Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
in Breast Cancer The following summarises the key data supporting the use of SIR-Spheres Y-90 resin microspheres in the treatment of liver metastases from breast cancer: Lead Author n Treatment ORR SD Median TTP Median Survival SIR-Spheres† 47% 47% nr 86% alive at 14 months 58 SIR-Spheres† 26%§ 63%§ nr 10.8 months 40 † SIR-Spheres 31% 39% 6.8 13.6 months 71 SIR-Spheres† 62% 27% nr 13.6 months Treatment Hiatus or Chemorefractory Disease Coldwell1 44 Chemorefractory Disease Haug2 Saxena Cianni4 3 Key: ORR: objective response rate (complete response + partial response) by RECIST; SD: stable disease; TTP: time to progression; †: SIR-Spheres Y-90 resin microspheres; nr: not reported; §: CT/MRI data only available for 43 patients. Retrospective study of patients with breast cancer liver metastases treated with SIR-Spheres Y-90 resin microspheres A retrospective study of 44 patients with unresectable liver metastases from breast cancer who were chemotherapy refractory and subsequently treated with SIR-Spheres Y-90 resin microspheres revealed: • patients (mean age 58 years; range 42–71) all had bilateral lesions and liver-related symptoms prior to SIRT and 66% had bone or nodal metastases. All had received doxorubicin and docetaxel; 31 (70%) were ER-positive and had received endocrine therapy, whilst 12 (27%) were HER2 receptor positive and 10 had received trastuzumab;1 • 73% of the patients were considered chemotherapy refractory, having failed three or more regimens, with the remainder (27%) treated for liver progression during a treatment hiatus after first- or second-line chemotherapy;1 • all patients reported mild-to-moderate post-embolisation syndrome, but only 8 (18%) needed hospitalisation for one night for pain control (3) or dehydration (5), with the remainder treated as out-patients. Grade 3 toxicities of nausea, vomiting and pain were present in 16% of patients. No patients required surgery;1 • there was a complete response in 17% of evaluable patients by PET imaging at 12 weeks, a partial response in 58%, stable disease in 20%, and disease progression in 5%;1 • by CT using RECIST criteria, there were partial responses in 47% of evaluable patients, with stable disease or minor response in 47%, and disease progression in 6%;1 • 38 of 44 patients were still alive (86%) at a median follow-up of 14 months – 92% surviving in the treatment-hiatus cohort and 84% in the chemotherapy refractory group. The deaths were due to brain metastases (3 patients), recurrent hepatic disease (1 patient) or both (2 patients). Survival was short (median 3.6 months) if patients did not experience a response by PET or CT. No deaths were attributable to the procedure;1 • the authors concluded that SIR-Spheres Y-90 resin microspheres demonstrated efficacy in treating hepatic metastases from breast cancer, both in chemotherapy refractory disease and during a treatment hiatus. They also noted that they expected these patients to show an increase in their overall survival since they had not reached their median survival even at 14 months post-SIRT;1 • in comparison, two large cohorts of 350 and 500 breast cancer patients with liver metastases reported a median survival following diagnosis of 14–16.3 months respectively, which included the time spent on standard of care chemotherapy.5, 6 Retrospective study of SIR-Spheres Y-90 resin microspheres in patients with treatment-refractory breast cancer liver metastases The results of a retrospective study of 58 patients with breast cancer liver tumours who had failed prior chemotherapy and were treated using SIR-Spheres Y-90 resin microspheres, and which expanded upon earlier work from the same centre, showed:2, 7–10 • patients (mean age 58 ± 10.9 years) had a mean of 3.1 ±1.8 prior chemotherapies; 85% underwent prior anti-hormonal therapies and 17% received prior local hepatic therapies;2 • mean hepatic tumour burden was 17.5%, and 20 patients presented with a hepatic tumour burden of more than 25%. Thirty-eight patients (66%) exhibited extrahepatic metastases;2 • grade 4 toxicities appeared in two patients and two deaths were observed within three months after the procedure. The authors stated that death was most probably attributed to treatment-related hepatic toxicity. The first patient had been treated with 2 different chemotherapies (including taxanes and anthracyclines), anti-hormonal therapy, and radiofrequency ablation of hepatic metastases. The second patient had undergone four different chemotherapies (including taxanes, anthracyclines, capecitabine, vinorelbine), bevacizumab, and trastuzumab;2 • six patients experienced SIRT-induced gastric or duodenal ulcerations; five of these patients were treated before the study site started to do frequent monitoring of hepatic arterial flow during the procedure;2 • CT/MRI findings were available for 43 patients, of which 11 (25.6%) showed a partial response, 27 (62.8%) showed stable disease, and five (11.6%) showed progressive disease;2 • median overall survival was 47 weeks (10.8 months), with a significant correlation to SUVmax assessed by 18F-FDG PET/CT, with responders having significantly longer survival (65 weeks) than non-responders (43 weeks; P < 0.05).2 A pre-therapeutic SUVmax > 20 for the most intense hepatic metastasis per patient was associated with significantly shorter survival than was an SUVmax of 20 or less (median survival: 52 weeks vs. 21 weeks; P < 0.005). The presence of extrahepatic metastases was not associated with a shorter survival (median survival in both groups was 47 weeks; P = 0.92);2 SIR-Spheres® is a registered trademark of Sirtex SIR-Spheres Pty Ltd • the authors conclude that 18F-FDG PET using SUVmax is able to predict survival of breast cancer patients with hepatic metastases independently of their hormone or Her2/neu receptor status, hepatic tumour burden, response as assessed with CT or MRI, and the presence of extrahepatic disease;2 • three of the first 16 patients treated by the authors were sufficiently downsized for potentially curative radiofrequency ablation (RFA) to be performed successfully. The authors concluded that SIR-Spheres Y-90 resin microspheres are able to downsize liver metastases making RFA suitable and the combination of SIRT + RFA could extend the number of patients with a complete response after minimally invasive therapy and should be taken into account for the best tailored approach;8 • in a retrospective analysis of baseline biomarkers prior to SIRT, bivariate Cox regression models (using the Wald test) revealed a significant correlation of CEA (P = 0.022), CA 15-3 (P = 0.006) and LDH (P = 0.012) with overall survival;9 • in a separate analysis, the investigators noted that treatment was associated with a significant mean decrease in the whole liver volume of 10.2% (median 16.7%; P = 0.0024), mainly caused by a reduction in the right lobe volume (mean 16.0%; P = 0.0001). These changes were accompanied by a significant increase in the diameter of the main portal vein (mean 6.8%; P < 0.0001) as well as splenic volume (mean 50.4%; P < 0.0001). Liver-tumour volume and diameter decreased by a median of 24% and 39.7%, respectively. The authors concluded that radioembolisation is associated with changes of hepatic parenchymal volume, splenic volume and portal vein size that appear not to represent clinically important sequelae in this patient cohort.10 Retrospective study of SIR-Spheres Y-90 resin microspheres in patients with chemoresistant breast cancer liver metastases A single-centre study of 40 patients with unresectable, chemoresistant breast cancer liver metastases treated using SIR-Spheres Y-90 resin microspheres showed: • the mean age of patients was 54.4 years (range 28–77);3 • 17 patients (43%) had ≥ 26% replacement of the liver by tumour. 24 patients (60%) had evidence of limited extrahepatic disease. All patients (100%) had been previously treated with at least one line of systemic chemotherapy. One patient (3%) underwent concomitant treatment with systemic chemotherapy and 15 patients (38%) were treated with systemic chemotherapy post SIRT;3 • a complete response was observed in two of 38 patients (5%), a partial response was observed in 10 patients (26%), stable disease in 15 patients (39%), and progressive disease in 11 patients (29%). One patient (3%) who had a partial response to treatment was downsized to resection after treatment;3 • the median survival after SIR-Spheres Y-90 resin microspheres was 13.6 months. The median time to progression was 6.8 months;3 • two factors were associated with an improved survival on multivariate analysis: CR/PR to treatment (vs. SD vs. PD; P < 0.001) and chemotherapy after radioembolisation (vs. no chemotherapy; P = 0.004);3 • 16 patients (40%) developed clinical toxicity after treatment; all complications were minor grade I/II and resolved without active intervention;3 • the authors concluded that treatment with SIR-Spheres Y-90 resin microspheres is a safe and effective treatment for patients with liver-dominant, chemoresistant breast cancer liver metastases and that the survival outcomes in this study are significantly superior to historical controls.3 Retrospective study of SIR-Spheres Y-90 resin microspheres in patients with chemotherapy-refractory breast cancer liver metastases References 1. Coldwell D, Kennedy A, Nutting C. The use of yttrium-90 microspheres in the treatment of unresectable hepatic metastases from breast cancer. Int J Radiation Oncol Biol Phys 2007; 69: 800–804. 2. Haug AR, Tiega Donfack BP, Trumm C et al. 18F-FDG PET/CT predicts survival after radioembolization of hepatic metastases from breast cancer. J Nucl Med 2012; 53: 371–377. 3. Saxena A, Kapoor J, Meteling B et al. Yttrium-90 radioembolization for unresectable, chemoresistant breast cancer liver metastases: A large single-center experience of 40 patients. Ann Surg Oncol 2014; 21: 1296–1303. 4. Cianni R, Pelle G, Urigo C et al. Radioembolization with Yttrium-90 (90Y) resin microspheres in the treatment of liver metastases from breast cancer. GEST meeting abstracts, J Vasc Interv Radiol 2014; 25: 811.e9 Abs. 5. Eichbaum MH, Kaltwasser M, Bruckner T et al. Prognostic factors for patients with liver metastases from breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2006; 96: 53–62. 6. Pentheroudakis G, Fountzilas G, Bafaloukos D et al. Metastatic breast cancer with liver metastases: a registry analysis of clinicopathologic, management and outcome characteristics of 500 women. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2005; 97: 237–244. 7. Jakobs TF, Hoffmann RT, Fischer T et al. Radioembolization in patients with hepatic metastases from breast cancer. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2008; 19: 683–690. 8. Hoffmann RT, Jakobs TF, Kubisch C et al. Radiofrequency ablation after selective internal radiation therapy with yttrium90 microspheres in metastatic liver disease – is it feasible? Eur J Radiol 2010; 74: 199–205. 9. Michl M, Hoffmann RT, Laubender R et al. Selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) for treatment of patients with breast cancer with metastatic liver disease. ASCO Annual Meeting, J Clin Oncol 2010; 28 (Suppl 7s): Abs. 1135. 10.Paprottka PM, Schmidt GP, Trumm CG et al. Changes in normal liver and spleen volume after radioembolization with 90Y-resin microspheres in metastatic breast cancer patients: Findings and clinical significance. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2011; 34: 964–972. Sirtex Medical Limited Level 33, 101 Miller Street, North Sydney, NSW 2060, Australia Tel: +61 2 9964 8400 Fax: +61 2 9964 8410 Email: [email protected] Sirtex Medical Singapore Pte Ltd 50 Science Park Road, #01-01 Science Park II, Singapore 117406 Tel: +65 6308 8370 Fax: +65 6778 9424 Email: [email protected] Sirtex Medical Europe GmbH Joseph-Schumpeter-Allee 33, 53227, Bonn, Germany Tel: +49 228 18 407 30 Fax: +49 228 18 407 35 Email: [email protected] 977-EA-0115 The results of a retrospective analysis of 71 patients with breast cancer liver metastases who had failed prior chemotherapy and were treated using SIR-Spheres Y-90 resin microspheres demonstrated: • the mean age of patients was 57.5 years. Patients were divided in 2 groups: group 1 (42 patients) included those with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score of 0, liver involvement of 0%–25%, and no extrahepatic disease (EHD); group 2 (29 patients) included patients with an ECOG score of 1–2, liver involvement of 26%–50%, and evidence of EHD;4 • there was a partial response in 44 patients (62% of eligible patients), stable disease in 19 patients (27%) and disease progression in eight patients (11%);4 • the median overall survival was 13.6 months. For the group 1 cohort, the median survival was 16.7 months, compared with 9.2 months for group 2;4 • the authors concluded that treatment with SIR-Spheres Y-90 resin microspheres was effective in patients with breast cancer liver metastases. A relevant survival rate and encouragingly high response rate in patients with treatment-refractory disease was demonstrated.4