demographic characteristics (e.g. body size or age class structure,
sex ratio, fecundity rates, survival/ mortality rates)
1.4 Mobile species community composition
– 1.4.1 Relative abundance of community elements (e.g relative abundance of species;
relative abundance of large/small individuals; relative abundance of
sensitive/resilient individuals)
Updated criteria and
indicators for D1
Habitat level
1.5 Habitat geographic distribution and extent
– 1.5.1 Distributional range
– 1.5.2 Distributional pattern
– 1.5.3 Habitat extent (area and volume)
1.6 Habitat condition
– 1.6.1 Condition of the typical species and communities
– 1.6.2 Relative abundance and/or biomass, as appropriate
1.7 Ecosystem structure
– 1.7.1 Composition and relative proportion of ecosystem components (habitats and
species)
Assessment framework for
species groups
Species group
(e.g. shelf demersal fish & elasmobranchs)
Overall
GES assessment
for a species group
to feed the D1
Species Level
assessment
Aggregation rule
for species
Species A
Species B
Species C
Representative
species (criteria)
Aggregation rule
for relevant criteria
Criterion 1.1
- distribution
Criterion 1.2 –
population size
Criterion 1.3 –
population
condition
GES boundary
defined per
criterion or
indicator
Data set A
Data set B
Data set C
Input from
other
legislations
and RSCs
Assessment framework for
habitats groups
Habitat Group (EUNIS 2015 level 2)
(e.g. circalittoral sand)
Aggregation rule
for criteria
GES boundary
defined per
criterion
Criterion 1.5 –
habitat extent
(proportion lost)
Data set A
extent of physical
loss – from D6.1
(loss)
Aggregation rule
for
methodological
standards
GES boundary
defined per
indicator
Criterion 1.6 –
habitat condition
(proportion
impacted)
Data set B
extent of physical
damage – from
D6.1 (damage)
Subhabitat A
Data set C on
benthic condition
from D1.6
Overall
GES assessment
for a habitats
group to feed the
D1 Habitat Level
assessment
Data set E, F etc
extent of other
impacts (e.g. D5 eutrophication, D2 NIS)
Subhabitat B
Data set D on
benthic condition
from D1.6
Representative
habitats including
also HD & RSCs
listed habitats to
assess condition
Follow up work for D1
•
Work on identifying a suited and common aggregation rule
for each step of the assessment process, where data need to be
aggregated
•
Further consideration of the special (listed) habitats for the
MSFD and how we can take stock of HD, WFD and RSCs
assessments
•
Working examples on the integration across descriptors for
the assessment of biodiversity groups and elements
•
Working examples on the new introduced criterion (1.4)