Download rethinking strategy to addressing the informal sector with lessons for

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Economics of fascism wikipedia , lookup

Economic planning wikipedia , lookup

Fei–Ranis model of economic growth wikipedia , lookup

Economic growth wikipedia , lookup

Non-monetary economy wikipedia , lookup

Đổi Mới wikipedia , lookup

Rostow's stages of growth wikipedia , lookup

Informal sector wikipedia , lookup

Transformation in economics wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
BEYOND ACCEPTANCE OR REJECTION: RETHINKING STRATEGY
TO ADDRESSING THE INFORMAL SECTOR WITH LESSONS FOR
THE FEDERAL CAPITAL CITY (FCC), ABUJA
By
Professor Adamu Ahmed FNITP
Department of Urban and Regional Planning
Ahmadu Bello University Zaria – Nigeria.
Paper presented at the workshop on the Review of the FCC Master Plan, organized by the
FCT Chapter of the Nigerian Institute of Planners (NITP) held on Thursday 30th of March,
2017at the CBN Training Institute, Abuja.
INTRODUCTION
The Informal Sector has received widespread and growing attention in the literature
relating to perceived notions of value and liability (Carbreath ,2015; Feige, 1989,
Hart, 1971). The view of the Sector as a major contributor to the economies of most
developing countries has been established from studies of the World Bank (2005,
2016, & 2009) and the International Labor Organization (ILO), just as other studies
have stigmatized the sector for being unproductive, chaotic and difficult to manage.
As expected, many of the policy responses to the sector have either been towards
enablement or coercion, both often producing undesirable outcomes. The growing
prominence to the subject of informality and the contradictions of emergent policies
raise concerns for new perspectives and approach to addressing the constraints and
opportunities of the sector. What should be the concern of this new policy? And
what role would be expected of planners? This paper contributes to this debate with
particular reference to Abuja, the Federal Capital City in two ways. First by raising
concerns on the degree of significance to which coercion or accommodation would
work for the informal sector. The second explores the argument that informal
developments and activities are symptoms of defective economies, and policy focus
should as much be about creating robust and comprehensive economic growth
rather than addressing symptoms. The theoretical footing of the position argued in
the paper lie within the traditional view of the modernization theory, that the
unorganized sector with its surplus labor will gradually disappear as the surplus
labor gets absorbed in the organized sector. The paper is structured into three parts.
1
The first explores the literature on the informal sector regarding value and nuisance
and the second, the conceptual basis for the need to rethink approach. The third
examines the enabling factors of informality linked to the quality of urban planning,
and how planners would be required to respond. The last part relates the arguments
raised to the FCC, Abuja with lessons from Dubai.
UNDERSTANDING THE CONCEPT OF THE INFORMAL SECTOR
The original use of the term ‘informal sector’ is attributed to the economic
development model put forward by W. Arthur Lewis in the early 1950’s.The later
usage of the term was by Hart (1971) following a study of Ghana. The concept is
generally used to describe employment or livelihood activity primarily within the
developing world that falls outside of the sector. The ‘traditional sector’, the
“survival” sector, the ‘unregulated sector’, etc, are all terms that are used to describe
the informal sector, to encompass production activities of small size, including
handicrafts, which have a “domestic or unorganized character” and may also be
part of the “non-monetary” sector of the economy (Hugon, 1990). Bromley (1978)
considers the sector to be the spin-off of the dual economy literature, originating
with Lewis (1955), which conceptualized economic development as the emergence
and growth of the manufacturing sector (modern) through the absorption of labor
being freed from agriculture (the ‘traditional’ sector) due to the more efficient
means of production in the former. Whereas the dual economy (the ‘moderntraditional’ dichotomy) literature mainly addressed the sectoral differences in terms
of the technology applied, a somewhat later related literature focused more on the
organization of the sectors (Sethuraman, 1976).
Participants in the informal economy generally lack employment security, work
and social security. Definitions of the informal sector also imply a lack of choice
or agency in involvement, and participation may also be driven by a wish to avoid
regulation or taxation. This may manifest as unreported employment, hidden from
the state for tax, social security or labour law purposes, but legal in all other aspects.
Edgar (1989) further sees the informal economy from the perspective of non2
compliant behavior to an institutional set of rules. While Feige (1989) also argues
that circumvention of labor market regulations specifying minimum wages,
working conditions, social security, unemployment and disability benefits as giving
rise to an informal economy that deprives some workers of deserved benefits while
conveying undeserved benefits to others.
The term Informal Sector is also useful in describing and accounting for forms of
shelter or living arrangements that are similarly unlawful, unregulated, or not
afforded protection of the state. In their conditions, informal developments are
generally considered to be poor quality of depressed value and unhealthy for
habitation. Because informal developments are considered ‘illegal’, most are of
temporary materials. The informal sector is largely characterized by several
qualities including; ease of entry, lack of stable employer-employee relationships,
a small scale of operations, and skills gained outside of a formal education. The
type of work that makes up the informal economy is diverse, particularly in terms
of capital invested, technology used, and income generated. The spectrum ranges
from self-employment or unpaid family labor to street vendors, shoe shiners, and
junk collectors.
Agriculture

Retail




Small-scale farmers
Financial Services



Thrift cooperative
societies (ajo, esusu)
Money lenders
Accountants
Informal
Economy
Street vendors
Road-side sellers
Hawkers
Caterers
Education

Private tutors
O ther Service Providers
Transport









Make-up artists
Photographers
Fashion designers
Event planners
Artisans
Technicians
Fig 1: Example of Informal Sector Activities
Private-hire taxi drivers
Tricycle operators (marwa)
Motorcycle operators
(okada)
Source: Informal Economic Survey by Philips Consulting
THE VALUE VERSUS NUISANCE DEBATE
3
Most literature view the Informal sector favorably based on its positive spin offs
especially in the developing countries. It is also considered by far, to be the most
important source of employment as the formal sector has struggled to generate
sufficient employment. While initially the informal sector was viewed as more or
less a ‘residual sector’ for those unable to find employment in the formal sector,
recent empirical research has shown the contrary. Charmes (1990) has shown
evidence that the informal sector worker generally contributes to GDP over and
beyond the minimum wage, and that productivity in the sector is much higher than
average per capita GNP in most 3rd world economies.
In many countries also, the Informal sector is the primary source of employment
for workers, particularly for those that are relatively disadvantaged in the labor
market. The sector is generally seen to be larger in sub-Saharan Africa than in other
parts of the developing world accounting for up to 80% of non-agricultural
employment (Charmes,1990). The share varies across countries as for instance,
India (73%), Indonesia (77%), Philippines (66%) and Thailand (51%).In Latin
America and North Africa, the share is much smaller (Charmes, 1990; Charmes
2000). The share for Eastern Europe and Central Asia shows that the informal
sector generally constitutes only about 5-20% of non-agricultural employment.
Across Asia and Africa, the shares exhibit a strong upward trend given weak
employment creation and income generation from economic growth (ILO
2000).Evidence also exist showing that the poor in most developing countries resort
to the Informal Sector activities as an escape route out of poverty. The positive
views of the informal sector provided basis for the inclusionist arguments of policy
makers and international support organizations.
Most of the criticisms of the informal sector have been directed at the fact that often,
the earnings and employment situation of its workers is inferior to that of the formal
sector workers. Wages are generally very low in the sector and unstable compared
to the formal sector, and more often below legislated national minimum wage
levels. Informality both in housing and livelihood generation is also considered a
4
social ill usually described in terms of what participant’s lack, or wish to avoid. The
worker’s lack of access to basic protections and services is a related shortcoming.
Generally, an inverse relationship between an increased informal sector activity and
slower economic growth has long been established. Informal businesses are
stigmatized for lack of potential for growth, trapping employees in menial jobs
indefinitely.
The negative perception of informality also extends to the view of the sector being
disruptive to the national economy and a hindrance to development. Such criticisms
are justified by the view that the informal economy is fraudulent resulting in loss
of revenue to governments; it’s capacity to weaken unions; its links to the creation
of unfair competition; absence of regulatory controls by government; the sectors
lack of observance of health and safety standards; and reduced availability of
employment benefits and rights. These characteristics have led to many countries
and cities pursuing a policy of deterrence, with strict regulation and punitive
procedures, including arrests, demolitions and evictions, etc.
RETHINKING THE APROACH TO ADDRESSING INFORMALITY
The Shortcomings of Formalization and Eviction Strategies
In the economic literature, the most important incentive to informal sector operators
is the escape of government taxation and increased regulation. That is, the tax
burden and social security contribution implied from formalization amongst other
reasons is an important explanation for the existence of the informal sector. This
notion is today as valid and relevant as it was at the turn of the century. Many
authors therefore view the political economy of the formal/informal divide as being
exploitative primarily to meet the insatiable appetite of governments to generate
revenue. Interest by governments to tax and regulate aspects of their economies has
never been unusual. The opposing interests of the informal sector and governments
creates conflict points that regularly undermine policy formulation and
implementation. As shown from several case studies, the excessive use of legal
instruments and coercion has not produced sufficient incentives to the formal sector
to formalize or grow. De’Soto has shown that for instance, the excessive taxes and
5
regulation in the Peruvian economy (and other Latin American countries) of the
informal sector instead have forced a large part of the economy into informality and
thus preventing the formalization agenda of the government. Several studies also
refer to the failure of the eviction strategy as being suggestive of the lack of
suitability of the coercion strategy to addressing informality. Deriving the incentive
for the formalization of the informal sector from the tax argument therefore, and
the failure of coercion strategies provide the justification for a rethink of approach
to policy.
Addressing Informality through Economic growth
A great majority of literature have shown how economic underdevelopment is
directly linked to the existence of the informal sector (Todoro, 1987; Williams,
1955, Mabogunje, 1980). The growth of the informal sector is linked to economic
policies failing to support increased labor force in a formal way. The experience of
many countries shows that growth of the informal sector has been largely associated
with the weak capacity of the formal private sector to generate adequate
employment and incomes (Sethuraman 1997, Tokman 1990, Charmes 1998).
Conversely, informal sector employment (growth) has declined in countries that
have experienced periods of robust and sustained economic growth (Charmes
1998). In pre-crisis Southeast Asia, on account of strong export-led growth and
industrialization, the formal sector was able to absorb informal sector workers and
new labor force entrants in increasing numbers resulting in a marked deceleration
in the growth of the informal sector (see Alonzo 1991, Lubell 1993).
The
complementary empirical accounts of employment expansion during economic
downturns and employment contraction during robust economic recoveries also
testify to the counter-cyclical character of the informal sector with East Asia being
a case in point.
6
Fig 2: Relationship between economic growth and existence of Informal sector.
The second important argument is from the growing evidence that poverty is a key
characteristic of the informal sector, proven by the positive association between the
incidence of poverty and participation in the informal sector. Measured on the basis
of consumption expenditure, evidence from India shows that 43 percent of informal
sector participants are poor compared to only 6 percent in the formal sector
(Pradhan et al, 1999). Sethuraman (1997) also reports extensive evidence for urban
centers in Latin America which shows that, between 50 – 85% of the working poor
are in the informal sector, and that the incidence of extreme poverty is higher in the
informal sector. Other Studies reveal the “derived demand” character of some
informal sector activities and how a downturn in the overall economy can create
incentive and as well informal sector.
Literature therefore, generally support the notion that economic growth and poverty
reduction which most developing countries grapple with cannot be achieved
without sound policies that promote growth of the formal sectors of the economy.
This is supported by development theories which post that, as economies mature
and develop, economic activity will shift from the informal to the formal sphere. In
fact, much of the economic development discourse is centered on the notion that
formalization indicates how developed a country's economy is.
PHYSICAL
PLANNING
AND
ECONOMIC
DEVELOMENT:
The
connecting Argument
7
The City as an Economic Resource
Most advanced economies of the world attribute their development to the economic
opportunities presented by the growth of their cities. The World Bank has provided
evidence suggesting that cities are responsible for 80% of global GDP (World
Bank, 2005) in addition to indicating that the top 100 largest cities account for 35%
of Global GDP; the top 600 for 62%; and the top 1,000 for 68%. Country level data,
shows that Tokyo with 26.8% of Japans population contributes 34.0% of the
country’s GDP; London with 20.3% population accounts for 25.4% of UK’s GDP;
and Sao Paulo with 10% of Brazil’s population accounting for 25% of the country’s
GDP. In China, 53 metropolitan regions with cities of more than 1 million people
were currently home in 2007 to 370 million people or 29% of the country’s
population, but accounting for more than 62% of the country’s non-farm GDP.
Cape Town, Durban and Johannesburg account for 50 percent of South Africa’s
GDP but represent only 20 percent of the national population (SACN, 2004). In
Asia, India with a relatively early state of urbanization has 14 major clusters of
cities accounting for 17% of the country’s total population and 35% of total GDP.
Lagos accounts for 60% of Nigeria’s non-oil GDP.
The urban dominance in economic productivity also shows up in fiscal performance
as well. For example, the Bangkok metropolitan region accounts for about 53% of
public sector revenue in Thailand, but is home to less than 20% of the population.
Cities are also proven poverty fighters with their income generally four times higher
than rural areas in many countries including China, Thailand and some African
countries (World Bank, 2005).
The growing recognition of the economic opportunities offered by cities has
provided basis for the adoption of urbanization as a global development strategy.
Many countries and international development agencies have embarked upon
aggressive programs of accelerated urbanization designed to spur economic
growth. Through its pro-urbanization policies, China has successfully removed 220
million people from poverty in less than 25 years (Chan, 2003). The growing
acceptance of the values of urbanization guarantees that cities will remain high on
both domestic and global agendas. This hasbeen supported by renewed interest of
8
the UN Habitat and the World Bank on urban problems and opportunities. Increased
and sharper policy focus upon urban issues is therefore expected in subsequent
years.
Many theories have explained the factors responsible for the economic relevance
of cities. Integral to industrialization is rapid income growth which arises from the
benefits of Scale and agglomeration economies (Henderson and Davis, 2003).
Efficiency gains generally are associated with large number of firms locating in the
same place and from labor pooling (Nakamura, 1985). Levy (1985) observes that
manufacturing and services production in cities creates savings in travel and
distribution costs. Firms located in cities are also able to more readily copy best
practices in technology and management from more advanced firms; and they more
easily hire skilled workers (Duraton and Puga, 2004; Rosenthal and Strange, 2004).
Big cities also allow for more efficient distribution of social services such as
government assistance and health care (Levy, 1985). They also create large markets
for business and attract international investment and tourism. The diversity and
face-to-face interactions cities facilitate is what leads to cross-cultural mix and the
formation of new ideas and knowledge collaborations necessary for economic
development (Lucas, 1988).
The World Bank’s recent diagnostic survey of Nigeria’s growth potential has
shown how cities, when adequately reformed can provide the required transition
from oil dependence, and to drive economic growth and poverty reduction. For
decades, Nigeria’s growth and revenue has been dependent on oil which now has
unsustainable with the collapse of the oil market. From 1980 to 2010, oil revenue
contributed over 75% of federal government revenues and almost 95% of exports.
Oil dependence and poor governance has led to underdevelopment of other sectors
and left cities with limited job creation abilities and access to basic services.
Urbanization traditionally has been associated with structural transformation
toward manufacturing and services. Cities are also central to improving agricultural
output as the efficiency of farm production is tied to consumption system in urban
9
areas. Enabling the transition of cities from passive role to being active agents of
economic growth requires addressing the interrelated shortcomings of the
urbanization process through effective planning.
Planning and Economic Growth of Cities
Environment, prosperity and economic development are foundation arguments of
physical planning. Most literature refers to the creation of conducive living
conditions for work, living and leisure, and the need for sustainable and inclusive
growth and development as its primary objectives. At inception, the concern for
economic development was influenced by social ideals including the response to
improving environmental quality, reducing poverty and improving access to
housing and social services. Physical planning generally has indirect relationship
wealth creation through the orderly use of space at both the urban and regional
levels. Land generally is an economic resource and its efficient use for productive
enterprise bores down to the quality of physical planning. At the regional level,
growth is linked to the ease by which production and market centres are effectively
connected. The physical, infrastructural and demographic considerations that guide
location decisions and how they are integrated over space to facilitate growth are
also primary considerations of physical planning. Mabogunje (1980) observes that
efficiently and cost effectively integrated spatial units accelerate economic growth.
Within cities, the availability of employment opportunities is the primary driver of
growth which is determined by quality of infrastructure, ease of access to land and
housing, and physical security. Relating to this, the upgrading of poor
neighborhoods is known to have direct link to the retention of jobs and the attraction
of new industries. Older industrial districts and inner cities are generally less
attractive to investment due to crime, congestion and parking problems, poor
infrastructure, housing deficit, commuting problems, and a poor working
environment. In recent times, evidence to the economic contributions of cities to
national and global GDP’s has re-kindled interest on the notion that planning, by
creating basis for productive urbanization has important value to economic growth
management beyond the traditional notions of physical controls.
10
The Value of Planning Tools in Economic development
The primary tools of planning have traditionally included the Comprehensive
Urban Master Plan, the Regional Master Plan and the National Physical
Development Plan. The Urban Master Plan provides basic guidance to physical
development of cities that is maintained with regular revisions. The plan defines
the spatial framework which permits the best outcomes from the location of
population, industry, businesses, open spaces and publicly built facilities. It also
addresses physical, economic and social problems and the opportunities available
for growth, and correlates development with the provision of transportation, water
supply, schools, etc. Many cities have favorable economic ratings based on the
physical development and economic policy attractions they offer to industries and
businesses.
The Regional Development Plan defines the spatial framework for promoting
growth and development for city systems. It ensures that locational decisions take
advantage of natural resource distribution, population clusters and market centres
towards economic growth; and the provision of networks of infrastructure between
production and consumption centres to create economic growth. The National
Physical Development Plan has similar purpose as the Regional Development Plan.
In recent times, the City Development Strategy (CDS) concept has become a useful
tool for improving the quality of urban growth management. The CDS is premised
on the position that good urban management has synergy with national
development goals of sustainable economic growth and poverty reduction. Well
positioned and well timed public, private, and civil society strategic interventions
through the CDS help to alter the development trajectory of cities by making them
competitive and resilient. Competitiveness and resilience are dependent on the
internal and external environments of a city,both of which are essential to
facilitating economic growth. In 2005, emerging economies grew by $1.6 trillion,
more than the industrialized countries, and most of the increment linked to cities
with well-prepared CDS reports.
11
PLANNING THE FUTURE OF THE
FCC FROM
STRATEGIC
ECONOMIC GROWTH
Background and Basis for the informal sector of Abuja
Comprehensive statistics on the actual size and composition of the informal sector
of the FCC is lacking. Various projections however suggest the informal sector to
be responsible for more than 85% of the production base of the city. Like other
major cities, the sector consists of various enterprises but especially of artisans,
construction workers, domestic servants and hawkers. Most of the informal sector
activities occur around the vicinity of the capital but also at strategic locations close
to activity centres with the objective of reaching the maximum number of
customers. The largest concentration of informal activities is in the satellite town
and the Municipal Council areas. This is also where the largest concentration of
informal housing exists. As expected, informal housing in these allocations are
temporary and poorly built. Nearly 75% of informal workers live in these shanties
from where they commute daily to the FCC.
12
13
As found elsewhere, the inability of the formal sector to generate jobs in the
required quantities has been the primary reason for the growth of the informal
sector. But in Abuja, this also particularly has link to marginal industrial activity
and the original conception of the status of the city as the administrative Capital of
the Nigeria. Other factors that help account for the size, physical and locational
characterization of the informal sector include inadequate housing, large
infrastructural deficits and difficulties in accessing land. Inappropriate resettlement
policies add up to the constraints just as the unrealistic policies and proposals of the
FCC master plan, most of which have become not only expensive to implement but
generally also socially and economically unrealistic. The very high standard of
infrastructure envisaged by the plan and the high quality of construction demanded
by the building code have increased both land and property development cost. The
disciplined implementation of the plan itself has been compromised both by
corruption and political high handedness of the FCT leaderships.
The Choices available to the FCC for Inclusive Development
1. Need for Economic development strategy.
New thinking regarding the economic value of cities requires that much deeper
consideration be given to policies for enhancing productivity of the FCC. This will
require transcending the preparation of Physical Master Plans as standalone tools
to complementing the process with the formulation of a City Development Strategy
(CDS). The focus of the strategy would be to agree to a broader vision of economic
development for the City to deliver continuous growth, prosperity and inclusion.
This implies putting the regional economy of the Federal Capital City on a
trajectory of growth based on the productivity of firms and workers, and one that
raises the standards of living for all. That is, suggesting growth that is robust,
shared and enduring. This will extend to emphasis on building strong business
ecosystems for industries, improving the productivity of firms and people and
facilitating external trade which together constitute the market foundations from
which the required growth, prosperity and inclusion can emerge.
14
Further to this, growth of the economy would need to be stimulated from internal
competencies which will come from creating the necessary incentives to attract
firms and industries based on the existing quality of infrastructure in the city, and
to invest in the ecosystem of innovation, trade, talent, further infrastructure and
governance to support globally competitive firms and enable small businesses to
grow in the market. Deriving from this, export growth and trade with major local
international markets would develop to further deepen local industrial
specializations and bring in further new income and investment. Growing the
economy of the FCC would not only create formal jobs but rather also eliminate
the incentives for growth of the informal sector.
2. Need for Effective Urban Governance
Stronger legal and administrative frameworks are required that allow for the
seamless and effective governance of the FCC. The progress recorded between
2003 -2007 with the creation of the Abuja Municipal Management Agency, has
been gradually eroded, but requires restoration and legal backing to become
effective. In almost the whole country, responsibility for managing cities has
belonged to nobody. Urban governance therefore consisted of fragmented authority
located in multiple of agencies often with primary focus on land use and
development control. An effective governance framework will also imply creation
of new working frameworks with the municipal councils and the private sector for
efficient services delivery. In particular, the private sector culture of organization
can be embedded for quality delivery, prompt access, accountability, and
transparency. Other related governance issues would include building capacity for
civil servants and strengthening tax collection. The functions envisaged for the re structured Municipal Management agency should be purely that of monitoring and
coordination of various aspects of service delivery by the development and service
agencies of the FCC.
15
3. Provide Support for the Informal Sector.
The literature has generally underscored the variety of constraints (technology,
credit, capital, and education and training) that the informal sector face that are also
applicable to the FCC situation. As acknowledged globally therefore, the challenge
is how to design polices to systematically and consistently address these issues.
The few interventions that exist have been disappointing because they did not
prioritize on the critical needs of the informal sector which include problems of
access to credits and the lack of flexible rules and guidelines for the sector.
Uncoordinated policies across agencies like for instance the AEPB, the URP
Department and the Development Control Department have undermined
effectiveness of strategies, suggesting a need for a coordinated and multi-sectoral
approach to policy and management. That is, suggesting that individual policy
“silos” be replaced in the design and implementation of policies and programs. Of
fundamental importance is the need to re – consider the incentive of formulization
by government away from the tax arguments, to programs of facilitation and
concessions. To make people want to become legal, it will be necessary to discuss
advantages of formalization and to eliminate cost of being becoming ‘legal’. As
De’Soto observes, the root cause of poverty is the legal system which limits ability
of the poor to own titles and rights. That is, the ease by which the formalization
process occurs will determine how the poor are able to access credit to increase the
value of the assets.
4. Need for comprehensive urban development policy
A comprehensive urban development policy is required for the FCC to define the
context within which the FCT will develop. This should particularly address
existing challenges including the creation of economic prosperity and employment;
protection and improvement of the urban environment; promoting good urban
governance; and facilitation of Integrated urban &regional development. As argued
previously, urban issues are increasingly a prominent feature of the national agenda
of cities globally and this should be the case for the FCC. An urban development
policy for the FCT should not only facilitate coordinated development of the
16
settlement system but also lead to the emergence of a competitive and dynamic
regional system to achieve economic, social and environmental objectives.
5. Care and Due-Diligence in the forthcoming Review of the FCC Master Plan
Previous attempts to review the FCC Master Plan have not been successful even
when the need for doing so had long been established. As the intention for the
review is now becoming a reality, it would be important that the errors of the
existing master plan be kept in view in ensuring that such are not carried over or
are allowed to re – occur. Several studies have referred the shortcomings to the
inadequacies of proposals on housing, transportation, services, land use and the
economy. Master plans are more than physical artifacts, and are therefore required
to be responsive to both socio economic and political exigencies within the short
and long term horizon.
CONCLUSION: Getting Inspiration from from Dubai
Dubai is a classical example of what vision, planning, leadership and discipline can
do for a city, that the Federal Capital City, Abuja can learn from. Dubai started as
a local township with very humble credentials. It had a modest economy and
population but a determined mindset, and a clear vision to achieve international
excellence and a global city standing. Most literature refer to Dubai as epitome of
entrepreneurial spirit, good planning and determination for success. Through an
ambitious plan, Dubai has successfully positioned itself as a central hub providing
various services for transportation, logistics, tourism, media, education and
financial services to more than 2 billion people. The city has recently developed a
comprehensive long term and detailed socio – government agenda called ‘the Dubai
strategic plan’ focusing on challenges related to the economy, infrastructure, human
development, environment and society. Dubai’s Gross Domestic Product as at
2008 was $ 82.11 billion. Although its economy was initially built from revenue
from the oil industry, revenue from oil and gas now accounts for less than 20% of
its Gross Domestic Product. Dubai’s economy is supported by manufacturing,
banking and financial services. It also serves as a major trade hub and a tourism
destination. In the recent times Dubai has been classified as the top business
17
gateway for the Middle East and Africa. The story of Dubai is a testimony to the
fact that the ‘future is open to suggestions’, one that should inspire and define the
future possibilities for growth and development of Abuja.
REFERENCES
Ades Come, A.E, and E. Glaeser (1995), ‘Trade and Circuses: Explaining Urban
Giants’, Quarterly China common Journal of Economics, 110, 195-227.
Ahmed, A (2009). “Contribution of Planned Urban Growth to the Attainment of
the Millennium Development Goals (MDG’s)”, Paper presented at the
Conference on Challenges of Unplanned Urban Expansion in Peri-Urban
Areas of North-west Zone of Nigeria, organized by the Nigeria Institute
of Town planners, Katsina state chapter at Katsina, September 29th – 30th,
2009.
Ahmed, A (2009). “Physical planning Tools and Strategies as Catalysts for
Economic Growth”, Paper presented at the Annual conference of Town
Planners, FCT, organised by the Nigeria Institute of Town Planners, FCT
chapter at Abuja 6th August, 2009.
Ahmed, A and Bello, A (2009). The Spatiality in Development: Debating The Need
for Spatial inputs in Development Planning”. In ATBUJET Journal of the
School of Environmental Technology, published by the
AbubakarTafawaBalewa University, Bauchi, Vol. 3, No. 2 June, 2009, Pp
34-40
Alonzo O.R (1991), “the informal sector in the Philippines” in A . L Chikering et
al, (eds). The silent Revolution: The informal sector in five Asian and
Near Eastern Countries, San Francisco, Calif:ICS Press.
Black, D. and J.V. Henderson (1999), ‘A Theory of Urban Growth, ‘Journal of
Political Economy, 107, 252-84.
18
Bromley, R. (1978), “Introduction – The Urban Informal Sector: Why is it worth
discussing?”, World Development, v6, n9/10, pp. 1033-1039.
Carr, Marilyn and Martha A. Chen. 2001. “Globalization and the Informal
Economy: How Global Trade and Investment Impact on the Working
Poor”. Background paper commissioned by the ILO Task Force on the
Informal Economy. Geneva, Switzerland: International Labour Office.
Chan, K.W. (2003), ‘Urbanization in China in the 1990s’, The China Review, 3,
37-59.
Chan, K.W., J.V. Henderson, and K.Y. Tsui (2008), ‘Spatial Dimensions of
Chinese Economic Development’, in L. Brandt and T. Rawski (eds.),
China’s Great Economic Transformation, Cambridge University Press.
Charmes, J (1990), “ A critical Review of concepts, Definitions and studies in the
informal sector”, in : D. Turnham et al (eds), The Informal Sector Revised.
Paris: OECD.
Davis, J. and J.V. Henderson (2003) “Evidence on the Political Economy of the
Urbanization Process”, Journal of Urban Economics, 53, 98-125.
Davis, Mike (2006). Planet of Slums. London: Verso. pp. 79–82.
Dean Calbreath. "Hidden economy a hidden danger". U-T San Diego. Retrieved 4
March 2015.
Duraton, G., and D. Puga (2002). “Diversity and Specialization in Cities: Why
Where and When Does it Matter”, in P.McCann (ed.) Industrial Location
Economics, ed. P.McCann. Cheltenham, U.K: Edward Elgar.
Edgar L. Feige (1989). Edgar L.Feige, ed. The Underground Economies:Tax
Evasion and Information Distortion. Cambridge University Press.
Faruqui, Z. D. (1990), “Case Study on Intervention and Supportive Measures for
Urban Informal Sector in Karachi”, in: Q. Aziz and Z. Zar (eds.) Urban
Informal Sector: Role of Small-scale
Hart, K. (1971), “Informal Income Opportunities and Urban Employment in
Ghana”, in: R.Jolly et al. (eds.): Third World Employment: Problems and
Strategy, Harmondsworth: Penguin.
19
Henderson J.V (2005a), “Urbanization and growth” in P. Aghion and S. Durlauf
(eds.), Handbook of Economic Growth, Elsevier
Hernando de Soto (1989). The Other Path: The Economic Answer to Terrorism.
Harper Collins. ISBN 0-06-016020-9.
Hugon, P. (1990). “The Informal Sector Revisited (in Africa)”, in: D. Turnham, B.
Salomé, and A. Schwarz (eds.), The Informal Sector Revisited, Paris:
OECD.
International Labour Organization (ILO)(2009). ‘Decent work and the Informal
economy” ILO.org.Revised 2017
John C. Cross (January 1995). "Formalizing the informal economy: The Case of
Street Vendors in Mexico City". Archived from the original on 2006-1213. Retrieved 2006-12-18. A working paper describing attempts to
formalize street vending in Mexico.
Lewis, William (1955). The Theory of Economic Growth. London: Allen and
Unwin.
Mabogunje, A.L (1980): The development process, A Spatial Perspective,
Hutchinson and Co. Publishers, U.K
Meier, Gerald M.; Rauch, James E. (2005). Leading Issues in Economic
Development (8 ed.). New York: Oxford University Press. p. 373.
Nakamura, R., (1985), ‘Agglomeration Economies in Urban Manufacturing
Industries: the Case Of Japan’, Journal of Urban Economics, 17, 108-124
Rosenthal, S. and W. Strange (2004), ‘Evidence on the Nature and Sources of
Agglomeration economies’, Handbook of Urban and Regional
Economics, Vol. 4, J.V. Henderson and -F Thisse (eds.), North Holland.
Sachs, J.J; McArthur, G; Schmidt-Traub, M. Kruk, C, B; Michael F, and McCord
G. (2004), Ending Africa’s Poverty Trap. Paper prepared for the
Millennium Project, Draft. Report New York: Columbia University.
Stopler, W.F (1966), Planning without Facts: Lessons in Resource Allocation from
Nigeria’s Development. Harvard University Press Cambridge,
Massachusetts.
20
Sethuraman, S.V (1976), “ Urban poverty and the informal sector: A Critical
Assessment
of
current
strategies”,
available
http://www.ilo.org/public/urbpover.htm
Temkin, Benjamin (2009). "Informal Self-Employment in Developing Countries:
Entrepreneurship or Survivalist Strategy? Some Implications for Public
Policy". Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy. 9 (1).
Todaro, M. P. (1987), Economic Development in the Third World: An Introduction
to Problems and Policies in a Global Perspective, London: Longman.
Tokman, V.E (1990), “ The informal sector in Latin America: fifteen year later” in
D. Duruham et al (eds). The informal sector revisited, Paris: OECD.
World Bank (2005): “Africa’s Growth Tragedy: An Institutional Perspective”.
Country Note G in Economic Growth in the 1990’s: Learning from a
decade of reform. Washington, D.C.
World Bank (2009), World Development Report 2009: Reshaping Economic
Geography, World Bank
World Bank (2016) from oil to Cities: Nigeria’s next Transformation. The World
Bank, Washington DC.
21