* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Slide 1 - UW Hydro - University of Washington
Survey
Document related concepts
Transcript
Generating a Comprehensive Climate Change Streamflow Scenarios Database for the Columbia River Basin Alan F. Hamlet Kurt Unger Philip W. Mote Eric Salathé Dennis P. Lettenmaier JISAO/CSES Climate Impacts Group Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Washington WA State Department of Ecology Recession of the Muir Glacier Aug, 13, 1941 Aug, 31, 2004 Image Credit: National Snow and Ice Data Center, W. O. Field, B. F. Molnia http://nsidc.org/data/glacier_photo/special_high_res.html Collapse of the Larsen B Ice shelf, Antarctica March 5, 2002 Trends in April 1 SWE 1950-1997 Mote P.W.,Hamlet A.F., Clark M.P., Lettenmaier D.P., 2005, Declining mountain snowpack in western North America, BAMS, 86 (1): 39-49 Overview of 21st Century Climate Projections and Some Water Resources Impact Pathways Observed 20th century variability °C +3.2°C +1.7°C +0.7°C 0.9-2.4°C 0.4-1.0°C Pacific Northwest 1.2-5.5°C Observed 20th century variability % -1 to +3% +1% +6% +2% -1 to +9% Pacific Northwest -2 to +21% Simulated Changes in Natural Runoff Timing in the Naches River Basin Associated with 2 C Warming 120 Simulated Basin Avg Runoff (mm) 100 80 Impacts: •Increased winter flow •Earlier and reduced peak flows •Reduced summer flow volume •Reduced late summer low flow 1950 60 plus2c 40 20 0 oct nov dec jan feb mar apr may jun jul aug sep Water Supply and Demand •Changes in the seasonality water supply (e.g. reductions in summer) •Changes in water demand (e.g. increasing evaporation) •Changes in drought stress •Increasing conflicts between water supply and other uses and users of water Energy Supply and Demand •Changes in the seasonality and quantity of hydropower resources •Changes in energy demand •Increasing conflicts between hydro and other uses and users of water Instream Flow Augmentation •Changes in low flow risks •Changes in the need for releases from storage to reproduce existing streamflow regime. •Changes in water resources management related to water quality (e.g. to provide dilution flow or to control temperature) Flood Control and Land Use Planning •Changes in flood risks •Changes in flood control evacuation and timing •Dam safety Impacts in Estuaries •Impacts of sea level rise and changing flood risk on low lying areas (dikes and levies) •Impacts to ecosystem function •Changes in land use policy (coastal armoring, land ownership, FEMA maps) Long-Term Planning, Water Resources Agreements, Water Law and Policy •Water allocation agreements in a non-stationary climate (e.g. water permitting) •Appropriateness of the historic streamflow record as a legal definition of climate variability •Need for new planning frameworks in a non-stationary climate •Transboundary implications for the Columbia Basin A Need to Provide Improved Access to Hydrologic Scenarios for Planning As the public and professionals in the water management and policy arenas have become increasing concerned about the impacts of climate change on PNW water resources, demand for hydrologic scenarios suitable for planning purposes at a range of spatial scales has increased dramatically. Currently there does not exist an up-to-date, comprehensive, and self-consistent data base of hydrologic scenarios for the Columbia River basin that is suitable for the range of planning activities the Climate Impacts Group is being asked to support. Study Overview Collaboration with WA Department of Ecology and Regional Stakeholders to Provide Improved Access to Hydrologic Scenarios in the Columbia River Basin Funding Source: House Bill 2860 •$16 Million for studies related to enhancing water supplies in the Columbia River basin for irrigation and municipal water supply. •Up to $200 Million for implementing improvements identified by these studies. Answers to FAQ regarding WA 2860 from the Department of Ecology website: http://www.ecy.wa.gov/pubs/0611014.pdf Regional Study Partners •WA State Department of Ecology •Bonneville Power Administration •Northwest Power and Conservation Council •State of Oregon •Province of British Columbia (BC Hydro and The Ministry of Environment) Streamflow Data Needs to Support a 21st Century Planning Framework Incorporating Climate Information and Uncertainty 2 Emissions Scenarios X 20 GCM Scenarios X 2 Downscaling Approaches X 2 Hydro. Modeling Approaches = Up to 160 realizations of future streamflow variability at each location! The Need to Encompass Multiple Spatial Scales Large Scale Planning Studies Examples: •Hydro System Performance •Flood Control •Main Stem ESA •Transboundary Issues •Large-Scale Irrigation Impacts Medium Scale Planning Studies Examples: Water Supply Planning •Yakima Basin •Okanogan Basin •Methow •Walla Walla Basin WA State Water Resources Inventory Areas Schematic of VIC Hydrologic Model and Energy Balance Snow Model 6 km 6 km 1/16th Deg. PNW Snow Model Alternate Approach: DHSVM Developed in the UW Land Surface Hydrology Research Group at UW, the model has been used for over a decade in hydrologic research applications associated with small catchments. DHSVM: Distributed Hydrology-SoilVegetation Model Streamflow Locations Currently Under Consideration Blue = Large Scale Planning Sites Green = Snake River Sites Red = Additional Sites in WA Partnerships with the BPA, NWPCC, OR and BC will extend the number of sites included in the study to support specific planning activities in these areas. The UW will also collaborate informally with the U of I. On-Line Survey Website, Project Scope http://cses.washington.edu/cig/ http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.aspx?sm=daSOYBVOb238oFy6ia7bcA_3d_3d