Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Compact Muon Solenoid wikipedia , lookup
Spin (physics) wikipedia , lookup
Eigenstate thermalization hypothesis wikipedia , lookup
Relativistic quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Electron scattering wikipedia , lookup
Theoretical and experimental justification for the Schrödinger equation wikipedia , lookup
Particle accelerator wikipedia , lookup
Polarization of CEPC M. Bai Collider Accelerator Department Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973 Dec. 16-17, 2013 International workshop on Future High Energy Circular Colliders, IHEP, Beijing Outline • Challenges of high energy polarized electrons – Depolarizing mechanism – Achieved polarization in circular accelerators • VEPP, ELSA, LEP and HERA • A preliminary look at CEPC polarization • What can be done to reach high energy polarized electrons? – Think out of the box Dec. 16-17, 2013 International workshop on Future High Energy Circular Colliders, IHEP, Beijing Spin motion in a circular accelerator Thomas BMT Equation: (1927, 1959) Spin vector in particle’s rest frame L. H. Thomas, Phil. Mag. 3, 1 (1927); V. Bargmann, L. Michel, V. L. Telegdi, Phys, Rev. Lett. 2, 435 (1959) G Magnetic field along the direction of the particle’s velocity : Magnetic field perpendicular to the particle’s velocity is the anomoulous g- factor, for proton, G=1.7928474 Lorenz factor Spin tune Qs: number of precessions in one orbital revolution: Dec. 16-17, 2013 Q = Gg s Energy Circular Colliders, IHEP, International workshop on Future High Beijing Depolarizing mechanism in a synchrotron horizontal field kicks the spin vector away from its vertical direction, and can lead to polarization loss dipole errors, misaligned qadrupoles, imperfect orbits betatron oscillations other multipole magnetic fields other sources y y beam x beam z Bx x Initial y Bx 1st beam z full betatron Oscillation period x Bx z 2nd full betatron Oscillation period Depolarizing Resonance Intrinsic resonance: • • Focusing field due to the intrinsic betatron oscillation Location: Imperfection resonance: • Source: dipole errors, quadrupole misalignments • Resonance location: G = kP±Qy G = k, k is an integer P: super periodicity of the accelerator, Qy: vertical betatron tune • Resonance strength: • Proportional to the size of the betatron oscillation • Resonance strength: • Proportional to the size of the vertical closed orbit distortion Dec. 16-17, 2013 International workshop on Future High Energy Circular Colliders, IHEP, Beijing Depolarizing Resonances@ SPERA Dec. 16-17, 2013 International workshop on Future High Energy Circular Colliders, IHEP, Beijing Sokolov-Ternov Radiative Polarization Limit • Synchrotron radiation has a weak dependence on the spin direction of the particle cCg E 4 é 55 wc ù Pqm = 1- ( + n̂ × b̂) ú 2 ê 2pr ë E û 8 3 • Spin flip transition rate cCg E 2 é 2 8 wc ù 2 W = wc n̂ × b̂ ê1- (n̂ × ŝ) + ú 2p Rr ë 9 E û 5 3 • Beam polarization for the case of a uniform magnetic field W+ -W8 -t/t p P= Þ P = P¥ (1- e ) = » 0.924 W+ +W5 3 with Dec. 16-17, 2013 5 3 g5 P¥ = » 0.924; t = c c re 3 8 r 5 3 8 -1 p International workshop on Future High Energy Circular Colliders, IHEP, Beijing In a planar circular accelerator • The magnetic field is distributed piece-wisely instead of uniformly P¥ = 8 r -3 n̂ × b̂ 5 3 r -3 [1- 2 (b̂ × n̂)2 ] 9 2ù 5 3 2 -1 5 -3 é tp = c c reg r ê1- b × n ú ë 9 û 8 ( ) • Clearly, a single snake or other configurations which lays the stable spin direction in the horizontal plane, can cancel the S-T radiative polarization build-up Dec. 16-17, 2013 International workshop on Future High Energy Circular Colliders, IHEP, Beijing Now, let’s add in spin diffusion • An emission of a photon yields a sudden change of the particle’s energy, as well as its spin phase P¥ = r -3 b̂ ×[ n̂ - g 8 5 3 2 2 11 ¶n̂ 2 r [1- (b̂ × n̂) + g ] 9 18 ¶g -3 5 3 t = c c reg 5 8 -1 p Dec. 16-17, 2013 ¶n̂ ] ¶g 2ù é 2 2 11 ¶n̂ ú -3 ê r 1- b × n + g 18 ¶g úû êë 9 ( ) International workshop on Future High Energy Circular Colliders, IHEP, Beijing Synchrotron Sideband • Spin tune is modulated due to synchrotron oscillation g = g 0 + Dg cosy with y = n sq + f0 n = Gg = n 0 +GDg cosy with n 0 = Gg 0 • Hence, the spin-orbit coupling factor averaged over all synchrotron phase becomes 2 G 2 J m2 ( Dn / n s ) ¶n̂ =g = n 02e K2 å 2 2 ¶g é 2 ù m êë (n 0 - K ) - n s úû ( C. Biscari, J. Buon, B. Montague, CERN/LEP-TH/83-8 ) Enhancement factor due to synchrotron motion • For a spin tune spread distribution of f ( Dn ) = 2Dn s Dn e 2 -Dn / s 2Dn • Spin-orbit coupling factor becomes G 2 = n 02e K2 e -s D2n /2n s2 åé êë((n m fc = (n 0 - K ) e 4 -s D2n /2n s2 I m2 (s D2n / 2n s2 ) 2ù K m n n ) 0 s) sú û åé êë((n m 2 2 = n 02e K2 (n 0 - K ) I m2 (s D2n / 2n s2 ) 0 - K ) - mn s ) C. Biscari, J. Buon, B. Montague, CERN/LEP-TH/83-8 2 - n ùú û 2 s 2 4 fc LEP Enhancement Factor • Synchrotron tune ~0.07, momentum spread ~ 0.0007 • At beam energy 51.5GeV, ~50% vertical polarization was achieved with careful spin matching to minimize the resonance strength Dec. 16-17, 2013 International workshop on Future High Energy Circular Colliders, IHEP, Beijing 100 50 90 45 80 40 70 35 60 30 polarization 50 25 beam energy 40 20 30 15 20 10 10 5 0 0 www.desy.de/~mpybar/psdump/amspap2.ps.gz Beam Energy [GeV] Polarization [%] Achieved Electron Polarization Current CEPC Design SPECs Qin, et al, Preliminary Accelerator Design of a Circular Higgs Factory in China, TUPBA03, NAPAC13 Preliminary Estimate • S-T polarization build-up time for beam energy at 120 GeV t p » 20 min ~120.72GeV • Enhancement factor due to synchrotron motion Dec. 16-17, 2013 International workshop on Future High Energy Circular Colliders, IHEP, Beijing Preliminary Estimate of Equilibrium Polarization Beam Energy ~ 120.68 GeV Equilibrium polarization Momentum spread 0.0007 Momentum spread 0.0013 Synchrotron tune For both cases, a resonance strength of 0.001 is assumed Preliminary Estimate of Equilibrium Polarization Beam Energy ~ 90.245 GeV Equilibrium polarization Momentum spread 0.0007 Momentum spread 0.001 Synchrotron tune For both cases, a resonance strength of 0.001 is assumed For Polarized CEPC/TLEP • Careful lattice design from day one to make sure a good spin matching to minimize the depolarizing resonance strength • Careful choices of beam parameters including longitudinal to avoid depolarization – betatron tunes and synchrotron tune – small momentum spread • Excellent spin matching and very precise beam control, i.e. closed orbit, betatron tune, are required to minimize the depolarizing resonance strength – In general, the depolarizing resonance gets stronger at higher energies. This means the tolerance to closed orbit distortion as well as other beam parameters is much tighter than LEP Dec. 16-17, 2013 International workshop on Future High Energy Circular Colliders, IHEP, Beijing Preliminary Estimate of Equilibrium Polarization • However, one may still have to make compromise between luminosity and polarization due to the beam-beam induced tune spread, which pushes particles to the spin resonances. Such an effect has been seen at LEP, HERA. • In addition, one still has to build spin rotator • In summary, it seems very daunting to have polarized beams at ~50% or higher polarization at the energy of CEPC or TLEP Criterion for Keeping Polarization ¶n̂ r b̂ ×[ n̂ - g ] ¶g -3 P¥ = 8 5 3 2 9 r -3 [1- (b̂ × n̂)2 + 5 3 t = c c reg 5 8 -1 p 2 11 ¶n̂ g ] 18 ¶g 2ù é 2 2 11 ¶n̂ ú -3 ê r 1- b × n + g 18 ¶g úû êë 9 ( ) • Keep the stable spin direction along the main B field direction – To allow ST polarization built-up • Reduce spin chromaticity – Improve equilibrium polarization – Minimize synchrotron side band Dec. 16-17, 2013 International workshop on Future High Energy Circular Colliders, IHEP, Beijing Can Siberian Snake Help? • In a storage ring like RHIC, a pair of Siberian snakes located diametrically to yield a spin tune of ½, energy independent. This is good • However, the same advantage of completely cancels out Sokolov-Ternov effect, which is bad • So, one could conceive the scenario of accelerate prepolarized electrons to the top energy. But, – What about positron? One way to solve this, is to have a polarizer ring for both e+ and e- beam at lower energy to establish polarization – Even with dual snake, it may still not efficient enough to suppress the spin-orbit coupling factor[J. Buon, LAL-RT-84-05]. But, what about three pairs? Detailed analysis including simulation needs to be done. Dec. 16-17, 2013 International workshop on Future High Energy Circular Colliders, IHEP, Beijing With Siberian Snakes • Low energy polarizer ring – Reasonable polarization time – > 50% polarization – Both injector and main ring are equipped with snakes. Main ring needs spin rotators snake • Polarization wigglers for the injector – No need of low energy polarizer ring – Both injector and main ring are equipped with snakes, plus the spin rotator for main ring – However, challenge is whether one can achieve >50% polarization within reasonable time Dec. 16-17, 2013 International workshop on Future High Energy Circular Colliders, IHEP, Beijing Conclusion • It is very challenge to establish polarized electron-positron beam with > 50% polarization at CEPC/TLEP • Several critical R&D items – Lattice design with spin matching – Local spin rotator for high energy electron/positron beam – Explore the feasibility of applying dual snake or odd pairs of snake to overcome the strong depolarizing mechanism due to quantum excitation • Wigglers or other beam manipulations to generate S-T polarization – In addition to existing algorithms for spin-coupling factor calculations, SLIM, SODOM, etc, a robust numerical simulation code for high energy polarized electronpositron collider