Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Spherical Earth wikipedia , lookup
Biogeography wikipedia , lookup
Schiehallion experiment wikipedia , lookup
Age of the Earth wikipedia , lookup
History of Earth wikipedia , lookup
History of geomagnetism wikipedia , lookup
Supercontinent wikipedia , lookup
Plate tectonics wikipedia , lookup
History of geology wikipedia , lookup
Editorial – Alfred Wegener’s Theory By: Kelrin Li Some people may believe that Alfred Wegener’s theory of how all of earth’s land masses were joined at one point in time and were called the supercontinent “Pangaea” is true and some may believe otherwise. But with all the facts that support Wegener’s theory, versus the facts that are against it, I believe that his theory could be true. For the first point, if I were to try to fit the continents together and see if they could have fit together at one point, I may have also made the statement of the jigsaw fit between South America and Africa. But how could it have gone from one large land mass to seven different continents? What could’ve had such a tremendous force that it could split Earth’s large land mass? Well, Wegener’s theory of the “continental drift” and how he said that all of earth’s land masses were in constant motion does seem logical. It would also explain how mountains were formed as well if in fact his theory of Pangaea and the earth splitting apart 200 million years ago is correct in addition. This being because if Pangaea started to break apart in that time period and the pieces started to “drift” and move apart because Earth’s land masses were in constant motion, then we can see how mountains were formed; if the plates were in constant motion and collided with one another, Wegener said that the heavier would get forced underneath by the lighter one; this would make sense. Wegener has also made the observation of how some plants and animals found in the jigsaw-fitting match of South America and Africa are the same. I feel this is very important evidence to support his theory because if these fossils were in the same two continents that seem to fit together, the only logical explanation, that follows his continental drift theory as well, would be that they were once joined together. In the 1960’s, a Canadian, J. Tuzo Wilson further developed the theory of the continental drift. In 1968, he developed a new theory called “plate tectonics” that helps explain most geologic processes. This theory states that Earth’s outer shell is made of 20 plates; most being plates being made of a continent and an ocean. And that due to unequal distribution of heat within the Earth, it would cause “convection currents” to move plates; this would partly explain how the earth’s land mass was split apart and how mountains were formed. Evidence of some similar mountains ranges on our world map today is the Appalachians in eastern United States and Canada and similar ones in the Northern British Isles and Europe. These mountains could have been formed 300 million years ago when North America collided with Europe and Northern Africa seeing as these mountains are similar in age and structure but they are on opposite sides of, the present day, large Atlantic Ocean. But how exactly and why do plates move? In 1948, a scientist named Ewing discovered a large group of islands in the Atlantic Ocean that were the highest points along a mountain range hidden below sea level; he named this the Mid Atlantic Ridge. He discovered that there were similar rocks on either side of this large mountain range showing that there was a constant movement of rocks on either side of the mountains because it was already known that Earth reverses its magnetic field every now and then. In 1962, another scientist named Hess discovered that these new rocks under the Atlantic were next to the Mid Atlantic Ridge and from that he could conclude that the sea floor was slowly moving from the Mid Atlantic Ridge to the USA coast; moving by up to 5 cm a year. But as the sea floor was getting wider, wouldn’t it seem that the Earth was enlarging in size as well? But scientists knew that that was not the case and in finding deep trenches along the pacific coast, it seems that the Earth’s surface was slowly moving into these trenches and vanishing the same time as new surface was being created. These new discoveries would provide Alfred Wegener with the information that he had not been able to find himself; an explanation as to why and how the continents moved. From all these discoveries and new evidence, I believe that it makes Alfred Wegener’s theory even truer now than it was before because scientists have found information that Wegener was not able to discover. Aside from the many findings that Wegener revealed, the new evidence does support his theory of Pangaea and the continental drift; Ewing and Hess’ discoveries explains even more how the continents moved. If scientists today further investigated this theory, I feel that it could become even more believable to many more individuals and possibly completely true.