Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Approved by University Studies Sub-Committee March 23rd. A2C2 action pending Approved by Faculty Senate April 4, 2005 University Studies Course Approval Department or Program: Course Number: Course Title: Catalog Description: CMST 452 Topics in Public Communication This is an existing course that has previously been approved by A2C2: Yes. Department Contact Person for this course: Dr. Ted Reilly 457-5238 Email: [email protected] The proposed course is designed to satisfy the requirements in: Oral Flag Catalog Description: An in-depth study of of topics of concern in rhetoric and public address. Topics vary. Prerequisite: CMST 191 and CMST 283 or permission of instructor for non-majors. May be repeated with different topics. Offered yearly. This course includes requirements and learning activities that promote students' abilities to... a. Earn significant course credit through extemporaneous oral presentations; Thirty percent of the course final grade is derived from grades on oral presentations. This includes one 8 minute speech, one 10-12 minute speech, and one extended presentation (approximately thirty minutes). (Note: these times may vary from instructor to instructor). Requirements for the speeches will at a minimum meet the basic core requirements of what is expected in the university studies basic skills public speaking class. The 30 minute presentation is conceived of as a teaching presentation which will synthesize research on a narrow topic and present it to the class. It is intended to be delivered extemporaneously. b. Understand the features and types of speaking in their disciplines; Public speaking has been a foundation of the communication discipline for over 2000 years. As in the polis, students today are provided instruction for public address in ways that advance their individual interests as well as enhance community well- being. Students will be exposed to various types of deliveries such as impromptu, extemporaneous, manuscript and memorization. Students will be graded only on extemporaneous speaking projects. As this is a 400 level course in the communication studies major, it is not likely that students outside of the major or minor will be in the class. The majority of students will have had detailed instruction in public speaking, debate, group communication and group presentation contexts, as well as have a background in the history and theory of rhetoric. Although the basic skills course in public speaking should be adequate preparation for speaking in this class, non-majors who do take the class will be offered and accommodated with any needed instruction they or the instructor feels necessary to complete the assignments in this class. c. Adapt their speaking to field-specific audiences; Students learn techniques in audience analysis and adapt their speeches appropriately to communication studies audiences. Topics will be dictated by research and subject matter covered in the course. Therefore, students will gain experience honing their skills on audience adaptation. d. Receive appropriate feedback from teachers and peers, including suggestions for improvement; All speeches are graded individually and student progress is made evident through written critiques, oral feedback, and peer review. Each student shall receive written evaluations back from the professor and the student’s peers for each speech. Peer commentary is required for and from every student. Peer feedback, however, does not factor into the grade assigned to a student’s presentation. This will give students experience in evaluating speeches, providing helpful, but not hurtful criticism, and the benefit of receiving multiple viewpoints on their presentational content, structure and delivery. e. Make use of the technologies used for research and speaking in the fields; Students are encouraged to enhance speaking effectiveness through the use of technology and visual aids. Some examples are power point, overhead projectors, TV/VCR and media visual aids. Although no specific assignments requires the use of a visual aid or a given technology, presentation technologies such as over head projectors, ceiling- mount LCD projector, ELMO projects, DVD and VCR decks, and audio systems are available in the room. Students will receive instruction at the start of the semester in their use, and will also receive feedback about their use on evaluation forms as appropriate. For the purpose of research, the course will include a unit on library research, taught minimally by the professor, taught optimally by library staff. This includes not only the use of the latest library databases, but also those databases made available through the National Communication Association for its membership. f. Learn the conventions of evidence, format, usage, and documentation in their fields. Students present claims and evidence in traditional inductive, deductive and narrative forms. Students are instructed as to the proper citation formats (normally, APA and MLA). Emphasis is also put on standard forms of outline and proper structure of presentations. All work submitted for a grade in the course must conform to an accepted style sheet. SAMPLE SYLLABUS CMST 452: Topics in Public Communication: Political Rhetoric Dr. Ted Reilly |Hours: MWF: 9:30- 12; 1-2|& by appt. Office: 242, PAC | 457-5238 | [email protected] Texts: Campbell, K.K. and Jamieson (1990). Deeds done in words: Presidential rhetoric and the genres of governance. Chicago: U. of Chicago Press. Hahn, D. F. (2003). Political communication: Rhetoric, government, citizens. State College, PA: Strata Publishing. Trent, J.S. Friedenberg, R. V. (1995) Political campaign communication: Principles and practices, 3d ed. New York: Praeger, 1995. * Reserve readings will be used weekly, usually in the form of journal articles. These readings will be posted regularly on the course blackboard site and will be on reserve at the library or distributed in class. Course Description: This purpose of this course is to provide the theoretical and historical background necessary to evaluate and analyze contemporary political messages. We will cover four areas of political communication (and we will not cover others). 1. The theory/background/research into political discourse. This will provide a foundation for application to three more specific areas of political communication. 2. Campaign rhetoric and communication 3. Presidential rhetoric 4. Social movement/Outgroup rhetoric This is a University Studies Course. It satisfies the oral flag requirement. As such a course must include requirements and learning activities that promote students' abilities to... a. earn significant course credit through extemporaneous oral presentations; b. understand the features and types of speaking in their disciplines; c. adapt their speaking to field-specific audiences; d. receive appropriate feedback from teachers and peers, including suggestions for improvement; e. make use of the technologies used for research and speaking in the fields; and f. learn the conventions of evidence, format, usage, and documentation in their fields. Late Policy: Late work will be reduced up to 20% for each period late. Make it a priority to deliver your work on time. Attendance: 2 “free” absences for whatever reason. Thereafter, 15 pts apiece deducted from final grade. I do not keep track of excuses, and I do not distinguish between excused and unexcused absences. Academic Integrity: All work presented in this class should be no less than 100 percent your own. All violations are handled through University Judicial System. Writing/Speaking considerations: All work turned in for a grade (papers, outlines, evaluations) are to be cleanly typed according to MLA or APA guidelines. Keep papers and speeches free from profanity, racism, sexism, etc. Be civil. Grade Calculation: Grades are computed on a standard scale (95= middle A; 85=B; 75=C; 65=D). Plus/minus are assigned to individual projects (plus grades= 68, 78, 88; minus grades= 72, 82, 92) not to final grade. Your grade is always available to you. You can also keep track with the chart below. Project Points Value Your Score Midterm 20% 200 Final Exam 20% 200 Paper/Project 20% 200 Annotated Bib 10% 100 Speech #1-ism 5% 50 Speech #2-iss. 10% 100 Speech #3- sem 15 % 150 Total 100% 1000 * This is a political election year, which lends itself to exciting opportunities to discuss the events going on nationally in the classroom. Please take advantage of this, and prepare for class by keeping abreast of the national and local news, as well as course reading material. * It is a small class. Come prepared to talk. This class will not be one to just sit back and take notes while others do the work. * I intend to use blackboard for posting course materials such as assignments, useful and/or interesting web sites, course schedule, etc. * Below is the schedule we will start with (with the best of intentions). Revisions (every few weeks) will be posted on blackboard. Tentative Course Schedule Fall, 2004 Date MAug30 WSEP1 F3 W8 F10 M13 W15 F17 M20 W22 F24 M27 Topic/Activity Course Introduction The Jeremiad in American Political discourse Film: G. Bush’s 2004 Nomination Acceptance Bush, Cont’d; Bitzer Bitzer, cont’d; ideology and Communication Definition in communication Form in communication Speech #1: Political Ideology Speech #1 Political ideology Speech #1 Political ideology Political debates (film) Presidential Debates (film) W29 OCT F1 M4 W6 F8 M11 W13 F15 (first Pres. Debate Thursday night, Sept 30 Myths and Metaphors Myth/Metaphor, cont’d (VP debate October 5) Speech #2: Campaign issues Speech #2 Campaign issues Speech #2 Campaign issues Speech #2 Campaign issues Fall Break Day- No Classes Reading/preparation RR: Ritter “American political… …rhetoric and jeremiad trad” RR: Bitzer “Rhetorical Situation” Hahn, Chs 1 and 2 Hahn Ch. 4 Hahn Ch. 5 USP A,B,C,D,E,F USP A,B,C,D,E,F USP A,B,C,D,E,F RR: Benoit “Meta analysis of Presidential debate research” USP A,B,C,D,E,F (2nd Pres. Debate) USP A,B,C,D,E,F USP A,B,C,D,E,F (3 Pres. Debate) USP A,B,C,D,E,F rd M18 W20 F22 M25 W27 F29 NOVM1 W3 F5 M8 W10 F12 M15 W17 F19 M22 M29 DECW1 F3 M6 W8 F10 Review for Exam; Discuss Debates Exam #1 (midterm) Presidential genres: War rhetoric Presidential genres: Veto messages Presidential genres: Impeachment rhetoric Presidential genres: Impeachment rhetoric News analysis and discussion (Election Hangover): concession speeches Social Movements Social Movements Social Movements: Nonviolence and violence Veterans Day – No Class Political violence and terror Rhetoric and Terrorism Rhetoric and terrorism Seminar Presentations Seminar Presentations Seminar Presentations Seminar Presentations Seminar Presentations Seminar Presentations Wrap up, end up. Jaimeson chs 1-3 Jaimeson, chs 4-6 Jamieson- chs- remainder (Eve of Election): Whose?????????? RR: Simons “Problems, strategies….” RR: Windt “Diatribe as discourse….” RR: Griffin RR: F. Beers on War Metaphors Paper Draft due USP USP USP USP USP Final Paper due A,B,C,D,E,F A,B,C,D,E,F A,B,C,D,E,F A,B,C,D,E,F A,B,C,D,E,F