* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download STAC RESTRUCTURE
Transmission (medicine) wikipedia , lookup
Horizontal gene transfer wikipedia , lookup
Plant virus wikipedia , lookup
Introduction to viruses wikipedia , lookup
Ebola virus disease wikipedia , lookup
Hepatitis B wikipedia , lookup
Virus quantification wikipedia , lookup
History of virology wikipedia , lookup
Biotechnology and Biodefense: Security Challenges Presented by Genetically Modified Organisms Bioterrorism and Homeland Security Course WMD Course Series Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences 25 April 2006 Objectives • Review the properties of traditional biological warfare (BW) agents and consider factors that may drive pursuit of enhanced, emerging and advanced agents. • Provide an overview of some relevant life science technologies with potential for misapplication by those with hostile intent. • Discuss the potential for life science discovery to enhance challenges posed by existing BW agents and enable evolution of the BW threat. Traditional BW Agents Traditional Biological Agents • Pathogens: – Bacteria – Viruses • Toxins: – Proteins – Non-Proteins Traditional BW Paradigm • Agents developed by selecting a harmful pathogen, toxin, or other biological compound, then “weaponizing” the agent • The process is focused on the naturally-occurring agent, not the target organism • Historically, intrinsic limitations thought to hamper BW utility for military employment to selective scenarios Why Might an Adversary Seek to Move Beyond Traditional Agents? • Limiting the “sandbox” to traditional agents favors the defense over the long term: – Need to overcome medical/physical countermeasures – Application of technology may provide best “bang for the buck” • Concerns over attribution following use may drive development or use of agents not formerly associated with BW. • Situations requiring covert application of BW for strategic purposes may necessitate use of unique agents. Enhanced BW Agents These are traditional BW organisms that have been selected or engineered to defeat countermeasures: • Antibiotic-resistant • Capable of circumventing detection • Evading vaccine-mediated protection How does one skin the cat? • Selected from natural/clinical isolates • Selective pressure of growth environment • Random mutagenesis • Recombinant DNA engineering Emerging BW Agents • Newly identified naturally-occurring agents of disease - also occasionally referred to as Emerging Infectious Diseases (EIDs) that demonstrate virulence, stability and production capacity consistent with their potential for intentional dissemination. • Infectious diseases whose incidence has recently increased or threatens to increase in the near future and include: – New infections resulting from changes or evolution of existing organisms. – Known infections spreading to new geographic areas or populations. – Previously unrecognized infections appearing in areas undergoing ecologic transformation. – Old infections reemerging as a result of antimicrobial resistance in known agents or breakdowns in public health measures. Advanced BW Agents • Life science advances are likely to enable those with hostile intent to identify critical physiologic nodes and rationally engineer agents to exploit vulnerabilities. • Advanced BW agents would be novel and would not exist in nature. • A variety of underlying technologies may support engineering of a vast range of such pathogens. Anticipating the Evolution of Biological Threats Traditional Enhanced Emerging Advanced Naturally occurring microorganisms/ toxin products Selected/modified to circumvent countermeasures Naturally occurring organisms/EIDs (i.e. SARS, AI) Artificial agents engineered in laboratories Finite number of agents Finite yet related number Unknown number; likely finite for BW Unknown but potentially infinite Known signature Identifiable signature Identifiable signature Signature unknown Knowledge gaps exist re: properties, availability, stability Knowledge gaps exist re: feasibility, stability, vulnerability Knowledge gaps driven by public health community Almost complete gaps in knowledge regarding hazards Potential for exponential expansion of threat highlights the need to separate fact from fantasy in setting priorities Need to Inform Novel Defensive Strategies/ Architecture Life Science Technologies May Impact Adversary Capabilities Throughout the “BW Cycle” • Acquisition, Research and Development • Production • Formulation • Delivery • Dissemination Engineering Countermeasures Evasion: Lessons Learned from Basic Science JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY, Jan. 2004, p.999-1005 0022-538X/04/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JVI.78.2.999-1005.2004 Copyright @ 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved. Vol. 78, No. 2 Production of Novel Ebola Virus-Like Particles from cDNAs: an Alternative to Ebola Virus Generation by Reverse Genetics Shinji Watanabe, Tokiko Watanabe, Takeshi Noda, Ayato Takada, Heinz Feldmann, 1 2,3 2,4 2,3 5 Luke D. Jasenosky,1 and Yoshihiro Kawaoka1, 2,3 15018-15023 | PNAS | December 23,2003 | Vol. 100 | no.26 www.pnas.org/cgi/dol/10.1073/pnas2433882100 Hypervirulent mutant of Mycobacterium tuberculosis resulting from disruption of the mce1 operon Nobuyuki Shimono, Lisa Morici, Nicola Casali, Sally Cantrell, Ben SIdders, Sabine Ehrt and Lee W. Riley Issues equally pertinent to foreign and “domestic” publications Vaccine, Vol. 15, No. 17/18, pp. 1846-1850, 1997 @ 1997 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved Printed in Great Britain 0264-410X/97 S17+0 00 PH: S0264-410X(97)00132-1 Expression of cereolysine AB genes in Bacillus anthracis vaccine strain BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOPHYSICS ensures protection against Additive Synthesis of Regulatory Peptide in Vivo: the experimental hemolytic anthrax Introduction of the Vaccine Strain of Francisella tularensis infection Producing - Endorphin A.P. Pomerantsev *, N.A. Staritsin, Yu. V. Mockov and L.L Marinin V.M. Borzenkov, A.P. Pomerantsev, and I.P Ashmarin UDC 615.371:579.841.95].012.6.07 Reverse Genetics: Creating Viruses from Scratch Plasmids Activator Plasmid Containing Virus Genome Plasmid Virus Proteins Target Cell Virus RNA Virus Assembly Infectious Virus (Thousands per Cell) Containing Viral Proteins Practical Application: Targeted Mutation of Ebola Viruses Reverse Genetic Transcription Manipulation Ebola Virus Ebola RNA Ebola cDNA Cell Culture Genetically Tranfection Cells Genetically Modified Into Produce Modified Ebola Cultured Ebola Ebola cDNA Mammalian Virus Virus CellsC Volchkov, et al.Science 291:1965-9 (2001) DNA Shuffling DNA Shuffling • Accelerated evolution in a test tube could: • Optimize a gene or genes encoding virulence factors • Evolve a simple viral genome toward enhanced virulence • Create chimeric organisms with radically altered properties Fragmentation DNA from 2 Related Organisms (Green Genes Encourage Desired Trait, Red Genes Suppress Desired Trait) Pool of Random DNA Fragments Reassembly Large Library of Recombinants Screening for Desired Trait Recombinants Possessing Desired Trait DNA Shuffling: In practice, a variety of DNA sources and fragments would be employed Tropism Alterations HIV Ebola HIV Pseudotyped with Ebola Coat Proteins Nucleus Nucleus Cell Receptors T-Cell (Highly specific for (Virus not Infectious via Aerosol) Viruses) Lung Epithelial Cell (Virus Infectious via Aerosol Kobinger, et al Nat Biotechnol 19:225-30 (2001) RNA Interference: RNAi Plasmid: siRNA shRNA siRNA • Rapidly degraded • Limited expression • Low association shRNA • Hairpin structure prevents degradation • Greater expression • More efficient folding Coding Direction: Transcript: Product: shRNA Can Impair Cell Function and Survival Delivery Vehicle shRNA Plasmid Expression RISC (inactive) shRNA shRNA not degraded RISC remains active Activates RISC Shuts off target gene Nucleus Prevents ‘reading’ Cytoplasm of target mRNA Induces mRNA Degradation Critical Proteins not made Cell Death! Combinatorial Chemistry • Encompasses a broad range of chemical techniques and tools for creating large libraries of molecules • Can also create peptide libraries by amino acid assembly or cleaving existing proteins Step 1 + + Step 2 Split Pool and Wash Step 3 Split Pool and Wash Simplified Illustration of Split Synthesis on Solid Bead Supports • Selection or screening processes identify those candidates displaying a specific desired property • Could be used to create and develop novel CBW agents (antipersonnel, antiagricultural, anti-material) Stabilization and Delivery Means Stabilization: • Microencapsulation • Biofilms • Carrier Beads Delivery Vectors: • Viral • DNA • Transgenic Delivery: Viral Vectors Packaging Genes (From virus X) Vector (From virus Y can include Therapeutic Gene) Packaging Cell Virus Vector (Contains genetic material from Virus Y coated with Surface proteins from virus X) A variety of methodologies can potentially be applied to manipulate viral systems not typically identified as biological warfare agents. DNA Vaccines Naked DNA inherently more stable than protein components of classical vaccines: • Could enhance aerosol delivery of a vaccine. • Also could enable development and delivery of DNA constructs for hostile purposes. Relative Estimate of Evolving BW Challenges BW Agents Advanced Agents Enhanced Agents Traditional Agents Emerging Agents 2003 1980 1990 2000 2010 Notional Timeline 2020 2030 Implications: New BW Use Options • Customizable aspects of ABW agent development could increase confidence in results following agent release, expanding the range of viable use scenarios. • Agents could be tailored to target a specific population based upon genetic or cultural traits. • Creation of slow-acting or debilitating agents might permit cover application of BW as a strategic weapon against a target population for long term effects. Implications: Continued • Protection against CBW agents still necessary. • New agents will continue to attempt to exploit weakness of protective posture. • Confirmation of use will be more difficult due to advent of new agents. Evolution of Biological Threats: Impact upon Biodefense By enabling development of novel agents, life sciences will challenge efficacy of traditional approaches to biodefense: Counterproliferation Environmental detection Medical countermeasures Attribution Counterproliferation • Technology and methodology innovations coupled with underlying life science community policies and practices will likely pose significant proliferation challenges. • Dissemination of life science information ubiquitous: – Intrinsic barriers to regulation/restriction. – Inhibition of knowledge transfer deleterious to biodefense and public health. • Focus on novel strategies for counterproliferation, monitoring for indicators of “activities of concern.” – Likely to necessitate successful partnership with life science community. Secondary Market Proliferation • Sources of biological science laboratory and bioprocessing equipment: – Can be surplus, remanufactured, closeout, or used. – Usually in good working order. – Often late model or slightly outdated, but reliable. • Typically Internet-based: – Low overhead, little direct interaction with clients. – Global shipping and delivery. – Little concern regarding client identity provided reliable payment. • Small-scale or part of larger overall business: – Small private reseller of overstock or labs that have closed. – Subsection of larger auction category. Digital Proliferation of Organisms Challenges efficacy of strategies focused on physical transfer of specimens Environmental Detection • Currently, no “real time” detection systems for traditional organisms of concern. – Current efforts highly agent specific. • Optimal systems would profile a variety of physical (biological?) characteristics likely to be incorporated into novel agents. – Wide range pathogen detection could also encompass traditional, enhanced and emerging agents. Attribution • Need to continue development and maturation of a robust National capability for forensic analysis of biologicals. – Genetic databases and post-incident molecular analyses a component. • However: alternate options focused on identifying the source of genetic and supporting production material also critical. – Post-incident attribution will remain a long-term goal. Medical Countermeasures • Current diagnostics, prophylaxis, and therapeutics: – All standard approaches can potentially be circumvented by enhanced or advanced agents. • “Next Generation” approaches: – Detection: Bioprofiling: Host response to infection. Low level nucleic acid indices of infection. – Prophylaxis: Stimulating innate and “Midspectral” immunity: Generalized immunomodulation via pharmaceuticals. Targeted vaccination for generalized immune memory. – Therapeutics: Will remain a unique challenge: High throughput approaches may aid drug discovery. “Gene trap” knockouts may highlight novel targets for therapeutics. Conclusion • Traditional BW Agents will continue to be the primary threat for the immediate future. – Enhanced and emerging agents likely to present near term challenges as well. • Advances in biotechnology and genetic engineering likely to enable development of Advanced agents. • Such agents would require fundamental shift in US biodefense paradigms.