Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Running head: NEUROPLASTICITY AND RESILIENCE Neuroplasticity and Resilience: Development Over the Lifespan Abbie E. Siex Salt Lake Community College 1 NEUROPLASTICITY AND RESILIENCE 2 The process of adapting well in the face of adversity, trauma, tragedy, threats or significant sources of stress — such as family and relationship problems, serious health problems or workplace and financial stressors is resiliency. Resilience is not innate; it is an acquired trait that is developed through certain thoughts and behaviors. Therefore, anyone has the ability to become resilient. There are many ways for one who has faced adversity to build resiliency. Research on resilience has shown that when one builds good relationships, sets realistic goals and strives to achieve them, and takes care of one’s self, resiliency is strengthened (Comas-Diaz, et al., n.d.). Both resiliency and neuroplasticity are developed throughout the lifespan and affect all individuals differently. Neuroplasticity is defined as the brain's ability to change and adapt as a result of experience. Neuroplasticity is a result of two phenomena, either a result of learning with new memories and experiences, or as a result of the brain’s ability to adapt after damage has been sustained. Until recently neuroplasticity was thought to only be involved in infancy and early childhood and by early adulthood, the brain was essentially permanent in physical structure. More recently, it has been discovered that neuroplasticity is a lifelong process involving glial cells, neurons, and vascular cells. These cells work together and strengthen some connections, while getting rid of others. This is called synaptic pruning, which allows the brain to tailor to one’s ever changing surroundings (Cherry, n.d.). As previously mentioned, neuroplasticity occurs over the lifespan. In “A Learning Machine: Plasticity and Change Throughout the Life,” by Leah Nelson, it is stated, “The brain is almost infinitely adaptable from earliest infancy through latest adulthood in capacity to bend, stretch, expand, and specialize itself in response to challenges.” This means that through need and/or desire to learn, the brain can shape itself to the individual and their circumstances. This is shown several times throughout Nelson’s article. It is first shown by Gregg Recanzone’s NEUROPLASTICITY AND RESILIENCE 3 experiment with owl monkeys. Recanzone gave the monkeys two tones and decreased the tone difference over time. By the end of his experiment, he found that the monkeys could discriminate between two tones that initially were indistinguishable. This result corresponded with the finding of functional reorganization of the cerebral cortex. The neurons in the monkeys’ brains had adapted. Michael Merzenich did something similar to humans. He initiated auditory training in individuals from the ages 70-95. His subjects were able to recover cerebral cortex plasticity, which compared to individuals 10 to 15 years younger than them. Merzenich also did a visual training with even a higher plasticity recovery. Lifespan plasticity was also a finding of the final presenter, Sir Michael Rutter. His experiment examined the long term effects on children in Romanian orphanages, who were adopted by UK families. He found, through cognitive and psychological tests, that most of the children initially tested as mentally retarded, but by age 11 they tested nearly normal. Of course the time that the child lived in the orphanage played a part in their overall recovery, with those who had spent six months or less recovering almost completely. Unfortunately, those who endured longer at an orphanage were not as lucky and displayed more severe or long lasting effects (Nelson, 2006). All of these experiments demonstrate the brain’s ability for neuroplasticity over the lifespan. La Tanya and Tichelle showed great resiliency after suffering several years of sexual abuse from their mother’s boyfriend, Earl Osborn. In Emily Bazelon’s article, “A Question of Resilience,” it discusses the ways in which resiliency is an adaptive characteristic and how a certain gene plays apart in resilience. By statistical standards, La Tanya and Tichelle should have been unemployed, homeless, addicted to drugs/alcohol, and /or alone; this was not the case for these two. They both exceeded expectations by graduating high school, having their own cars, maintaining successful jobs, and living in their own apartments. This circumstance and others NEUROPLASTICITY AND RESILIENCE 4 lead scientists to research the question, “How is it that some children show a certain resilience after experiencing a trauma, and others do not?” An experiment, by Norman Garmezy and Ann Masten, showed that children with good relationships with adults had a tremendous effect on lessening the effects of adversity. To no surprise, La Tanya and Tichelle had a great support system. Their grandma and a half-sister took them in and nurtured them. Resiliency has also been evident when there are adults children can trust, and reinforcements that make the children believe in themselves (Bazelon, 2006). The study of resilience is nearly 50 years old. However recently, researchers have discovered a certain gene that can help promote resilience. All individuals have the 5-HTT gene, but when adversity isn’t present, the gene does not express itself. The scientific finding on the genetic basis for resiliency materialized in 2003, in a study by Caspi and Moffitt. This study looked at 847 adults who had been mistreated as children or who had experienced other life adversity. Subjects having two short alleles of the 5-HTT gene were found incredibly likely to suffer depression. Those with one short allele were found to have an intermediate risk in suffering from depression. Those with two long alleles faired the best, since they had a high chance of recovering from these negative circumstances. Those with two long alleles were individuals wearing armor, when facing adversity. Another study was done by Stephen Suomi, who studies rhesus monkeys. Suomi took 500 rhesus monkeys, who share 96 percent of their genes with humans, including 5-HTT. He divided them into several groups. Some lived with their mothers, while others were put through an experience similar to that of an abused or neglected child. Suomi discovered that the motherless monkeys, who had a copy of the short 5-HTT allele, were more likely to show fear, panic, and aggression, when placed next to a strange monkey in another cage. Suomi’s idea was once again reinforced, when he and Bazelon stepped inside a cage full of mothered and motherless monkeys. The motherless monkeys would NEUROPLASTICITY AND RESILIENCE 5 quickly run and huddle together in the back of the cage, while the mothered monkeys stayed in the middle, looking at the newcomers. Eventually, some monkeys from the huddled group would show resilience and go towards the middle group. The monkeys that showed resilience most often had the two long 5-HTT alleles. Both previous experiments were of great importance in showing the connection between genes and an abusive surrounding. However, Joan Kaufman wanted to extend on their research and include the effect of less important factors in abused children’s lives. She studied 196 children between the ages of 5 and 15. Of the 196 children, 109 of them had been removed from their homes because of abuse or neglect. Joan took children of different ethnicities and same social economic status and compared them to a second, nonabused group of same racial diversity and economic status. Joan then surveyed all 196 children about their moods in relation to mental health. Later, she used DNA testing to check the children’s 5HTT alleles. She found that abused children, with two short 5-HTT alleles, had a higher score for depression than both the abused children, with two long alleles, and the nonabused children, regardless of their alleles (Bazelon, 2006). The signature assignment for Human Growth and Development vastly expanded my knowledge of resiliency and neuroplasticity. Through my research, I discovered many valuable tools to use when faced with adversity and how to become more resilient in the things that I find difficult in life. With development being a lifelong journey, I want to understand the reasons and norms of what I am going through. Resiliency plays a part in my development because it can explain some of the reasons that I might have a harder or easier time than others, when going through a death or family struggle. The factor of the resiliency gene allows me to understand my responses to struggles, even though I have not been tested. Knowing that some individuals are more resilient than others helps me to be more understanding, when dealing with other people. NEUROPLASTICITY AND RESILIENCE 6 The research that has been done and is continuing in neuroplasticity brings me optimism for my continuing development. As I develop, I can continue to expand and specialize my brain in the areas that I find most important. I can also mold my brain to learn to overcome my OCD issues, since neuroplasticity involves learning, experiencing, and memory formation (Cherry, n.d.). The information that I have gained is important for others to know to help them to continue their growth and development. With other individuals knowing the findings in resiliency studies, the possibilities of helping those who have faced adversity are endless. This information could help those who have suffered child abuse, those with PTSD, and others, who are going through stressful times. Being aware of the resiliency gene allele can help people, like La Tanya, “Feel better knowing there is a reason for life being hard” (Bazelon, 2006). There are many possibilities to be gained from the knowledge from the neuroplasticity studies. Those suffering from hearing and vision loss can reverse the effects, expanding on their development. Individuals can strengthen neural connections that they have and build new ones with continued experience. Our learning and development objectives are finally within our grasp. NEUROPLASTICITY AND RESILIENCE 7 References Bazelon, E. (2006, April 30). A question of resilience. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/30/magazine/30abuse.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0 Cherry, K. (n.d.). What is brain plasticity? Retrieved from http://psychology.about.com/od/biopsychology/f/brain-plasticity.htm Comas-Diaz, L., Luthar, S. S., Maddi, S. R., Oneill, K. H., Saakvitne, K. W., & Tedeschi, R. G. (n.d.). The road to resilience. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/helpcenter/roadresilience.aspx Nelson, L. (2006, August). A learning machine: Plasticity and change throughout life. APS Observer, 19 (8), 27-28. Retrieved from http://www.psychologicalscience.org/index.php/publications/observer/2006/august-06/alearning-machine-plasticity-and-change-throughout-life.html . NEUROPLASTICITY AND RESILIENCE 8